The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > Superman > Man of Steel

View Poll Results: Too much action
Yes 20 33.33%
No 40 66.67%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2014, 02:28 AM   #76
KRYPTON INC.
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 12,458
Default Re: Too much action?

THE ENDLESS I am not saying that YOU mischaracterize MOS' finale but brother, there are more than enough posters that DO. "Superman knocked over all those buildings!!" Uh.. NO he did not. "Well... I still don't like it. I mean Jon Kent and his wife were abusive parents" You mean when Martha calls the truth of Clark's origin "beautiful" or when Jon says that WHEN the time comes Clark will look on his powers as a "blessing" they were abusive? "What ever..."

That's the attitude I'm talking about. And yes, it is frustrating to see that Hulk and Thor get a pass for not trying to stop that Leviathan from crashing into the VERY OBVIOUSLY still filled with people Grand Central, but Superman gets crucified for the scoutship crashing into a couple of demolished buildings at the edge of the blast zone of the Black Zero attack.

But you know what? I call a mulligan on ALL the nitpicks and gripes in THE AVENGERS because before MOS IT was the most like seeing a comic book come to life. MOS just did that to an even greater magnitude. There is nothing that happens in MOS or AVENGERS that does not regularly occur in a superhero comic, but once we as fans finally get that we piss and moan.

Now that I've got a taste of the epic action, I AINT GOING BACK TO THE FINALES OF YESTERYEARS!!! Too often they just petered out, or were not very satisfying. Whedon and Snyder gave us all what we said we wanted for so long. The internet forum backlash for it befuddles me. Batman gets mulligan after mulligan in the Nolan films even after all his "one rule" BS, then the film's story and the fans eat up what ever technicalities one can imagine to absolve the character of any "sin". Superman? "He's boring, and I dislike the character and his stories, but please, also don't do anything new or challenging with him cuz we'll piss and moan about that too."

__________________
My father. 1946-2014

He truly proved that every person has the potential to be a force for good in this life. So anyone that reads this, do me a favor... Call your parents.
KRYPTON INC. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 02:33 AM   #77
bluearth
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 253
Default Re: Too much action?

It all goes back to Snyder who is a visual director. He shows many instances of Superman saving people even as a little boy. This should tell the audience he cares about human life. But because the film didnt feature a throwaway memorial scene like the one in the avengers ending or one cut of captain america protecting a dozen people then some folks thought Superman didnt care, totally ignoring the previous 130 minutes and the fact superman resorted to killing to save lives. All the while the people who complained that he saved nobody complained about him killing to save.

We planly see in the final battle Metropolis is still largely intact but because theres no scene dedicated to the press surveying the damage peoples imaginations ran wild. Theres countless people who believe Metroplis was totally destroyed. Max Landis was upset Lois was invited to a game because he mistakenly believed a: the daily planet scene took place 24 hours later and b: the stadium was destroyed with most of the city.

I guess it could be considered a flaw in snyders direction. For a few days I even thought Superman screamed after killing zod because he saw the family dead, as there isnt a clear shot of them alive afterwards.

bluearth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 02:45 AM   #78
sportjames23
Side-Kick
 
sportjames23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 314
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRYPTON INC. View Post
THE ENDLESS I am not saying that YOU mischaracterize MOS' finale but brother, there are more than enough posters that DO. "Superman knocked over all those buildings!!" Uh.. NO he did not. "Well... I still don't like it. I mean Jon Kent and his wife were abusive parents" You mean when Martha calls the truth of Clark's origin "beautiful" or when Jon says that WHEN the time comes Clark will look on his powers as a "blessing" they were abusive? "What ever..."

That's the attitude I'm talking about. And yes, it is frustrating to see that Hulk and Thor get a pass for not trying to stop that Leviathan from crashing into the VERY OBVIOUSLY still filled with people Grand Central, but Superman gets crucified for the scoutship crashing into a couple of demolished buildings at the edge of the blast zone of the Black Zero attack.

But you know what? I call a mulligan on ALL the nitpicks and gripes in THE AVENGERS because before MOS IT was the most like seeing a comic book come to life. MOS just did that to an even greater magnitude. There is nothing that happens in MOS or AVENGERS that does not regularly occur in a superhero comic, but once we as fans finally get that we piss and moan.

