Batman-"the most realistic" superhero?

[Chris Wallace]

I think that's happening on a lot of threads, actually.

[November Rain]

even so, most people would be hard pushed to say he is the 'most realistic' out there.

i guess i was trying to say he wasn't realistic at all. even though his feats are achievable on their own, the accumulation of all of them together is rare

so is the ability to remain inconspicious

so is his abilty to driven into a lifestyle based on teh events that happened to him as a child, without requiring any sort of councelling etc to verge him off path.


and while the punisher is more likely a real vigilante, i've yet to hear about many revenge hit cops going after large scale mafia or organised crime bosses. I thought the majority of the hits done on them were done by other gang leaders.

but i am naiive to that side of things so i can't vouch for it.

but again, a superman (pariah to a civilization becoming an champion for his host nation) and a xavier (a leader of a certain persecuted culture rising up to defend it in the media) are my best candidates for heroes.

[Tatsumarushinob]

Physical qualities such as endurance, strength, power and above average ability in martial arts: Possible

Emotional qualities such as a sober assessment of situation through objective examination and a cool, clear head while under pressure, be it through combat or survival situation: Possible

Monetary qualities of a millionaire or billionaire nature through inheritance of a fortune cover weapons, armor, and medical expenses: Possible

Witnessing the the death of your parents at a very young age and essentially being left alone and scarring you for life: Possible

ALL OF THESE QUALITIES CONCURRING, PLUS THE DRIVE TO CHANNEL THE PSYCHOLOGICAL SCAR THROUGH A LIFE OF FIGHTING CRIME, EVIL OR WHATEVER YOU DECIDE TO CALL IT: Batman= Fiction= Damned near impossible

[November Rain]

tenchu fan?

[Tatsumarushinob]

Originally Posted by November Rain

tenchu fan?

Who you asking ?

[GothamAlleys]

Originally Posted by Chris Wallace

Says WHO?.

1. Early Script which explained who ordered the hit (Rupert Thorne who eventually became Carl Grissom)
2. Napier was a mobster from early days
3. Take a look at the assasins. They were waiting for them in the alley. They knew where they were. Both had leather gloves. Both had shiny expensive shoes and even expensive suits, coats and ties (!), not to mention the neat and sleek hairdo. Hugo Blick who played young Napier said his suit was so expensive they didnt even let him keep it. People like that dont hang out in the alleys, and certainly dont need some street robbery or wallet money. And remember they were following them
4. Napier was just standing there with his gun ready in his pocket. They never asked for wallet or money, never pulled a gun on them. Never took it. Napier never even uttered a word, he just shot the two while standing away in the shadow

[November Rain]

Originally Posted by Tatsumarushinob

Who you asking ?

it's just a simple yay or nay question

[CJ]

Not really. I'd say The Punisher or Kick-Ass are the most realistic superheroes.

[Chris Wallace]

Originally Posted by GothamAlleys

1. Early Script which explained who ordered the hit (Rupert Thorne who eventually became Carl Grissom)
2. Napier was a mobster from early days
3. Take a look at the assasins. They were waiting for them in the alley. They knew where they were. Both had leather gloves. Both had shiny expensive shoes and even expensive suits, coats and ties (!), not to mention the neat and sleek hairdo. Hugo Blick who played young Napier said his suit was so expensive they didnt even let him keep it. People like that dont hang out in the alleys, and certainly dont need some street robbery or wallet money. And remember they were following them
4. Napier was just standing there with his gun ready in his pocket. They never asked for wallet or money, never pulled a gun on them. Never took it. Napier never even uttered a word, he just shot the two while standing away in the shadow

Bob grabbed the pearls, was shocked when Jack fired, and then bailed, encouraging Jack to do the same. All your points are truly speculative as NONE of this was confirmed in the actual context of the film.

