The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > Batman > The Dark Knight Rises

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2013, 07:35 PM   #526
ThePhantasm
The Shadow Knows
 
ThePhantasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 10,668
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Part of me wishes they used the 400-page script and just split it into two films.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesConceptz View Post
Im done. Im leaving this website. I promise i will not be spiderman or attempt to be. I have a ral careerr to fulfill. Please don NOT tell anyone about this. I would appreciate if you all kept this a secret.
ThePhantasm is offline  
Old 01-03-2013, 08:58 PM   #527
jmc
callin' it like I see it
 
jmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
Posts: 21,135
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenrir View Post
To start with, the whole 8-year gap is fine, but I would've made Batman fade from public sighting gradually over the years rather than just abruptly make him disappear. Bruce Wayne would've been a hermit, sure, but in the sense that he has become 'lost inside his monster'. He has isolated himself from the world as Bruce Wayne but not as Batman. He still would go out every other night after Dent's murder being on the run from the police but not finding much crime on the streets as the Dent Act was working perhaps so well that slowly Bruce realizes that he isn't needed out on the streets anymore. Suddenly he has lost all sense of purpose. True to what Rachel said in TDK about "the day would never come when Bruce no longer needs Batman" even Gotham doesn't anymore. He just sulks around the cave hoping for a reason to put on the suit again. This would've tied very well with Alfred's speech about Bruce never moving on and simply waiting for things to go bad.

Secondly, it would've been so much better had they not completely undermined TDK's ending by exposing the Dent coverup. In TDK, Batman and Gordon make a questionable but perfectly justifiable decision for the greater good, and in my opinion was the right thing to do. It was morally ambiguous, but TDKR undercuts it by showing that it was the wrong choice, which takes the ambiguity a step back to the simpler black-white scale. So my version of the script would've kept the truth about Dent concealed. Of course, it would still be killing Gordon on the inside praising Dent as a martyr, but making that conflict permanent as retribution for their lie would've made for better storytelling by showing that Gordon, like Batman, was also paying the price for it.

Now, Bane. Building on the fact that he and his men "were behind the coup in West Africa", Bane would be a genuine extremist revolutionary along the lines of Che Guevara rather than simply wanting to 'destroy Gotham'. Throughout his childhood, Bane himself witnessed the excesses of capitalism sucking the lifeblood out of developing impoverished nations and his crusade against the Western economic imperialists gains him his own group of mercenaries, fanatical followers and resources. Of course, Bane would be ex-LOS who was cast out by Ra's because Bane's methods were too radical as well as too ideologically different, and this would also be one of his motivations for attacking Gotham - to prove Ra's wrong and succeed where Ra's failed. His attack on the stockmarket would bankrupt not only Bruce Wayne, but also pension funds and many social security benefits instruments. This economic collapse would be the trigger for Bane to start his own French Revolution and recruit the common working man who lost everything to the greed of blue-blooded aristocrats. There is actual civil war and Gotham's citizens are given their fair share of screentime. This setup would've made the film much more relevant and resonant to our times just like TDK.

The whole pit prison subplot would essentially remain the same with a few notable changes. First of all, no Ra's flashback. That was just cheesy and unnecessary. The blind doctor, with the help of Bruce's cellmate, would actually do some sort of medical operation on Bruce's back to help his recovery. The mystery of the child who escaped the pit - unchanged. With his mask broken, Bane's crippling pain would be what ultimately kills him. In the climax of the final battle with Batman, Bane would lie there, paralyzed, defiantly refusing to be saved (because as I said, he would be someone who truly believed in his cause) and takes his last breath with words of respect towards his able adversary.

I'd also axe the pointless city orphans subplot and give more screentime to Selina Kyle/Catwoman and Miranda Tate/Talia. Speaking of Talia, she would be this supremely talented infiltrator who had infiltrated both Bane's mercenaries and Wayne Enterprises. Bane would think her on his side, as would Bruce, but in truth she would be working under both their noses to fulfill her father's (and the now scattered and defeated League Of Shadows') destiny. She would also be the one who kills Fox (you really need an important death to raise the emotional stakes) and Batman, thinking it was Bane, let's out all his fury at him in the final battle.