Now that I've got a taste of the epic action, I AINT GOING BACK TO THE FINALES OF YESTERYEARS!!! Too often they just petered out, or were not very satisfying. Whedon and Snyder gave us all what we said we wanted for so long. The internet forum backlash for it befuddles me. Batman gets mulligan after mulligan in the Nolan films even after all his "one rule" BS, then the film's story and the fans eat up what ever technicalities one can imagine to absolve the character of any "sin". Superman? "He's boring, and I dislike the character and his stories, but please, also don't do anything new or challenging with him cuz we'll piss and moan about that too."

*high fives KRYPTON, INC.*


My dude!

sportjames23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 04:29 AM   #79
BH/HHH
Cavill's Hairychest
 
BH/HHH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 14,839
Default Re: Too much action?

Krypton Inc, I think you just saved the freaking day. That was EPIC sir

BH/HHH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 04:33 AM   #80
KRYPTON INC.
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 12,458
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BH/HHH View Post
Krypton Inc, I think you just saved the freaking day. That was EPIC sir
Don't thank me... (rises up into the air) We're all on the same team. Good nite. (salutes and flies off. Williams theme starts to play.)

__________________
My father. 1946-2014

He truly proved that every person has the potential to be a force for good in this life. So anyone that reads this, do me a favor... Call your parents.
KRYPTON INC. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 05:02 AM   #81
Bruce_Begins
I am still Green Goblin
 
Bruce_Begins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,128
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluearth View Post
It all goes back to Snyder who is a visual director. He shows many instances of Superman saving people even as a little boy. This should tell the audience he cares about human life. But because the film didnt feature a throwaway memorial scene like the one in the avengers ending or one cut of captain america protecting a dozen people then some folks thought Superman didnt care, totally ignoring the previous 130 minutes and the fact superman resorted to killing to save lives. All the while the people who complained that he saved nobody complained about him killing to save.

We planly see in the final battle Metropolis is still largely intact but because theres no scene dedicated to the press surveying the damage peoples imaginations ran wild.

Theres countless people who believe Metroplis was totally destroyed

Max Landis was upset Lois was invited to a game because he mistakenly believed a: the daily planet scene took place 24 hours later and b: the stadium was destroyed with most of the city.

I guess it could be considered a flaw in snyders direction.

For a few days I even thought Superman screamed after killing zod because he saw the family dead, as there isnt a clear shot of them alive afterwards.
Even when I saw the movie for the first time... I never thought that the Daily Planet scene happened 24 hours after the destruction of Metropolis.

I never thought that Superman screamed after he killing Zod as the family died, it was because he was responsible for Zod's death, one of the few survivors of his Kryptonian race.

It is really weird how people can imagine what is not intended, but at the same time cannot imagine what the filmmakers want you to imagine.

__________________

*\S/T*
Bruce_Begins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 05:25 AM   #82
Bruce_Begins
I am still Green Goblin
 
Bruce_Begins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,128
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Pleasury View Post
Superman destroyed a spaceship right above the city and let it fall over it. I'm no even saying anything about how good/bad that is, but he did do quite some damage there.
The space-ship crashed on a few abandoned buildings, the buildings were in the area where Black Zero had flattened out a few blocks of the city.

Supes did not let it crash on buildings full of people, that part of Metropolis was already cleared.

After all, why would anyone stay in the buildings where an alien ship is causing destruction and where fighter jets are firings missiles over that ship ? (And all this happened before Supes came back into Metropolis.)

Those who are making such baseless complaints need to see the movie again.

__________________

*\S/T*
Bruce_Begins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 05:34 AM   #83
sportjames23
Side-Kick
 
sportjames23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 314
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce_Begins View Post
The space-ship crashed on a few abandoned buildings, the buildings were in the area where Black Zero had flattened out a few blocks of the city.

Supes did not let it crash on buildings full of people, that part of Metropolis was already cleared.

After all, why would anyone stay in the buildings where an alien ship is causing destruction and where fighter jets are firings missiles over that ship ? (And all this happened before Supes came back into Metropolis.)

Those who are making such baseless complaints need to see the movie again.

They've had it pointed out to them many times. They just ignore it when they get checked.

sportjames23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 05:49 AM   #84
Bruce_Begins
I am still Green Goblin
 
Bruce_Begins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,128
Default Re: Too much action?

