The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > Superman > Superman Returns

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2013, 02:40 AM   #1
Hordakfan
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Santa Ana California
Posts: 463
Default Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

What does everyone think of Singer's idea of ignoring 3 and 4 like they don't exist from continuity and continuing where the 1st two started off?

I mean face it, 3 was silly and 4 was unspeakably god-awful you know.

Hordakfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 09:59 AM   #2
Senator Pleasury
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,846
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

I think it was a fantastic idea naturally.

Senator Pleasury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 01:14 PM   #3
Tacit Ronin
Side-Kick
 
Tacit Ronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,385
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

It was a bad idea because Singer therefore muddled the exact sequel his film uses as a springboard for its own narrative purposes. The film suffered from cherry picking elements of Superman 2 and discarding others, leading to a lot of confusion over exactly which film it was a sequel to, Superman or Superman 2. Singer should've ditched his film's connection to Donner wholesale or he should've taken all the films into continuity.

__________________
Robert Downey Jr: Max Ray
Daniel Craig: Jake Rockwell
Chris Evans: Ace Mccloud
The Centurions Live Action Film!
Tacit Ronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 01:19 PM   #4
Dr. Remy Lebeau
The doctor is in chere!
 
Dr. Remy Lebeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 435
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

Given that the film had a completely new cast it worked for me. I never saw it as a direct sequel to the Donner films, but more of a stand alone film that was essentially rebooting the franchise without a new origin tale.

Dr. Remy Lebeau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 01:33 PM   #5
Senator Pleasury
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,846
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excelsior. View Post
It was a bad idea because Singer therefore muddled the exact sequel his film uses as a springboard for its own narrative purposes. The film suffered from cherry picking elements of Superman 2 and discarding others, leading to a lot of confusion over exactly which film it was a sequel to, Superman or Superman 2. Singer should've ditched his film's connection to Donner wholesale or he should've taken all the films into continuity.
That I understand (he should have been clearer about what elements should and should not be considered, although the best option would have been to consider everything). Still doesn't make the ignoring SIII and SIV a bad idea.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Reme Lebeau View Post
Given that the film had a completely new cast it worked for me. I never saw it as a direct sequel to the Donner films, but more of a stand alone film that was essentially rebooting the franchise without a new origin tale.
That was precisely the idea. but when you reboot franchises like Batman, for example, and you tell everyone this is a reboot with no connection with the previous movies whatsoever and people still say "Oh, so it's a prequel," then you have to be extra clear about it.

Senator Pleasury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 01:37 PM   #6
Dr.
Scorpion-Kick
 
Dr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,777
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Reme Lebeau View Post
Given that the film had a completely new cast it worked for me. I never saw it as a direct sequel to the Donner films, but more of a stand alone film that was essentially rebooting the franchise without a new origin tale.
Likewise.

For me, the biggest clue was that STM was set in 1978 and SR in 2006.

Dr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 09:05 AM   #7
DarkKnight88
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,772
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

It was most definitely a loose sequel and not a full on reboot. It would be like if Batman Begins used Danny Elfman's score, images of Jack Nicholson's Joker, direct quotes from Batman '89 ect.

It's pretty safe to assume Singer meant for you to watch the 1978 Superman before watching Returns. Returns doesn't really stand on its own. Imagine showing it to someone who's never even heard of Superman before and they'd be confused.

DarkKnight88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 10:05 AM   #8
Senator Pleasury
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,846
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkKnight88 View Post
It was most definitely a loose sequel and not a full on reboot. It would be like if Batman Begins used Danny Elfman's score, images of Jack Nicholson's Joker, direct quotes from Batman '89 ect.
More like Nolan would have followed B. Returns instead of making an origin movie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkKnight88 View Post
It's pretty safe to assume Singer meant for you to watch the 1978 Superman before watching Returns. Returns doesn't really stand on its own. Imagine showing it to someone who's never even heard of Superman before and they'd be confused.
This is true. You totally need to see STM and SII before SR, as this is a sequel to those. At least STM. And not everyone did before watching SR. But I cannot blame them.

