![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 3,368
|
We're getting closer and closer to phase 2 so I'm wondering what everyone's predictions are for the movies' budgets and BO grosses are as a whole. Here's mine:
-IM3 Budget: 200M Gross: 900M - 400M/500M OS -Thor 2 Budget: 175M Gross: 600M - 200M/400M OS -Cap 2 Budget: 150M Gross: 400M - 200M/200M OS -GotG Budget: 175M Gross: 500M - 200M/300M OS -A2 Budget: 250M Gross: 1.6B - 700M/900M OS -AM Budget: 140M Gross: *350M - 150M/200M OS -Total Budget: 1.09B Gross: 4.4B Last edited by Mr. Dent; 10-24-2012 at 02:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,205
|
Iron Man 3
Budget: $200 M Domestic: $350 M Foreign: $450 M Worldwide: $800 M Thor: The Dark World Budget: $200 m Domestic: $240 M Foreign: $400 M Total: $640 M Captain America: The Winter Soldier Budget: $175 M Domestic: $225 M Foreign: $285 M Total: $510 M Guardians of the Galaxy Budget: $175 M Domestic: $175 M Foreign: $300 M Worldwide: $475 M Avengers 2 Budget: $300 M Domestic: $500 M Foreign: $1.25 Billion Worldwide: $1.75 Billion Ant-Man Budget: $125 M Domestic: $110 M/ $150 M (If Pym is in A2) Foreign: $150 M / $250 M (If Pym is in A2) Worldwide: $260 M/ $400 M (If Pym is in A2)
__________________
Marvel Slate: 2013: Iron Man 3, The Wolverine, Thor: The Dark World 2014: Captain America: The Winter Soldier, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, X-Men: Days of Future Past, Guardians of the Galaxy, Big Hero 6 2015: Fantastic 4 Reborn, Avengers 2, Ant-Man Your move, DC... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,341
|
Obviously it's early so these aren't much more than guesses...
Iron Man 3 Budget: 225M/Domestic Gross: 350M/Overseas Gross: 550M/Total Gross: 900M Thor: The Dark World Budget: 200M/Domestic Gross: 220M/Overseas Gross: 450M/Total Gross: 670M Captain America: The Winter Soldier Budget: 175M/Domestic Gross: 200M/Overseas Gross: 300M/Total Gross: 500M Guardians of the Galaxy Budget: 175M/Domestic Gross: 160M/Overseas Gross: 250M/Total Gross: 410M Avengers 2 Budget: 300M/Domestic Gross: 550M/Overseas Gross: 1.1B/Total Gross: 1.65B Ant-Man Budget: 100M/Domestic Gross: 110M/Overseas Gross: 150M/Total Gross: 260M |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hunter of weaklings
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,762
|
Iron Man 3
Budget: $215 M Domestic: $395 M Foreign: $470 M Worldwide: $865 M Thor: The Dark World Budget: $200 m Domestic: $285 M Foreign: $450 M Total: $735 M Captain America: The Winter Soldier Budget: $185 M Domestic: $255 M Foreign: $375 M Total: $650 M Guardians of the Galaxy Budget: $180 M Domestic: $195 M Foreign: $285 M Worldwide: $370 M Avengers 2 Budget: $265 M Domestic: $590 M Foreign: $1 Billion Worldwide: $1.59 Billion Ant-Man Budget: $130 M Domestic: $158 M Foreign: $130 M Worldwide: $288 M
__________________
Natasha Romanoff - "Are you boys really that naive? S.H.I.E.L.D. monitors potential threats." Bruce Banner - "Captain America is on threat watch?" Natasha Romanoff - "We all are." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,205
|
Quote:
Occasionally, message board geeks do, too.
__________________
Marvel Slate: 2013: Iron Man 3, The Wolverine, Thor: The Dark World 2014: Captain America: The Winter Soldier, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, X-Men: Days of Future Past, Guardians of the Galaxy, Big Hero 6 2015: Fantastic 4 Reborn, Avengers 2, Ant-Man Your move, DC... Last edited by KangConquers; 10-24-2012 at 05:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,747
|
I don't see how you do GotG properly with 175 million. Outer space/alien settings, two major cgi characters, special effects up the ***. If they actually want to pull off Rocket - ie hes not just an animated sidekick/mascot - its gonna take top notch voice work and a Hulk-sized financial commitment. In fact, I would argue that its gonna be trickier to pull off Rocket than the Hulk. and he could end up having even more screen time than the Hulk did in TA.