I wish Snyder had left the longer cut of the scene where Clark Kent rides the bicycle in Metropolis to reach the Daily Planet office looking for a job.

Where the sign-boards of rebuilding the part of Metropolis are displayed, which shows that it took them time to get the city back to normal.

This also shows that Clark Kent did not go looking for a job 24 hours after the destruction caused by Black Zero, after all the sign boards cannot be put up for advertisement withing 24 hours of such an incident. :P




__________________

*\S/T*
Bruce_Begins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 05:52 AM   #85
sportjames23
Side-Kick
 
sportjames23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 314
Default Re: Too much action?

Yeah, I don't know why scenes like that were left out. It makes everything seem so abrupt at the end of the film.

sportjames23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 07:28 AM   #86
kguillou
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 5,619
Default Re: Too much action?

Imo, the action is what took my breath away in this movie. I will agree that maybe the film could've maybe...paced the action a little better between scenes but the action scenes themselves, especially the Smallville fight were absolutely amazing. I had been waiting sooo long for a superhero movie to give us a truly epic, all out destructive battle and MoS absolutely delivered. In fact, this was the kind of epic scale action i was HOPING we were going to see in The Avengers and the Battle of New York just looks very tame to the Battle of Metropolis.

This is what has me SOO excited for Supes' battle with the Dark Knight in the next movie. I doubt its going to be nearly as destructive as MoS but you bet your tuckus it is going to be EPIC, perhaps the coolest superhero showdown ever. You just know Snyder is going to knock that out of the park.

Just my thoughts.


Last edited by kguillou; 02-28-2014 at 07:31 AM.
kguillou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2014, 02:18 PM   #87
blumatic
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 566
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Endless View Post
Yes they did. There was dozens of people in a bank who were going to get executed. Cap saved them. Hawkeye was shown pulling people from a wrecked bus etc.

Supes caught one soldier falling from a chopper. But he also basically crashed a space ship into a populated city.

Again, I really enjoy MoS. But some of the stuff in the final battle was overkill because falling sky scrapers look shocking and evoke 9/11. Didn't matter that it was out of character for Superman to disable a spaceships controls over a city and not try to catch it or divert it. Then you have Zod being the one to take the fight into the upper atmosphere. Whyyyyy? Why not have Kal do that to restrict civilian casualties? Why would Zod take the fight into outer space and not Kal?
I will stand corrected on the Avengers. Cap saved them in the same sense Superman saved the city by destroying the World Engine. But remember. They are a team. Ironman Hulk and Thor didn't save anyone directly, let's crap on them for not doing enough.

Secondly the villain always chooses the site of battle. Superman was chasing Zod. Zod was fighting aimlessly. The travel at crazy speeds. They were there in space by accident.


Secondly artistically speaking, you have to fight in the city. What awesome battle did not take place in a city.

Superman taking the fight to a desert would be so boring.

blumatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2014, 07:11 PM   #88
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,019
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blumatic View Post
I will stand corrected on the Avengers. Cap saved them in the same sense Superman saved the city by destroying the World Engine. But remember. They are a team. Ironman Hulk and Thor didn't save anyone directly, let's crap on them for not doing enough.

Secondly the villain always chooses the site of battle. Superman was chasing Zod. Zod was fighting aimlessly. The travel at crazy speeds. They were there in space by accident.


Secondly artistically speaking, you have to fight in the city. What awesome battle did not take place in a city.

Superman taking the fight to a desert would be so boring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blumatic View Post
I will stand corrected on the Avengers. Cap saved them in the same sense Superman saved the city by destroying the World Engine. But remember. They are a team. Ironman Hulk and Thor didn't save anyone directly, let's crap on them for not doing enough.

Secondly the villain always chooses the site of battle. Superman was chasing Zod. Zod was fighting aimlessly. The travel at crazy speeds. They were there in space by accident.


Secondly artistically speaking, you have to fight in the city. What awesome battle did not take place in a city.

Superman taking the fight to a desert would be so boring.


