The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > Superman > Superman Returns

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2011, 01:39 PM   #101
Dr.
Scorpion-Kick
 
Dr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,777
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuffsaid View Post
No, its the same principle. Only the gap is larger. If Iron Man takes place in 2009, why is Stark using cell phones from 2007? Someone so up to date on the latest tech would never carry such "outdated" gadget.
I’m not sure I follow. Having the timeline within the narratives be consistent is what’s germane, not the release dates of the films. When Supes first appears in STM (as Supes), the year is 1978. This is established through dialogue. The events of SII occur shortly after. (In the RDC, it’s immediately after; the Lester Cut is not as clear, it might be a few months.) Thus, the FOS tryst in SII (the alleged conception of Jason) happens around 1978-79. (Make it 1980 if you like – the difference won’t matter.) The point being: none of these possible dates can be reconciled with a timeline that has Jason being 5 or 6 years old in 2006. So, clearly, SR represents a new iteration of the Superman story. As such, it’s a non sequitur to question why Lois’s SII amnesia isn’t referenced in SR – a detail from an older, separate iteration.

Quote:
But it can. Because the child won't be conceived in the 80's but closer to the millenium. It is the same concept applied in the comics. How long has it been in the Marvel universe since Superheroes started appearing? A little over a decade. Yet "over a decade" was the 40's. It is all part of the suspension of disbelieve process.
Yes, exactly! Each new generation retells the Superman story. In Action #1, Supes is active in 1938. In STM, baby Kal-El only arrives on Earth in 1948. In Smallville, the ship crashes in Kansas in 1989. The broad strokes are the same but the details have been updated in each retelling. And each new iteration establishes its own continuity – not beholden to the continuity of predecessors.

Cheers,

Dr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011, 06:32 PM   #102
I SEE SPIDEY
HYPE AWARD WINNER!
 
I SEE SPIDEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In Superman's arms
Posts: 34,417
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce_Begins View Post
Since many here are determined to compare Spider-Man movies to SR.



And where is Spider-Man 4 ? A movie with stranger plot points (Spider-Man 3) which many considered as exciting when it was released and made ton of money ?

Lets face some facts, both Singer and Sam Raimi are a fan of Donner Superman movies (So is Nolan.) In fact the first Spider-Man movie has many parallels with STM, second Spider-Man movie follows Superman 2 in many areas, third Spider-Man movie is close in many respects to Superman 3.

Superman as a Character is often compared to Moses and Jesus both in Comics and Movies, as Singer was making SR a part of existing Donnerverse Superman, it was to be expected.

I would say that Spider-Man character was created by taking inspiration form Superman.

Anyone who disagrees is not willing to look at these points.
In reponse to both of your Spider-Man bashing posts:

I'm talking about SR in this thread, not Spider-Man. I don't give a flying crap what your opinion is on those films. Bash those films elsewhere.

My only (poorly spelled) point was this; if the movie was more entertaining, those strange plot points wouldn't matter and a second sequel would be forthcoming.

Can you please keep the Spider-Man bashing on the Spider-Man forums? I mean we get it, you don't like the Spider-Man movies. Atleast I'm talking about SR on it's own freaking boards. Is that so hard for you to do?

__________________
Come think with us:http://thinkmcflythink.squarespace.com/

...It's Batman and Superman, lets just be honest, I don't know how you get bigger than that--Zack Snyder.
I SEE SPIDEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011, 10:46 PM   #103
Bruce_Begins
Taking a break.
 
Bruce_Begins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,284
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

It is well known that Spider-Man movies do have parallels with Superman movies, If I point that, how am I bashing them ?

I was merely pointing out how much Spider-man and Superman movies and characters are alike, personally I wanted to see Spider-man 4.

Since this is SR thread, I will just talk about SR.

__________________

*\S/T*

I'll be back !

Last edited by Bruce_Begins; 04-28-2011 at 10:51 PM.
Bruce_Begins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 10:44 PM   #104
Showtime
The Night He Came Home
SHH! Global Moderator
 
Showtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Haddonfield
Posts: 41,425
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Good idea. Let's stick to Superman Returns.