The budget for casting will probably be significantly less than TA or IM, so they'll probably save 30 million right there. Im gonna go with 200 million (the official budget) for GotG. IM3 200 million Thor:TDW 180 million Cap:TWS 180 million GotG 200 million Avengers 2 275 million Ant-Man 125 million I agree that 200 million seems like a lot for a completely unproven property, but thats part of what makes GotG a ballsy choice by Marvel. I think they really need to go all in and treat it like a tent-pole project. And of course they have to keep the focus on the characters, which will require talent and money. Otherwise, it could be another JC. Last edited by Joeyjojo72; 10-24-2012 at 06:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 3,368
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,747
|
I dont believe for a second that MoS budget is actually 175. But I guess we're going by official numbers. I just think that the non-human characters will require some next level **** fx-wise. But since they wont have RDJ or even ScarJo level salaries to pay, maybe its doable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,341
|
I doubt it did. And Star Trek definitely did not cost 150M, lol. I just used the budgets that I think they'd be willing to report, we never get actual budgets for movies
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hunter of weaklings
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,762
|
Do you guys think Marvel might be able to get Weta for GotG? Them or ILM are the only fx companies I'll be able to accept for a film like that. We don't want another Green Lantern or even Incredible Hulk (Even though I liked it) in terms of special effects/cgi
__________________
Natasha Romanoff - "Are you boys really that naive? S.H.I.E.L.D. monitors potential threats." Bruce Banner - "Captain America is on threat watch?" Natasha Romanoff - "We all are." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Avenger
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Asgard
Posts: 523
|
Quote:
__________________
News Editor at the best fanboy site on the web, www.unleashthefanboy.com I still believe in heroes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,747
|
Given Marvel's large slate, they'll need to use WETA, ILM and various other effects firms to keep up with the work. WETA in particular should really benefit from Marvel's plans. Im hoping they have their best people working on Rocket Raccoon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,976
|
Quote:
__________________
Iron Man Captain America Thor Black Widow Hulk Hawkeye ____________________________________ Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase Two ________________________________Gamora Star-Lord Groot
Drax the Destroyer Rocket Raccoon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 3,368
|
I think his budget for Ant-Man is too low, and Avengers is wayy high lol. I've never seen a film have budget up to 300M if we're talking about reported budgets and we're talking about Marvel here.
Last edited by Mr. Dent; 10-27-2012 at 02:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
===---- ゴジラ 2014 ----===
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,177
|
Quote:
Also, I think the budgets for Avengers 2 come down by a good 50M.
__________________
Phase 1 >>> IM - TIH - IM2 - Thor - CA: TFA - The Avengers Phase 2 >>> Iron Man 3 - Thor: TDW - Captain America: TWS - Guardians of the Galaxy - The Avengers 2 - S.H.I.E.L.D. Phase 3 >>> Ant-Man - Doctor Strange ゴジラ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
marvelpalooza roady
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,067
|
I have a hard time seeing Cap making 600M at this point, 450 -500M is much more reasonable. Let's see a trailer at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,205
|
Quote:
But yes, I imagine Marvel will only admit to a quarter billion budget. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hunter of weaklings
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,762
|
Joss Whedon will have his hands all over this one, plus Cap is the character that really benefits the most from The Avengers. I can definitely see it making about $200M domestically and $400M internationally. Plus, along with GotG, this one will be the one that leads right into Avengers 2 the next year. I see $480M as the floor with this one.
__________________
Natasha Romanoff - "Are you boys really that naive? S.H.I.E.L.D. monitors potential threats." Bruce Banner - "Captain America is on threat watch?" Natasha Romanoff - "We all are." |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
marvelpalooza roady
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,067
|
I hope your right. That would be a 230M increase.
I won't even try and guess with GoTG. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 3,368
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,205
|
Quote:
Iron Man is tougher to gauge. Some people think he will perform like Batman post Avengers. I think as a solo character, he's hit his ceiling in domestic markets. I'm basically predicting Iron Man 2 numbers with a 3-D boost. Generally, it's harder for a character that's already successful and already highly visible to have a giant increase than it is one who performed at sort of mid-tent pole level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Hunter of weaklings
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,762
|
Quote:
Your logic is reversed, in essence the more successful the character's solo movie was, the less of a boost their sequel will get from The Avengers. More people BECAME fans of Captain America IN The Avengers than any of the other heroes because more people were already fans of those other characters beforehand from their solo movies. So basically, Captain America benefited the most from Avengers, then Thor, then Iron Man. If Hulk were getting a sequel then he'd definitely be the one who benefited the most. I hope that explained what I meant.
__________________
Natasha Romanoff - "Are you boys really that naive? S.H.I.E.L.D. monitors potential threats." Bruce Banner - "Captain America is on threat watch?" Natasha Romanoff - "We all are." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,205
|
Quote:
Co-sign....Iron Man may have reached his saturation point as a solo franchise already. Cap and Thor have plenty of room for growth. This might be personal bias, but I think Captain America has the most room to grow based not only on having a lower solo performance, but also based on pre-film popularity. Up until the Marvel Cinematic Universe started in 2008, Cap was substantially more famous than Iron Man and Thor. There's something about Captain America that appealed to people for generations, and I think once they find the right combination to unlock that popularity on film, Cap will be a domestic box office juggernaut. Last edited by KangConquers; 10-27-2012 at 10:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,341
|
Domestically, sure. Overseas it's going to explode next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,205
|
I agree with that. I see it doing 450-600 M foreign. Domestic? I think 400 is going to be tough for it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|