![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,256
|
The past is the past, I know.
BUT, when I watch both films back to back, it's sooo annoying to see the lack of continuity in Rachel's casting. So, for the sake of continuity, if you had the choice to go back in time, would you originally cast Maggie as Rachel in BB, or would you have Katie return for TDK? Personally, I would have Maggie in both films. NOTE: Ignore Tom Cruise and their personal lives, and just look at both ladies' performances themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Clown Prince of Crime
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jollity Farm
Posts: 33,698
|
Maggie. She can act.
Katie, she was so bad the Razzies scooped her into their nominations.
__________________
"Sometimes I remember it one way. Sometimes another. If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!" - The Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,256
|
Batman Begins was nominated for a Razzie!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Clown Prince of Crime
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jollity Farm
Posts: 33,698
|
LOL, god no!
Katie Holmes was for her role as Rachel.
__________________
"Sometimes I remember it one way. Sometimes another. If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!" - The Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rubbing your rhubarb.
Posts: 15,263
|
Yes, and we could have Schumacher directing Begins and all that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
In the Welsh
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Bale-Cave
Posts: 11,718
|
Personally I would have had Holmes back for the sequel. Apart from a few scenes in BB I thought she was fine. Plus it would've been fun to see her reunite with Eckhart after TYFS.
__________________
Before SHH, your miserable, insignificant little life was laughable. Now that you've found SHH, have you noticed you've become more popular? Suddenly EVERYONE wants to hang out with you. SHH. You owe us your livelihood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 8,998
|
The latter.
__________________
"If you want to save yourself the ticket price, go into the kitchen, cue up a male choir singing the music of hell, and get a kid to start banging pots and pans together. Then close your eyes and use your imagination." - Roger Ebert on Revenge of the Fallen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Dickensian Archetype
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Depths
Posts: 5,206
|
Ideally Gyllenhaal would've played the role in both films.
__________________
This should be agony I should be a mass of aching muscle Broken, spent, unable to move And were I an older man, I surely would But I'm a man of thirty, of twenty again The rain on my chest is a baptism I'm born again |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 8,998
|
Ideally Rachel Dawes shouldn't have even existed. It should've been Harvey Dent in her place.
__________________
"If you want to save yourself the ticket price, go into the kitchen, cue up a male choir singing the music of hell, and get a kid to start banging pots and pans together. Then close your eyes and use your imagination." - Roger Ebert on Revenge of the Fallen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Dickensian Archetype
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Depths
Posts: 5,206
|
Arguable. However I think she worked as a love interest for Bruce, but more than that a (hollow) chance at a normal life for him, fulfilling a sort of Andrea Beaumont role. And her significance was raised much further in TDK with her relationship with Harvey, not to mention she's the only good guy in the film not to compromise.
__________________
This should be agony I should be a mass of aching muscle Broken, spent, unable to move And were I an older man, I surely would But I'm a man of thirty, of twenty again The rain on my chest is a baptism I'm born again |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,256
|
Ultimately, Rachel shouldn't have existed. I agree.
We didn't NEED a love interest in these films. It would've been yet another bold and ballsy move on Nolan's part. If anything, Selina Kyle could've replaced Rachel's time as a small time thief who eventually rises in power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,942
|
Maggie
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Thwip Thwip
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,186
|
I probably would of preferred someone different all together...
(having to recast character in-between movie wasn’t ideal) though, it is kind of an ironic question, as more or less (not that she wasn't cast based on her talent, as well) but, she was also cast somewhat do to her resemblance to Katie... therefore, had Katie not been in the first one, Maggie probably wouldn't of been considered but, as for the question at hand... if I had to choose, I'd go with Maggie for both |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SuperFerret's Shoebox of Solitude
Posts: 32,542
|
Quote:
__________________
Faster than a speeding hamster. -----More powerful than a box of tissues. ----------Able to leap off of tall buildings and hit the ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Love Tension
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,780
|
I'll say Holmes for both movies. She looks more like a princess that you want to save.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
WINNING
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,244
|
I would have preferred Gyllenhaal in both films, but don't feel strongly about it.
__________________
When supervillains want to scare each other they tell Joker stories. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Clown Prince of Crime
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jollity Farm
Posts: 33,698
|
In Batman's world it is
__________________
"Sometimes I remember it one way. Sometimes another. If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!" - The Joker |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,685
|
I believe Holmes won the Razzie, congrats on that.
Frankly I would've nixed the character altogether. I think Iron Man is a good template for how romance should be handled in the Bat-films. I have no qualms with Batman having a love interest, but having his fawn over a girl who doesn't really love him back (i.e. putting ole' Bats in the "friend zone") doesn't work for me at all. What I would've preferred is Nolan slowly develop Selina Kyle over the course of a few movies. Start her off as an ancillary character, then slowly develop a romance between the two (as well as showing her journey to becoming Catwoman - perhaps by the second or third film). I didn't mind the 'childhood friend' aspect, but I always thought giving that role to Dent - despite being antithetical to the comics - would've worked A LOT better. The whole 'friend zone' aspect was really odd? Interesting, but odd. Not entirely against his persona per say Last edited by Optimus_Prime_; 04-08-2011 at 08:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rubbing your rhubarb.
Posts: 15,263
|
As some of you said, either Maggie on both or no Rachel at all. That's a good couple of alternatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Flawless!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 7,736
|
I honestly didn't mind Katie Holmes in Batman Begins... so for the sake of continuity I would of preferred if she returned for The Dark Knight.
BUT Maggie is the FAR superior actress and after watching her in The Dark Knight, I wish she would have been cast in Batman Begins. I really thought her performance was great. So really... I don't know. ![]() The whole character kind of fell flat anyway... But perhaps we would have connected to her slightly more if she was played by Maggie through the two films.
__________________
Michelle Pfeiffer: Living Legend... you can look, but don't touch! VIDEO-CLick to Watch!:
I'll miss you dad! xx |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
I will find him!
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South West, UK
Posts: 9,178
|
Maggie in both.
If Katie had been in TDK, there would be a parts I wouldn't like so much.
__________________
25 days to go! (3 weeks and 4 days!) "Dreams save us. Dreams lift us up and transform us. And on my soul, I swear... until my dream of a world where dignity, honor and justice becomes the reality we all share -- I'll never stop fighting. Ever." - Superman
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SuperFerret's Shoebox of Solitude
Posts: 32,542
|
Nah, in Batman's world, it's stupid and dangerous. In fact, that's kind of the whole point of The Dark Knight. Sure, Batman didn't break his "one rule", but he did have to resort to underhanded tactics and exploitation of private technology in order to defeat the Joker. Rachel's way would've gotten more people killed.
__________________
Faster than a speeding hamster. -----More powerful than a box of tissues. ----------Able to leap off of tall buildings and hit the ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
superhero fan
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,405
|
They seemed about equal to me. Maggie was somehow more annoying which caught me by surprise.
__________________
If Jessica Biel has a son, she should name him Batmo. —The internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
In the Welsh
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Bale-Cave
Posts: 11,718
|
I always found it funny how all the men wanted Maggie in TDK.
__________________
Before SHH, your miserable, insignificant little life was laughable. Now that you've found SHH, have you noticed you've become more popular? Suddenly EVERYONE wants to hang out with you. SHH. You owe us your livelihood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Love Tension
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,780
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|