__________________

Showtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 05:08 PM   #105
Zack Snyder
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,184
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDaniel View Post
Couldn`t have said it better. But about point 6, i dont think the problem were the actors because they are decent and even if i think that Routh is not a good actor and is very bland sometimes, he was a good Superman. Singer's idea and script were the main problem. Not even Oscar winner Kevin Spacey could save that stupid version of Luthor. Although i do agree that Lois should've been portrayed by a more experienced actress.
That may be a perfect post Even Spacey is not at fault, they wrote him as the Hackman sequel. He didn't choose the way they wanted him to play the character.

Zack Snyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 12:21 AM   #106
M.E.H.Z.E.B
Banned Usèr
SHH! Global Moderator
 
M.E.H.Z.E.B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bloodshed Valley
Posts: 10,593
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Gee, Thanks guys.

__________________
MESS WITH THE BE$T : D1E L1Ke THE Re$T
The Nightmare is just Beginning...

member of gods among men
M.E.H.Z.E.B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 05:06 AM   #107
hopefuldreamer
Bangarang!
 
hopefuldreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South West, UK
Posts: 11,293
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. View Post
Well, that’s a somewhat problematic conclusion to draw… as the “consummation act” in SII appears to have happened around 1978-80 while SR (explicitly – the date is shown on the front page of the DP) takes place in 2006. Jason would be over 25 years old.

Taking SR as “stand-alone,” the assumptions one makes about its “pre-narrative” events are fairly modest and straightforward: shortly prior to the 5-year absence, Supes and Lois (must have) had sex – which (apparently) resulted in a pregnancy.

In the grand scheme, this is not a profoundly mysterious occurrence which requires Sherlock Holmes–like powers to figure out. And it's not one which remotely inspires the speculation that “amnesia” must somehow be involved.
When you go into the cinema having been TOLD this movie Is set after the events of S2, the assumptions you can make about the pre narrative, are not assumptions. They are based on what we saw in S2...

If Singer declared it was a 'stand alone' plot that mirrored the style of the previous films, then there would be no problem. But he didn't, did he?

__________________
I think back to my father. As a farmer, he had a natural understanding for the Earth. I remember him telling me this world is capable of providing for all its creatures. Even now, with so many more people, there exists enough food for everyone.

"The problem," Pa used to say, "is people. As far back as we go, we've always had problems with sharing. Seems everyone's too busy holding on to what they've got to care how their neighbors are doing."


*\S/T*
hopefuldreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 05:12 AM   #108
hopefuldreamer
Bangarang!
 
hopefuldreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South West, UK
Posts: 11,293
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack Snyder View Post
That may be a perfect post Even Spacey is not at fault, they wrote him as the Hackman sequel. He didn't choose the way they wanted him to play the character.
It's really hard when you start debating whose at fault, the actor or director. In theory, because the director has chosen you and is literally telling you how to stand, what to do with your hands, how angry or cool to be... It's always their fault.

But I don't think it's fair to blame Bosworth for a bad Lois but not blame Spacey for a bad Lex.

It was ALL about the way they were written in the script. I think a Lois with witty dialogue, less 'mood' shots and more banter with CK would have been a lot better assesment of Bosworth's acting. I think she probably would have done a lot better.

__________________
I think back to my father. As a farmer, he had a natural understanding for the Earth. I remember him telling me this world is capable of providing for all its creatures. Even now, with so many more people, there exists enough food for everyone.

"The problem," Pa used to say, "is people. As far back as we go, we've always had problems with sharing. Seems everyone's too busy holding on to what they've got to care how their neighbors are doing."


*\S/T*
hopefuldreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 07:26 AM   #109
GreenKToo
In the fire
 
GreenKToo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In the fire.
Posts: 11,140
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

It's really too bad. SR had lots of potential. From the moment we saw Lex with the old lady in the mansion I figured it was in trouble. I literally cringed at that.
That scene, imo, should have been cut instead of the RTK one. what were they thinking....

Anywho, this is what *I* would have preferred to see...

This Lex would have also been responsible for tricking Superman into leaving, and he would have been non-goofy. Dark humor yes, screaming ''WROOOONG!!'' no.
Lex would have stolen the crystals in order to create high tech inventions and weapons, with NO mention of real estate, NONE.
He would have sold his inventions/weapons to the highest bidders, and created Lex-corp from the proceeds. He could have even used the kryptonian tech and changed one of his henchmen/bodyguards into Metallo.

