Should SM3 be the last

Red · 07-28-2005, 04:24 PM

I loved the spidey moves ( perhapes 1 more though), but IMO i think this should be the last because, i would rather have an amazing spider-man trilogy, then have the sequals deminish over time *Cough* *Cough* * superman 3,4 & batman forever, batman & robin *Cough*. Its not possible for them all to be good, so whats it to be a great trilogy or average saga?

spiderfan08 · 07-28-2005, 04:28 PM

i am not sure. i guess if everybody wants to stop, they should stop. but i would like to see some more spider-man movies. i don't care if they are by a different director and different actors. so yes i would like to see more spidey movies but don't care who does it.

i also have to say that spider-man can go more than 3. i know batman and superman couldn't but they are dc movies. marvel, i think, has a bigger fan base and will get more people to come see the movie.

ace60galaxy · 07-28-2005, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderfan08

i am not sure. i guess if everybody wants to stop, they should stop. but i would like to see some more spider-man movies. i don't care if they are by a different director and different actors. so yes i would like to see more spidey movies but don't care who does it.

i also have to say that spider-man can go more than 3. i know batman and superman couldn't but they are dc movies. marvel, i think, has a bigger fan base and will get more people to come see the movie.

agree

TheBat812 · 07-31-2005, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderfan08

i am not sure. i guess if everybody wants to stop, they should stop. but i would like to see some more spider-man movies. i don't care if they are by a different director and different actors. so yes i would like to see more spidey movies but don't care who does it.

i also have to say that spider-man can go more than 3. i know batman and superman couldn't but they are dc movies. marvel, i think, has a bigger fan base and will get more people to come see the movie.

the two most popular superheroes that everybody knows about are Superman and Batman, so don't give me that ****. also, i don't want more than a trilogy. 3 films just works perfectly.

GoldGoblin · 07-28-2005, 04:36 PM

Spidey movies can go stronger than three.

MUGSY · 08-08-2005, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldGoblin

Spidey movies can go stronger than three.

Yep. And there is so much more to expolre throught the Spiderman series.

kamesan · 08-08-2005, 09:55 AM

Spider-Man has fought the most villians in Marvel history (that I know of) so theoretically you could do endless sequels w/out running out of material. However, they fxxxed up by not putting Gwen Stacy in the movie from the word go. The problen w/ sequels though is you're never guaranteed to get a quality movie.

Arcturus · 08-08-2005, 10:24 AM

SM-3 will not be the last, Sam Rami told me there are going to be 340579035034 movies.

Go figure.

WalkingDead · 07-28-2005, 04:40 PM

I personally think they'll finish up 1-3 with the original cast, then replace people like Tobey and Kirstin for other actors so they can do 4-6. (If they stick to the 2 Trilogies idea)

I would like them to actually do the two Trilogies and then say goodbye for 7-10 years or so, if not longer. As long as the story can hold up and the acting and characters are done well-enough, I say continue. Sequels always don't have to do downhill, but it generally happens because less detail and attention is paid to the characters and situations as time goes on...leading to worse written and worse directed movies.

The Kid · 07-28-2005, 05:02 PM

studios are funny.

Batman's crappy sequels happened despite Superman's crappy sequels existing.

The Matrix trilogy debacle happened despite Back to the future trilogy existing.

So I feel inclined to agree wholeheartedly. They never pay attention to history.

Kevin Roegele · 08-01-2005, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wesyeed

studios are funny.

Batman's crappy sequels happened despite Superman's crappy sequels existing.

The Matrix trilogy debacle happened despite Back to the future trilogy existing.

So I feel inclined to agree wholeheartedly. They never pay attention to history.

How is that funny? Studios care about cash, not quality. Batman and Superman movies make a lot of money. And no-one tries to make a bad film, it's just very hard to make a good film. It's very hard to make a film, period.

Spider-X · 07-28-2005, 06:02 PM

there have been about 10 of this exact same thread in the past few months...and i'm gonna say what i usually do:

Why stop making them if they continue to make quality movies? there is such an anormous fan base and so much great original material to go from...so to answer: NO!

Vile · 07-28-2005, 07:26 PM

End it with a trilogy. I doubt Raimi will return for more and I dont trust any other director.

Dr Freeze · 07-28-2005, 07:36 PM

Of course it WON T .

Batman franchise sucked at the end because of the change of direction AND the director choosed for it .

Trust me if Raimi or someone of his caliber (Alex Proyas , David Fincher) remains at the helm of it, we could have a lot of Spidey movies .