Now, since there is civil war in Gotham, the federal government would want to step in and take control of the situation. However, Bane's deterrent this time around would not be a fusion nuclear bomb (screw the entire clean energy project subplot), but rather a biological weapon - a virus or plague of some sort developed by Dr. Pavell. Bane threatens that if anyone interferes with the revolution, he has infected an unknown number of his people with the virus who would spread the plague throughout the country. Ergo, the U.S government orders a full-on quarantine of Gotham. Boom, you get your No Man's Land scenario and a believable reason for how the army and national guard would not let anyone in or out of Gotham.

Gordon, Blake, the honest cops and some of Gothams upright citizens are trying to maintain order are fighting a losing battle against the revolutionaries and are running out of both time and resources. Before dying, Fox completes working on a cure for the plague and a way to disperse it in the atmosphere. And the mobile core would be the instrument to do so. The cure would need to be ignited at extremely high temperatures to make it airborne a.k.a why The Bat needs to drag it to the skies for your big explosion in the end. After backstabbing Batman, Talia finds out about the mobile core cure for the plague and plans to sabotage it with the help of her loyal LOS members who also had infiltrated Bane's mercenary group. Gordon drives the truck with the core in the back to keep it safe from Talia and her goons in the Tumblers who plan to destroy it and permanently plunging Gotham towards a self-destructive civil war.
I like ya thinkin'. I'd still eliminate the LoS stuff and Talia but other than that those are some good changes. The biological warfare stuff is cool but maybe a little too reminiscent of film one. The quarantining of Gotham is without doubt a much better idea I will say.

__________________
Celebrating 75 years of Batman saving Gotham City.

Fanboys make excuses, real fans acknowledge screw-ups.

Do me a favour - don't break up my posts into multiple quotes when replying, I won't answer back.
jmc is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 08:29 PM   #528
Ryan
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,062
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

In hindsight, I wish Nolan would have stuck to what was setup in TDK. The acheivements by Dent and the fear of undoing them was seen as monumental by Gordon and Batman at the end of TDK. So much so, Batman was willing to be labelled a cop murderer in order to preserve what Dent had done and also out of the fear of what would happen if the truth was found out. This great secret and coverup that Gordon and Batman felt might tear Gotham apart really turned into a non event in TDKR when it was revealed. With the threat of nuclear extinction in Gotham, who would really care about what Dent had done? And so the noble act that seemed so important at the end of TDK, became nothing more then a checkmark on a checklist of things that had to be revisisted. Bane's or Talia's success in taking over Gotham was pretty much sealed once they blew up the football field and showed the folks of Gotham their nuclear bomb.

Ryan is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 08:45 PM   #529
Anno_Domini
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,997
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
In hindsight, I wish Nolan would have stuck to what was setup in TDK.
And you're saying that as someone who believed Nolan didn't stick to what was set up in TDK? Nolan acknowledged what would have been best to do after TDK and so what is TDKR of the Dent Act being created, Batman not being needed, et cetera. It may not be what someone would expect would come after TDK, but obviously it's what Nolan thought was best.

Anno_Domini is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 08:59 PM   #530
FeedOnATreeFrog
A Metal Gear reference
 
FeedOnATreeFrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,132
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePhantasm View Post
Part of me wishes they used the 400-page script and just split it into two films.
I would have loved two long movies. Heck, a mini-series set in Bane's No-Man's-Land would have been better.

They could have really made this thing feel like an epic, with a bunch of asides with random smaller villains (who Bane unleashes), etc.

Still a great single movie though.

FeedOnATreeFrog is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 01:09 AM   #531
Anno_Domini
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,997
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

A mini-series would seem really odd to fit in two actual movies from Nolan and while I wouldn't mind two parts, the best option I'd have gone for is one long movie that didn't have limits from IMAX.

