Originally Posted by ddddeeee
It's largely because there's a new movie out and it must be hyped at all cost, even if it means the first film must be thrown under the bus. Ask this question this time two years and the results will be a lot closer.
Thor has a better story, better pacing, better music, a much more satisfying arc for Thor himself and isn't boggled down by endless exposition. While TDW has better action, set-pieces and Hiddleston is at his best, the first Thor succeeds in the more important areas imo.
No it's not, outside of this forum i see most considering Thor one of the weakest films of Phase I, i've even seen some saying the MCU sucks and use this film as their main example.