![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Master Tim
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,884
|
![]() Quote:
Yes. They weren't religious fanatics. But they do have solid motivation that is established in Batman Begins. They see themselves as the stewards of society. They serve as the check that balances it. "The League of Shadows has been a check against human corruption for thousands of years." -Ra's al Ghul The League of Shadows' motivation was to seek out and destroy corruption in its various forms. They view the contemporary and accepted justice/legal system to be fundamentally flawed and broken and feel that it is their job to fix it. And to them, fixing it means destroying and bringing down those systems entirely. When Ra's died, Talia and Bane took up this belief. Talia seems to have modified it a bit. She seems to be more of an ecological terrorist than her father (which he is in the comics) and that she wants to destroy Gotham because of the affect Gotham has on the world. Bane seems to be more in line with Ra's al Ghul's beliefs than he is the environment like Talia is. But I'd say their motivations we anything but non-existant or poorly executed. -R |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,494
|
![]() Quote:
The LOS under Talia & Bane was (like Al-Qaeda) attacking America for being America: Corrupt, excessive, bloated, petty, ignorant, arrogant & above all - completely unaccountable for anything. Nolan did a great job fleshing out the parallels between this new LOS faction & Al-Qaeda. The whole "hang them where the world can see" bit pretty much confirms it. That and the fact that Bane was picked up by the CIA in Kazakhstan & The Lazarus Pit was in Syria. Last edited by Alexei Belyakov; 10-24-2012 at 11:18 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | ||
Lobsterized
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,471
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Also...honestly, the way Bane talked about fulfilling Ra's al Ghul's destiny had this quasi-religious resonance to it, as if Ra's was some kind of higher being that they all believed in and that his destiny had to be fulfilled. Especially when you consider that Ra's al Ghul is Arabic for The Demon's Head. Alfred mentions Bane having the "power of belief". I think the idea is there. The opening scene of the movie shows us that these people are willing to die for their cause at a moment's notice and have a deep conviction about what they're doing. I think having the League of Shadows in these films is a good way to incorporate the idea of radical extremists and terrorism, fears relevant to our times, without getting too topical and specific about it that it stops being "Batman". And they stayed true to the general purpose behind the League of Assassins in the comics. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,494
|
![]() Quote:
Frankly, I didn't know Nolan was going to get as geopolitical as he did with TDKR. I went in expecting the real world, just not THE real world. My only clue was the document released prior to the film that explained The Dent Act. Immediately I knew The Patriot Act's disguised presence in the film would somehow allude to modern terrorism. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Lobsterized
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,471
|
![]()
The important thing to consider is that TDKR is not meant to be a film that depicts ideas like terrorism, class uprising, police surveillance, nuclear energy etc. in any sort of realistic way, and it's not a film that is meant to educate on those issues. It's crafting a larger than life canvas for our concerns, interests, fears and hopes to play out in a way that enthralls us. I think that's been a huge aspect of all three movies and why they were so successful.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: LOST Island
Posts: 15,490
|
![]() Quote:
If you say so pal. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: LOST Island
Posts: 15,490
|
![]() Quote:
My Nolan film rankings: The Dark Knight Inception The Dark Knight Rises Memento The Prestige Batman Begins Following Insomnia I think pretty much everyone's lists would differ tremendously, with the only universal being no one would have Insomnia at the top. And I like that movie quite a bit too. ^^^^ This is my ranking of Nolan films as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: LOST Island
Posts: 15,490
|
![]() Quote:
![]() As with each and every debate, nitpick, analysis, and over analysis of TDKR and with each Nolan film.....Nolans legend continues to grows. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: LOST Island
Posts: 15,490
|
![]() Quote:
Exactly. Alexi, I agree with a lot of your posts. I think Nolan deserves a Best Director nod and the TDKR deserves a Best Picture nod. I'm just not expecting it, because we know the Academy's weird history when it comes to Nolan and snubbing him for TDK and snubbing him for a Best Director nod with Inception. They have a bias towards him that is evident. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,494
|
![]() Quote:
I think this year he could easily get the Best Director Nomination and share the ballot with Paul Thomas Anderson, Ang Lee, Tom Hooper & Ben Affleck. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
away for a while
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 31,232
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
away for a while
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 31,232
|
![]()
That ain't happening. Nolan's time will come but it will not be for Rises. Bet every dollar you have on it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,494
|
![]() Quote:
The LOS in TDKR is Al-Qaeda. Again, its impossible to understand people who strap bombs to their chests and blow themselves up along with innocent people. That's what Bane & Talia were trying to do. To say their motivations were poor & badly written is to say Bin Laden's motivations to destroy The World Trade Center were poor & ill conceived. These people cannot be understood. They are insane. Remember, Bane was excommunicated by Ra's Al Ghul. A terrorist too extreme for Ra's says it all. Last edited by Alexei Belyakov; 10-25-2012 at 03:42 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
away for a while
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 31,232
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,494
|
![]() Quote:
Bane arrives in Gotham claiming he IS the League of Shadows. Alfred is concerned that might be true. But after Talia reveals herself we learn that Ra's heir wasn't Bane after all. Talia & Bane are terrorists. Their motivations like the Jihad are deluded. Its not about restoring peace through destruction. Its about making Ra's chosen son watch his people burn, helpless. Again, this is an insane agenda. To kill millions in the name of revenge & jealousy. The LOS in TDKR isn't really the LOS. Its the bastard child of Ra's ideals (much like Bane). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#41 | |
away for a while
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 31,232
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by jmc; 10-25-2012 at 06:54 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |||
SHHFFL 2014 Champion
SHH! Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In the neighborhood!
