![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 248
|
Ant-Man won't be three movies. We don't even know if Hulk will get a sequel at this point. Eventually, yes. GotG may end up barely above Green Lantern in terms of financial and critical success. It is a complete unknown.
I think Thor/Cap will get six movies, be it a third installment or a fourth Avengers movie. We'll see. I want Avengers to be a four part series and not the basic trilogy. Each movie should be a self contained story and none of the movies should directly tie into one another. Just tell us three, hopefully four great Avenger stories. Thanos should be like Mandarin, who barely shows up or referenced in IM 1/2. He will even be in the background for much of IM 3. That's how I would handle Thanos. Masters of Evil would be kinda lame, but a lineup featuring the likes of Mandarin, The Leader, Skull/Zemo is almost too good to pass. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 32,287
|
Hopefully they won't spend $300 million on Guardians like Green Lantern.
__________________
"This is true. This is real. This . . . Is . . . Straight Edge." - CM Punk |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 411
|
Which is why I said "potentially" for each. You don't know that it won't be a success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 248
|
If Green Lantern won't get a sequel (it might with a new Lantern if we do get another) then I wouldn't hold out on Ant-Man being this dark horse property. Anything is possible. I've always felt IM would get three movies before 2008. IM1/2 plus Avengers or just a trilogy. After its success in 2008, I felt Cap/Thor could also be 3-6 movie characters. Now, outside of the Hulk, Marvel doesn't have a potentially sustaining franchise that I would bet a penny on. I'm a bit concerned as to the plan outside the Avengers. GotG, while promising, isn't the direction I would have gone personally. Especially with so many FF characters tied up at Fox.
Last edited by AvengeME; 07-31-2012 at 09:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered Rhymnicologist
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 254
|
I get what you're saying AvengeME, which is why I fully expect GotG to be sort of an "experiment" for Marvel - a test to see if a non-Avengers property can stand on its own.
I'm sure we may very well get a reference to Thanos, but I expect that will be the extent of it. I doubt we will even hear the word "Avengers". |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 200
|
Well, Phase 1 wasn't much of a plan other than finally making the Avengers. I think using individual film characters in a team-up movie was obviously unique and worked well. But the threads building to Avengers weren't particularly well thought out. Some post-credits scenes. And shoe-horned cameos.
I'd like to see Phase 2 be a little more thought out. It doesn't have to be hammered home, but I'd prefer to see more threadlines buried in the films. Thematically and factually. Hopefully the theme of Avengers 2 plays off where they leave the characters after their sequel films. I'd like also like to see smaller, world-building threads established in the individual sequels. Stuff like AIM. While we don't know exactly how much of a role it'll play in IM3, I think it should be referenced in other films even if only in news clips. I'd like to see the build to the villain of Avengers 2 woven into the tapestry of the Phase 2 films yet not be overbearing in those films. For instance, if it's Ultron, introduce the Ultron computer system in IM3 somehow. Some earthbound scene in Thor 2 (Jane Foster working with SHIELD scene) shows us how Ultron has integrated into their systems (AI help). Cap 2 has a scene where Ultron suggests that some agents are expendable to meet final goal which alludes to Ultron's turning on mankind. Avengers 2, Ultron becomes fully independent and attacks mankind. I would suggest that Phase 2 would be about expanding the roster of characters, but we're only getting 1 film (maybe 2 if Ant-Man happens) with original characters (other than supporting & villains). While Phase 2 could build to Thanos, we just had a cosmic threat in Avengers 1. I'd love to see Thanos on film, but I'm leaning toward wanting him in Avengers 3, so we can have a large roster of characters face him. I'd rather have Phase 2 build to an earth-based threat to the team. I'm hoping Phase 3 expands the number of franchises and starts to explore more fringes to the MCU, like mysticism with Dr. Strange and strange lands with Black Panther and Namor. Which then ends with all these diverse heroes coming together to stop Thanos. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Mad (Blonde) Titan
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 7,634
|
Quote:
__________________
I want something good to die for, to make it beautiful to live. ---- Queens of the Stone Age, "Go With the Flow" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 35
|
Here's a thought- if they ever do lead up to a Masters of Evil storyline, with the archrivals coming back for vengeance, who will be IM's opponent? If they introduce Zemo in CA2 and Skurge & Amora in Thor2, and have Chen Lu in Antman, that's really stick close to th books. They could even bring back Blonsky for good measure. But I don't really see a foe for Tony. Vanko would have worked, but he blowed himself all up. I don't really see Mandarin joining a league of evil arches. But this is all just speculation as most of those characters aren't even confirmed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Mad (Blonde) Titan
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 7,634
|
Quote:
Or, better yet, bring back Justin Hammer, and have Hammer create his own superhenchy, like Beetle; then all the fanboys will be fangasming over how close to canon this roster appears.
