View Single Post
Old 04-09-2005, 06:08 PM   #23
Chomp's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WI
Posts: 401
Default Re: Was BF a "decent" Batman Film or Not?

Originally Posted by GuestStar2004
just because batman forever wasn't burton material, doesn't mean he isn't a fan of the comics
This thread isn't about either of the Burton films...its about Batman Forever. No where in any of my posts did I compare Burton and Schumacher.

Originally Posted by GuestStar2004
its just the way he chose to do the film that bothers you, and i think he tried to please people who remember the 60's tv series, fans of the animated series and burton batman films fans.... and maybe it just doesn't mix well
No, I said what I dislike about the film...Batman Forever wasn't a take off of the 60's TV was a continuation of the last 2 Batman films. The setting and cinematography I could care less about...What I hated was the way the two villains of Two Face and The Riddler were played out as. They both were worthless, laughable villains. In the comics, Two Face and The Riddler are two of Batman's greatest pathological, sadistic villains.

Originally Posted by GuestStar2004
burton didn't do the penguins charactor right in br, but you can't accuse him of not reading a comic
Burton didn't read the comics.

Again, Burton's films have its flaws, but this thread is not about them. This thread is about whether or not Batman Forever was a decent Batman film. And in my opinion, I feel it wasn't.

Last edited by Chomp; 04-09-2005 at 06:26 PM.
Chomp is offline