View Single Post
Old 09-10-2013, 06:25 PM   #94
Dr Tactics
Ill Brova
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New Jeruz
Posts: 945
Default Re: "Merging of Brands"?

Originally Posted by Xeno-noesis View Post
I don't know how smart Vin is, as I suspect he may have used the wrong word in "brand".

I think many of you are off on what a brand is. Two titles which are the same product within a single company are not "brands" in any way, shape or form. Brands are similar products made by different companies, such as Coke and Pepsi, for competition. For movie studios, it would be Disney, Paramount and Universal. In comic film studios, it would be Warner Bros., Sony, Fox, and Marvel Studios.

GOTG is already a part of Phase 2 of the MCU so that doesn't count (and Iron Man is currently a member of the GOTG in the comics anyway).

The simplest and likeliest merge would be the Star Wars and Marvel Comics properties, however they are nearly similar as brands now (marketed the same as both have movies, comics, video games, etc.) and also owned by a single company.

*Edit - I wanted to add that the biggest money-maker potential of two brands would be Spider-Man/Avengers. Fox and Marvel do not have a good relationship but Marvel does with Sony. In this particular line of thought, Sony (by using Spider Man) could be the link between all three studios.
Well I definitely don't think the SW and MCU will ever co-exist in the same universe so that brand merger I suspect is not what he referenced. Now about the Spider-Man/MCU merger (not absolutely a Avengers merger though that would make the most business sense) is the most possible. Especially with Daredevil back at marvel with many of them charring the same foes like The kingpin, the chameleon and so forth. And Vin would be awesome as the Wilson Fisk.

Dr Tactics is offline   Reply With Quote