[GothamAlleys]

I got the impression that Bob was just scared cause he was in the line of fire and didnt expect Jack to shoot when he was right next to them (btw Uslan hinted its not Bob but Chill). And again, those guys were gangsters with expensive suits and leather gloves, that and the fact that the early script flat out said its a hit is more than enough for me. Not to mention Chill was a killer for hire in both pre and post Crisis universes

[PB210]

Max Allan Collins, when he wrote Wild Dog, stated that he followed in the tradition of masked or costumed adventurers such as Zorro, the Shadow, the Green Hornet and the Lone Ranger. If you listen to the Green Hornet radio show, he mostly tackled mundane crimes. In the pulps the Shadow could not cloud men's minds. (The Spider never had metahuman powers, but his adventures stood as rather peculiar.) Of course, Collins carefully distinguishes between the concepts of costumed or masked hero and metahuman hero.

[Nave 'Torment']

Every hero who ever lived -- from the time of Heracles and Achilles down to Superman -- are heroes because they've achieved something superhuman and have gone beyond the call of duty and the ordinary to accomplish their feats. But each of them has to have something that makes them relatable to those who are listening to their story. I personally believe all hero-myths speak of human mortality, and so their humanity, whether in jeopardy or not, always has a strong role in it. This is something that comic-book writers often forget in their never-ending zeal to indulge in fantasy, It's not a crime since that's also what happened to the early myth-makers -- but I think that with such heroes what you essentially have is a pure speculation about the human condition -- what happens when someone is exposed to such extreme circumstances, or what happens to our humanity when faced with such extremities? Our heroes answer that and they give us hope.

But just as Heracles died of a poison, Achilles had his weak heel, and Superman has Kryptonite, these heroes are equipped with vulnerabilities to show that at the end of the day they are just as vulnerable as us -- they are just as human. I wrote an extended answer in the article on my sig but the gist is this: Batman is the most realistic because among all the superheroes his "weakness" is reflected in the very clearly articulated fact that he's a human being.

On that note, yes he comes from a long tradition of pulp figures like Zorro, the Shadow, and the Phantom, but those are aspects that make him superhuman. His humanity also lies in the fact that he's a detective and he uses his intellect and rationality to solve these absurd villains and mysteries. His realism comes from his detective background.

Now does that mean he's a character of the realist literary genre? Not necessarily, and with 70+ years of history you can't just say he's from one genre with so many stories being told for him. But he does come from a relatively more realistic starting point than say Superman or Wonder Woman. The answer is yes -- Batman, in my book, is the most realistic superhero, and with the recent film trilogy this is made even more explicit. But that doesn't mean he doesn't have his share of urban legends and surreal aspects. The answer is that compared to others, his role has always been to solve the surreal. When compared to others he's much more realistic than we give him credit for. Fundamentally so since with Batman (just look at that name!) you have an immediate juxtaposition between the real and the surreal -- the human and the mythical. And THAT is what makes a true hero-myth last.

The same can be said for Punisher and Kick-ass, but they lack that brilliant juxtaposition. They don't have the surreal that compliments the real in their stories or starting points. They are purely fantasies of ultra-violence designed to speak about vigilantism that a character like Batman has already answered. I see the Punisher as a Batman copy-cat, no offense, but it's the same imaginative strand that created Bruce Wayne but only amped up to 60 for the sake of gore and blood. That existentialist argument about Frank Castle's mission is a case that can be made for any other character ever created. While Batman did start off from the Shadow and Phantom and the rest, at least he served to correct things there -- characters like the Punisher and Kick Ass go a step backward and embraces the violence that they were meant to oppose.

In the end, Batman really lasts in our imagination because he comes so fully-formed as a new face of heroism. In the superhero tradition he starts the animal-motif while still being realistic. It's something that we ought to give him credit for.

[Shikamaru]

I agree with the OP. Batman is by no means realistic. He is definitely more grounded in reality than other superheroes but that doesn't exactly make him realistic.

The argument people use to defend Batman happening in real life is absurd. They will say stuff like "Anyone can be Batman if they're rich and do a bit of training around the world!" Not only is that statement false but it shows that these people don't understand what Batman is and what he is capable of.