After all there s tons of interesting villains which could make for great entertainment on the big screen

So I really hope it won t be the last of Spidey Movie, only the last one filmed by Raimi since it s time for a fresh start again

spidey207 · 07-28-2005, 08:15 PM

I'm fairly sure sony is commited to making 6 spiderman films. I heard that a while ago, like right after sm2. I think they will make 6.

Showtime · 07-28-2005, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spidey207

I'm fairly sure sony is commited to making 6 spiderman films. I heard that a while ago, like right after sm2. I think they will make 6.

I remember this being the case as well.

hulkamania85 · 11-10-2005, 04:32 PM

No way. Spider-Man needs to become the next James Bond at best, or get run into the ground like Rocky at worst.

Nirvana · 07-28-2005, 08:19 PM

No way. We still need to see the better villains like Lizard, Venom, and Scorpion. When they make one with Venom devote the whole movie to Venom and put aside the love story and Peter's life.

CConn · 07-28-2005, 08:30 PM

If SM3 is an average film, yes, they should stop. If SM3's good or great, they should continue.

spiderfan08 · 07-28-2005, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CConn

If SM3 is an average film, yes, they should stop. If SM3's good or great, they should continue.

i agree somewhat. i think if #3 does well then hell yes continue. but if it bombs, which it won't totally, they will probably just end it.

Dr Freeze · 07-28-2005, 08:38 PM

One thing is for sure :

the more it will make money, the more we will get some out of them .

The less it will make, the earliest it will be gone forever

AmerikazMostWanted · 07-28-2005, 08:32 PM

dude honestly dude seriosuly bro dude what I think dude bro what i think should like happen bro dude I think seriouly I think Spiderman 3 should end the movies thats my opinion

Vile · 07-28-2005, 08:48 PM

Sadly, that is true. Problem is, they could completey destroy the franchise and everyone will only notice when it's too late - if it sells Happy Meals, then it'll continue...Case in point, the Batman and Superman franchises.

Silver Sable · 07-28-2005, 10:01 PM

No let's have more Spidey films! I'm not saying to have 10 of them but at least 5 or 6

The Kid · 07-28-2005, 10:20 PM

I still like happy meals...

07-28-2005, 04:24 PM	#1
Red It Always Ends The Same Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Wherever the wind takes me Posts: 13,179	Should SM3 be the last I loved the spidey moves ( perhapes 1 more though), but IMO i think this should be the last because, i would rather have an amazing spider-man trilogy, then have the sequals deminish over time Cough Cough * superman 3,4 & batman forever, batman & robin Cough. Its not possible for them all to be good, so whats it to be a great trilogy or average saga?

07-28-2005, 04:28 PM	#2
spiderfan08 Side-Kick Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: at band practice Posts: 2,827	Re: Should SM3 be the last i am not sure. i guess if everybody wants to stop, they should stop. but i would like to see some more spider-man movies. i don't care if they are by a different director and different actors. so yes i would like to see more spidey movies but don't care who does it. i also have to say that spider-man can go more than 3. i know batman and superman couldn't but they are dc movies. marvel, i think, has a bigger fan base and will get more people to come see the movie. Last edited by spiderfan08; 07-28-2005 at 04:40 PM.

07-28-2005, 04:36 PM	#5
GoldGoblin Side-Kick Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: California(The Golden State) Posts: 14,281	Re: Should SM3 be the last Spidey movies can go stronger than three. __________________ What if Norman Osborn is dead,the Chameleon pretends to be Norman and Harry is the Green Goblin.

08-08-2005, 09:55 AM	#7
kamesan Side-Kick Join Date: May 2005 Location: san antonio, tx Posts: 1,567	Re: Should SM3 be the last Spider-Man has fought the most villians in Marvel history (that I know of) so theoretically you could do endless sequels w/out running out of material. However, they fxxxed up by not putting Gwen Stacy in the movie from the word go. The problen w/ sequels though is you're never guaranteed to get a quality movie. __________________ (ellipsis).........

08-08-2005, 10:24 AM	#8
Arcturus Side-Kick Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 12,482	Re: Should SM3 be the last SM-3 will not be the last, Sam Rami told me there are going to be 340579035034 movies. Go figure.

07-28-2005, 04:40 PM	#9
WalkingDead Side-Kick Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Running Down A Dream Posts: 1,567	Re: Should SM3 be the last I personally think they'll finish up 1-3 with the original cast, then replace people like Tobey and Kirstin for other actors so they can do 4-6. (If they stick to the 2 Trilogies idea) I would like them to actually do the two Trilogies and then say goodbye for 7-10 years or so, if not longer. As long as the story can hold up and the acting and characters are done well-enough, I say continue. Sequels always don't have to do downhill, but it generally happens because less detail and attention is paid to the characters and situations as time goes on...leading to worse written and worse directed movies.