Anno_Domini is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 02:14 AM   #532
TheBat812
Side-Kick
 
TheBat812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,072
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
In hindsight, I wish Nolan would have stuck to what was setup in TDK. The acheivements by Dent and the fear of undoing them was seen as monumental by Gordon and Batman at the end of TDK. So much so, Batman was willing to be labelled a cop murderer in order to preserve what Dent had done and also out of the fear of what would happen if the truth was found out. This great secret and coverup that Gordon and Batman felt might tear Gotham apart really turned into a non event in TDKR when it was revealed. With the threat of nuclear extinction in Gotham, who would really care about what Dent had done? And so the noble act that seemed so important at the end of TDK, became nothing more then a checkmark on a checklist of things that had to be revisisted. Bane's or Talia's success in taking over Gotham was pretty much sealed once they blew up the football field and showed the folks of Gotham their nuclear bomb.
Alot of people fail to realize that the point was that the Joker DID win despite them trying to prove otherwise. He made them turn on their belief in the fixing the system by making them rig it. This was Joker's ace in the hole, not just the motivation for the final act in TDK. The Nolans actually made it mean alot more than it being the right choice. It truly made for an interesting scenario. They DID win the war on street crime. But that was not really what he'd set out to do. He'd set out to reinstill hope in the infrastructure of their city. To get rid of the "Joe Chills" of the world by getting rid of the corruption by poisoned it. This is why he was so into the teachings of the LOS, but ultimately rejected because their methods would involve destroying, not fixing, his city. Like his father, he's a philanthropist who believes that there are good people willing to do good if only they had a beacon of light to guide them. Batman IS that symbol of light. Which is why the Dark Knight is called the Dark Knight, and the sequel is titled The Dark Knight Rises. He has to fall down in order to pick himself up.

__________________
"No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness." - Aristotle
TheBat812 is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 08:17 AM   #533
The Joker
Clown Prince of Crime
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jollity Farm
Posts: 37,532
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Did Joker win the battle for Gotham's soul at the end of TDK? No. Did he manage to bring a better class of criminal to Gotham like he wanted? No. So he didn't win. His victory was covered up with a lie.

Bruce: "The Batman wasn't needed any more. We won"
Gordon: "Based on a lie"

It may have been based on a lie, but they still stopped the Joker from winning.

__________________
"Sometimes I remember it one way. Sometimes another. If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!"

- The Joker
The Joker is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 09:36 AM   #534
Ryan
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,062
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
Did Joker win the battle for Gotham's soul at the end of TDK? No. Did he manage to bring a better class of criminal to Gotham like he wanted? No. So he didn't win. His victory was covered up with a lie.

Bruce: "The Batman wasn't needed any more. We won"
Gordon: "Based on a lie"

It may have been based on a lie, but they still stopped the Joker from winning.
Exactly and as the thread asks "in hindsight what changes would YOU do", it would be that the lie that was created at then of TDK would have actually meant something when it was exposed. Just seems odd to have lead an audience into believing how important the coverup was and then have it mean so little in the sequel.

Ryan is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 04:06 PM   #535
JDonaldD
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 86
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Joker would have won in the eyes of the public if Batman didn't take the blame. Not only was Batman trying to keep Harvey's work intact but in many ways, when he looks down at Harvey's body and says "but the Joker cannot win," it's his way of not allowing the Joker's plan of corrupting Dent to work. It's not just about keeping the criminals in jail, it also seems to be about Batman thwarting the Joker's plan.

I think they created a really complex ending with TDK and I was really wondering how they would deal with the ramifications of people finding out about the lie.I think they chose to avoid a lot of it by doing the time jump. Strangely, Gordon still seems to be commissioner by TDKR's end and we get no insight into what happened to him. Was he reprimanded at all? Maybe nothing happened because there is no proof. I wonder if it's the city turning a blind eye. No matter what the goal, Gordon became corrupt as well and it kind of undermines Batman's seeming interest in preserving faith in the justice system. In fact, most of TDKR undermines the ideas of TDK with Blake's story arc.

JDonaldD is offline  
Old 01-06-2013, 10:49 AM   #536
Tequilla
Side-Kick
 
Tequilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: P
Posts: 1,752
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
In hindsight, I wish Nolan would have stuck to what was setup in TDK.
He did.

Everything in Rises is about the consequences of the past , Bruce's sacrifices , and his ability to overcome them.

Tequilla is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 05:35 PM   #537
Eros
Side-Kick
 
Eros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,487
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

In Hindsight, Bruce should of had the same resolve as many other superheroes[Like spider-man,Kyle Rayner etc] after his "true love" was killed, and kept on fighting no matter what. But after the dark knight, he gave up.

