The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > General Movies > Misc. Comics Films

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2010, 11:43 AM   #1
Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
 
Chris Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,660
Default Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

30 years ago, we had absolutely no problem whatsoever going to see a movie whose lead character was dressed head-to-toe in colorful spandex. Fast forward to 1989, we see for the first time a Dark Knight type Batman-one whose battle gear, while based on the garb he sports in the comics-is radically changed. The filmmakers deem his grey tights "silly & unrealistic". And we, the fans, buy into this for the most part. But now so many movies & TV shows are taking such drastic liberties & taking characters' looks further and further away from their pulp counterparts. We, the fans, debate these decisions relentlessly-some of us defend it, others are totally against it. But if not for Batman's black rubber, would we all eagerly run to see the colorfully clad characters without any regard for how "silly" they looked?

__________________
Michael Joseph Jackson 1958-2009. Gone Too Soon.
May he finally find the peace that eluded him in life.
There is only ONE Spider-Man. His name is Peter Parker. He's an adult, and he's straight!
Chris Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 12:15 PM   #2
El Payaso
Banned User
 
El Payaso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rubbing your rhubarb.
Posts: 15,263
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Batman89 improved the batsuit forever and some other characters have been copying it to death. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. But for Batman it still works - okay, maybe if Nolan wouldn't exaggerate the armoured suit concept.

I still would have loved if Nolan would come up with something different.

El Payaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 12:58 PM   #3
cronosred
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,471
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

I don't feel Batman is as much to blame as The Matrix is.

cronosred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 02:06 PM   #4
Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
 
Chris Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,660
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cronosred View Post
I don't feel Batman is as much to blame as The Matrix is.
I disagree. We're not talking about trenchcoats, guns & vinyl here. And since there is no precedent for the Matris-no comic book in which the characters run around in tights-it really doesn't fit the mindset.

__________________
Michael Joseph Jackson 1958-2009. Gone Too Soon.
May he finally find the peace that eluded him in life.
There is only ONE Spider-Man. His name is Peter Parker. He's an adult, and he's straight!
Chris Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 03:49 PM   #5
TheFuture
Rising
 
TheFuture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,354
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Batman's traditional garb would have looked ridiculous within the context of B89 as well as Nolan's films. Taking liberties is not necessarily a bad thing, you just have to hope that those liberties make sense and add to the quality of the character and plot.

__________________
"A hero can be anyone. Even a man doing something as simple and reassuring as putting a coat around a young boy's shoulders, to let him know the world hadn't ended."


Avatar courtesy of Kane52630
TheFuture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 03:52 PM   #6
JAK®
Upstart
 
JAK®'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7,400
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFuture View Post
Batman's traditional garb would have looked ridiculous within the context of B89 as well as Nolan's films. Taking liberties is not necessarily a bad thing, you just have to hope that those liberties make sense and add to the quality of the character and plot.
It doesn't.

__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
You are now breathing manually.
JAK®



JAK® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 03:54 PM   #7
TheFuture
Rising
 
TheFuture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,354
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

I may be wrong but I thought his traditional garb was the gray and bright blue colours?

__________________
"A hero can be anyone. Even a man doing something as simple and reassuring as putting a coat around a young boy's shoulders, to let him know the world hadn't ended."


Avatar courtesy of Kane52630
TheFuture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 07:04 PM   #8
El Payaso
Banned User
 
El Payaso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rubbing your rhubarb.
Posts: 15,263
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAK® View Post
It doesn't.
It doesn't because that is the same armoured bat-suit created by burton, used by him, Schumacher and Nolan (with many variation of the original concept) but gray. That is not the traditional comic suit. Now, after 1989 many comics have depicted the bat-suit as an armoured suit but you know who to thank for for that.

El Payaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 04:11 PM   #9
Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
 
Chris Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,660
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFuture View Post
Batman's traditional garb would have looked ridiculous within the context of B89 as well as Nolan's films. Taking liberties is not necessarily a bad thing, you just have to hope that those liberties make sense and add to the quality of the character and plot.
See, I wonder about that now. I agree with you but, how much of that agreement is based on my own aesthetic preferences & how much of it is because over the last 20 years we've been conditioned to think certain outfits would look silly on film? I mean, nobody but nobody has more fiercely defended the leather X-suits or opposed the idea of bringing Batman's grey tights to the silver screen than I have. But then Spider-Man wore tights in his movies & looked GREAT. Had the same time & care that went into his suit been put into Batman's traditional garb, then maybe-just maybe they could've pulled it off. Is it entirely inconceivable that the movies could have just told us that the suit was made of some kind of special protective fabric and we would've swallowed that? We don't question it when they say it in the comics. Tell us an obviously form-fitting & otherwise ordinary looking suit is armored, we accept it. From time to time the outermost layer bts ripped up, revealing a kevlar mesh underneath & we're fine with it. And it HAS been pulled a time or two-the Flash series said that his suit was some unique material that could stand up to vibrations. We bought into the FF's "unstable molecules" bit. (I know the FF movies were wildly unpopular but for all the complaints I've heard, plausibility of the costumes was NOT among them.) Maybe, just maybe. I don't know. I'm only speculating. The only real evidence any of us has AGAINST the use of spandex really comes from things like the 60's Batman TV show & cheaply made fan-films.

__________________
Michael Joseph Jackson 1958-2009. Gone Too Soon.
May he finally find the peace that eluded him in life.
There is only ONE Spider-Man. His name is Peter Parker. He's an adult, and he's straight!
Chris Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 04:25 PM   #10
TheFuture
Rising
 
TheFuture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,354
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wallace View Post
See, I wonder about that now. I agree with you but, how much of that agreement is based on my own aesthetic preferences & how much of it is because over the last 20 years we've been conditioned to think certain outfits would look silly on film? I mean, nobody but nobody has more fiercely defended the leather X-suits or opposed the idea of bringing Batman's grey tights to the silver screen than I have. But then Spider-Man wore tights in his movies & looked GREAT. Had the same time & care that went into his suit been put into Batman's traditional garb, then maybe-just maybe they could've pulled it off. Is it entirely inconceivable that the movies could have just told us that the suit was made of some kind of special protective fabric and we would've swallowed that? We don't question it when they say it in the comics. Tell us an obviously form-fitting & otherwise ordinary looking suit is armored, we accept it. From time to time the outermost layer bts ripped up, revealing a kevlar mesh underneath & we're fine with it. And it HAS been pulled a time or two-the Flash series said that his suit was some unique material that could stand up to vibrations. We bought into the FF's "unstable molecules" bit. (I know the FF movies were wildly unpopular but for all the complaints I've heard, plausibility of the costumes was NOT among them.) Maybe, just maybe. I don't know. I'm only speculating. The only real evidence any of us has AGAINST the use of spandex really comes from things like the 60's Batman TV show & cheaply made fan-films.
I think you have to look at each superhero within his own context. Spider-Man is light in tone for the most part, so the tights fit the context.

In regards to the X-Men, I think have each character in their own specific costume would have looked horrificly bad and camp in live action. The "aesthetic" would have been all over the place. Plus, you have to think about what Singer was presenting us with; a bunch of outsiders/mutants who come together in unity. What better way to portray that unity than have them wear a kind of uniform which states "we are one"?

Now, in regards to Batman, the tights would have looked out of place badly in both Nolan's and Burton's universes. Imagine Batman's introduction in BB; would it have worked as well with tights? Would the theme of fear worked with tights? I'm not so sure.

__________________
"A hero can be anyone. Even a man doing something as simple and reassuring as putting a coat around a young boy's shoulders, to let him know the world hadn't ended."


Avatar courtesy of Kane52630
TheFuture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:27 AM   #11
Darthkush
Avenger
 
Darthkush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stark towers.
Posts: 2,881
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wallace View Post
I disagree. We're not talking about trenchcoats, guns & vinyl here. And since there is no precedent for the Matris-no comic book in which the characters run around in tights-it really doesn't fit the mindset.

Actually, I DO agree with him. Because of the Matrix, X-men looked...the way it did. I honestly think if it weren't for the Matrix, Nolan's Batman(while still not in bright blue or anything), would've possibly been in gray and black at least. WE know that the Matrix isn't a comic book film but I think many people put Matrix in the same category as most of these superhero flicks.

Darthkush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2013, 11:55 AM   #12
Optimus_Prime_
Banned User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,671
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cronosred View Post
I don't feel Batman is as much to blame as The Matrix is.
Gonna have to agree with this.