Senator Pleasury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 10:26 AM   #9
Lex Luthor
Evildoer
 
Lex Luthor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Legendary Pictures
Posts: 9,562
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

It's understandable, especially due to Singer's open affinity for STM (and whatever he liked about II), that he decided to go with that "vague continuity" idea, essentially ignoring what are considered the lesser films (III + IV). However, for the average joe who might have seen the Reeve Superman films, but didn't have that "vague continuity" approach in mind, and just wanted to watch a new Superman film that summer, I think it effectively jumbled up things much to the detriment of the film itself.

__________________

Lex Luthor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 04:03 PM   #10
Comics N' Toons
Viva La Revolucion!
 
Comics N' Toons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,985
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

I feel like Superman The Movie was a perfect comic book movie. Superman 3 and 4 each have good moments that make the movies worth watching for Superman fans but are not good movies. Superman 4 has probably 20 minutes that are really good. Superman 3 even less, but still.

Comics N' Toons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 01:14 PM   #11
Metallo
Evil Dead Re-Animator
 
Metallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,815
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

I looked at SR as an alternate reality or alternate timeline to STM and SII. I think thats what Singer was trying to say without getting too Complicated. Where events similar to those films happened before SR but they also happened a bit differently. For one thing the main crystal at the fortress isn't green like in the Donner material.

I felt Birds of Prey did something similar with the Batman films being used as story inspiration even though there are differences in continuity. More differences than there are between STM/SII and SR.

Basicslly I like to see it as a film versions of a multiverse. But that's parts just fannon.

Metallo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2013, 04:56 AM   #12
DarKush
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,626
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

I think it was a mistake to ignore Superman 3 and 4 despite how poorly each movie was received. Including them wouldn't have detracted from the story Singer wanted to tell, perhaps could've provided more nods to be placed in SR (for fans of those films and I'm sure they are out there; I liked Superman 3 and didn't think Nuclear Man was that terrible an idea), and it would've cleared up confusion about where SR fits in the Donner-Singer continuity.

Personally I think that Singer should've just made SR a complete reboot, with some nice nods to the Donner films, Smallville, and other Superman lore. It made little sense to me to have a whole new cast and tie say they are the same characters from the 70s and 80s films. Routh did okay channeling Reeve but Bosworth didn't even try with Kidder. I thought Spacey took Hackman's reins very well, but I think he could've given an even better performance if he hadn't been shackled to the old films.

DarKush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2013, 07:42 AM   #13
Metallo
Evil Dead Re-Animator
 
Metallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,815
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

I think he did what he did because he's primarily a fan of the Donner films or at least parts of them but he also knew that to tell the kind of story he did it can be even better to have a Superman that the audience has a bit of familiarity with. It's the same reason that the Batman vs Superman script did things it did so that it could be a vague continuation of the previous film batman and to a lesser extent a previous Superman. It could have worked well with new versions of a batman and superman but it couldve worked even better with versions of the character whose history we had already invested in.

I didn't really mind want Singer did. I liked SR a lot but it had more fundamtal problems than just continuity as far as getting a bigger audience.

As far as the audience and the timeline and dates I always saw Singers reasoning as the film being on a sliding timescale like the comics or the Bond films. More so since its not even a direct sequel.

Metallo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2013, 01:05 PM   #14
metalometallo
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

The thing is though, had SIII & SIV not mentioned that Martha Kent was deceased, there shouldn't of been any problems keeping them in the continuity.

metalometallo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2013, 09:59 PM   #15
RaY_Z
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SYDNEY!!!
Posts: 87
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalometallo View Post
The thing is though, had SIII & SIV not mentioned that Martha Kent was deceased, there shouldn't of been any problems keeping them in the continuity.
Actually, if I remember correctly, Lana mentioned in the reunion to Clark, that it was the first time he'd been back to Smallville since his mom past away.

RaY_Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 10:59 PM   #16
superhero
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mars
Posts: 2,702
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

they did the same thing with x-men organs wolverine they skipped after that the made the wolverine . same thing with ghost rider they made it reboot instead of they acted like the first one didn't happen

superhero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 06:55 PM   #17
Metallo
Evil Dead Re-Animator
 
Metallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,815
Default Re: Ignoring Superman 3 and 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaY_Z View Post
Actually, if I remember correctly, Lana mentioned in the reunion to Clark, that it was the first time he'd been back to Smallville since his mom past away.
In III Lana said that meaning Martha died sometime between the period after STM and before III. In IV Clark is selling the farm. She's still alive during the later parts of STM because Kent wanted part of his salary sent to his mother.

Metallo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.