Totally with you on the artistic value of having a fight in the city, but
also giving the fight some scale. I mean Thor v Loki in Avengers was pretty much like 2 ordinary guys fighting, Supes v Zod was waayyyy more epic - even when they trade a couple of blows on the ground, it's much more like two gods fighting. And yes, part of the epic feeling comes from the speed and the destruction - which was highlighted by the urban setting. It was an artistic choice and one that worked. Yeah, I suppose he and Zod could have levelled some mountain ranges, but that wouldn't be as dramatic IMO

It's weird how when we get on to the action in MOS, it always seems to come back to that old "Superman didn't save anyone" complaint. I suppose if you only see the movie once, you might get lost in all the action, so fair enough. But like somebody else said, watch the film again and you realise that's just not true.

As to the destruction being over the top or "disaster porn" what I
I truly believe is that Snyder/Nolan's point in making that choice was
that they wanted to say " If Superman really had a fight in the middle of a city, THIS is what it would look like."

On that note, I loved the fact that we got a very close up view of cars and people being flattened by the gravity beam. Avengers cops out a little by not showing civillian casualties ( you mean the Chitauri didn't manage to kill anyone, come on ? )

I don't want to knock the Avengers, it was tremendous fun, but I think
MOS was a spectacle at least one level up from that, with much greater
stakes.

Besides, comparisons with Avengers start to break down when you think about them a little, especially in respect of the final battle, partly because the Kryptonians didn't send in a bunch of soliders on flying quad bikes, who carried small arms, they used a single immensely destructive weapon.
So containing the damage was a different challenge - a challenge they were able to succeed at because, there's more than just one person.
(also, Supes did contain it, to Metropolis, as opposed to the whole world)


Which is also, as you pointed out, the reason the Avengers were able to save a few people (well some of them did) is because....they're a team, which by definition means there's more than one of them. Superman, for all his great power, is one person, and can't be in two places at once. So he could either fight Zod, or let Zod smash more of Metropolis

Plus, Zod was virtually as powerful as Superman (which makes him infinitely more powerful, dangerous and destructive than the Chitauri ), whereas the Avengers who were solely fighting the Chitauri (Thor, Iron Man and Hulk) were basically picking off bugs (well, big nasty bugs, but compared to Thor, bugs).

And of course again there's the big picture, that if Supes doesn't stop Zod there and then, well, that's it for the human race (which is the reason he had to kill Zod, not to save the family, but to save humanity).

And in terms of saving people you've got:

the oil rig workers, the kids in the school bus, Lois in the escape pod, the helicopter pilot, the entire human race (by destroying the world engine), the family at the end. So there's actually a few saves there.

Why didn't he save anyone during the battle ?

Saving the pilot was a great example of what happens when Superman stops in the middle of a battle to save someone, he gets smacked from behind, which leaves the bad guys free to destroy more stuff, as Faora was gleefully slaughtering the soliders while Supes was busy with Nam Ek).

Fights (even between ordinary people) are messy things -particularly when the combatants are trying to kill each other, and have similar abilities.
The idea that Superman could exert some kind of control over the conditions is nonsense. In a real fight, you don't have time to think about what's going on. It's one thing to watch a fight, and think "Hey why doesn't that guy just..." but another thing to be in a fight and think of the right thing to do.

Superman is pretty damn green in this film, in fact he's never been in a fight before. Is it that much of a stretch that he makes some blunders ?


As to why Supes didn't try to catch the spaceship. Well, he was inside it when it crashed. I suspect that the reason he didn't catch it is that he just couldn't. Maybe he'd have been able to lift it if it was stationary, but an object that size (it's 300m long, so the size of 3 football fields) travelling at a few hundred miles per hour, would have been
really hard to stop (force = mass x change in acceleration, Newton's second law).

Remember he didn't actually stop the escape pod Lois was in (which would have been travelling pretty damn fast, as it was falling from orbit) he just caught up to it, tore it open, and pulled her out.

Superman in MOS isn't as powerful as Silver age Superman, who could have stopped the scout-ship with one finger.

Also, he crashed the ship into the crater left by the gravity beam, so not all that likely that anyone was left there. The fact is that almost all of the destruction caused in Metropolis was caused by the Gravity beam, or by
Zod (using heat vision to cut the skyscraper in half so it crumbled) or tossing Supes through a bunch of buildings - remember when Supes punches Zod and sends him flying it's above the buildings, it's then Zod who flies down into the city to hide and then ambush Supes).

(and again, big picture, if Zod has the ship, and then can kill Kal and get the codex, then humanity's history, as Zod will be able to raise a whole generation of kryptonian super-babies).

