The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice > Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2018, 07:44 AM   #901
Flint Marko
Bring me Thanos
 
Flint Marko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,524
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
It's not valid if it's not accurate. The comments that are there not only don't reflect Randian philosophy, they also aren't embraced by the protagonist and the films as a whole. It's not a fair reading in any way as a result.
You can personally disagree with this interpretation all day, it refutes nothing. The simple fact that this Randian subtext has been independently noted by numerous people for quite some time now definitively proves that is absolutely a fair reading whether you like it or not. That's my point. The fact that he wants to make a Fountainhead movie is just the cherry on top.

__________________
Quote:
"Kevin Fiege built this in a cave! With a box of scraps!."
Flint Marko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 08:03 AM   #902
misslane38
Side-Kick
 
misslane38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,640
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint Marko View Post
You can personally disagree with this interpretation all day, it refutes nothing. The simple fact that this Randian subtext has been independently noted by numerous people for quite some time now definitively proves that is absolutely a fair reading whether you like it or not. That's my point. The fact that he wants to make a Fountainhead movie is just the cherry on top.
That's an ad populum fallacy, and when it's noted it's done in the same lazy and inaccurate way you noted it with the same out of context lines and nonexistent analysis. It's a reading that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Even you aren't able to explain or support it.

misslane38 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 08:12 AM   #903
Flint Marko
Bring me Thanos
 
Flint Marko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,524
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
That's an ad populum fallacy, and when it's noted it's done in the same lazy and inaccurate way you noted it with the same out of context lines and nonexistent analysis. It's a reading that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Even you aren't able to explain or support it.
Oh I certainly can, I just know better than to engage in a debate with you as you’ve long been noted for your tendency to assert your interpretation as the only valid one. This is a wonderful example of that.

“Ad populum fallacy”, lol. I’m not arguing that it’s true because a lot of people say it is, I’m clearly saying that it’s a valid reading because it’s clearly something many people are seeing. I’m not sure how you missed that.

__________________
Quote:
"Kevin Fiege built this in a cave! With a box of scraps!."
Flint Marko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 08:15 AM   #904
misslane38
Side-Kick
 
misslane38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,640
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint Marko View Post
Oh I certainly can, I just know better than to engage in a debate with you as you’ve long been noted for your tendency to assert your interpretation as the only valid one. This is a wonderful example of that.

“Ad populum fallacy”, lol. I’m not arguing that it’s true because a lot of people say it is, I’m clearly saying that it’s a valid reading because it’s clearly something many people are seeing. I’m not sure how you missed that.
More nonsense and grasping at straws. I can't see this going anywhere productive, so agree to disagree, I guess?

misslane38 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 08:58 AM   #905
Flint Marko
Bring me Thanos
 
Flint Marko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,524
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
More nonsense and grasping at straws. I can't see this going anywhere productive, so agree to disagree, I guess?
Agree to disagree, then. Enjoy your fountainhead movie

__________________
Quote:
"Kevin Fiege built this in a cave! With a box of scraps!."

Last edited by Flint Marko; 05-29-2018 at 09:07 AM.
Flint Marko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 10:41 AM   #906
Flemm
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,611
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
I get that Snyder seems interested in adapting Rand's work, like The Fountainhead, but he tends to deconstruct and subvert a lot, and it may be that he's mostly interested in it as a commentary on art and creativity without much interest in applying it to economics or morality.
Does that really make sense? Objectivism is a moral philosophy, primarily. It's explicitly anti-christian on the crucial topics of compassion and altruism. I don't think there's any way around that.

We don't have to assume that the movies are philosophically coherent. They have never really come across to me as being all that coherent, and trying to reconcile two contradictory moral philosophies could be the cause of that.

The article linked earlier suggests that a creative tension between the writers and the director (for BvS) is the root cause of certain aspects of the film being dissonant. I noticed that comment because I had a similar reaction to the film without considering the philosophical question. (We don't need to speculate about the filmmakers' philosophical views to pick up on some of the inconsistencies noted in the linked commentary, but it's one possible explanation.)