In Supes absence, Lex would have been busy. He would have went on and created cures for cancer, stopped poverty, and used metallo to fight crime (while secretly stealing from the biggest corps in the world, and starting small wars to sell more weapons)
Lex would have cleaned up Metropolis to gain the public's trust ( who he hates ) so he could run for public office. mayor first, then congress.

Lex would have used every public speaking egagement to turn the public against the superman who abandoned them. He works the crowds into a fervor against superman at event after event. Before long, the public would have replaced Superman with Lex as their hero.

Time marches on. It's been 5 years and Lex finds himself bored. He's won. He has everything he has ever wanted. He is rid of Superman, he has power, wealth, women, but somethings missing. He paces the floor muttering. He stops and sips at a drink he's holding. He frowns.
Then it hits him. He actually misses his rival, the sparring, the chase...he shakes his head and stares out his Lex-corp penthouse window.....lightning flashes off in the distance, and for a brief instant, we see the reflection of Lex smile.

As if on cue, this is when superman's ship returns and crashlands in smallville. The next day, after he has recovered, clark catches up on things and indeed wonders if he is needed anymore. Maybe another city somewhere would be best. After some soul searching, he decides to try Metropolis again.

This Clark wouldn't have gotten his job back so easy at the planet. Jimmy is still his bud of course, and Lois still treats him like crap. It's Not until he, as clark, gets the dirt on Lex and releases it to the public that perry hires him back. Clark had to prove himself again. Clark also discovers that Lex tricked him into leaving..
With Clark having released damaging info on him, the publics trust in Lex is shattered. Lex is livid and sends Metallo to the DP.

We would have gotten an awesome shirtrip, and a shocked and excited Lex at the sight of Superman's return.

It would have had two superfights. Supes loses the first against metallo (in a close one), and wins the second..lots of damage and destruction happen.

Also, no kid. Its not that I hated him, its just that it created a big problem in SR and would have been even more of a problem in a sequel.

__________________
''Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.'' ~ John Wayne



Last edited by GreenKToo; 06-09-2011 at 12:08 PM.
GreenKToo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 10:11 AM   #110
Dozerman
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 46
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenKToo View Post
It's really too bad. SR had lots of potential. From the moment we saw Lex with the old lady in the mansion I figured it was in trouble. I literally cringed at that.
That scene, imo, should have been cut instead of the RTK one. what were they thinking....

Anywho, this is what *I* would have preferred to see...

This Lex would have also been responsible for tricking Superman into leaving, and he would have been non-goofy. Dark humor yes, screaming ''WROOOONG!!'' no.
Lex would have stolen the crystals in order to create high tech inventions and weapons, with NO mention of real estate, NONE.
He would have sold his inventions/weapons to the highest bidders, and created Lex-corp from the proceeds. He could have even used the kryptonian tech and changed one of his henchmen/bodyguards into Metallo.

In Supes absence, Lex would have been busy. He would have went on and created cures for cancer, stopped poverty, and used metallo to fight crime (while secretly stealing from the biggest corps in the world, and starting small wars to sell more weapons)
Lex would have cleaned up Metropolis to gain the public's trust ( who he hates ) so he could run for public office. mayor first, then congress.

Lex would have used every public speaking egagement to turn the public against the superman who abandoned them. He works the crowds into a fervor against superman at event after event. Before long, the public would have replaced Superman with Lex as their hero.

Time marches on. It's been 5 years and Lex finds himself bored. He's won. He has everything he has ever wanted. He is rid of Superman, he has power, wealth, women, but somethings missing. He paces the floor muttering. He stops and sips at a drink he's holding. He frowns.
Then it hits him. He actually misses his rival, the sparring, the chase...he shakes his head and stares out his Lex-corp penthouse window.....lightning flashes off in the distance, and for a brief instant, we see the reflection of Lex smile.

As if on cue, this is when superman's ship returns and crashlands in smallville. The next day, after he has recovered, clark catches up on things and indeed wonders if he is needed anymore. Maybe another city somewhere would be best. After some soul searching, he decides to try Metropolis again.