I'd even throw X-Men in there.

Seemed like Batman ('89) was more or less a fair representation of what was seen in the comics. Very similar to suits he had worn, only darker and more monochromatic, but overall, I would lay the blame elsewhere. If anything Batman sort of does his own thing and doesn't follow any necessary trend.

Optimus_Prime_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 01:21 PM   #13
JAK®
Upstart
 
JAK®'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7,400
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

It's more to do with studios not wanting to take risks. Why put time and effort into constructing a good-looking, comic accurate costume when you could play it safe and follow typical 'cool' design conventions? (Black, leather/rubber, coats instead of capes)

__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
You are now breathing manually.
JAK®



JAK® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 03:58 PM   #14
Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
 
Chris Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,660
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

The blue is debatable. Batman was introduced wearing black. Black costumes were, for the longest time, highlighted in blue, as the base color of comic book ink is black. Over time, with deadlines & God knows what else, inkers filled in less & less black, while colorists filled in more & more blue. Somehow this led to people coming onto the book with the impression that his garb was SUPPOSED to be blue, & rendering him accordingly.

__________________
Michael Joseph Jackson 1958-2009. Gone Too Soon.
May he finally find the peace that eluded him in life.
There is only ONE Spider-Man. His name is Peter Parker. He's an adult, and he's straight!
Chris Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2010, 07:29 PM   #15
Kahran Ramsus
Side-Kick
 
Kahran Ramsus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Sunshine State
Posts: 5,278
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
30 years ago, we had absolutely no problem whatsoever going to see a movie whose lead character was dressed head-to-toe in colorful spandex.
Here's where the argument falls apart. With pretty much the sole exception of Superman: The Movie, superheroes were seen as either jokes, for kids, or at best guilty pleasures. It wasn't until Batman '89 that they started becoming cool and it was mostly due to its dark and gritty look.

While the traditional spandex and bright colours can work for more light-hearted heroes like Spider-Man or Superman, it can't be on badasses without the audience revolting. Nobody would ever take Wolverine seriously if he was wearing yellow and blue spandex.

Kahran Ramsus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 12:36 AM   #16
Dr.Dude
Side-Kick
 
Dr.Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: On your computer screen.
Posts: 3,984
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

It's an interesting argument, here. I don't think that realism is really a factor when it comes to costumes, despite how often it's brought up - it's more about aesthetics and how serious the costumes will be taken on screen. I mean, even the most realistic comic book movie costumes usually wouldn't function too well in real life.

For instance, I really doubt that Tim Burton had realism in mind when he was telling the designers what he wanted in his version of the bat suit. My feeling is that Burton wanted to make Batman look more powerful, by representing him in an armored suit instead of a spandex one. It also has a lot to do with Burton's view of the character - I mean, there's a reason that Michael Keaton wasn't told to bulk up the way that Christian Bale or Tobey Maguire were told to. I think Burton wanted his Batman to be a less a self-made, muscular man and more of a distant, quiet outsider, a smaller man, who used gears and tools to make himself into a creature of the night. Not necessarily a comics accurate depiction, which is why I prefer Nolan's interpretation by far...but I think that it was the reasoning behind the 1989 rubber suit.

I think the movie that made comic fans and studios so hung up on the realism idea was, actually, X-Men back in 2000. Changed costumes may have started with Batman but it wasn't until 2000 that the term "realism" started becoming so accepted as a reason for changing things around, dulling them down, using materials like leather and so on.

Personally, I like the leather X-Men costumes quite a bit but I don't think they're particularly more realistic than the comics ones.

__________________


Last edited by Dr.Dude; 02-24-2010 at 01:36 AM.
Dr.Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 02:01 AM   #17
Bruce Malone
Side-Kick
 
Bruce Malone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Stay out of my territory
Posts: 5,923
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Misguided argument considering that before TDK the king of the comic book movie world was spiderman with his spandexish costume and i see no rush to radically change his look for the nest film.

The FF movies had spandex, Daredevil had tight leather.