Last edited by Flemm; 05-29-2018 at 11:15 AM.
Flemm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 11:54 AM   #907
misslane38
Side-Kick
 
misslane38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,640
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flemm View Post
Does that really make sense? Objectivism is a moral philosophy, primarily. It's explicitly anti-christian on the crucial topics of compassion and altruism. I don't think there's any way around that.
If that were true, then Rand wouldn't have been able to express the philosophy metaphorically through a narrative about artistic creation. It can be possible to appreciate its application there without endorsing it's application in other ways.

Quote:
We don't have to assume that the movies are philosophically coherent. They have never really come across to me as being all that coherent, and trying to reconcile two contradictory moral philosophies could be the cause of that.

The article linked earlier suggests that a creative tension between the writers and the director (for BvS) is the root cause of certain aspects of the film being dissonant. I noticed that comment because I had a similar reaction to the film without considering the philosophical question. (We don't need to speculate about the filmmakers' philosophical views to pick up on some of the inconsistencies noted in the linked commentary, but it's one possible explanation.)
I read the articles, and they themselves aren't coherent and lack accuracy in key areas relevant to this discussion. You can still feel the films weren't coherent without embracing this particular explanation for why it might feel that way.

misslane38 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 12:17 PM   #908
Flemm
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,611
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
If that were true, then Rand wouldn't have been able to express the philosophy metaphorically through a narrative about artistic creation.
Well, anything can be expressed metaphorically.

Now, can something like The Fountainhead be interpreted in such a way as to distinguish it from the moral and ethical views that were expressed more directly by the same author later?

Maybe. That feels like an open question, though I am skeptical.

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
You can still feel the films weren't coherent without embracing this particular explanation for why it might feel that way.
Yes, that's true. I didn't embrace it, I just noticed it in passing.

Flemm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 06:05 PM   #909
Flint Marko
Bring me Thanos
 
Flint Marko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,524
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
The Randian reading of Snyder's DCEU work is very flimsy and not worth taking seriously.
https://irrationalgames.ghoststoryga...5-zack-snyder/

10:30

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack Snyder

I had a big meeting one time for Fountainhead....I was like 'wow, I'm a big fan of the book....'

Rand does have that kind of comic book heroic - there's a naiveté to her philosophy that - I always feel like maybe my first brush with the idea of this renaissance Superman came from her and I kind of went backwards - and I always say I grew up reading Heavy Metal, I didn't read the classic comic books I had to go back to them. I was captivated with fantasy art.... I liked heavy metal, and then I kind of really started following the body-building circuit, and that kind of got me to Rand....
That's so weird that the guy who grew up reading and liking Ayn Rand before superheroes and, in his own words, came to discover superheroes through that specific lens, then went on to make superhero movies that a bunch of people all independently observed some Randian influences in....

But hey you're right, now tell us how that's all just one big coincidence!

__________________
Quote:
"Kevin Fiege built this in a cave! With a box of scraps!."

Last edited by Flint Marko; 05-29-2018 at 06:45 PM.
Flint Marko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 06:50 PM   #910
misslane38
Side-Kick
 
misslane38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,640
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint Marko View Post
https://irrationalgames.ghoststoryga...5-zack-snyder/

10:30



That's so weird that the guy who grew up reading and liking Ayn Rand before superheroes and, in his own words, came to discover superheroes through that specific lens, then went on to make superhero movies that a bunch of people all independently observed some Randian influences in....

But hey you're right, that's probably just a coincidence! Tell us more about how "flimsy" that reading is.
It is flimsy. You are continually relying on logical fallacies to make your argument. You have to cite the actual text of the actual film to support your reading of Snyder's work as Randian. The "independently observed Randian influences" are all based on a misreading and misquoting of two scenes featuring the words of the Kents. It takes dialogue out of context and completely ignores the choices made and celebrated by the protagonist. It's also wrong to suggest the observation was made independently. In this era of social media, a thought can be shared and it spreads. It's more of a bandwagon of conformity than independent thinking.