__________________
"All superheroes are essentially criminals who capture other supercriminals in vigilante-style justice and engage in wanton destruction of public property during superpowered fights".
Eros is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 05:39 PM   #538
BatLobsterRises
Lobsterized
 
BatLobsterRises's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,063
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eros View Post
In Hindsight, Bruce should of had the same resolve as many other superheroes[Like spider-man,Kyle Rayner etc] after his "true love" was killed, and kept on fighting no matter what. But after the dark knight, he gave up.
He showed that resolve in TDK, when he quickly got back on the saddle and stopped The Joker. He only quit on being Batman once he was no longer needed in Gotham. But ultimately he was just waiting for things to go bad again so he'd have a purpose.

__________________
IMAGINE THE FIRE
My TDKR Metal cover
My MOS Trailer 3 score recreation
My take on why there is no "DC Films" Division at WB:
http://forums.superherohype.com/show...&postcount=158
BatLobsterRises is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 05:44 PM   #539
Eros
Side-Kick
 
Eros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,487
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by BatLobsterRises View Post
He showed that resolve in TDK, when he quickly got back on the saddle and stopped The Joker. He only quit on being Batman once he was no longer needed in Gotham. But the whole time he was just waiting for things to go bad again.
Incorrect, you cant fix a city in one night, it took years for the cops and the outlandish "dent act" to do its job. Batman could of helped out, and as long as rapists,murders, and evil exists in gotham Batman will always be "needed". A upsurd fantasy act cant stop muggers,murders,rapes,stealing and etc. It was those "small crimes" that cost Bruce his parents.

__________________
"All superheroes are essentially criminals who capture other supercriminals in vigilante-style justice and engage in wanton destruction of public property during superpowered fights".
Eros is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 06:00 PM   #540
BatLobsterRises
Lobsterized
 
BatLobsterRises's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,063
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eros View Post
Incorrect, you cant fix a city in one night, it took years for the cops and the outlandish "dent act" to do its job. Batman could of helped out, and as long as rapists,murders, and evil exists in gotham Batman will always be "needed". A upsurd fantasy act cant stop muggers,murders,rapes,stealing and etc. It was those "small crimes" that cost Bruce his parents.
It was made clear in Batman Begins that this version of Batman didn't intend be there forever to beat up every single criminal he could get his hands on, but had the more tangible ambition to "show Gotham that their city doesn't belong to the criminals and the corrupt" aka, get rid of the mob's stranglehold on the city. By the end of TDK, not only is Gotham well on its way to achieving that, but he's destroyed all meaning his symbol had in an effort to make a martyr out of Dent.

Anyway, even if you don't like the Dent Act as a plot device, that doesn't change the fact that it's the reason the writers provided for why he stopped being Batman. It doesn't have to do with Rachel's death. The point is that things like Rachel's death do weigh upon him, but he's stripped of his usual method of dealing with pain- being Batman, which gave him purpose. That is not the same as "I am sad, I quit."

__________________
IMAGINE THE FIRE
My TDKR Metal cover
My MOS Trailer 3 score recreation
My take on why there is no "DC Films" Division at WB:
http://forums.superherohype.com/show...&postcount=158
BatLobsterRises is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 06:03 PM   #541
soundofyousick
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 191
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eros View Post
Incorrect, you cant fix a city in one night, it took years for the cops and the outlandish "dent act" to do its job. Batman could of helped out, and as long as rapists,murders, and evil exists in gotham Batman will always be "needed". A upsurd fantasy act cant stop muggers,murders,rapes,stealing and etc. It was those "small crimes" that cost Bruce his parents.
I never got the sense from the film that it was anything to do with Rachel, his quitting, it was about him being injured, about the cops being able to handle the job from now on, *and* the fact that the cops where after him now, as much of their resources would be spent on chasing him down, instead of the real crooks. Like what happened in TDKR, when Bane got away due to this.
and look at what happened in BB when they were after him just for being a vigilante, the cops were flipping out over the pancaked cop cars(poetry), so what would it be like night after night going after harvey's killer?