As for the X-men franchise they would not have been depicted in their traditional costumes even had Batman 89 never come out. I could almost book that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wallace View Post
But if not for Batman's black rubber, would we all eagerly run to see the colorfully clad characters without any regard for how "silly" they looked?
Rubber or no rubber batman is not a colorful super hero. He probably has the dullest colors of any major comic book character so why are you comparing the effect his costumes depiction should have on the "color" of others.

Bruce Malone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 03:36 AM   #18
jmc
callin' it like I see it
 
jmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
Posts: 21,668
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

I think the easiest way to look at things is simply to accept that what works on the page doesn't always translate well into real life, there are plenty of comic costumes where you can just see how they wouldn't work in live action. It might sound cliched but it rings true, that also goes for things like altering story arcs, character origins, settings, etcs, it's not just costumes. You've also got to take into account the type of character and the type of movie they are making, so really you just have to take each character as they come. The way I look at it, if a character's costume in a comic is iconic, as long as the suit keeps the spirit of the comic book design it shouldn't matter what the materials are made out of or whether it's got too many seams or whether it's deemed 'to busy', the point is if it's clearly recognizable as the character, really what difference does it make?

__________________
Celebrating 75 years of Batman saving Gotham City.

Fanboys make excuses, real fans acknowledge screw-ups.

Do me a favour - don't break up my posts into multiple quotes when replying, I won't answer back.
jmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 07:58 AM   #19
Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
 
Chris Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,660
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Wow. So much to respond to.
I agree that the X-Men do and always would look better in a team uniform than in the random rainbow garb that tends to populate the comic book pages. I've said this before, but with the exception of Storm, Wolverine and occasionally Archangel, there's no individual themes for them to display. Many of their comic book suits-Jean & Gambit particularly come to mind-are very generic in their design. The X-Men aren't the Avengers or the JLA-a bunch of solo heroes who band together in an emergency & then go back to defending their separate cities. They are a true team-nay, a FAMILY. And while i do like the uniforms they had in the movie, I'm now open to the possibility that there was a third option that may have been overlooked.
On "The Matrix"-I see no signs of its influence on any superhero project except MAYBE for "Smallville"'s JLA. Plus, Burton's Batman came first.
Batman's NOT a colorful superhero, this is true. I hate that so many attempts have been made to turn him into one. And while I would hate to see something that reminded me of the Adam West days or the numerous fanfilms I've come across, the TDK suit is far from prefect. Again, maybe there were other possibilities that were simply overlooked.
I guess my biggest concern is how this "realism" mentality could infect other projects. Look at the "Ultimate" books-it's like the superhero costume-apart from Spidey-is just a dead concept. If you go to the Captain America costume thread, there are so many horrendous proposals, most of which are steeped in the argument of whether or not someone would wear that in a war zone in real life. They wouldn't. But so what? NObody would wear a pointy-eared cowl to fight drug dealers either.
I want costumes that LOOK good as well as costumes that are functional. But I don't want them to sacrifice one for the other.

__________________
Michael Joseph Jackson 1958-2009. Gone Too Soon.
May he finally find the peace that eluded him in life.
There is only ONE Spider-Man. His name is Peter Parker. He's an adult, and he's straight!
Chris Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 02:45 PM   #20
jmc
callin' it like I see it
 
jmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
Posts: 21,668
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wallace View Post
I guess my biggest concern is how this ''realism'' mentality could infect other projects.
Realism is the wrong word, justification is probably a better alternative, 'why would this character wear this costume?' is the question, and really there's nothing wrong with asking it. I think in film, especially if the character is to be treated seriously a la Batman or Iron Man, you have to at least try to give some rational reason as to why this person would start to wear some ridiculous outfit. I think they days of simply accepting 'that just how it is' for these big name characters are over.

__________________
Celebrating 75 years of Batman saving Gotham City.

Fanboys make excuses, real fans acknowledge screw-ups.

Do me a favour - don't break up my posts into multiple quotes when replying, I won't answer back.

Last edited by jmc; 02-24-2010 at 02:49 PM.
jmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 12:23 AM   #21
Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
 
Chris Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,660
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc View Post
Realism is the wrong word, justification is probably a better alternative, 'why would this character wear this costume?' is the question, and really there's nothing wrong with asking it. I think in film, especially if the character is to be treated seriously a la Batman or Iron Man, you have to at least try to give some rational reason as to why this person would start to wear some ridiculous outfit. I think they days of simply accepting 'that just how it is' for these big name characters are over.
But who is asking the question? Who decided that justification was needed and acceptance was over? Spider-Man and Superman never had a reason for taking up a costume and nobody questioned it.
When I look at the concept art for Captain America, along with the fan manips for SUperman and for the Spider-Man reboot, I would definitely say the costume aspect is suffering.