Please do the analysis yourself. Research Rand, research The Fountainhead, research the canon of MoS and BvS. Provide the evidence. If the independent readings have merit, then you should be able to find ample support yourself. An interview with Zack Snyder from 2010 where he discusses a generic ubermensch does not tell me anything about the messages embedded in his DCEU films and his Superman. Find the places where Rand and Snyder intersect in his DCEU oeuvre and then report back whether or not you believe there is enough evidence to support such an interpretation.

Be a critical thinker.


Last edited by misslane38; 05-29-2018 at 07:08 PM.
misslane38 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 07:17 PM   #911
Flint Marko
Bring me Thanos
 
Flint Marko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 15,524
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by misslane38 View Post
It is flimsy. You are continually relying on logical fallacies to make your argument. You have to cite the actual text of the actual film to support your reading of Snyder's work as Randian.

The "independently observed Randian influences" are all based on a misreading and misquoting of two scenes featuring the words of the Kents. It takes dialogue out of context and completely ignores the choices made and celebrated by the protagonist. You are embarrassing yourself, Flint Marko.

Please do the analysis yourself. Research Rand, research The Fountainhead, research the canon of MoS and BvS. Provide the evidence. If the independent readings have merit, then you should be able to find ample support yourself. An interview with Zack Snyder from 2010 does not tell me anything about the messages embedded in his DCEU films. Find the places where Rand and Snyder intersect in his DCEU oeuvre and then report back whether or not you believe there is enough evidence to support such an interpretation.

Be a critical thinker.
Nah, I've already explained that I'm not interested in engaging the text with you for a variety of reasons (cue MBJ's meme of arguing with a brick wall), the main one being that it ultimately isn't even necessary to make my point work.

My main point has only been that you are not the arbiter of what is and is not a valid interpretation of Snyder's films and widely observed Randian influences in the work of someone who is a huge fan of Rand is a valid reading of these movies whether or not you ultimately agree with them.

__________________
Quote:
"Kevin Fiege built this in a cave! With a box of scraps!."

Last edited by Flint Marko; 05-29-2018 at 08:18 PM.
Flint Marko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2018, 09:04 PM   #912
The Guard
Side-Kick
 
The Guard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 32,295
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

What's the bodybuilding connection to Rand?

Is it because of the "Atlas" thing?

__________________
"Perception is the enemy of reason."

-Me
The Guard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 01:05 AM   #913
lordofthenerds
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
 
lordofthenerds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 11,580
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

I'm not sure whether I'd call MOS or BvS "Randian", though MOS did strike me as having some (subtle) right-libertarian themes in it. It doesn't surprise me that Snyder is an Ayn Rand fan.

The clearest example of such a theme in MOS was the decision to make Krypton essentially function as a left-wing police state, leading to its collapse. Kryptonians were no longer biologically born, but were genetically engineered by the state to serve a specific function for the collective society. As we know, Jor-El took issue with messing around with the sanctity of biological birth (more of a conservative theme), and preached of the freedoms that this social engineering stripped of its citizens to choose their own paths. The film made this a fairly prevalent theme, and even tried to tie the planet's destruction to Krypton's genetic engineering project.

In the Superman lore, Krypton has never had this type of left-wing autocratic society. This vision of Krypton, and the messages attached to it, was injected into the movie by (presumably) Snyder and Goyer. It didn't bother me, but it wasn't entirely necessary.

I didn't pick up on any major socio-political themes in BvS, but maybe I missed something.

lordofthenerds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 10:55 AM   #914
Aurakles
Side-Kick
 
Aurakles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 556
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint Marko View Post
“You don’t owe this world a thing.”

“You should consider letting kids die to protect yourself.”


Yup, nothing Randian about that. Total coincidence that same director wants to make a Fountainhead movie.

It's important to look at both of these in context.

In the MOS scene, Jonathan starts out angry at Clark; slamming the door on his way out, the way he delivered "We talked about this, right?". He's annoyed that Clarks secret has been put at risk and scared that his son might now be in danger.

