![]() |
![]() |
#151 |
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Stay out of my territory
Posts: 8,152
|
![]()
Whedon is a creator, avengers probably doesn't have as big a place in his heart as his original work due to the fact that it was something he signed on to and not created himself. He likely considers some of his original creations great but not the thing he was just singed up for.
It's sort of a reason you won't see very established directors jump onto other properties, they like to create the worlds themselves. I think the only reason Disney got him back is they must have offered him the moon when it came to his salary bump up. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#152 | |
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 434
|
![]() Quote:
As for the 'rushed production' comment, I stand by it. Whedon admitted that he had very little time to get everything sorted and claimed to be writing, directing and editing the film all at the same time. He said that he enjoyed the pressure and wasn't being hostile towards Marvel when he was speaking but he did make it clear that he came in fairly last minute and was given a very strict deadline. They weren't going to move the release date again to accommodate Whedon. Under the circumstances, it's pretty impressive that Whedon produced something as great as he did. Last edited by Lorus; 09-04-2012 at 05:46 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#153 |
Believe it!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 11,186
|
![]()
If you're talking subjectively, fine. You can like whatever the hell you want.
But to make a declaritive statement that Avengers is EASILY his weakest, there needs to be some kind of objective reasoning behind that for the statement to have any credibility at all. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#154 | ||
Raining hell from above
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Knowhere
Posts: 8,124
|
![]() Quote:
The Buffy film is still Whedon's artistic work, whether or not he wants to disown it. As is the case with the wretched Alien Resurrection. It's understandable that Whedon wouldn't want to take the blame for those massive failures, but he got sole writing credits for both the Buffy film and AR, which makes him responsible for those scripts. And then there's Dollhouse. Even allowing for the subjective nature of judgments about quality, claiming that it was better than The Avengers is laughable on its face. Would you say that The Avengers is weaker than Alien Ressurection or Dollhouse? Or are you pulling the "Whedon didn't like it/the network interfered so it isn't his work" card for those ones, too?
__________________
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#155 | ||
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 434
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Dollhouse is not perfect, nothing is, but I think its strengths outweigh its flaws. Season 1's 'Man on the Street', season 2's 'Vows' or the unaired pilot 'Echo' are good examples of the strengths of that show. All written by Whedon. They tackle some interesting themes, provide good characterisation and the subtext is tackled with perhaps a greater degree of nuance, or is less muddled than Avengers. I don't find those statement particularly absurd. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#156 |
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 27,971
|
![]()
edited for douchiness of statement
Last edited by lixdexia; 09-04-2012 at 07:47 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#157 | |
SHIELD Director Coulson
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 12,044
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It's the nature of the 'Hype. ![]()
__________________
THE COTTON AVENGERS ...They move like slick cotton on oil. ---Echostation, 3/18/2014 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#158 |
Believe it!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 11,186
|
![]()
No, I think on these forums, whenever someone has an opinion that is particularly strong or extreme, if they DON'T back it up with any real reasoning, a lot of the time they're trolling. It's an unfortunate truth on the Hype.