This Clark wouldn't have gotten his job back so easy at the planet. Jimmy is still his bud of course, and Lois still treats him like crap. It's Not until he, as clark, gets the dirt on Lex and releases it to the public does perry hire him back. Clark had to prove himself again. Clark also discovers that Lex tricked him into leaving..
With Clark having released damaging info on him, the publics trust in Lex is shattered. Lex is livid and sends Metallo to the DP.

We would have gotten an awesome shirtrip, and a shocked and excited Lex at the sight of Superman's return.

It would have had two superfights. Supes loses the first against metallo (in a close one), and wins the second..lots of damage and destruction happen.

Also, no kid. Its not that I hated him, its just that it created a big problem in SR and would have been even more of a problem in a sequel.

I like this story but I don't think it would work for a movie. It would make a great comic or short story. Remember that singer only had the movies for reference. He didn't read any comics and wasn't even a fan. On another note. Do you think Lois get's rid of her amnesia when Jason throws the piano. Like in superman 4 when her and superman jump off the roof of Clark's Apartment.

Dozerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 10:31 AM   #111
hopefuldreamer
Bangarang!
 
hopefuldreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South West, UK
Posts: 11,293
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenKToo View Post
It's really too bad. SR had lots of potential. From the moment we saw Lex with the old lady in the mansion I figured it was in trouble. I literally cringed at that.
That scene, imo, should have been cut instead of the RTK one. what were they thinking....

Anywho, this is what *I* would have preferred to see...

This Lex would have also been responsible for tricking Superman into leaving, and he would have been non-goofy. Dark humor yes, screaming ''WROOOONG!!'' no.
Lex would have stolen the crystals in order to create high tech inventions and weapons, with NO mention of real estate, NONE.
He would have sold his inventions/weapons to the highest bidders, and created Lex-corp from the proceeds. He could have even used the kryptonian tech and changed one of his henchmen/bodyguards into Metallo.

In Supes absence, Lex would have been busy. He would have went on and created cures for cancer, stopped poverty, and used metallo to fight crime (while secretly stealing from the biggest corps in the world, and starting small wars to sell more weapons)
Lex would have cleaned up Metropolis to gain the public's trust ( who he hates ) so he could run for public office. mayor first, then congress.

Lex would have used every public speaking egagement to turn the public against the superman who abandoned them. He works the crowds into a fervor against superman at event after event. Before long, the public would have replaced Superman with Lex as their hero.

Time marches on. It's been 5 years and Lex finds himself bored. He's won. He has everything he has ever wanted. He is rid of Superman, he has power, wealth, women, but somethings missing. He paces the floor muttering. He stops and sips at a drink he's holding. He frowns.
Then it hits him. He actually misses his rival, the sparring, the chase...he shakes his head and stares out his Lex-corp penthouse window.....lightning flashes off in the distance, and for a brief instant, we see the reflection of Lex smile.

As if on cue, this is when superman's ship returns and crashlands in smallville. The next day, after he has recovered, clark catches up on things and indeed wonders if he is needed anymore. Maybe another city somewhere would be best. After some soul searching, he decides to try Metropolis again.

This Clark wouldn't have gotten his job back so easy at the planet. Jimmy is still his bud of course, and Lois still treats him like crap. It's Not until he, as clark, gets the dirt on Lex and releases it to the public does perry hire him back. Clark had to prove himself again. Clark also discovers that Lex tricked him into leaving..
With Clark having released damaging info on him, the publics trust in Lex is shattered. Lex is livid and sends Metallo to the DP.

We would have gotten an awesome shirtrip, and a shocked and excited Lex at the sight of Superman's return.

It would have had two superfights. Supes loses the first against metallo (in a close one), and wins the second..lots of damage and destruction happen.

Also, no kid. Its not that I hated him, its just that it created a big problem in SR and would have been even more of a problem in a sequel.
That's perfect. Seriously. Love it

__________________
I think back to my father. As a farmer, he had a natural understanding for the Earth. I remember him telling me this world is capable of providing for all its creatures. Even now, with so many more people, there exists enough food for everyone.

"The problem," Pa used to say, "is people. As far back as we go, we've always had problems with sharing. Seems everyone's too busy holding on to what they've got to care how their neighbors are doing."


*\S/T*
hopefuldreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 11:46 AM   #112
STC
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 314
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenKToo View Post
It's really too bad. SR had lots of potential. From the moment we saw Lex with the old lady in the mansion I figured it was in trouble. I literally cringed at that.
That scene, imo, should have been cut instead of the RTK one. what were they thinking....