When Clark says "What was I supposed to do, just let them die?", Jonathan pauses, he's speechless for a moment. He realises that he's made a mistake, and is ashamed.
Consider the way Costner delivers that "Maybe", he's quiet now, and looking at the ground, he isn't saying yes, he's saying he doesn't know.
Jonathan is considering a scenario where letting a small number of people die now, will save many in the future and he's struggling with that moral dilemma.
He knows that Clark did a good thing by saving the kids, but he's also a parent scared for his child, and someone who feels the weight of history on his shoulders.
Jonathan makes clear he knows Clark is going to radically change the world, so he's trying to make sure it doesn't go wrong. He's trying to impress upon Clark the importance of being very careful how he uses his powers.

I think a lot of people have taken "Maybe" to mean yes, but it very much doesn't, it means I don't know. It's a very realistic, human response, he wants to do good, but isn't sure what the best way to do that is.



For BVS, the full quote is:

"Be their hero Clark, be their angel, be their monument, be anything they need you to be.
Or be none of it. You don't owe this world a thing, you never did."

Martha tells Clark he has a choice, she doesn't tell him what to do, she let's him make his own decision. She tells him he has two paths infront of him, without saying he should follow.

Martha is saying that if he's going to wear the cape, he's going to need to accept that fact that people will idolise him, and he'll need to try to embody the highest ideals of humanity.
And that if he can't do that, he needs to stop.

Martha believes in Superman, that he does good and is helping people. But she's also a mother, who is seeing her son being publicly criticised just for trying to save lives, accused of murder, of being a threat to the human race. It's completely natural for her to feel angry, she loves her child and is protective of him, of course she's going to feel some resentment towards the way he's being treated.
Martha is conflicted, isn't sure what the right thing is.

Again, it seems a lot of people took this as Martha saying "be none of it ", which isn't the case she just reframes Clarks options for him.
Martha isn't telling him to stop being Superman, she's letting him decide.

Both of these are examples of a parent trying to help their child with a difficult decision that they are both struggling with.
It's different from the super-hero norm, where there's a Jor-El or an Uncle Ben who tells the hero in no uncertain terms what the right thing is, where right and wrong and easily distinguished.
Rather than the hero just being given their marching orders by a perfect role model, the Kents are good people but fallible, the don't have all the answers but are trying their best.
MOS and BVS show that the right choice isn't always easy to determine, that real people with pure intentions have trouble finding the best way to help.

Aurakles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 02:45 PM   #915
misslane38
Side-Kick
 
misslane38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,640
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by lordofthenerds View Post
I'm not sure whether I'd call MOS or BvS "Randian", though MOS did strike me as having some (subtle) right-libertarian themes in it. It doesn't surprise me that Snyder is an Ayn Rand fan.
I think the mistake you and others are making is assuming that seeming evidence of an individual thing is indicative of wholesale endorsement; it's more or less making a mountain out of a molehill. It's something explored in this article about The Incredibles, which was also subjected to accusations of Objectivism:

Except that Brad Bird [the man behind The Incredibles] isn’t an Objectivist. He’s an avowed centrist, stating in multiple interviews that any Rand-sympathizing ideology in the film was completely incidental. In talking to IGN’s Andy Patrizio, Bird put it in no uncertain terms: “I think [the film] got misinterpreted a few times. Some people said it was Ayn Rand or something like that, which is ridiculous. Other people threw Nietzsche around, which I also find ridiculous.” In an interview with animation historian Michael Barrier, Bird said, “Sometimes I feel like people got silly with their analysis of [the film]."

The factors compelling audiences to create unintended meaning in superhero movies vary, but a shared root cause unites them. Discerning what a film is “really about” gives analysts a comfortable feeling of simplicity and exactitude. Articles like Cracked’s list of “Mind-Blowing Hidden Meanings” approach films as questions that each have a single, fully formed answer. It fosters the mistaken idea that watching a movie is a matter of “figuring it out,” of seeing past the smoke and mirrors to art’s clear-cut intentions. When a film conceals its underlying significance like a riddle, it can be safely filed away once it’s solved. Viewers have successfully triumphed over the film’s trickery, and can walk away with the warm feeling of being smart enough to “get it.”

