![]() |
|
|
#51 |
|
Ladies call me Torch
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,813
|
The thing to remember (as I said before) is that she won't be flying around on missions.She'll just be wearing it to protect herself.I don't see it as being ridiculous,and I don't see her suddenly becoming a superhero.
Either way,I'll bet bet once she's in the armor and actually onscreen, people will change their tune.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Mad (Blonde) Titan
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 7,643
|
Quote:
She's "Iron Woman," for all intents and practical purposes, and that's a very douche-y thing to do --- something you'd see in Silver Age DC Comics, where they just tacked "Woman/Girl" or "Boy/Kid" onto an existing popular superhero to create a "new" character instead of taking the time to build a brand new superhero/ine from the ground up.
__________________
I want something good to die for, to make it beautiful to live. ---- Queens of the Stone Age, "Go With the Flow" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Ouch!!!!
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,758
|
What kills me about this is that people are gonna cry doom until the movie comes out. That's when people will be praising the choice of adding Rescue.
It kind of remind me of another message board where people where crying doom about Thor having to spin his hammer to fly. People where saying it would look corny and ruin the movie.The movie came out and it look fine. Everyone got over it.
__________________
ironmanlil quote from youtube Quote:
Loki: i have an army Tony Stark: we have a hulk! VIDEO-CLick to Watch!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Life's End Boss
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,504
|
Quote:
Your Thor's hammer comparison is hardly apt either. Worrying about how a signature move might look onscreen and the needless addition of yet another armoured superhero and the changing of the character's role are worlds apart.
__________________
Lady Luck is smiling at me. She knows something I don't. My worst fear: When I die all I see is a sign saying 'level 2'. Which means I have to live all of this all over again. Only on a higher difficulty setting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Mad (Blonde) Titan
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 7,643
|
Quote:
__________________
I want something good to die for, to make it beautiful to live. ---- Queens of the Stone Age, "Go With the Flow" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
Point N2: Pepper is not, and has never been, a damsel in distress. She has come under fire in the previous movies because she 1) singlehandedly gathered proof of Stane´s machinations and cleverly went to the authorities and 2) personally supervised the evacuation of her company´s Fair. All of the above required more balls than most men probably come equiped with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
I want to be Kate Bishop
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: With the Hawkeyes
Posts: 5,148
|
I'm sorry...but what have people got against Pepper as Rescue?
__________________
"Turkey sucks and you suck, and who made you boss?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Life's End Boss
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,504
|
Quote:
__________________
Lady Luck is smiling at me. She knows something I don't. My worst fear: When I die all I see is a sign saying 'level 2'. Which means I have to live all of this all over again. Only on a higher difficulty setting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
I go by "Steve" as well.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 7,401
|
Maaaybe if she puts on the armor once for a minute or two, for a really good reason, I could forgive it. But as far as her making some sort of career out of being a superheroine? The movie would lose me completely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Armored Avenger!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a cave with a box of scraps
Posts: 6,357
|
Making Potts Rescue is part of the canon, wheather some like it or not. I think it would make logical sense from perspective of what we see in the trailer. Obviously Tony is obsessed that he can't protect Pepper, and after what happened in New York he was thinking that he almost lost her.
Building her, her own suit makes sense from a perspective on how he can constantly potect her. From the trailer we can see, she was kidnapped or something, and so maybe the suit is build to "rescue" her. Honestly it's not a big deal.
__________________
“Some people call me a terrorist. I consider myself a teacher. Lesson number one: Heroes....there is no such thing.” The Mandarin |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,863
|
I really don't want to see Gwyneth Paltrow acting all Gwyneth Paltrow-y in a suit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
DESI
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,493
|
Yeah me either I would just prefer it that she uses a suit to escape and THAT'S IT!
__________________
Summer 2013: Iron Man 3 8.5/10 Star Trek Into Darkness 9/10 Fast And Furious 6 Hangover III Man of Steel The Wolverine |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
I want to be Kate Bishop
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: With the Hawkeyes
Posts: 5,148
|
If she's going to be Rescue, I want her to be a superhero. Not a damsel in distress.
__________________
"Turkey sucks and you suck, and who made you boss?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,636
|
Agreed!
__________________
Mutant and proud
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Professor of Power
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In the Moment
Posts: 3,160
|
Honestly... armor flying onto her is a frakking brilliant way to save someone who is captured. I'd enjoy seeing that kind of "Rescue." Pepper as Iron Woman, not so much.
