The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > General Movies > Marvel Films

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-07-2012, 08:48 AM   #1
spideymouse
Side-Kick
 
spideymouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,212
Default Are MCU solo franchises necessary for all heroes?

Almost all comic book movies are inherently set up to have sequels and become franchises. It's why Marvel Studios is signing their actors to 6+ (!) film deals, and it's why we're getting sequels for three of their main characters to kick off the MCU's Phase II. Of course, the reason for this is the much observed effect that brand recognition has had on Hollywood: sequels make serious bank.

But does the MCU have to follow the formula for all of its heroes? Because they share the same universe, the same brand recognition, Marvel's movies from now on are pretty much sequels of each other in the larger, all-encompassing "MCU franchise." Does Marvel need to have solo franchises for everyone?

My question most directly relates to new characters that Marvel will be bringing into the fold. Ant-Man, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, and Ms. Marvel are probably at the top of most people's lists to join the MCU next, but do they all need to have their own solo franchises as well? One could perhaps argue that each deserves his/her own origin movie, but how crucial is it that there be, say, a Ms. Marvel 2 and 3 once she has joined the Avengers franchise? An example of this already happening could be the Hulk. While he is bound to appear in future films, the argument has now been made that Hulk may work best as a supporting character, and Marvel has no plans at this point to make a TIH2. We may never see a solo Hulk movie again, and that could end up being just fine with us.

My question also relates to some heroes who have already appeared in multiple Phase I MCU films. Nick Fury, Black Widow, and Hawkeye have each appeared at least twice in Marvel's first 6 movies, but none of them has yet to have a solo movie to their name. Some fans are clamoring for these three to have spin-off solo movies or a SHIELD movie, but as long as they continue to contribute to the greater MCU good by appearing in other heroes' movies, are they all that necessary?

What are your thoughts?


Last edited by spideymouse; 06-07-2012 at 09:03 AM.
spideymouse is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.