The danger is clear and present: Politicized “decodings” of pop culture don’t leave enough room for diversity of opinion. When a viewer does a bit of research after watching The Incredibles and lands on the Objectivist theory, that squeezes out half a dozen other critiques. The film’s deliberate characterization of the faceless thugs as real, remorseless killers frames it as a loving deconstruction of the big-budget superhero movies it emulates. As moral content goes, no self-respecting children’s film would claim “mediocrity is evil” as its guiding theme. Brad’s final act underlines a message that life’s gravest danger is not being true to yourself. When the Parr family lets the realities of everyday life (office drudgery, childcare, high school) overshadow the exuberant, joyful parts of their identities, they live in existential agony. Returning to superheroics is a reclamation of the familial mojo; Dash ends up going for the track team, coming in second, and loving it. That’s why they’re called “readings” instead of “solutions.” Art will never hand down rulings on who is right or wrong. All active viewers can do is formulate an opinion and supply evidence that supports it.

So the answer to the million-dollar question “Is The Incredibles an Objectivist film?” is a resounding “maybe.” Viewers are free to cook up whatever interpretations they like, which can be a wonderful thing. Room 237 illustrated the way a wealth of views on a film can invigorate the text and the people debating it. In any case, the text remains a thing of beauty to be looked upon and argued about. Appreciation of art lies in dialogue and dissent, not in wrestling entertainment into submission. When everyone’s assured of their own viewpoint, no one will be, and isn’t that just incredible?


To that end, meaning the value of dialogue when discussing differing viewpoints on a text, I offer an alternative view of Goyer and Snyder's take on Krypton in MoS.

Quote:
The clearest example of such a theme in MOS was the decision to make Krypton essentially function as a left-wing police state, leading to its collapse. Kryptonians were no longer biologically born, but were genetically engineered by the state to serve a specific function for the collective society. As we know, Jor-El took issue with messing around with the sanctity of biological birth (more of a conservative theme), and preached of the freedoms that this social engineering stripped of its citizens to choose their own paths. The film made this a fairly prevalent theme, and even tried to tie the planet's destruction to Krypton's genetic engineering project.
While you may see Rand, others see reflections of ancient Greek philosophers like Plato, referenced in MoS, and Socrates. Still others might see in Krypton's fall either a warning about poor environmental stewardship and xenophobia or parallels to Hitler's fascist state where eugenics and military might were key.

Quote:
In the Superman lore, Krypton has never had this type of left-wing autocratic society. This vision of Krypton, and the messages attached to it, was injected into the movie by (presumably) Snyder and Goyer. It didn't bother me, but it wasn't entirely necessary.
This isn't exactly true. In several versions of Krypton's past, the society is similar to what is portrayed in MoS. There are guilds present, for example, and artificial population manipulation involving clones and genesis chambers are also in use in MoS's antecedets. It's also inaccurate to say Krypton was autocratic. It was run by a ruling council; Zod was the autocrat who attempted a military coup only for the council to arrest him and sentence him to the Phantom Zone along with his conspirators. This isn't that different from Wakanda in Black Panther where a council of the tribes meets to make decisions and which was also challenged by a more militant leader: Killmonger.

misslane38 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 06:54 PM   #916
lordofthenerds
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
 
lordofthenerds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 11,580
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Fair enough, I suppose. Man of Steel's depiction of Krypton was admittedly subtle enough (thematically speaking) to draw multiple interpretations of it. The word "autocratic" wasn't really the word I was looking for - "authoritarian" would work better, seeing as it seemed to have no democracy, and nearly complete control over its citizens lives.

lordofthenerds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 05:59 AM   #917
the last son
Side-Kick
 
the last son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,103
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

What made the Senator realize there was a jar of pee mid sentence? How did it get there without her noticing in three first place?

the last son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 07:47 PM   #918
Aurakles
Side-Kick
 
Aurakles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 556
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

I think either Mercy put it there, or Luther payed someone who worked there to plant it.
It was there the whole time but being caught up in the fact that she was chairing a massively important proceeding she didn't notice it until she was speaking.
Upon seeing it she would have first been confused why it was there instead of her normal glass of water. The she slowly realised that the very powerful man who was responsible for many murders and she had challenged had put it there.