What seems a bit of a double standard is that people make it out that when Superman gets thrown through those buildings by Zod, it's somehow his fault for the destruction that results.

Yet, when the jets fire missiles which get deflected and then themselves
crash into the city, causing enormous destruction, no one goes "Wow, those air force bastards did a lot of damage to Metropolis"
Glad somebody else pointed that out ( I mean, those jets open up with missiles and cannon fire on main street Smallville, when they have troops on the ground, and civillians hiding in buildings. How many people would have got killed in the resulting explosions, waaayyy more than Supes and his Kryptonian enemies killed. And when the jets crashed, well, there goes downtown Smallville !)

So, in summary, I enjoyed the final battle of MOS, I'm not saying that with a few tweaks it could have been even better, and possibly avoided some of the criticisms that have been levelled at it. But hey, it is what it is.

I'm also not saying that MOS is a perfect film (I loved, LOVED, it ) but every film has its flaws, and MOS does too. However, I just can't see the action being one of them.

Sorry to everyone who's already brought all these arguments up in defence of MOS, as I'm covering old ground.


Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2014, 08:32 PM   #89
manofsteel4life
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,459
Default Re: Too much action?

Couldn't have said it better Batman....

__________________
Quote:
As the poet John Dryden once had it: "Beware the fury of a patient man." Or Batman.
manofsteel4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2014, 10:57 PM   #90
MrsKent26
Whatever.
 
MrsKent26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 10,397
Default Re: Too much action?

MOS did not have too much action. It was the best CBM action I've every seen. I hope Snyder brings it for the sequel.

__________________
"Somewhere in our darkest night, we made up the story of a man who will never let us down…" - Grant Morrison.

*
\S/T*
MrsKent26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2014, 11:11 PM   #91
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,019
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by manofsteel4life View Post
Couldn't have said it better Batman....
Cheers dude ! Let's hope Snyder listens to the poll results
and maintains the level of action and excitement in Superman's
next film appearance. Man, 2016 is just too far away.

Peace out Super-fans !

Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 09:40 AM   #92
kguillou
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 5,619
Default Re: Too much action?

I just finished watching it again and each time I watch it the action scenes, to me, get shorter and shorter. The Smallville and Zod fights are both barely under 5 minutes. Whenever I watch those scenes now, I'm like "That's it? I remember these fights being longer!". Here's what i think: I think people were just overwhelmed with the intensity of the action and not so much the amount of action itself. When added up MoS probably has less action than The Avengers but the intensity and gravity of the action is much higher than Avengers. That's why I think people say there's "too much", they just didn't like or appreciate the massive destruction that occurred during these sequences. I, for one, thought it was pure spectacle and took my breath away. These are the kind of epic action scenes that you have to watch on a big screen tv with the volume and bass turned all the way up to really fully appreciate.

I mean, to each his own I suppose. The Transformers movies got ripped for the same reasons (even though those movies are, in fact, bad movies). I know for a fact though that a lot of Superman fans including myself have been waiting for a movie where Superman can cut loose and show what he's capable of and I'm so happy we finally got it.


Last edited by kguillou; 03-02-2014 at 09:43 AM.
kguillou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 10:58 AM   #93
snpklsdmbldr
welcome to the planet
 
snpklsdmbldr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 329
Default Re: Too much action?

complaining about too much action in a comicbook movie is like complaining there's too much jokes in a comedy or too much crying in a drama.

snpklsdmbldr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 12:26 PM   #94
sportjames23
Side-Kick
 
sportjames23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 314
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batmannerism View Post
Totally with you on the artistic value of having a fight in the city, but
also giving the fight some scale. I mean Thor v Loki in Avengers was pretty much like 2 ordinary guys fighting, Supes v Zod was waayyyy more epic - even when they trade a couple of blows on the ground, it's much more like two gods fighting. And yes, part of the epic feeling comes from the speed and the destruction - which was highlighted by the urban setting. It was an artistic choice and one that worked. Yeah, I suppose he and Zod could have levelled some mountain ranges, but that wouldn't be as dramatic IMO

It's weird how when we get on to the action in MOS, it always seems to come back to that old "Superman didn't save anyone" complaint. I suppose if you only see the movie once, you might get lost in all the action, so fair enough. But like somebody else said, watch the film again and you realise that's just not true.