As Batman says in Year One, if he has to fight both the cops and the crooks, it's not a realistic proposition to do the job like that for long. Same goes here, as events in BB show us, he had to get some cops on his side, not possible after TDK.

soundofyousick is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 06:11 PM   #542
Eros
Side-Kick
 
Eros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,487
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by BatLobsterRises View Post
It was made clear in Batman Begins that this version of Batman didn't intend be there forever to beat up every single criminal he could get his hands on, but had the more tangible ambition to "show Gotham that their city doesn't belong to the criminals and the corrupt" aka, get rid of the mob's stranglehold on the city. By the end of TDK, not only is Gotham well on its way to achieving that, but he's destroyed all meaning his symbol had in an effort to make a martyr out of Dent.

Anyway, even if you don't like the Dent Act as a plot device, that doesn't change the fact that it's the reason the writers provided for why he stopped being Batman. It doesn't have to do with Rachel's death. The point is that things like Rachel's death do weigh upon him, but he's stripped of his usual method of dealing with pain- being Batman, which gave him purpose. That is not the same as "I am sad, I quit."
Either way he quit, and then took the fall for Dents terror spree. Why so people would keep "believing in Harvey dent", which is truly heroic on his part, but logically he must of known a man Like Bane would come along and expose the harsh truth.

__________________
"All superheroes are essentially criminals who capture other supercriminals in vigilante-style justice and engage in wanton destruction of public property during superpowered fights".
Eros is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 06:20 PM   #543
JackWhite
Third Man
 
JackWhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,853
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Being forced into retirement doesn't equal quitting. When an athlete can no longer compete with the cream of the crop and they have to retire; that does not equal quitting. What is so hard to understand about that concept?

Anyways, I really would have liked for a darker turn during Bane's reign. Just take the montage that we see, and build, build, build on top of that. Keep everything with Bruce in the prison the exact same. The pit scenes were some of the best stuff in the film.

Extend the final battle a little bit. See a bit more of what we saw in the spy footage of Batman plowing through 4-5 thugs before getting to Bane.

But yeah, IMAX limitations is pretty much the main issue with anything I had a problem with, which isn't much anyways.

JackWhite is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 06:52 PM   #544
Ryan
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,062
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
In hindsight, I wish Nolan would have stuck to what was setup in TDK.
In my original post, I referred to what was setup by Nolan with having Dent's death and the cover up by Batman and Gordon being the focus of the third film was what I would have wanted changed in hindsight.

Ryan is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:19 PM   #545
RAINMAKER
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 68
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Long time lurker, first time poster.

Things I'd change in "The Dark Knight Rises":

1. I would've liked to see the first fight between Batman and Bane happen in the Batcave in front of Alfred. I think it would've been a very powerful scene to show the horror on Alfred's face as he watches the boy he was supposed to protect, get his back broken. And then they drag Bruce away from Alfred.

2. The 2nd fight to be longer and more intense. As soon as it was getting good, it ended. I would've like to see it start out in the streets and end in the sewers.

3. I would've eliminated the "LOS" completely from the movie. I know a lot of people think that the "League of Shadows" returned, but after watching multiple times, I don't think Talia and Bane ran the "actual" "League of Shadows". Just take a look at how they were trained ninjas in BB, but in "....Rises" they were only good with guns. I think they were just a bunch of mercenaries recruited by Bane and Talia. In fact, as it was stated in "....Rises", Bane was excommunicated before Ra's recruited Bruce. Why would the remaining members let these too run the show all of the sudden?

4. Eliminate Talia. As stated in BB, Ra's says "...my wife and daughter were taken from me." They should've left it alone.

5. Bane was the one who climbed out of the pit.

6. If I'm not mistaken Zsasz was still on the loose in "BB" and was never mentioned of being caught in the next two movies. I'd would've liked to see a fight scene between them.

That's all I can think of right now.


Last edited by RAINMAKER; 01-09-2013 at 10:48 PM.
RAINMAKER is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:47 PM   #546
TheHeatKitchen
Side-Kick
 
TheHeatKitchen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,132
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAINMAKER View Post
Long time lurker, first time poster.

Things I'd change in "The Dark Knight Rises":

1. I would've liked to see the first fight between Batman and Bane happen in the Batcave in front of Alfred. I think it would've been a very powerful scene to show the horror on Alfred's face as he watches the boy he was supposed to protect, get his back broken. And then they drag Bruce away from Alfred.