You know how people say that no one is perfect? That we all have something we are good at and something we are bad at? That doesn't apply to Batman. He can do everything. Both physically and mentally. Physically, he has the perfect body. If he was in the Olympics, he would win a gold metal in pretty much every single field. A person simply cannot train his/her body to complete perfection. Swimmers train their bodies their whole life so that they could have the perfect body for swimming. Runners train their bodies their whole life so that they could have the perfect body for running. Batman has the perfect body in each field period. No person will ever be able to achieve that and if there is someone who will, it will take them their entire life to do that while Bruce finished his training and was ready to be Batman at the age of 25 in the comics.

That is excluding all the martial arts and mental training Bruce had to go through. Batman knows 127 martial arts styles and has incredible detective, strategic, tactical, and scientific skills. These 3 things (perfect physical body, perfect and all martial arts, perfect mental training) each, IF possible to achieve in the real world by a person (which they're not), would take that person their entire lifetime to achieve that. Bruce achieved something that would take a person at least 3 whole lifetimes to achieve before the age of 40. Even the more realistic versions of Batman - the Frank Miller Year One Batman, Long Halloween Batman, and Chris Nolan Batman - despite being more grounded in reality are still not versions of Batman that can technically happen in the real world.

Everything I said so far excludes the first point the OP made, which is the technology behind Batman, which is not available in the real world at the moment.

The reason why many people believe Batman can happen in real life, even though he can't, is due to the psychology behind Batman. Bruce is so determined and motivated to reach physical and mental perfection that we, as the readers/viewers (depending on the medium), buy it that a man can become something as larger-than-life such as Batman. However, that is simply not the case. If you think about it, Batman is almost in the same league as Captain America in terms of physical abilities. It's just that Marvel is a more realistic universe than DC is and due to that, they couldn't have a man like Steve Rogers reach physical perfection with just physical training so they brought in science fiction and had him injected with the Super Soldier serum but since DC's universe is less grounded in reality so they didn't have to do that with Batman. But if Batman originally was created by Marvel and Cap was originally created by DC, Cap would've probably been the one that went through a hell of a training to reach the level he is at and Batman would've probably been the one injected with a serum that would make him reach the level he is at.

As for for how relatable he is, Batman is one of the least relatable characters in the DC universe. Guys like Superman and Flash may have incredible powers but at the end of the day, they are Clark Kent and Barry Allen, two ordinary citizens living in Metropolis and Central City respectively that struggle with women, taxes, jobs, etc. while Bruce Wayne is a rich man unstable (to a degree) and completely obsessed with eradicating crime completely and is not afraid to push people away or to give his life away in order to achieve that.

[Chris Wallace]

Well said. ANd we still can't overlook the technology. When we see him flying a remote control Batmobile out of the city ro avert nuclear disaster, that's a stretch.

[Anno_Domini]

Batman is hard to call the most realistic, or at least one of the more realistic, simply because of the universe he's in where there's a couple of aliens, a king who lives in the ocean, a space corps that protects planets, etc.

[Anno_Domini]

Originally Posted by MessiahDecoy123

Punisher is the most realistic superhero.

It would be rather easy for an ex-special ops dude with guns to start a covert mission of killing criminals. Depending on how smart he was his killing spree could last anything from a couple of days to a few months.

[Nave 'Torment']

Originally Posted by Shikamaru

I agree with the OP. Batman is by no means realistic. He is definitely more grounded in reality than other superheroes but that doesn't exactly make him realistic.

I have to disagree but I think it has to do with your definition of realistic. When it comes to art it's not simply saying what is believable or natural...