As to the destruction being over the top or "disaster porn" what I
I truly believe is that Snyder/Nolan's point in making that choice was
that they wanted to say " If Superman really had a fight in the middle of a city, THIS is what it would look like."

On that note, I loved the fact that we got a very close up view of cars and people being flattened by the gravity beam. Avengers cops out a little by not showing civillian casualties ( you mean the Chitauri didn't manage to kill anyone, come on ? )

I don't want to knock the Avengers, it was tremendous fun, but I think
MOS was a spectacle at least one level up from that, with much greater
stakes.

Besides, comparisons with Avengers start to break down when you think about them a little, especially in respect of the final battle, partly because the Kryptonians didn't send in a bunch of soliders on flying quad bikes, who carried small arms, they used a single immensely destructive weapon.
So containing the damage was a different challenge - a challenge they were able to succeed at because, there's more than just one person.
(also, Supes did contain it, to Metropolis, as opposed to the whole world)


Which is also, as you pointed out, the reason the Avengers were able to save a few people (well some of them did) is because....they're a team, which by definition means there's more than one of them. Superman, for all his great power, is one person, and can't be in two places at once. So he could either fight Zod, or let Zod smash more of Metropolis

Plus, Zod was virtually as powerful as Superman (which makes him infinitely more powerful, dangerous and destructive than the Chitauri ), whereas the Avengers who were solely fighting the Chitauri (Thor, Iron Man and Hulk) were basically picking off bugs (well, big nasty bugs, but compared to Thor, bugs).

And of course again there's the big picture, that if Supes doesn't stop Zod there and then, well, that's it for the human race (which is the reason he had to kill Zod, not to save the family, but to save humanity).

And in terms of saving people you've got:

the oil rig workers, the kids in the school bus, Lois in the escape pod, the helicopter pilot, the entire human race (by destroying the world engine), the family at the end. So there's actually a few saves there.

Why didn't he save anyone during the battle ?

Saving the pilot was a great example of what happens when Superman stops in the middle of a battle to save someone, he gets smacked from behind, which leaves the bad guys free to destroy more stuff, as Faora was gleefully slaughtering the soliders while Supes was busy with Nam Ek).

Fights (even between ordinary people) are messy things -particularly when the combatants are trying to kill each other, and have similar abilities.
The idea that Superman could exert some kind of control over the conditions is nonsense. In a real fight, you don't have time to think about what's going on. It's one thing to watch a fight, and think "Hey why doesn't that guy just..." but another thing to be in a fight and think of the right thing to do.

Superman is pretty damn green in this film, in fact he's never been in a fight before. Is it that much of a stretch that he makes some blunders ?


As to why Supes didn't try to catch the spaceship. Well, he was inside it when it crashed. I suspect that the reason he didn't catch it is that he just couldn't. Maybe he'd have been able to lift it if it was stationary, but an object that size (it's 300m long, so the size of 3 football fields) travelling at a few hundred miles per hour, would have been
really hard to stop (force = mass x change in acceleration, Newton's second law).

Remember he didn't actually stop the escape pod Lois was in (which would have been travelling pretty damn fast, as it was falling from orbit) he just caught up to it, tore it open, and pulled her out.

Superman in MOS isn't as powerful as Silver age Superman, who could have stopped the scout-ship with one finger.

Also, he crashed the ship into the crater left by the gravity beam, so not all that likely that anyone was left there. The fact is that almost all of the destruction caused in Metropolis was caused by the Gravity beam, or by
Zod (using heat vision to cut the skyscraper in half so it crumbled) or tossing Supes through a bunch of buildings - remember when Supes punches Zod and sends him flying it's above the buildings, it's then Zod who flies down into the city to hide and then ambush Supes).

(and again, big picture, if Zod has the ship, and then can kill Kal and get the codex, then humanity's history, as Zod will be able to raise a whole generation of kryptonian super-babies).

What seems a bit of a double standard is that people make it out that when Superman gets thrown through those buildings by Zod, it's somehow his fault for the destruction that results.

Yet, when the jets fire missiles which get deflected and then themselves
crash into the city, causing enormous destruction, no one goes "Wow, those air force bastards did a lot of damage to Metropolis"
Glad somebody else pointed that out ( I mean, those jets open up with missiles and cannon fire on main street Smallville, when they have troops on the ground, and civillians hiding in buildings. How many people would have got killed in the resulting explosions, waaayyy more than Supes and his Kryptonian enemies killed. And when the jets crashed, well, there goes downtown Smallville !)