__________________
Michael Joseph Jackson 1958-2009. Gone Too Soon.
May he finally find the peace that eluded him in life.
There is only ONE Spider-Man. His name is Peter Parker. He's an adult, and he's straight!
Chris Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 01:23 AM   #22
roach
I am the night
 
roach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Under your Refrigerator
Posts: 39,613
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Wallace View Post
But who is asking the question? Who decided that justification was needed and acceptance was over? Spider-Man and Superman never had a reason for taking up a costume and nobody questioned it.
When I look at the concept art for Captain America, along with the fan manips for SUperman and for the Spider-Man reboot, I would definitely say the costume aspect is suffering.
exactly...there really wasnt a need to justifiy Captain America's suit.
Hollywood is over thinking the costumes. When a character has an iconic look that has been the same since the creation of the character then thats the way it should be in the movies. The Spiderman costume should look like the comics suit...same with Supes, Bats and Cap.
To inject a sense of realism in the costume...in a movie with supersoldiers, indestructable shields, red skulls and cosmic cubes is silly. No one debated endlessly the costume Perseus wore in Clash of the Titans???

__________________
There seems to be a grave misunderstanding in today’s protest-hungry world of entertainment fans into how far their opinion should really matter. You don’t like a story? That’s fine – don’t read a story. Former Marvel editor Tom Brennan
roach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 04:10 PM   #23
Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
 
Chris Wallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,660
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

And why are those days over? Huh? Because Hollywood ended them, that's why. And audiences went along with it. I put "realism" in quotes because the need to justify seems to translate almost invariable into reality vs. fantasy. Now I'm not saying that every character should wear tights onscreen but I think there should be more wiggle room for what we assume audiences will & will not accept. (I can't believe I'm siding with JAK after all the times we've fought!) Costumes are generally justified in comics and it's not over-analyzed. I would hate to see someone like Black Panther decked out in leather because it's considered "more realistic". And I DO NOT want Cap in his "ultimized" costume either. I want to see Captain America, not a patriotic reject from G.I. Joe.

__________________
Michael Joseph Jackson 1958-2009. Gone Too Soon.
May he finally find the peace that eluded him in life.
There is only ONE Spider-Man. His name is Peter Parker. He's an adult, and he's straight!
Chris Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 04:33 PM   #24
jmc
callin' it like I see it
 
jmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
Posts: 21,668
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

It seems to be working regardless of who ended it. Again you have to take it on a character by character basis, even if the comics have justified costumes that doesn't guarantee it's suitable for film, again it's cliched but what works on the page doesn't always work on film. Most cases there's a middle ground that can be reach, but that still won't wash with some people. Honestly, if people want 100% comic actuate costume they're probably better off browsing some cosplay websites or going through the many fan films on youtube to get their fix because I'm doubtful Hollywood is gonna start rolling back to bright coloured spandex any time soon.

__________________
Celebrating 75 years of Batman saving Gotham City.

Fanboys make excuses, real fans acknowledge screw-ups.

Do me a favour - don't break up my posts into multiple quotes when replying, I won't answer back.
jmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 04:37 PM   #25
JAK®
Upstart
 
JAK®'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7,400
Default Re: Has Batman hurt the genre where costumes are concerned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc View Post
It seems to be working regardless of who ended it. Again you have to take it on a character by character basis, even if the comics have justified costumes that doesn't guarantee it's suitable for film, again it's cliched but what works on the page doesn't always work on film. Most cases there's a middle ground that can be reach, but that still won't wash with some people. Honestly, if people want 100% comic actuate costume they're probably better off browsing some cosplay websites or going through the many fan films on youtube to get their fix because I'm doubtful Hollywood is gonna start rolling back to bright coloured spandex any time soon.
Bright coloured spandex? Cosplay? Fan films?

No wonder you don't think it will work if that's what you imagine in your head.

__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
You are now breathing manually.
JAK®



JAK® is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.