__________________
WW TV Show Ideas "... because he's the hero that we need right now, even if we don't deserve him. Because he's our only hope against the cold dark cosmos. Because he's not our weapon... he's our shield. Our valiant defender, an unmovable guardian. A man of power, a man of virtue. A Man of Steel." #FishburneVoice With a Ph.D in Metascience
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Killing Time
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: the future past
Posts: 1,910
|
Seriously, just saying, if I were Tony Stark, what with the public superhero identity and billions of dollars, I would most definitely create a suit for my loved ones- wife children, parents, dog, hamster, whatever.
It's not like he's limited on resources to build them if he's on mark 47 or whatever Pepper should have either extremis or the avengers-style bracelet activated suits and hell, i'd say it should be on auto-pilot to fly her to a safe house The suit could be "Rescue", as opposed to Pepper, per se
__________________
I wanna riot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Mad (Blonde) Titan
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 7,643
|
Quote:
Stark built the IM suit for a very specific reason, and it's his identity. He's not in the business of mass-producing them, and his entire motivation in the movies *and* comics has been to try to keep this tech out of everybody else's hands. If he starts producing suits for his girlfriend, dog, hamster, whatever, then the question becomes in the public's mind: "Why not me?" In the government/military's mind: "Why not me?" In the rest of the world's mind: "Why not me?" They'd want Stark to assembly-line the suits and hand 'em out like free bacon at Hickory Farms down at the local shopping mall. Bottom line is that the Iron Man suit is Tony's identity, his persona. You don't give that away, not even to the people closest to you. That's why he fights so vehemently against War Machine for literally stealing his identity.
__________________
I want something good to die for, to make it beautiful to live. ---- Queens of the Stone Age, "Go With the Flow" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Why not you? Because you're not part of Tony Stark's family. Absolutely ridiculous argument you have made there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Professor of Power
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In the Moment
Posts: 3,160
|
It's not completely ridiculous. Everyone is ALREADY "why not me" in IM2, and would only be moreso if he produces 47 suits in IM3. The idea that Tony isn't giving out armor like candy is true, however, he clearly doesn't fight vehemently against War Machine or else that IM2 rooftop ending scene would have been quite different. If there was anyone else IM would be okay having armor (especially if it were under his remote control) it would be Pepper.
__________________
WW TV Show Ideas "... because he's the hero that we need right now, even if we don't deserve him. Because he's our only hope against the cold dark cosmos. Because he's not our weapon... he's our shield. Our valiant defender, an unmovable guardian. A man of power, a man of virtue. A Man of Steel." #FishburneVoice With a Ph.D in Metascience
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Mad (Blonde) Titan
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 7,643
|
Quote:
__________________
I want something good to die for, to make it beautiful to live. ---- Queens of the Stone Age, "Go With the Flow" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Newbie First Class
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
It will not be repetitive, in the movie-going public eyes, because the love interest in a Superhero movie has never been given superpowers by the hero before. I can count exceptions easier than the normals: Jean Grey, Elektra, Catwoman, and those characters all met their respective love interest heroes AFTER getting superpowers, not before. This will be the first time a love interest has been upgraded from non-combatant to super-powered combatant in the third installment. So, new. And your argument that it will be repetitive because so many people have armor would apply to the X-Men franchise as well, but that has not gotten redundant by too many characters having mutant powers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Life's End Boss
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,504
|
Pretty sure 'too many mutants' has been a big complaint with the lesser X-men movies. Adding another armoured hero is repetitive no matter how you cut it. I really don't picture the audience being wowed by the love interest getting her own armour.
__________________
Lady Luck is smiling at me. She knows something I don't. My worst fear: When I die all I see is a sign saying 'level 2'. Which means I have to live all of this all over again. Only on a higher difficulty setting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Newbie First Class
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 19
|
Well, I guess we can agree to disagree. I think it could go either way, depending on how they do it (kind of like the Juggernaut. Could have been way better, was handled poorly IMO). I'm just crossing my fingers I guess.
EDIT: Now I got myself thinking about X3... So many regrettable decisions in that movie... I shouldn't have brought it up. *Drinks away sorrow* Last edited by Supermouse; 12-05-2012 at 03:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
I want to be Kate Bishop
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: With the Hawkeyes
Posts: 5,148
|
I think done well, Pepper as Rescue will be great
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|