Anywho, this is what *I* would have preferred to see...

This Lex would have also been responsible for tricking Superman into leaving, and he would have been non-goofy. Dark humor yes, screaming ''WROOOONG!!'' no.
Lex would have stolen the crystals in order to create high tech inventions and weapons, with NO mention of real estate, NONE.
He would have sold his inventions/weapons to the highest bidders, and created Lex-corp from the proceeds. He could have even used the kryptonian tech and changed one of his henchmen/bodyguards into Metallo.

In Supes absence, Lex would have been busy. He would have went on and created cures for cancer, stopped poverty, and used metallo to fight crime (while secretly stealing from the biggest corps in the world, and starting small wars to sell more weapons)
Lex would have cleaned up Metropolis to gain the public's trust ( who he hates ) so he could run for public office. mayor first, then congress.

Lex would have used every public speaking egagement to turn the public against the superman who abandoned them. He works the crowds into a fervor against superman at event after event. Before long, the public would have replaced Superman with Lex as their hero.

Time marches on. It's been 5 years and Lex finds himself bored. He's won. He has everything he has ever wanted. He is rid of Superman, he has power, wealth, women, but somethings missing. He paces the floor muttering. He stops and sips at a drink he's holding. He frowns.
Then it hits him. He actually misses his rival, the sparring, the chase...he shakes his head and stares out his Lex-corp penthouse window.....lightning flashes off in the distance, and for a brief instant, we see the reflection of Lex smile.

As if on cue, this is when superman's ship returns and crashlands in smallville. The next day, after he has recovered, clark catches up on things and indeed wonders if he is needed anymore. Maybe another city somewhere would be best. After some soul searching, he decides to try Metropolis again.

This Clark wouldn't have gotten his job back so easy at the planet. Jimmy is still his bud of course, and Lois still treats him like crap. It's Not until he, as clark, gets the dirt on Lex and releases it to the public does perry hire him back. Clark had to prove himself again. Clark also discovers that Lex tricked him into leaving..
With Clark having released damaging info on him, the publics trust in Lex is shattered. Lex is livid and sends Metallo to the DP.

We would have gotten an awesome shirtrip, and a shocked and excited Lex at the sight of Superman's return.

It would have had two superfights. Supes loses the first against metallo (in a close one), and wins the second..lots of damage and destruction happen.

Also, no kid. Its not that I hated him, its just that it created a big problem in SR and would have been even more of a problem in a sequel.
Nice one!

STC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 09:53 PM   #113
Squaremaster316
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 310
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Confused Matthew gives his thoughts on the problems with the film.

http://confusedmatthew.com/Superman-Returns.php


Last edited by Squaremaster316; 10-06-2012 at 10:00 PM.
Squaremaster316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 10:27 AM   #114
BH/HHH
Cavill's Hairychest
 
BH/HHH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 14,844
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenKToo View Post
It's really too bad. SR had lots of potential. From the moment we saw Lex with the old lady in the mansion I figured it was in trouble. I literally cringed at that.
That scene, imo, should have been cut instead of the RTK one. what were they thinking....

Anywho, this is what *I* would have preferred to see...

This Lex would have also been responsible for tricking Superman into leaving, and he would have been non-goofy. Dark humor yes, screaming ''WROOOONG!!'' no.
Lex would have stolen the crystals in order to create high tech inventions and weapons, with NO mention of real estate, NONE.
He would have sold his inventions/weapons to the highest bidders, and created Lex-corp from the proceeds. He could have even used the kryptonian tech and changed one of his henchmen/bodyguards into Metallo.

In Supes absence, Lex would have been busy. He would have went on and created cures for cancer, stopped poverty, and used metallo to fight crime (while secretly stealing from the biggest corps in the world, and starting small wars to sell more weapons)
Lex would have cleaned up Metropolis to gain the public's trust ( who he hates ) so he could run for public office. mayor first, then congress.

Lex would have used every public speaking egagement to turn the public against the superman who abandoned them. He works the crowds into a fervor against superman at event after event. Before long, the public would have replaced Superman with Lex as their hero.