Posts: 45,659
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I am allowed to have/state my opinion. If you don't like it, ignore me.
__________________
Rating MCU films: Iron Man - 4/5, The Incredible Hulk - 4/5, Iron Man 2 - 3/5, Thor - 4/5, Captain America: The First Avenger - 5/5, The Avengers - 5/5, Iron Man 3 - 3.5/5, Thor: The Dark World - 3.5/5, Captain America: The Winter Soldier - 5/5, Guardians of the Galaxy - 4.5/5, Avengers: Age of Ultron - 4.5/5, Ant-Man - 4/5, Captain America: Civil War - 5/5, Dr. Strange - 4/5, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 - 5/5, Spider-Man: Homecoming - 5/5, Thor: Ragnarok - 5/5, Black Panther - 5/5 Spider-Man 3 is a good movie. Yes. I said it RIP Vartha :csad: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Lobsterized
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,471
|
![]() Quote:
Look, it's fine if you or anyone don't like this motivation or you didn't want the LOS to return. I just don't agree with this notion that it's impossible to understand and makes no sense. It makes plenty of sense if you think about what the LOS truly stands for. What makes no sense is expecting a radical terrorist organization to back down when the western world is able to suppress their problems in their own way. Terrorists are not that cuddly and reasonable. Locking up criminals does not eliminate the greed so deeply rooted in that society that leads to their existence (hence the film focusing more on white collar side villains and class tension). They had Gotham selected because it was "the world's greatest city". It's a very global ideal they have. Just because Gotham locked up its mobsters doesn't mean the world was any more balanced. The LOS, both in the films and in the comics essentially want to reboot society. Everything they did in TDKR reflected this ideal. It's never monologued away in the film, but it's very much present. I like the way Alexei said it though, they're attacking America for being America. Last edited by BatLobsterRises; 10-25-2012 at 10:15 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
The Clown Prince of Crime
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 48,917
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Sometimes I remember it one way. Sometimes another. If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!" - The Joker |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,671
|
![]()
The plot overall was just flimsy in how it strung together all it's elements.
I think I'd compare a lot of the movie to the BB Mr. Earle subplot. If you think about Mr. Earle, other than providing some Bruce Wayne tension, his character makes no sense. Why is he bad? Because he makes weapons? So do Lucius and Wayne apparently. Because he wants to make money and wants to protect his job when Bruce returns? Why is that bad? Bruce is the one doing all the insider trading anyways. It's also not established that he warrants any of the blame for the weapon being stolen. In TDKR you have about five or six plotlines just that pointless. Talia for example. Had this been a three movie character, she might have worked. Instead she was just in there to force a twist a la Batman Begins. Which made no sense. By movie three you'd already established the League of Shadows, and that Ra's Al Ghul could potentially have children. The twist was unnecessary, and quite frankly smacked of being completely baffling -- even with my foreknowledge of the character, I struggled to figure out why Bane simply wasn't the man in charge. He was the "extreme" one anyways. Talia was "carrying on her father's legacy". Bullsh**. She was carrying on Bane's legacy, which muddles Bane being just a lackey, as opposed to an equal partner. Had they removed the twist, they may have been able to flesh that out a little more prior to the climax. Instead it crammed into the last five meaningful minutes, and comes off as confused. I think actually what is my least favorite aspect of the movie in hindsight is how much I remember of Blake, Catwoman, Bane, Talia and Bruce, and how very little I remember of actual Batman (who gets about 15 minutes of screentime). That just speaks to the volume of irrelevant characters and plotlines they crammed in this thing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Lobsterized
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,471
|
![]() Quote:
I mean who didn't love that "Didn't you get the memo?" callback? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Fountainhead of culture.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Peter North's Southern Headquarters
Posts: 57,638
|
![]()
I'm glad Marv showed Mr. Earl who was boss.
__________________
It's like a non-consecutive 24-hour dance party.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Side-Kick
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 390
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Fountainhead of culture.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Peter North's Southern Headquarters
Posts: 57,638
|
![]()
I will say this;
I view movies a little differently than most. Most of the time, I really don't give a **** about plotholes or illogicalities in the overall plot or story. Movies are, to me, firstly emotional experiences, and secondly philosophical experiences; if it ultimately resonates emotionally and philosophically for me, it really doesn't matter if there were some bumps in the road getting there. But, generally, if I have a complaint about a movie I believe to be really good, I can usually narrow it down to a singular overarching aspect that diminishes its quality, and I think I've finally narrowed that down for TDKR... It really should've been three separate movies. There was much that was happening and going on in it, that it truly needed about 6-8 hours of screen time to totally effectively tell the story it wanted to tell. Watching TDKR, it plays out like LOTR movies would have if someone attempted to cram them all into a single 3 hour film; or when you see a film adaptation of a great book where corners have to be cut to fit such a massive tale into a single film. I still like the movie as much as I ever did, of course, but without a doubt in my mind, had they separated the three acts into their own separate films, you would've ended up with an even better final product.
__________________
It's like a non-consecutive 24-hour dance party.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,494
|
![]()
And we're back to people disliking TDKR for not fitting their own vision instead of Nolan's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|