![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Actors from Original trilogy returning for a possible Days of Future past? | |||
| Ellen Page as Shadowcat |
|
67 | 41.36% |
| Hugh Jackman as Wolverine |
|
105 | 64.81% |
| Halle Berry as Storm |
|
56 | 34.57% |
| Anna Paquin as Rogue |
|
55 | 33.95% |
| James Marsden as Cyclops |
|
82 | 50.62% |
| Ben Foster as Angel |
|
28 | 17.28% |
| Kelsey Grammer as Beast |
|
46 | 28.40% |
| Alan Cumming as Nightcrawler |
|
49 | 30.25% |
| Shawn Ashmore as Iceman |
|
48 | 29.63% |
| Famke Janssen as Jean Grey |
|
64 | 39.51% |
| Taylor Kitsch as Gambit |
|
39 | 24.07% |
| Daniel Cudmore as Colossus |
|
44 | 27.16% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 162. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#26 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 928
|
I hadn't considered the whole 'mutant and proud' angle, but it doesn't necessarily mean that Mystique abandoning Nightcrawler would be a contradiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
...Im brain storming ideas on how it could work. Im not assuming that that is what happens. Its much more open minded than simply "noitwontworkandnothingwillconvincemeothwrwise!!!! " like you seem to think
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
X42014
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Future
Posts: 8,319
|
Quote:
Assuming Azazel would rape Mystique is too much.
__________________
X-MEN: The Next Trilogy
X4: Days of Future Past (2014) - Wolverine, Professor X, Storm, Beast, Rogue, Shadowcat, Iceman, Bishop, Colossus, Warpath, Blink, Magneto, Mystique, Trask X5: The Mutant Massacre (2016) - Wolverine, Cyclops, Storm, Rogue, Iceman, Angel, Shadowcat, Colossus, Bishop, Mr. Sinister, Marrow, Marauders X6: Age of Apocalypse (2018) - Wolverine, Cyclops, Storm, Psylocke, Rogue, Shadowcat, Iceman, Colossus, Apocalypse, Archangel, Horsemen The X-Men Central |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gamma Quadrant
Posts: 1,875
|
"Mutant and proud" Mystique could still abandon baby Nightcrawler. I mean, she doesn't have to act 1 dimensional all the time. Maybe she knows both that raising a child in a hostile terrorist organization is a bad thing and that it's not going to be easy for a mutant baby like him to grow up in a normal society...so she abandons him with a circus or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
Well because XFC gave us a pretty deep xavier / mystique connection (which honestly wasn't needed) they kinda have to explain why neither one of them talk to the other in the OT .... The lack of talking to a man that essentially was your sibling imo means there's quite alot of animosity there
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
Quote:
At least it'd explain alot ... Its probably the most drastic way... But its just one example of many
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
I want to be Kate Bishop
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: With the Hawkeyes
Posts: 5,123
|
Yeah, a bit too dark.
__________________
"Turkey sucks and you suck, and who made you boss?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 928
|
Given Mystique's characterization in the films, I can very easily envision a scenario where Kurt is born 'normal' and Erik convinced Mystique to kill the child by abandoning him to die through exposure to the elements, only for the Wagners to find and raise him, with his mutant powers and abnormal appearance only later manifesting themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,622
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 10,801
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,107
|
Not really. spideyboy is right. Giving up a child is circumstantial. Anybody with any life experience knows that a multitude of emotions often can and do arise when a woman gives birth to a child, especially her first, and those easily outweigh the "mutant and proud" slogan that was parroted throughout First Class. Just because Mystique is mutant and proud, and leaves with Erik on that beach, doesn't mean she wants to raise a child in that environment. Maybe she gives him up, knowing that is what is best for him. That's certainly keeping in line with some of the Raven we see in First Class. Conversely, maybe Mystique wants nothing to do with her son. 11 years later, maybe she takes a more hardened approach and gives him up because she doesn't want him holding her back, which would be in line with the Mystique we see in the original trilogy. There are a number of ways they can handle it, if they choose to address it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
Except in FC young xavier and mystique already had there abilities and were both prepubecent.... And appeared to possibly of had those abilities for at least a little while
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 928
|
Regarding why Mystique and Xavier don't talk to each other during the events of the OXT, I can very easily see her 'us vs. them' mentality only deepening, and Xavier's noble insistence on trying to 'build bridges' leading her to view him as an enemy and consequently bury any affection she held for him. I can also conceivably see Xavier learning of that and being deeply hurt by it, but not 'forcing the issue', as it were.
lordofthenerds, Mystique has very deep-set anger issues when it comes to humans. First Class and the OXT make this clear, and I think it is therefore very much in character for both her and Magneto to behave in the manner I talked about above. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 10,801
|
Quote:
Unless you're saying that XFC made a continuity error (which is completely understandable), and now all mutants are born with their powers at birth.
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 10,801
|
I agree, but that wasn't the point. How would they know the child wasn't a mutant if most of them don't show any signs of mutation until puberty?
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
In the comics its both though. Xaiver even states on film "most powers manifest at puberty" key word... "most" . Charles, Raven, and Kurt in the comics were always told to have been born with there abilities. The movie series obviously gave movie xavier and mystique that same trait
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 928
|
Another angle to consider is that, because of his own sexual orientation and life experiences, Singer has very much infused the films he's been involved in thus far with an emphasis on the parallels between mutantkind and the LBGT community, particularly the negative prejudices that many LBGT individuals face, and has even sort of reversed those prejudices to some degree with regards to Magneto and Mystique.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 10,801
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
Im not basing my ideas of Kurt being born looking human though...
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 10,801
|
I wasn't arguing with your ideas. I was arguing with the idea that Mystique and Magneto leave her baby to die because they believe she conceived a human.
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Young Avenger
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio, formally Los Angeles, by way of Ohio
Posts: 53,688
|
That's the plot hole in that reasoning... Which is why imo NC shouldn't be born human.
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Love Conquered Evil in California! August 4th, 2010
[=] |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 627
|
I never really got an impression that Mystique hated Xavier in the original trilogy. More that she just didn't really have any feelings towards him. After all that whole relationship did not even ever exist when they were making the trilogy, and Mystique was not exactly chatty or confessional on most subjects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wild wild west
Posts: 483
|
It is absolutely appalling and DISGUSTING that people keep bringing this up as a possibility. Rape is NOT A PLOT DEVICE, people. Movies that involve it address the weight and horror of it. They're not using it because they need one of their characters to get pregnant. For the love of god stop suggesting it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gamma Quadrant
Posts: 1,875
|
Well he's the devil isn't he? Kind of symbolism there.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|