Time marches on. It's been 5 years and Lex finds himself bored. He's won. He has everything he has ever wanted. He is rid of Superman, he has power, wealth, women, but somethings missing. He paces the floor muttering. He stops and sips at a drink he's holding. He frowns.
Then it hits him. He actually misses his rival, the sparring, the chase...he shakes his head and stares out his Lex-corp penthouse window.....lightning flashes off in the distance, and for a brief instant, we see the reflection of Lex smile.

As if on cue, this is when superman's ship returns and crashlands in smallville. The next day, after he has recovered, clark catches up on things and indeed wonders if he is needed anymore. Maybe another city somewhere would be best. After some soul searching, he decides to try Metropolis again.

This Clark wouldn't have gotten his job back so easy at the planet. Jimmy is still his bud of course, and Lois still treats him like crap. It's Not until he, as clark, gets the dirt on Lex and releases it to the public that perry hires him back. Clark had to prove himself again. Clark also discovers that Lex tricked him into leaving..
With Clark having released damaging info on him, the publics trust in Lex is shattered. Lex is livid and sends Metallo to the DP.

We would have gotten an awesome shirtrip, and a shocked and excited Lex at the sight of Superman's return.

It would have had two superfights. Supes loses the first against metallo (in a close one), and wins the second..lots of damage and destruction happen.

Also, no kid. Its not that I hated him, its just that it created a big problem in SR and would have been even more of a problem in a sequel.
Lois treating Superman like crap was the worst thing about Superman Returns for me, she never should treat him like crap. In the Donner movies she liked Clark and tried to help him alot (albeit sometimes by insulting him) but the heart was there.

I like the rest of your story though

__________________
MAN OF STEEL


THE GREATEST COMIC BOOK MOVIE OF ALL-TIME
BH/HHH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 06:39 AM   #115
sf2
Side-Kick
 
sf2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squaremaster316 View Post
Confused Matthew gives his thoughts on the problems with the film.

http://confusedmatthew.com/Superman-Returns.php
A Summary pls.

__________________
“Everything you can imagine is real.”
― Pablo Picasso
sf2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 02:34 PM   #116
Squaremaster316
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 310
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by sf2 View Post
A Summary pls.
Basically, he said it was a total mess of a film.

Squaremaster316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 03:23 PM   #117
BH/HHH
Cavill's Hairychest
 
BH/HHH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 14,844
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

But it's not a mess at all, it's just pretty devoid of fun. I'd say a mess is a film that doesn't flow or make sense. The only thing I'd say is a mess is the vague continuity.

__________________
MAN OF STEEL


THE GREATEST COMIC BOOK MOVIE OF ALL-TIME
BH/HHH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 05:48 PM   #118
Squaremaster316
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 310
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by BH/HHH View Post
But it's not a mess at all, it's just pretty devoid of fun. I'd say a mess is a film that doesn't flow or make sense. The only thing I'd say is a mess is the vague continuity.
A reboot/remake that is also a sequel, but not for part 3 or 4?

Sounds like a mess to me.

Squaremaster316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 03:58 AM   #119
Glassjaw
In training
 
Glassjaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Brighton/Somerset, UK
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

By this stage I'm sure there's nothing new which can be added to the subject of SR, but I watched it a few days ago, and damn Superman's board is moving slow as hell (a 6 year film drought will do that) so here's my take on it.

It wasn't a bad film. It wasn't a great film. It falls somewhere in-between, which is why SR isn't remembered as being bad, its actually barely remembered at all by the general audience. As a superhero film featuring the oldest and perhaps best known hero of them all it should have made huge splashes, instead it fell by the wayside.

I watched the dvd extra's and it made me like Routh even more, I think he could have been great - the role just gave him sweet FA to do. Much like people complain about there not being enough Batman/Bruce Wayne in TDKR, SR is what happens when the first Superman film in 20 years comes along, and he barely gets to say anything. Way too much attention is taken off Superman and Clark by prolonged scenes with Lex and his henchmen, or Lois and Richard, or the child. And then when we finally do get to a scene with Clark in, they're short and totally lacking in dialogue. Routh had no time to really own the role on screen. Also the script is clever and neat at times, before switching to scenes which un-do all the good stuff.

