![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 470
|
What are you talking about? I hope you're not suggesting that Bruce's ending is open to interpretation, because that's a major fail on your part. There is no open ending to Bruce in terms of whether he lived or died. The official novel and the script make it obvious that he's alive, and Greg Cox (New York times bestselling writer who wrote the novel) confirmed it. The only stuff open about Bruce's ending is stuff like how he and Selina now make a living, or if they're already married when Alfred sees them. Other than that, there is nothing ambiguous, and I'm glad Cox made that clear, even though it was already obvious to the 99% of us who paid attention to the last 5 minutes. The only thing open to interpretation is what happens to Blake. And that's only half the ending.
Last edited by kthevs; 08-21-2012 at 10:28 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: GOTHAM
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
If you read what Nolan say's about Inceptions end, there is no doubt about the ending. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
The Darkest Knight
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Batcave
Posts: 708
|
Quote:
__________________
RISE SIR CHRISTOPHER NOLAN He took Gotham's Dark Knight and turned him from laughing stock to legend HAWKEYE BATMAN DEADPOOL DREDD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 470
|
Except that the Bruce stuff is obviously not open to interpretation. Only the Blake stuff.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|