![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should Michael Bay leave the franchise? | |||
| Yes |
|
78 | 54.17% |
| No |
|
66 | 45.83% |
| Voters: 144. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#51 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 19,920
|
This is a bit disappointing, but honestly I shouldn't be surprised. The man has been working very hard for the last several years on the same thing, and clearly the man needs a change of backdrop in his life. I just hope that whoever replaces him tries hard to maintain a sense of continuity so we can still have an effective trilogy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
King(sley) Mandarin!
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crossroads of America
Posts: 10,390
|
I can't believe this.
__________________
"You're not a man. You're nothing more than a maniac. I'm not afraid of you. No politics here, just good old-fashioned revenge." |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 19,920
|
Ever consider that maybe they don't use the G1 designs because they DON'T work? Seriously, if I saw a "realistic" version of G1 Optimus Prime I would LMAO, and I'm sure most of the audience would too. They are just so simple and boxy that the audience would look at them like a cheap downgrade, so I see no reason to use them in the movies other than to please the G1 fanboys. This isn't G1, so I don't see why they should have to use G1's designs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
new name: Agent_Ghost!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
i support your agrument good ish man! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
El Psy Congroo
SHH! Global Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Interstellar
Posts: 24,033
|
If thats his reason for not directing a third film than it sure is. You should make improvements sure, but not quit working on a franchise based on what critics have to say. Thats just plain asinine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,156
|
ISh? Ish????
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
new name: Agent_Ghost!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
Like i said..noone can say the G1 verison wouldn't work..cuz we don' t know (never seen it on film..at least i haven't)..and i have no problem updating the look of robots/aliens whatever u want to call them...i just think alot and almost all the deceps look like put together trash cans who lack color ....i think messiahdeoy makes some very good points. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
new name: Agent_Ghost!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 469
|
it's "sh**t" edited...it's a rap thing if u never heard it said before...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,156
|
I hate rap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
new name: Agent_Ghost!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
The "D" is silent.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Right here
Posts: 8,669
|
I call bs. Bay will probably be coming back. With all those monster paychecks, what does he have to complain about?
__________________
By what right does the wolf judge the lion? VIDEO-CLick to Watch!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,156
|
Nothing, I just didnt know what "ish" ment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
XBOXLIVEGT= DeaDheaDSL84
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Drunken Clam
Posts: 9,981
|
This is probably Bay giving false information again, I don't think he wants a "Brett Ratner" type coming in and f***ing up his franchise.
__________________
:ninja:
...sometimes it's putting your coat over a kid's shoulders and letting him know the world is gonna be ok... |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In A-Rod's house
Posts: 8,249
|
Do you know Michael Bay? Have you ever seen him in interviews? He could give 2 craps about what happens to Transformers after him. He's his own person that does what he thinks is cool. He could care less about what happens after him. He'd probably even laugh if someone did come in after him and screwed everything up. The only franchise he cares about personally is Bad Boys and that's because it was his first big break so he's sentimental about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |||
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,929
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, totally different. Whatever makes your arguement man. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
DESI
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,493
|
Please get J.J. Abrams
__________________
Summer 2013: Iron Man 3 8.5/10 Star Trek Into Darkness 9/10 Fast And Furious 6 Hangover III Man of Steel The Wolverine |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
The "D" is silent.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Right here
Posts: 8,669
|
That ain't happening. He's got his own cash cow to look after now.
__________________
By what right does the wolf judge the lion? VIDEO-CLick to Watch!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In A-Rod's house
Posts: 8,249
|
Abrams gets bored easily, after Trek 2 I bet he moves on
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,929
|
This conversation about the fangs is ridiculous.
Why doesnt anyone talk about the noses? Both in G1 (suck it Geewuners) and in the movies. Do they smell? Why do they have mouths in G1? Shouldnt they have some sort of speaker? So you see its ridiculous. Prime looks the way he looks because he is the good guy. Megatron looks like a nazi in G1 and like a monster in the movies because he is the villain. Its as simple as that. Aliens would look nothing like humans in the real world. They look the way the look because they are based on our fiction. At least the bayformers have some variety. I remember a picture that showed HotRod next to a couple of autobots and the only difference in their heads was the fin on their helmet and the colour. At least, as robots from another planet that can transform into anything, Bay has given them a variety of forms, number of fingers, wheels instead of legs, etc. He evolved the designs and didnt copy those 20 year old designs. Every superhero has had changes to his suit and gear over the years, why cant Transformers evolve to suit our time? Enjoy your cubes and nearly identical robots. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,929
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,156
|
I liked it too. Feh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,929
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
El Psy Congroo
SHH! Global Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Interstellar
Posts: 24,033
|
I remember that WETA was doing some early concept work for a Neon Genesis Evangelion.
I know this suggestion might seem somewhat farfetched but having Peter Jackson's interpretation of "Transformers" would be a sight to see. Not sure if he would sign on that easily but Jackson is notorious for playing with sfx (something he would have fun doing with "Transformers" working with ILM and maybe even bringing WETA on board) and he is working with Spielberg on "The Adventures of Tin Tin" so there's a connection right there. Spielberg as a producer doesn't have to look far if he needs to get a new director for the third film. Last edited by craigdbfan; 06-18-2009 at 12:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 19,920
|
Quote:
The Bayformers do look different from the G1s, I won't argue against that. However, the important thing is that they are trying to maintain a sense of the characters' silhouettes. If you compare G1 Starscream to Bayformers Star Scream, yes they do have some rather remarkable differences, but if you were to just examine their silhouette, you can see a lot of similarities. The same can be said of many of the characters, and in character design half of the work is making a recognizable silhouette. I think the Bayformers overall do a good job of updating and adjusting how the characters look for a 21st century motion picture. Last edited by Timstuff; 06-18-2009 at 12:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 19,920
|
Quote:
Anyway, I'm not sure if Peter Jackson would do Transformers 3. The guy is pretty busy, and I honestly don't see him picking up where another director left off. And given that there's like a lot of creative differences between Jackson and Bay, I wouldn't count on a very strong sense of continuity since he'll probably want to change things to his own tastes. Personally, Louis Leterrier would be my first choice. He's just as capable of balls-to-the-wall action scenes as Michael Bay (including chaotic car chases, as seen in The Transporter), and in The Incredible Hulk showed that he can put together a cool monster fight scene. If the goal is to maintain continuity with the first two movies will injecting a bit of new flavor, I think Leterrier would be the most logical choice. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|