View Single Post
Old 12-21-2013, 03:39 PM   #31
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,016
Default Re: How about no Ant-Man sequels?

Originally Posted by Zaron View Post
Not even kidding, I don't think MODOK is as hard to pull off as most think. I mean, he would need to be heavily altered, obviously, but if it were something like this, would it really be so far-fetched?

I mean, Iron Man 3 set up AIM beautifully, and it would be nice for Marvel to use the momentum from this massive crossover universe to make the origin portions of their new franchises move a bit faster.
that's why I wanted them to use A.I.M as the enemy. they could easily substitute George Tarleton (M.O.D.O.K) for the villain from 'To Steal an Ant-Man.' that monstrous look of his might be result of Pym particle exposure-gone-awry. A.I.M scientist might have made the best of it by augmenting him into M.O.D.O.K.

Ant-manic is offline