2. The 2nd fight to be longer and more intense. As soon as it was getting good, it ended. I would've like to see it start out in the streets and end in the sewers.

3. I would've eliminated the "LOS" completely from the movie. I know a lot of people think that the "League of Shadows" returned, but after watching multiple times, I don't think Talia and Bane ran the "actual" "League of Shadows". Just take a look at how they were trained ninjas in the BB, but in "....Rises" they were only good with guns. I think they were just a bunch of mercenaries recruited by Bane and Talia. In fact, as it was stated in "....Rises", Bane was excommunicated before Ra's recruited Bruce. Why would the remaining members let these too run the show all of the sudden?

4. Eliminate Talia. As stated in BB, Ra's says "...my wife and daughter were taken from me." They should've left it alone.

5. Bane was the one who climbed out of the pit.

6. If I'm not mistaken Zsasz was still on the loose in "BB" and was never mentioned of being caught in the next two movies. I'd would've liked to see a fight scene between them.

That's all I can think of right now.
I like all of those, especially the part about Zsasz. I've always loved the idea if him in a film, as a subplot, Batman trying to catch him. It'd be very dark and show his detective side more.

TheHeatKitchen is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:56 PM   #547
The Joker
Clown Prince of Crime
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jollity Farm
Posts: 37,532
Thumbs up Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAINMAKER View Post
Long time lurker, first time poster.

Things I'd change in "The Dark Knight Rises":

1. I would've liked to see the first fight between Batman and Bane happen in the Batcave in front of Alfred. I think it would've been a very powerful scene to show the horror on Alfred's face as he watches the boy he was supposed to protect, get his back broken. And then they drag Bruce away from Alfred.

2. The 2nd fight to be longer and more intense. As soon as it was getting good, it ended. I would've like to see it start out in the streets and end in the sewers.

3. I would've eliminated the "LOS" completely from the movie. I know a lot of people think that the "League of Shadows" returned, but after watching multiple times, I don't think Talia and Bane ran the "actual" "League of Shadows". Just take a look at how they were trained ninjas in the BB, but in "....Rises" they were only good with guns. I think they were just a bunch of mercenaries recruited by Bane and Talia. In fact, as it was stated in "....Rises", Bane was excommunicated before Ra's recruited Bruce. Why would the remaining members let these too run the show all of the sudden?

4. Eliminate Talia. As stated in BB, Ra's says "...my wife and daughter were taken from me." They should've left it alone.

5. Bane was the one who climbed out of the pit.

6. If I'm not mistaken Zsasz was still on the loose in "BB" and was never mentioned of being caught in the next two movies. I'd would've liked to see a fight scene between them.

That's all I can think of right now.
I particularly like points 3 and 4.

__________________
"Sometimes I remember it one way. Sometimes another. If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!"

- The Joker
The Joker is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 03:27 PM   #548
RAINMAKER
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 68
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
I particularly like points 3 and 4.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHeatKitchen View Post
I like all of those, especially the part about Zsasz. I've always loved the idea if him in a film, as a subplot, Batman trying to catch him. It'd be very dark and show his detective side more.
Thanks. I forgot to add in my previous post, there's been some really good ideas on what they'd do if they were in the director's chair or writing the film.

And that was the who idea of this thread. But some people are taking it way too personal like were taking a swipe at Nolan and Goyer.

Most of us are grateful that WB even rebooted this series after the debacle they call "Batman and Robin".

Sure, this trilogy is perfect. But it's pretty damn good.

Here's some more changes I would've suggested if I were apart of the project:

