*Update* Your Rating for TASM

[Picard Sisko]

Originally Posted by Anno_Domini

Lol, nice reply there.

...

Originally Posted by Anno_Domini

I've always called it that we'll be getting another reboot in 2022. Webb does his trilogy, Sony will want another reboot, another trilogy, Sony will want a reboot...unless Marvel Studios interrupts that cycle. There's just no way Sony is going to continue Webb's series as a true and true Spider-Man series when it hasn't achieved really anything to be the true and true Spider-Man series.

We will never get the "true and true Spider-Man series," same as we will never get the "definitive Batman series." There will always be new incarnations, different versions, etc.

A some point, I figure that Sony will stop making Spider-Man movies. At some point. Then the rights would expire or they would sell them to marvel/Disney. Until then I think that Sony is going to continue with the Webb series/franchise that has been set up.

[Nemeres]

Originally Posted by Picard Sisko

...


We will never get the "true and true Spider-Man series," same as we will never get the "definitive Batman series." There will always be new incarnations, different versions, etc.

A some point, I figure that Sony will stop making Spider-Man movies. At some point. Then the rights would expire or they would sell them to marvel/Disney. Until then I think that Sony is going to continue with the Webb series/franchise that has been set up.

People keep begging for that, but I really hope it doesn't happen. So that he becomes yet another stepping stone towards an Avengers movie, as if that were the only thing superhero movies can aspire to now? Say what you want about Sony, but they’ve managed to produce two top-quality Spidey films… along with two subpar ones, one terrible (SM3) and one barely passable (TASM). I’ll wait for TASM 2 before hopping on the “rights back to Marvel” wagon. That’ll be the scale-tipper.

[Anno_Domini]

Originally Posted by Picard Sisko

We will never get the "true and true Spider-Man series," same as we will never get the "definitive Batman series." There will always be new incarnations, different versions, etc.

You do not understand what I mean(but nice shot at trying to bring up Batman in this topic ), but what I am referring to is Sony trying to find a series that they could continue and make more than just three films. And that'll never happen I fear because many thought Raimi would've been that director, even the talk of six films from both Raimi and Arad and that never happened.

A some point, I figure that Sony will stop making Spider-Man movies. At some point. Then the rights would expire or they would sell them to marvel/Disney. Until then I think that Sony is going to continue with the Webb series/franchise that has been set up.

Hah, keep dreaming on that. Sony letting go their most prized possession; highly doubt that will happen until Marvel Studios tries its hardest to get back Spidey.

[Picard Sisko]

Originally Posted by Anno_Domini

You do not understand what I mean(but nice shot at trying to bring up Batman in this topic ), but what I am referring to is Sony trying to find a series that they could continue and make more than just three films. And that'll never happen I fear because many thought Raimi would've been that director, even the talk of six films from both Raimi and Arad and that never happened.

Well its hard to understand what you meant by "true and true". I'm pretty sure they could make more than three films with Webb's franchise. It never happened with Raimi simply because he left. Sony gave him a lot of crap with Spider-Man 3, so the man knew when to back down and walk away.

I think after a certain point, they would do a James Bond thing with him, and just get a new actor and continue on making more films.

Hah, keep dreaming on that. Sony letting go their most prized possession; highly doubt that will happen until Marvel Studios tries its hardest to get back Spidey.

HAH. Well I guess we will be seeing a new Spider-Man movie at least every 5 years then.

[Anno_Domini]

Originally Posted by Picard Sisko

Well its hard to understand what you meant by "true and true". I'm pretty sure they could make more than three films with Webb's franchise. It never happened with Raimi simply because he left. Sony gave him a lot of crap with Spider-Man 3, so the man knew when to back down and walk away.

I think after a certain point, they would do a James Bond thing with him, and just get a new actor and continue on making more films.

Did Sony learn their lesson? Would they not try to bury their nose into the development so Webb could make more sequels? Who knows. But with how they did and was already really thinking about a reboot while Raimi was working on Spider-Man 4...it's hard to tell.

HAH. Well I guess we will be seeing a new Spider-Man movie at least every 5 years then.

I'm already counting on The Spectacular Spider-Man in 2022

[Picard Sisko]

I think after this trilogy (or quadrilogy) is over, they should do a "semi-reboot," and just give us more Spider-Man films that are loosely connected to the Webb films. So maybe by then Peter is married to MJ, is in college, or working as a teacher, has already faced the Lizard, Electro, Green Goblin, etc., and now continues with more stories.

[Picard Sisko]

I do see the Ravencroft Institute as potential for gathering the Sinister Six.

[Anno_Domini]

Nothing should be loosely connected to Webb's films. It should be on its own two feet, but with just no reboot with an older Peter, possibly giving away hints of the past through flashbacks and what not, but nothing loosely connected to Webb's series at all. That would just be a slap to the face of anyone who isn't a fan of Webb's series from the jump. It would be as if someone would hate a Batman reboot being loosely connected to Nolan's trilogy when they didn't like or hated Nolan's films.

[Picard Sisko]

Originally Posted by Anno_Domini

Nothing should be loosely connected to Webb's films. It should be on its own two feet, but with just no reboot with an older Peter, possibly giving away hints of the past through flashbacks and what not, but nothing loosely connected to Webb's series at all. That would just be a slap to the face of anyone who isn't a fan of Webb's series from the jump. It would be as if someone would hate a Batman reboot being loosely connected to Nolan's trilogy when they didn't like or hated Nolan's films.

LOOSELY connected. It would not be "a slap to the face of anyone who isn't a fan of Webb's series from the jump."

[Anno_Domini]

Again, it would be the same if someone didn't want a Batman film to be LOOSELY connected to Nolan's trilogy.

So a future Spider-Man film doesn't need to be LOOSELY connected to Webb's series.