However, I would like to have a discussion about it so Lorus, I'm curious as to your rationale, particularly with shows like Dollhouse that I think are bigger weaknesses of Whedon's. I'll start with my reasons why I think Avengers was one of his best, because he managed to perfectly bridge the mediums of comic and film by using all the same skills and writing tools he has utilised in his years of comic writing and managed to make it work on screen. He managed to juggle 5 or more big characters, included some great character moments, some of which are that particular characters greatest moments in any non-comic medium as well as delivering an amazing action finale. Discuss? :P |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#159 | |
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 434
|
![]() Quote:
Take the character arcs, they are fairly small and perfectly functional within the film, tying into the overall theme of the film. However, they are weakened somewhat by the fact that they don't get much exploration as it were. Take Natasha's arc: she wrestles with her own self delusion about the morality and clinical nature of her world view before actively deciding to involve herself in the world. This is instigated by her interrogation of Loki but there is little exploration of the idea before she concludes her arc in talking to Hawkeye. His other works, I think, delve into the evolution of the arcs more thoroughly. Serenity, which is a weaker ensemble piece in the sense of equally developed characters but a stronger overall film, takes more time with Mal's development and explores it to a greater degree. His tv ensemble work obvious does this too, but I hesitate to compare the depth of character work over a season of television to one film. The subtext is murkier in the Avengers as well. The themes of individualism, collectivism, control and identity are there but they don't quite cohere in my mind because they don't appear to have Whedon's full attention. I find that a bit frustrating because it makes some elements seem a bit disjointed. There seems to be a greater degree of streamlining in his other work, Dollhouse, I feel is very strong in this area. There are also a few awkward moments of storytelling within the Avengers. To an extent, the audience can be blamed for complaining about Stark's supposed regression or the Hulk's level of control because they have misinterpreted the film, but Whedon also bears some level of responsibility for not expressing himself clearly. I must confess that I feel I only understand Banner's character as I do because Whedon used a very similar device in Astonishing X-Men with Cyclops, where it was better expressed. I'm possibly rambling a bit but hopefully this can open a dialogue which will allow me to streamline my thoughts. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#160 |
Believe it!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 11,186
|
![]()
Yeah, I get where you're coming from.
On the topic of subtext and character development, I don't think it's quite fair to compare it with Whedon's television work. In those instances, he has about 12 - 20 hours per season to flesh out his characters, and they are HIS characters right from the get go. With Avengers, he was picking up other peoples iterations of these characters and his goal was to, along with bringing them all together in a cohesive and engaging story, to make the characters his as well, both things I think he succeeded at. Now, part of this is due to the strong level of communication Marvel has had across all the films as far as maintaining a continuity. But consider the fact that Joss Whedon now has the role of overseeing all of the Marvel properties. He is the one who will be joining the dots, connecting the visions. I think Avengers was just the start of Whedons vision, and with that in mind, I don't think it's fair to judge the extent of the character development we saw. The fact that we saw such great character development in a huge ensemble film like this at all is amazing, but in the scope of the overall MCU story, this is just one comic volume, one episode of an overall 'series' if you will. I don't think there needs to be the same expectation on development. If anything, a lot of the character development was resolved in the final fight, with some character conflicts being resolved from their OWN movies. The threads left untied seem more than likely to continue in the characters solo movies and I don't think that's a bad thing at all. Think of a comic book. How often do you get EVERYTHING resolved in the one volume? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#161 |
you are all diseased
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 807
|
![]()
Hired in summer 2010, film releases in 2012....no, that's 2 years to make the entire movie.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 | |
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indiana unfortunately....
Posts: 20,655
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 |
West Coaster
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,527
|
![]()
Which is not entirely unheard of and pretty doable in Hollywood. It's not like he was starting with a whole cast of blank characters he had to flesh out in a 2.5 hour film. Plus, Marvel had plenty of resources and people to help him with anything he needed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 | |
you are all diseased
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 807
|
![]() Quote:
That has absolutely nothing to do with it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
Loose Seal
SHH! Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,977
|
![]()
I think Avengers is FAR from Whedon's weakest piece (It easily tops Alien Resurrection, the Buffy movie, and maybe also Dollhouse and Dr. Horrible even though I love those), but I do think Buffy The Show, on the whole (not each and every episode, just like not each and every scene in the Avengers is without criticism), was a much bigger and better achievement. I actually still think it's his greatest achievement as a storyteller. BUT, Phase II (& maybe III?) has the potential to be even better if he ends up seeing it all through as one gigantic story. Avengers on it's own is like S1 of any Whedon show - barely scratching the surface of what it could/would become, imo.
__________________
"They say: sufferings are misfortunes...Once we're thrown off our habitual paths, we think all is lost; but it's only here that the new and good begins. As long as there's life, there's happiness. There's much, much still to come." Last edited by flickchick85; 09-04-2012 at 03:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#166 |
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,407
|
![]()
Avengers= weak on any level????