07-28-2005, 05:02 PM	#10
The Kid AMERICA FTW Join Date: May 2005 Location: Bronx Posts: 12,766	Re: Should SM3 be the last studios are funny. Batman's crappy sequels happened despite Superman's crappy sequels existing. The Matrix trilogy debacle happened despite Back to the future trilogy existing. So I feel inclined to agree wholeheartedly. They never pay attention to history. __________________ Superman Returns is better than the Dark Knight

07-28-2005, 06:02 PM	#12
Spider-X Big damn hero Join Date: May 2004 Location: Somewhere outside Seattle Posts: 6,617	Re: Should SM3 be the last there have been about 10 of this exact same thread in the past few months...and i'm gonna say what i usually do: Why stop making them if they continue to make quality movies? there is such an anormous fan base and so much great original material to go from...so to answer: NO! __________________ "I aim to misbehave." ~ Malcom Reynolds Do you like movie reviews, trailers, etc? If so, might I recommend my oh-so-tasteful movie blog: Reel Hero More to come...eventually

07-28-2005, 07:26 PM	#13
Vile The Future is Vile Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Does it matter? Posts: 2,823	Re: Should SM3 be the last End it with a trilogy. I doubt Raimi will return for more and I dont trust any other director. __________________ May 21st, 2011. "You have failed me for the last time, Jesus." Force-choke

07-28-2005, 07:36 PM	#14
Dr Freeze Side-Kick Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 154	Re: Should SM3 be the last Of course it WON T . Batman franchise sucked at the end because of the change of direction AND the director choosed for it . Trust me if Raimi or someone of his caliber (Alex Proyas , David Fincher) remains at the helm of it, we could have a lot of Spidey movies . After all there s tons of interesting villains which could make for great entertainment on the big screen So I really hope it won t be the last of Spidey Movie, only the last one filmed by Raimi since it s time for a fresh start again

07-28-2005, 08:15 PM	#15
spidey207 Side-Kick Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Colorado Posts: 509	Re: Should SM3 be the last I'm fairly sure sony is commited to making 6 spiderman films. I heard that a while ago, like right after sm2. I think they will make 6. __________________ This city deserves a better class of criminal, and Heath gave it to them

11-10-2005, 04:32 PM	#17
hulkamania85 Side-Kick Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 1,715	Re: Should SM3 be the last No way. Spider-Man needs to become the next James Bond at best, or get run into the ground like Rocky at worst.

07-28-2005, 08:19 PM	#18
Nirvana Slowly Losing My Mind Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: FL Posts: 9,343	Re: Should SM3 be the last No way. We still need to see the better villains like Lizard, Venom, and Scorpion. When they make one with Venom devote the whole movie to Venom and put aside the love story and Peter's life.

07-28-2005, 08:30 PM	#19
CConn Fountainhead of culture. Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Peter North's Southern Headquarters Posts: 57,456	Re: Should SM3 be the last If SM3 is an average film, yes, they should stop. If SM3's good or great, they should continue. __________________ It's like a non-consecutive 24-hour dance party.

07-28-2005, 08:38 PM	#21
Dr Freeze Side-Kick Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 154	Re: Should SM3 be the last One thing is for sure : the more it will make money, the more we will get some out of them . The less it will make, the earliest it will be gone forever

07-28-2005, 08:32 PM	#22
AmerikazMostWanted Banned User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Deatthhh Rowwww Posts: 7,068	Re: Should SM3 be the last dude honestly dude seriosuly bro dude what I think dude bro what i think should like happen bro dude I think seriouly I think Spiderman 3 should end the movies thats my opinion

07-28-2005, 08:48 PM	#23
Vile The Future is Vile Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Does it matter? Posts: 2,823	Re: Should SM3 be the last Sadly, that is true. Problem is, they could completey destroy the franchise and everyone will only notice when it's too late - if it sells Happy Meals, then it'll continue...Case in point, the Batman and Superman franchises. __________________ May 21st, 2011. "You have failed me for the last time, Jesus." Force-choke

07-28-2005, 10:01 PM	#24
Silver Sable Wild Pack Commander Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Queens,NY Posts: 27,576	Re: Should SM3 be the last No let's have more Spidey films! I'm not saying to have 10 of them but at least 5 or 6 __________________ Avatar by Me Buddies: Demogoblin,CaptainStacy,Godzilla

07-28-2005, 10:20 PM	#25
The Kid AMERICA FTW Join Date: May 2005 Location: Bronx Posts: 12,766	Re: Should SM3 be the last I still like happy meals... __________________ Superman Returns is better than the Dark Knight

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode