![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Mercin' & Workin'
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 12,397
|
![]()
With the recent news that Quicksilver will first appear in 'X-Men: Days of the Future Past', it's likely that Pietro might not show up in Avengers 2 afterall. But what about Wanda? Should she be in Avengers 2 or would it be wrong for her to appear without her twin?
Honestly, I wouldn't want Wanda to appear without Pietro. Without the brother/sister relationship you lose a really intereting aspect of her character (atleast at first)
__________________
"Okay...This looks bad."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blunt instrument
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,786
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 4,394
|
![]()
It's not exactly ideal having a competing studio use the same character in a movie less than a year prior to your own movie. It will confuse the general audience.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
House Stark
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,916
|
![]()
No. No reason for marvel to back down
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,000
|
![]()
No more than two studios releasing two Snow White movies three months apart
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
with great power...
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,109
|
![]()
agreed...
but, these are not the Wonder twins, or Mas y Menos were talking about here, they not inseparable they can easily be done as separate characters in fact were they separated for the major of the young life's, before they were reunited (in the comics) just saying |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Not a Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,228
|
![]()
I see no reason for Marvel to yield. If Fox really wants to throw him in, go ahead. It will only hurt their movie for the probable cramming. Marvel, meanwhile, is much more likely to put him to good use.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Side Kicker
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,227
|
![]()
This
__________________
C2: Cyclops Fans - United (2006) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"No."
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hype, Superhero
Posts: 18,364
|
![]()
Nah, no Wanda if Pietro isn't there. I don't even want to see her that much. I'd much rather see Wasp or Ms. Marvel.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Fierce User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: X-Mansion
Posts: 34,663
|
![]()
In my opinion, Marvel Studios shouldn't split them up just because FOX is using them in DOFP. And FOX shouldn't also hesitate to use Quicksilver/Scarlet Witch just because they are gonna appear in the Avengers.
If both studios want to use Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, then go ahead as long as they aren't breaking any rules.
__________________
Phoenix • Psylocke • Rogue • Storm
X - W O M E N Dazzler • Jubilee • Polaris • Shadowcat • White Queen |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 4,394
|
![]()
If Fox prevents Quicksilver from being in The Avengers 2 & Marvel keeps Scarlet Witch in, only one headline will suffice.
Fox lifts and separates the twins. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
I want to be Kate Bishop
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: With the Hawkeyes
Posts: 5,740
|
![]()
I agree. I actually want the twins in the X-Men and different Avengers in A2.
__________________
"Turkey sucks and you suck, and who made you boss?" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Avenger
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,548
|
![]()
Definitely not but I think fox are disgusting enough to do it
__________________
Mutant and proud.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
SHIELD Director Coulson
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 12,044
|
![]()
Or two James Bond movies in the same year (1983).
__________________
THE COTTON AVENGERS ...They move like slick cotton on oil. ---Echostation, 3/18/2014 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,511
|
![]()
Both Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver should be in Avengers 2, I think their brother/Sister relationship will be crucial there and do not want to see that lost. Whedon would not have been mentioning them this early if they were not important to the story.
I'm thinking a better option at this point with Fox would be to use Polaris instead of Scarlet Witch. Seemed to be a much larger demand with Lorna over Wanda showing up in an X-Men film. And Wanda is def more relevant to the Avengers. Last edited by def28; 05-24-2013 at 08:00 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Chairman of the Bored
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 14 N Moore St
Posts: 7,847
|
![]()
Scarlet Witch also has almost no history with the X-Men, she's much more of an Avengers character.
I'd be ok with keeping Wanda and Substituting in Wonder Man or Vision, change the brother/sister thing to a love relationship
__________________
@BIGKEVINK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,407
|
![]()
Or you can have both like Millar tried in The Ultimates!
__________________
If it’s not in the MCU we don’t want it Sony! Free Hulk & Namor! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Blunt instrument
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,786
|
![]()
And switch their last names to Lannister.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|