__________________
I want something good to die for, to make it beautiful to live. ---- Queens of the Stone Age, "Go With the Flow" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 248
|
Masters of Evil needs A-list Marvel villains. Going to the comic book rosters wouldn't work in a feature film, or at least most of iterations of the MoE roster. Leader and Mandarin are A-list but you already featured or will feature them in the solo acts. Plus it may be kinda cheesy for all those guys to team up at once. Depending on where IM3 leaves us, we may see the return of Mandarin although I doubt it. Red Skull is another possibility. Baron Zemo could be featured in both CA2 and Avengers 2. So we would already get a rehash in a sense. I don't think the recipe is there yet. We just haven't had an A-list calibur Marvel villain in this MCU. Not someone on that Magneto, Goblin, Doc Ock level. Until these solo MCU villains reach that iconic status in a featured film, I don't think bringing them all together will carry much weight.
I would go Ultron before MoE. Then after Hulk 3 and IM3 and CA 2/3, you could feature Skull/Zemo, Mandarin, and Leader in Avengers 3. Save Thanos for another time/trilogy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Mad (Blonde) Titan
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cherokee, NC
Posts: 7,634
|
Quote:
__________________
I want something good to die for, to make it beautiful to live. ---- Queens of the Stone Age, "Go With the Flow" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
The Spuzziest of Spuzzes
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,650
|
Ultron. Thanos. Kang. These guys should be priority before any other villain in the main Avengers films.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Returned Jedi
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 930
|
Quote:
__________________
2015 The Return Of The Jedi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
The Mandalore
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 11,469
|
I don't see how Iron Man 3 can tie into Thanos, UNLESS Mandarin stumbles upon one of the Infinity Gems in this movie. But I don't see that happening.
There's the rumors that the after-credits scene will tie into Ant-Man. I'm also hoping we can get a tease for Black Panther in this movie, I still have hope that he can get into Phase II. A Carol Danvers cameo would give me the biggest geekgasm as well.
__________________
Looogaan! We've missed you! Weapon X hasn't been the same without 'cha! Nobody calls me bub anymore!~ Deadpool Avengers, Defenders, Thunderbolts... I make any team better!~ Hawkeye If you see me typo it's because I'm typing on an iPhone. I don't have access to a computer currently & it's hard to type on this thing, sorry. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 398
|
When Jessica Chastain was originally named as part of the cast, I was really hoping she'd be Carol but now that her character's played by Rebecca Hall, I don't know...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,215
|
Yeah, there have been no indications of Carol appearing in Phase II at all so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 5,940
|
Quote:
__________________
"I dominated like a rabid, horny gorilla." - Robert Down Jr. in EW's coverage of The Avengers My official "The Avengers" film review:http://forums.superherohype.com/show...1&postcount=29 My official "Iron Man 3" film review: http://forums.superherohype.com/show...3&postcount=78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Ultimate Hero
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,652
|
A part of me thinks that with descriptions out there saying on how Mandarin was shown to have mentioned something about how he doesn't believe that there are real heroes in the world, along with his attack on Tony in the Comic Con Footage, that the upcoming MCU Solo films will perhaps reflect on how the villains present in the world (and even in the universe) have taken notice of how dangerous the Avengers can be if allowed to band together again (which was ironically something that Fury said that he wanted to point out to everyone at the end of TA), which will probably compel some interested parties in attacking everyone while they're all spread out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 96
|
If they do end up doing Civil War for Phase 3, I don't see them being able to do the story justice without somehow getting the rights to Spider-Man back or making some sort of deal with Sony, because Peter Parker's part in the whole Civil War plot is kind of essential, especially the relationship between Tony and Peter.
Last edited by fireflyhatter; 08-09-2012 at 07:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,087
|
Which is yet another reason to hope they *don't do Civil War.* There is little they could do that would drive away the GA faster.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|