The meaning of the jar comes from the conversation she had with Luthor earlier:
"You can call me whatever you like. Take a bucket of piss and call it Granny's Peach Tea; take a weapon of assassination and call it deterrence. You won't fool a fly or me. I'm not gonna drink it."

She linked piss with assassination, so him sending her the jar is a private joke, letting her know that he is going to assassinate her.

Aurakles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2018, 10:22 PM   #919
Assassin32
Or: Rōnin Iscariot
 
Assassin32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 6,588
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by the last son View Post
What made the Senator realize there was a jar of pee mid sentence? How did it get there without her noticing in three first place?
It was the filmmakers who made her realize it was there mid-sentence. She didn't notice it was there in the first place because the filmmakers wanted her to deliver those lines of dialogue first.

__________________
"I'm cold like a midnight in Aspen/I am the president and the assassin . . . "

Assassin32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2018, 05:48 PM   #920
Vaibow
Side-Kick
 
Vaibow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

So i rewatched BvS last night... in my mind it's definitely a Batman movie over Superman, Batfleck nails it too. It's also an intense movie, i can seen why kids/teens were turned off. Regarding objectism... i can see how it relates here, esp with the directors love of her work.

I just wish we had a MOS2 before this, would have made it even more powerful. We are only told of the implications of a super man, we didn't get to enjoy him being super.

Vaibow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2018, 06:17 PM   #921
Aurakles
Side-Kick
 
Aurakles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 556
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

I think it's more of a Superman movie, it's a film that examines Superman from various points of view; Batman, Lois, Luthor and even Clarks view of himself. All the major characters have arcs about how Superman has affected their lives, and what they think his role in the world is.

BVS uses Batman as an example of how Superman can inspire people to better themselves.

Aurakles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2018, 10:39 PM   #922
Vaibow
Side-Kick
 
Vaibow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurakles View Post
I think it's more of a Superman movie, it's a film that examines Superman from various points of view; Batman, Lois, Luthor and even Clarks view of himself. All the major characters have arcs about how Superman has affected their lives, and what they think his role in the world is.

BVS uses Batman as an example of how Superman can inspire people to better themselves.
sure, i appreciate that statement, but i guess that lines up with what i said about this movie being about his implications - it's indirectly a superman film, but directly focuses on the people around him.

Vaibow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2018, 10:09 AM   #923
Travesty
Side-Kick
 
Travesty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Your Mom's House
Posts: 22,454
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

I see it way more as a Superman movie that features Batman. Batman going after Superman is all because of what he witnessed with the attacks on Metropolis, and the main villains in the movie are Lex Luthor and Doomsday. It also follows Lois closely, about the conspiracy of Lex/Superman. I mean, every plot point is about Superman. The main focus of the movie is Superman.

I just don't see how it's more of a Batman movie? It would almost be like saying Ragnarok is a Hulk movie. I just don't see it.

__________________
"Political Correctness is Fascism Pretending to be Manners." - George Carlin
Travesty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2018, 11:02 AM   #924
Kane52630
Just Some Nut
 
Kane52630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York Subway
Posts: 93,597
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

But Ragnarok wasn't called Hulk v Thor: Dawn of Ragnarok

__________________
INTERSPACE | STARCADIAN
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
Kane52630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2018, 11:10 AM   #925
The Joker
The Clown Prince of Crime
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 49,355
Default Re: All Things Batman v Superman: An Open Discussion (TAG SPOILERS) - - - - - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane52630 View Post
But Ragnarok wasn't called Hulk v Thor: Dawn of Ragnarok

__________________
"Sometimes I remember it one way. Sometimes another. If I'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!"

- The Joker
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of Mandatory Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2018 All Rights Reserved.