Originally Posted by hippie_hunter
And here's one thing that makes absolutely no sense. Voters who would vote for a libertarian like Sarvis, would not go off and vote for a progressive like McAuliffe. Going from one end to the other makes no logical sense.
That is BS, many people who decide to vote Libertarian are one issue voters and like the way the libertarian candidate doesn't cut any bones about how he feels(instead of talking like a politician).
Look at Ron Paul he got alot of support from anti-war and pro-drug liberals for instance because unlike a "legit" candidate, Ron Paul cut no bones how he felt about those 2 issues. I am guessing many of those anti war and/or pro drug people weren't exactly on the same wavelength about many other issues.