Originally Posted by elgaz
In fairness, Batman did charge Harvey and take him over the edge.
No, that's not fair. People seem to conveniently forget that there was a 10 year old child involved and that if Batman did intend to 'kill' Dent like so many believe he was doing so at the risk of that young boys life - which is exact opposite of what happened. Dent death was collateral, Bruce's intention was to save the kid not worry about whether Dent would fall or not. Frankly how people can interpret it any other way, even after 5 years astounds me.
My fan artwork can be found at my blog. Feel free to say hi. :) www.fanartexhibit.com
Do me a favour - don't break up my posts into multiple quotes when replying, I won't answer back.