![]() |
|
|
#26 | |
|
bang bang
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the abstract
Posts: 25,031
|
Quote:
I don't think XOW and X3 are as good but I still find them entertaining. I've just come to accept them. I think making an X4 and completely ignoring part 3 would be weird and confusing to some. Interesting to think someday there might be 12 X-films to sit through. Xmen FC 1-3 Xmen 1-6 Wolverine 1&2 Deadpool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tijuana/San Diego
Posts: 4,599
|
i'm all for an X3 remake with Singer directing of course
![]() hell, there are 2 versions of Superman II and Evil Dead 2 is somewhat of a remake of Evil Dead 1 the only thing i would keep from Ratner's X3 is Kelsey Grammar as Beast. that role was cast perfectly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
All Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,480
|
Evil Dead 2's 7 fisr minutes are just quick recaps of what happened in the previous film, Sam Raimi said himself its suposed to be a sequel, not a remake.
If they contradicted X-3 then reboot it. As for wolverine, after the next The Wolverine i want 2 prequel, one based on the origin and another based on weapon X |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|