  1. Introduce Talia in BB when Ra's recruits him. They both share a strong attraction to each other which makes Bruce's decision to go against Ra's that much more difficult.
  2. Make Batman more like a ninja. For instance, when he stopped the shipment and knocked out Falcone. Also, when he picks off Crane's men one by one until he interrogates Crane. They got away from that in TDK and TDKR.
  3. Different fighting style. I understand the fighting style used as Ra's puts it briefly in BB, "....this isn't a dance". But the "dance" looks better.
  4. Cut scenes during important fights. For instance, when Batman was fighting the real "LOS" and Ras Al Ghul in BB. It was really frustrating. Batman and Bane's first fight was perfect in the sense that there were no cut scenes. Just a straight up brawl with no interruptions.
  5. We hardly saw any gadgets in TDKR.
  6. Not enough screen time for iconic Villans. By the time we knew about Ra's Al Ghul, he died. When Harvey became Two Face, he died. When Talia revealed herself, she died. Scarecrow and Zsasz were underutilized and could've been really creepy.
  7. Scarecrows hallucinations more creepy. There were rumors that there was supposed to be this "stage 2" of scarecrow hallucinations, but we never saw it. Some people say they saw the mask they were going to use, but Nolan denies it.
  8. If Nolan and his team knew that the "LOS" were going to return for the final film, Scarecrow should of been the main Villan in BB and Ra's/Talia Al Ghul should've been the main villians in the final film. Scarecrow could've easily pulled off what Ra's did by releasing the gas among Gotham City. Also, I would've tried for 4 films instead of 3. The main Villans in each film: BB - Scarecrow, TDK - Joker, TDR - Bane, Two-Face, 4th Batman Film - "LOS" or Ra's and Talia. Then sprinkle in minor villans in each film.
That's it for now.

RAINMAKER is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 05:12 PM   #549
Anno_Domini
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 17,997
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAINMAKER View Post
6. If I'm not mistaken Zsasz was still on the loose in "BB" and was never mentioned of being caught in the next two movies. I'd would've liked to see a fight scene between them.

That's all I can think of right now.
While Gordon did mention that the inmates are on the loose, nothing's really confirmed that it includes Zsaz who was knocked out by Batman.

Anno_Domini is offline  
Old 01-13-2013, 01:59 AM   #550
RustyCage
Come what may..
 
RustyCage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gotham
Posts: 4,019
Default Re: In hindsight what changes would you do

Batman Begins:

- Introduce a younger (to the point that we might buy that Bruce doesn't recognize her in TDKR) Talia to some degree in Begins during Bruce's training, they could have a brief glimpse at romance, but it falls apart when Bruce rebels against the League, her fate left a mystery.

- Have Bruce also learning other skills, such as escape artistry, during his travels.

- Cut out the 'I'm Batman.' line.

The Dark Knight:

- Keep Katie Holmes on for tone and consistency's sake.

- Keep Rachel's character warm and sad, not cold and arrogant. I know people who were -glad- when she died because she annoyed them so much in TDK and they couldn't understand what Bruce saw in her.

- Flesh out Rachel's personal relationship with Harvey instead of making them seem so distant and like they can't ever stop playing lawyer around each other. I didn't buy that they were in love. It was very scarce. This would add gravity to her death, and to Harvey going insane.

- Keep the neck of the cowl bulky, but still segmented for turning, so it doesn't look as bobbleheady and the 'Batman silhouette' is preserved and still intimidating.

(This might also help Bale breathe better so he can pull off the same quality of Bat-voice that he did in Begins, but hasn't since the suit changed. It would also keep him from making that gaspy "D:" face he seems to do ever since too.)

- Make the bat emblem on the chest more prominent, as it was in Begins.

- Make Batman more mysterious. More iconic shots, cape flowing. Phantom of the Opera.

- Darken the interrogation room to resemble the scene in The Killing Joke. Edgy bright light is there, but only in the center, so we have a lot more focus, atmosphere, and uneasiness, makes it more terrifying when Batman suddenly grabs the Joker up, or when Joker grins or laughs.

- Develop Bruce's relationship with Harvey a touch more, so that they're at least personal friends instead of just Bruce donating to him.

- More use of smoke bombs and the like.

- Why didn't he cut the lights at the party scene when Joker has Rachel? Would have been way cooler.

- Improve the fight scenes. The vs. Ra's and vs. Bane scenes in the other movies were intense, bring it up to that quality.

Or hell, when there are multiple thugs, mirror the intense camerawork and ferocity of the first fight in Begins where Bruce is fighting the criminals in the mud when he's in prison. More stuff like the docks fight would've been fine too.

- More stealth, less waltzing straight into wide open, fully lit places.

The Dark Knight Rises:

- More Crane, let Scarecrow really go nuts like he deserves to.