And I think that with Chris Nolan, a director who explores different facets of reality and for who the definition of fantasy is such that it's realistic (he argues that to us our fantasies are always "real" in some capacity, with Batman that definition is carried out), that precarious balance between the real and surreal is carried out rather well. It's kind of like that opera that Bruce attends in Batman Begins the night his folks died. It's like that show that the young Bruce Wayne went to the night his parents died, the reality we see in the films is an extension of that -- despite the claim by fans that this is all steeped in realism, it isn't -- sure there's a lot of realistic interpretation to the characters but it only serves to make it JUST believable and be JUST beyond what's capture on screen. Nolan mentioned the term hyper-reality during Inception one too many times and it's a fitting word for his take on Gotham: unlike realism which is essentially taking a photograph and capturing every detail as it is, hyper-realism in art is about using those details and giving us a glimpse of something that's essentially IMPOSSIBLE in reality, like a football field being demolished, a man dressed as a bat fighting crime, and an American city stripped of its civil rights and place in the nation. It's that "additional" element that pervades in all of Nolan's films and essentially makes them original: science in Prestige, an "exotic" condition in Memento, the Alaskan day in Insomnia -- things that are just out of the ordinary but still strange enough to stir up speculation. In other words: Modern Myths.

The argument people use to defend Batman happening in real life is absurd. They will say stuff like "Anyone can be Batman if they're rich and do a bit of training around the world!" Not only is that statement false but it shows that these people don't understand what Batman is and what he is capable of.

It's like what I wrote in my post -- with Batman you have a character who is constantly confronted with the Absurd and attempts to rationalise it. First off, what I disagree with in this post is that there has to be a single definition of who Batman is and what he's capable of. I don't think anyone is going too far with their argument if they say "oh sure he can pull this off -- he's got the money" they're being superficial.

You know how people say that no one is perfect? That we all have something we are good at and something we are bad at? That doesn't apply to Batman. He can do everything. Both physically and mentally. Physically, he has the perfect body. If he was in the Olympics, he would win a gold metal in pretty much every single field. A person simply cannot train his/her body to complete perfection. Swimmers train their bodies their whole life so that they could have the perfect body for swimming.

Except he can't. That's been a constant theme throughout his portrayals in everything -- that weakness, that limitation of what he can and cannot do. It's been a major theme behind Miller's Dark Knight Returns, Moore's The Killing Joke, and of course arcs such as Knightfall, NML, etc. Only in JUSTICE LEAGUE do you see him pulling that all-out "Batman > everyone else" bit just because writers are probably too fond of the guy (because they probably related to him more growing up - but more on that in a bit).

Runners train their bodies their whole life so that they could have the perfect body for running. Batman has the perfect body in each field period. No person will ever be able to achieve that and if there is someone who will, it will take them their entire life to do that while Bruce finished his training and was ready to be Batman at the age of 25 in the comics.

That is excluding all the martial arts and mental training Bruce had to go through. Batman knows 127 martial arts styles and has incredible detective, strategic, tactical, and scientific skills. These 3 things (perfect physical body, perfect and all martial arts, perfect mental training) each, IF possible to achieve in the real world by a person (which they're not), would take that person their entire lifetime to achieve that. Bruce achieved something that would take a person at least 3 whole lifetimes to achieve before the age of 40. Even the more realistic versions of Batman - the Frank Miller Year One Batman, Long Halloween Batman, and Chris Nolan Batman - despite being more grounded in reality are still not versions of Batman that can technically happen in the real world.

It's true that the feat is impressive but it isn't so impossible as an agent of the Greek goddesses with a magic lasso, or a space cop who's charting the universe -- it's still just possible to imagine someone excelling in physical and mental human feats in each field if they're driven enough. Polymaths aren't uncommon, and the Renaissance Man, which Bruce and every other superhero heavily draws from thanks to Doc Savage, was in fact someone who existed.

If it goes back to his wealth it's simply that he's had the luxury to devote his time to the development of his skills instead of looking after an income for his survival. This is a guy who doesn't have a family, is extremely devoted to his cause to the point of psychosis, and has the means and the motive to do what he wants to. So based on those, since we're talking about feats that's possible by ordinary humans, the fact that this polymath is doing something extraordinary is because he's also led an out-of-the-ordinary life: any hopes for normalcy died with his parents.