And as for the lack of action complaint, Steve argues in 'Whats so bad about SR?' that there is plenty of action, pointing out Supe's using his heat vision to melt the glass, frost breath to put out fires during the Metropolis earth quake bit etc. I would say okay, then there is a lack of exciting action. The plane rescue was great. Each time it gives me goosebumps. But it highlights how dull everything else is he does after that. Putting out fire with frost breath is just not up to scratch after a scene like that. Catching the Daily Planet globe is cool, but only if he then goes on to more visually exciting set pieces. Lifting up another object, albeit a far heavier one, is not up-ing the ante much.

The film has bad elements, but it's not a bad film because it has some really good elements too. In the end it equals out, and becomes a film everyone else has forgotten about, except us bigger Superman fans who can only de-construct what happened and wish things could have been done differently. That is, until MoS. If this new film turns out as great as were hoping it will be (after all, surely mistake have been learnt by now) then we will have to thank SR for part of it, and perhaps the Superman drought of the 00's would have been worth it.

PS. I ****ing hate the plastic S


Last edited by Glassjaw; 10-10-2012 at 04:02 AM.
Glassjaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 04:04 AM   #120
BH/HHH
Cavill's Hairychest
 
BH/HHH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 14,844
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squaremaster316 View Post
A reboot/remake that is also a sequel, but not for part 3 or 4?

Sounds like a mess to me.
Hence the reason I said the vague continuity is a mess but not the film itself. As a film its easy to follow, the hero returns, the world has changed, his old GF has a kid (which he later discovers is his), his arch nemesis is up to his old tricks, he saves the day. Don't see what's a mess about that.

__________________
MAN OF STEEL


THE GREATEST COMIC BOOK MOVIE OF ALL-TIME
BH/HHH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 07:16 AM   #121
sf2
Side-Kick
 
sf2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squaremaster316 View Post
Basically, he said it was a total mess of a film.
Wow. Never thought he would say that. I thought he woyuld at least defend the movie. Maybe like it.s more a romance movie than action hero movie...

__________________
“Everything you can imagine is real.”
― Pablo Picasso
sf2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 09:15 AM   #122
Dr.
Scorpion-Kick
 
Dr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,777
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by BH/HHH View Post
Hence the reason I said the vague continuity is a mess but not the film itself. As a film its easy to follow, the hero returns, the world has changed, his old GF has a kid (which he later discovers is his), his arch nemesis is up to his old tricks, he saves the day. Don't see what's a mess about that.
Indeed. It’s odd to assert that you need to know/research external interviews, commentary or behind-the-scenes materials in order to appreciate how good or “messed up” a movie is - that simply watching it is insufficient and will somehow give you wrong information.

Dr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 04:52 PM   #123
Nevaratoiel
I don't bite... hard.
 
Nevaratoiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Neverland
Posts: 1,039
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

If he thinks the vague continuity is a mess, it's a mess he himself created. Didn't he watch the film before releasing it?

Just a thought that struck me after reading it in this topic... In case people didn't know it yet, I personally loved the film.

__________________
Proud Owner of the Gambit's Royal Flush Fanlisting - 08/12/2013: NOW ALL NEW AND IMPROVED!
Proud Member of Gambit's Royal Flush


Taylor Kitsch.org | Elfae.com
Nevaratoiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 12:51 AM   #124
sf2
Side-Kick
 
sf2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Quote:
Originally Posted by BH/HHH View Post
Hence the reason I said the vague continuity is a mess but not the film itself. As a film its easy to follow, the hero returns, the world has changed, his old GF has a kid (which he later discovers is his), his arch nemesis is up to his old tricks, he saves the day. Don't see what's a mess about that.
I like the story than the movie itself.

Btw.. Dont have a good feeling on mos. Feel like a remake of s1 n s2.

__________________
“Everything you can imagine is real.”
― Pablo Picasso
sf2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 06:58 AM   #125
BH/HHH
Cavill's Hairychest
 
BH/HHH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 14,844
Default Re: Bryan Singer: Why 'Superman Returns' Didn't Work

Have you seen the CC footgae? MOS looks nothing like the first two Superman films. Yes revisiting characters and origin stories will always bring some familiarity but MOS looks noway like a rehash of the first two Donner movies.

__________________
MAN OF STEEL


THE GREATEST COMIC BOOK MOVIE OF ALL-TIME
BH/HHH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.