Some people just don't get it...
__________________
If it’s not in the MCU we don’t want it Sony! Free Hulk & Namor! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#167 | |
Raining hell from above
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Knowhere
Posts: 8,124
|
![]() At least most of them seem to have dropped the "looks like a TV show/the cinematography is horrible" canard, so I guess we should be grateful.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#168 |
Not a Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,228
|
![]()
Honestly, I wouldn't buy Buffy being stronger, not as a whole. Bearing in mind that comparing a movie to a TV series is somewhat apples and oranges, Buffy has two positively dreadful seasons, and large chunks of mediocrity. Avengers, by contrast, manages to maintain note-perfect characterization and ( especially ) pacing from beginning to end. Consistency is a major virtue.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#169 | |
The Gal from Themyscira
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tall and tanned and young and lovely
Posts: 44,060
|
![]()
Buffy also has quite a few annoying characters, and he was still in the thick of his excessive Whedonisms back then. They've gradually been pruned away so that people can be a bit more normal and not sound so quirky and adding "y" onto the end of everything. Avengers is a more mature and balanced work. Even Dollhouse had pruned away some of those elements, with the only overly quirky character being Topher, who would've been so commonplace back at the time of Buffy.
__________________
Quote:
Anne's Interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3-5e0OOLKQ
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 | |
High King
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 97,567
|
![]()
The Avengers just lacks the depth that Buffy often had.
It's Joss making his version of a Michael Bay Transformers movie. Granted, it's considerably better than an actual Michael Bay Transformers movie. But it's just all spectacle. Now, it's obviously not his worst work, that's just crazy. But it's also not his best.
__________________
https://twitter.com/HIGHzurrer/statu...05636392116224 Quote:
*sees someone trolling DCEU fans* *prepares to say something* *sees Snyder stans somehow being even more obnoxious than the trolls* *sighs*
*rinse and repeat* |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#171 | |
Superhero Novelista
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,918
|
![]() Quote:
I can't really speak to whether Buffy was better, since I've never seen it. Maybe it is. I don't think it's fair to categorize Avengers as just a spectacle. Whedon doesn't write those kinds of stories.
__________________
kingwrites.com // @kingmatte |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#172 | |
Stay thy hand troll!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beantown.
Posts: 6,930
|
![]()
If your talking about the series then sure. An on going series can go deeper because they have all the time in the world and you know the chatracters and sub plots from previous episodes. If you're talking about the movie then no freakin way. In fact that might be the worst thing that Joss ever wrote.
Quote:
__________________
MY GOD CARRIES A HAMMER, YOURS WAS NAILED TO A CROSS! ANY QUESTIONS? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#173 | ||
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 31,839
|
![]()
THE AVENGERS isn’t remotely Whedon’s weakest work. It’s also nowhere near his best, other than action and scale.
Quote:
Quote:
The actual character development is minimal. And yes, there’s a difference in the time one has to develop characters in the TV format VS film, but there’s really no difference in the idea of shifting focus from character development to story and action. You either focus on that element as a writer, or you don’t. Whedon chose to focus on humor instead, and let a lot of the weighter and more interesting elements sit on the backburner. And I think he recognizes that.
__________________
"Perception is the enemy of reason." -Me |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#174 |
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,407
|
![]()
Congrats you've just said the dumbest thing on the internet today!
__________________
If it’s not in the MCU we don’t want it Sony! Free Hulk & Namor! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#175 | |
High King
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 97,567
|
![]()
Oh gosh, I've pissed off the fanatics!
![]() Get over yourselves.
__________________
https://twitter.com/HIGHzurrer/statu...05636392116224 Quote:
*sees someone trolling DCEU fans* *prepares to say something* *sees Snyder stans somehow being even more obnoxious than the trolls* *sighs*
*rinse and repeat* |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|