The Bruce Wayne story, if it asks anything, asks the readers to have more faith in human will and human potential. technically it can happen, but it's not necessary that it does for it to be "realistic."

Everything I said so far excludes the first point the OP made, which is the technology behind Batman, which is not available in the real world at the moment.

And yet most of the science fiction stuff that we see is possible to imagine in the real-world; unlike Iron Tech Armour, you can imagine the tumbler to exist.

The reason why many people believe Batman can happen in real life, even though he can't, is due to the psychology behind Batman. Bruce is so determined and motivated to reach physical and mental perfection that we, as the readers/viewers (depending on the medium), buy it that a man can become something as larger-than-life such as Batman. However, that is simply not the case. If you think about it, Batman is almost in the same league as Captain America in terms of physical abilities. It's just that Marvel is a more realistic universe than DC is and due to that, they couldn't have a man like Steve Rogers reach physical perfection with just physical training so they brought in science fiction and had him injected with the Super Soldier serum but since DC's universe is less grounded in reality so they didn't have to do that with Batman.

But you're moving the argument away from that psychological reality and using a physical-example for it. The larger-than-life "symbol" of Batman is another aspect to the story, it's the part that elevates ordinary individuals to extraordinary status or reputation -- an urban legend of sorts, which at least with Batman is still anchored by some form of rational answer instead of being purely fantastical: Mr. Freeze has an ice-gun, but he's freezing his wife through "cryogenics;" the Joker has chalk-white skin and a ghostly-smile but it's due to "a chemical-accident;" the Penguin is this deformed enemy but he's "born that way." They struggled to ground this in the realm of make-belief, where it's just believable.

As for Captain America -- well again, how is an unspecified super-serum more believable than someone who uses cutting-edge tech and a life-time of physical training to appear superhuman? It's still the same thing. The Marvel Universe is not more realistic, it's simply more science fictional, and today people are still more trusting towards science so you're saying they're more "realistic." Like Radiation being used as a sort of magic power-giver; you can argue that it isn't being realistic but the point is it's been used for versimilitude, which brings me to--

As for for how relatable he is, Batman is one of the least relatable characters in the DC universe. Guys like Superman and Flash may have incredible powers but at the end of the day, they are Clark Kent and Barry Allen, two ordinary citizens living in Metropolis and Central City respectively that struggle with women, taxes, jobs, etc. while Bruce Wayne is a rich man unstable (to a degree) and completely obsessed with eradicating crime completely and is not afraid to push people away or to give his life away in order to achieve that.

Again, it depends on your definition of what is relatable and not. For one thing, the reason Bruce is more relatable is because the stories written about him has characterised him more; essentially speaking he's just as relatable as those other guys you mention. The difference is that 1) Bruce isn't superpowered so his struggles are more apparent to us, and 2) to insist that because Clark Kent and Barry Allen struggle with normal problems is discrediting the idea that even Bruce Wayne has had to struggle with them. They just weren't financial and apparent like it is with Peter Parker. Bruce's struggle to atone for something, that sense of guilt, mad drive towards a goal, these are all very, very palpable aspects of human character -- and pushing people away? I'm sorry but I can personally relate to that. And I'm sure I'm not the only one. Feeling "left-out" and "not normal" ? That's what Pete feels as a geek right? Well guess what other guy faces the same thing? At the end of the day you can even make a case that the utter isolation and alienation that Bruce Wayne is portrayed in reflects a sort of Modernist human condition where we're all struggling alone with our hopes for a better world.

The only other character who faced that was Clark Kent.

What I love about these characters is that at the end of the day they can be portrayed in so many brilliant ways but what really matters is that in essence what they're doing is encouraging speculation. For Bruce Wayne, the question he raises is this: how far can you go if you're really driven? What's the limit of human potential?

And THAT's what makes him a "realistic superhero."

[BareKnuckled]

I'm actually just impressed how deep the conversations are around here ! And everything without a single word of devaluations of other peoples opinions ! Great forum