So, in summary, I enjoyed the final battle of MOS, I'm not saying that with a few tweaks it could have been even better, and possibly avoided some of the criticisms that have been levelled at it. But hey, it is what it is.

I'm also not saying that MOS is a perfect film (I loved, LOVED, it ) but every film has its flaws, and MOS does too. However, I just can't see the action being one of them.

Sorry to everyone who's already brought all these arguments up in defence of MOS, as I'm covering old ground.


*high fives the hell outta Batmannerism*

sportjames23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 06:18 PM   #95
the5timechamp
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 172
Default Re: Too much action?

too much action? In MOS...

I dont think so, the tone and the stakes setup through the narrative of the film justifies the scale of the action.

Having just watched Thor 2 I still get the same feeling that the Marvel universe is a fun place where heroes get to be heroic in a sanitized family friendly way that we can all enjoy. DC films on the other hand are fun in their own regard but the tone is definitely darker and the actions of its heroes and villains create a more palpable feeling of consequence. Its hard to quantify but DC films have tension where the villains in Marvel feel as if they exist merely to be vanquished..

I enjoy both and feel the tones fit their respective universe better.

the5timechamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 08:43 PM   #96
MrsKent26
Whatever.
 
MrsKent26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 10,397
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kguillou View Post
I just finished watching it again and each time I watch it the action scenes, to me, get shorter and shorter. The Smallville and Zod fights are both barely under 5 minutes. Whenever I watch those scenes now, I'm like "That's it? I remember these fights being longer!". Here's what i think: I think people were just overwhelmed with the intensity of the action and not so much the amount of action itself. When added up MoS probably has less action than The Avengers but the intensity and gravity of the action is much higher than Avengers. That's why I think people say there's "too much", they just didn't like or appreciate the massive destruction that occurred during these sequences. I, for one, thought it was pure spectacle and took my breath away. These are the kind of epic action scenes that you have to watch on a big screen tv with the volume and bass turned all the way up to really fully appreciate.

I mean, to each his own I suppose. The Transformers movies got ripped for the same reasons (even though those movies are, in fact, bad movies). I know for a fact though that a lot of Superman fans including myself have been waiting for a movie where Superman can cut loose and show what he's capable of and I'm so happy we finally got it.
Agreed. Especially with the bold parts.

__________________
"Somewhere in our darkest night, we made up the story of a man who will never let us down…" - Grant Morrison.

*
\S/T*
MrsKent26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 08:53 PM   #97
the5timechamp
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 172
Default Re: Too much action?

Agreed as well.. the intensity caught audiences off guard..they wanted the "wholesome" superman.

My problem with Transformers (the sequels mostly).. was that the action rang hollow because I didnt care for any of the characters or the motivations of the bad guys..it was action for actions sake..

As much as people claim to love the forest battle in Transformers 2 I can honestly say the Scorponnok desert battle in Transformers 1 was the best sequence in those films.

Superman earned its action and I cared for the payoff to the narratives of the villains (even the small self contained narratives "a good death..") and the heroes..

the5timechamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 05:10 PM   #98
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,019
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportjames23 View Post
*high fives the hell outta Batmannerism*
Thanks dude ! Just got to call it as I see it.

Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 05:14 PM   #99
ThePhantasm
The Shadow Knows
 
ThePhantasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 10,551
Default Re: Too much action?

I thought the action was fine.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesConceptz View Post
Im done. Im leaving this website. I promise i will not be spiderman or attempt to be. I have a ral careerr to fulfill. Please don NOT tell anyone about this. I would appreciate if you all kept this a secret.
ThePhantasm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 07:37 PM   #100
Daywalker89
In Zion I await my spirit
 
Daywalker89's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Training In Rural Japan Kichijo-ji
Posts: 439
Default Re: Too much action?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batmannerism View Post
Thanks dude ! Just got to call it as I see it.
That was one hell of a post brother. Post of the damn thread .

__________________
" I have spent my whole life lookin' for that thing that killed my mother, and made me what I am. And every time I take one of those monsters out, I get a little piece of that life back. So don't you tell me about forgetting "
Daywalker89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.