- Pull from Knightfall a bit more to have Bane figuring out who Batman is through his own ingenuity, and then breaking him when he's worn down by Bane's trials. More Scarecrow is the ticket to that.

- More Gordon. One of the valves of the heart of BB and TDK was the strong camaraderie between Gordon and Batman. Ball fumbled here.

- Revise the identity reveal to Gordon to more mirror the scene in No Man's Land. Keep them alone. It was just a better moment.

- Flesh Bane out. Also, give him a philosophical point to make.

- Base Bane's motivation and plan more on the League of Shadows' point of view and Bane's personal sense of justice. Use the truth about Harvey's death to give this a foundation instead of it just being discovered happenstance later on.

- Put a pure chill in Bruce's eyes (he was stunningly smug and unfazed) when he discovers (preferably through Bane telling him and not Alfred telling him) Bane is carrying the torch of the League, and knows what he's done.

- Have him scold Bruce about how Ra's ended up being right in that Batman had to become corrupt to put a band-aid on corruption, how it was all a flimsy lie.

This will really make Bruce feel like a miserable failure while he receives the physical beatdown - which would also add to the believability of Batman approaching him for a one-on-one fist fight in the first place, he would be upset about that, guard down.

Instead, what we got was an arrogant guy who wants to beat up another arrogant guy on his turf. That's an immature kind of Batman. It's been done before (TDK Returns), but it feels very off for the character.

- So make Batman less arrogant and reckless, more controlled and intelligent. There's really no excuse for how he behaved when he found out about Bane, or in the fight against him.

Could use more dialogue like the scene where he gives Harvey an intellectual smackdown after catching his coin in TDK.

- Come up with something more intense and original than 'Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb!' for Batman's fake death.

- Batman barely did anything in his career. At least have mention of him doing SOMETHING in the 8 years after TDK so he actually -has- a somewhat substantial career as Batman before he abruptly quits. He can get depressed gradually instead of instantly.

- Flashback (if 8 years REALLY have to pass) of Gordon having to establish an anti-Batman pursuit team and meeting very secretly with Batman. Could make for some brilliant, iconic bonding moments between them. Many scenes in The Animated Series can be used as reference for this (the one I'm thinking of is on a bridge at night). Bullock and Montoya (or their TDK 'counterparts') could be briefly shown during this.

- Speaking of which, would have loved a flashback to what happens immediately after TDK ends, maybe an on-foot chase/battle with the police somewhere like the Narrows, maybe they manage to corner him or something so he can't just use the Batpod. Maybe a construction site for variety. Maybe he gets shot in the leg to reference Year One. Heavy fog and atmosphere. Have Batman snatching them out of the dark, have him pouncing from above. Can we have smoke bombs yet?

- Get rid of Foley and his car chase scene in favor of the above.

- Have Bruce give a damn about his parents, visit their graves, leave roses. Moment of reflection to rekindle the fire in him. Should have been obvious. Would have made the movie far more potent.

- Make the snowy theme FAR more noticeable, frame the emotion of scenes around it. Above scene suggested, Catwoman rooftop scene wouldn't hurt either.

- 'Catch me if you can' with Catwoman was completely skipped. Don't do that.

- Stop making Batman say stupidly obvious and sometimes even corny things. Cut the 'So that's what that feels like' line completely and have Batman turn around, see Selina gone, and take a moment to show him looking off the rooftop alone in silent acknowledgement, the night air teasing his cape around him. You could even make him smirk, if you REALLY have to explain his reaction. That's far more appropriate for the character.

- Batman lives up to the promise of the promotional material and literally leads an army of recruits against Bane's army of recruits, instead of just showing up in the middle of a brawl.

- Bane doesn't attempt to kill Batman with a shotgun. :|

- Catwoman doesn't blow Bane up. :|

- Have Batman use a better initial 'theatricality and deception' against Bane than throwing a few crackle pellets at him as if they were supposed to DO ANYTHING. Embarrassing. This is Batman AT THE EDGE OF RETIREMENT. He knows better.

- More intelligent and detective moments instead of less.

- Bring all fight scenes not against Bane up to the quality of the ones that are against Bane. Seriously.



That's all for now, may think of some more later.

__________________
Why do we fall?

Last edited by RustyCage; 01-13-2013 at 02:42 AM.
RustyCage is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.