The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > SHH Community > Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2018, 12:06 PM   #726
B
[insert witty comment]
 
B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7,756
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Docker2.0 View Post
What!? Have you been to a Starbucks? They do it all the time.
I go in now & again. I've literally never seen anybody sitting with a phone or laptop without a cup or plate next to them.. so either presumably they've bought something or have just chose to sit at a dirty table.

B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 12:23 PM   #727
DeadPresident
Side-Kick
 
DeadPresident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,023
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Kornphlake View Post
If you had actually read the article, you would have known there was a security video from the house that confirms that.
I did read the article, and it didn't show the actual security footage. All it had was the excerpts about the woman's comments, which doesn't make it look like the husband is the racist in this equation, it makes it look like she is.

Not to mention 'these people' (while likely implying race, I admit) could very well have been meant as 'burglars' or 'robbers', not necessarily 'black people'. Still seems like pretty weak evidence to go off to call the man a categorical racist. If they wanted people to be able to make their own minds up instead of leading with the highly slanted agenda they'd have released the footage.

Either way, these are two separate things. Whether either of them is a racist or not is an academic discussion at this point since it's difficult to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, the main point should be that the old geezer should be charged with something since firing a weapon with such little justification has to be criminal negligence/recklessness at the very least, if not attempted murder and a few other things thrown in.

DeadPresident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 12:26 PM   #728
TheCommissioner
Banned User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,434
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

but racism is the root of the problem here

she saw a black person at her door, presumed he was breaking in, and her racist ass husband felt the need to grab a weapon and fire

arrest them both with reckless endangerment, charge him with attempted murder and unlwaful discharge of a weapon - toss him in jail till he dies

TheCommissioner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 12:36 PM   #729
DeadPresident
Side-Kick
 
DeadPresident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,023
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCommissioner View Post
but racism is the root of the problem here

she saw a black person at her door, presumed he was breaking in, and her racist ass husband felt the need to grab a weapon and fire

arrest them both with reckless endangerment, charge him with attempted murder and unlwaful discharge of a weapon - toss him in jail till he dies
Lol - you're like a Dave Chapelle skit, man. You and Rock would make really terrible lawyers, you clearly don't seem to understand the concept of evidence or something as basic as 'proof'. I hope you guys aren't on the receiving end of someone else jumping to conclusions without evidence, because then cluster****s like this scenario pop off. Is it possible/likely race played a role? Yeah, it's likely. Is the old man a dyed in the wool racist? That's impossible to ascertain, and throwing the term around all the time diminishes what it means.

If anything the majority of the blame should be on the lady's overreaction, I completely understand her being skeptical but since the kid was likely just at the door and not making a racket or trying to force entry I don't understand why she started behaving like it was a burglary right off the bat.

Her husband (racist or not) was clearly going off her hysterical reaction when he got the gun - and then his mistake was jumping to conclusions and firing it off like a reckless fool. Either way, I can reasonably see attempted murder as a likely charge, especially if video footage could indicate the kid was running or had his back turned, that kind of proof would put him away in all likelihood.

DeadPresident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 12:38 PM   #730
TheCommissioner
Banned User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,434
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadPresident View Post
Lol - you're like a Dave Chapelle skit, man. You and Rock would make really terrible lawyers, you clearly don't seem to understand the concept of evidence or something as basic as 'proof'. I hope you guys aren't on the receiving end of someone else jumping to conclusions without evidence, because then cluster****s like this scenario pop off.

If anything the majority of the blame should be on the lady's overreaction, I completely understand her being skeptical but since the kid was likely just at the door and not making a racket or trying to force entry I don't understand why she started behaving like it was a burglary right off the bat.

Her husband (racist or not) was clearly going off her hysterical reaction when he got the gun - and then his mistake was jumping to conclusions and firing it off like a reckless fool. Either way, I can reasonably see attempted murder as a likely charge, especially if video footage could indicate the kid was running or had his back turned, that kind of proof would put him away in all likelihood.
considering things like the Tamir Rice and Walter Scott MURDERS, yes I as a black man have a good chance of being subjected to something like that

the two men accosted by badge wearing thugs in Target were subjected to what they were BECAUSE of someone jumping to a conclusion

Thank you for making the point for me

TheCommissioner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 01:43 PM   #731
DeadPresident
Side-Kick
 
DeadPresident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,023
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCommissioner View Post
considering things like the Tamir Rice and Walter Scott MURDERS, yes I as a black man have a good chance of being subjected to something like that

the two men accosted by badge wearing thugs in Target were subjected to what they were BECAUSE of someone jumping to a conclusion

Thank you for making the point for me
Yes...fighting fire with fire, that sounds like a successful strategy

DeadPresident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 01:47 PM   #732
NotNickFury
Side-Kick
 
NotNickFury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SHIELD offsite
Posts: 4,976
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

See, I can't tell if you're being genuine here or just playing devil's advocate.

NotNickFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 01:49 PM   #733
TheCommissioner
Banned User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,434
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadPresident View Post
Yes...fighting fire with fire, that sounds like a successful strategy
depends on the strategy

I want the world for those racist inbred a-holes that they want for the brown and black people they are so scared of

TheCommissioner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 01:56 PM   #734
DeadPresident
Side-Kick
 
DeadPresident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,023
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotNickFury View Post
See, I can't tell if you're being genuine here or just playing devil's advocate.
When I'm talking to people that seem unreasonable it's more the latter. I don't have an issue entertaining that the old man is racist, I'm just saying claiming it as fact is highly presumptuous.

Which part are you referring to specifically? I can contextualize it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCommissioner View Post
depends on the strategy

I want the world for those racist inbred a-holes that they want for the brown and black people they are so scared of
See this is the issue. You seem to like lashing out at whites in general, irrespective of whether they actually are the "racist inbred a-holes" you think they are or if there are just enough hints that make you jump to that conclusion.

So from the perspective of putting your energy or thoughts into something constructive, is wishing ill on incurable racists really what your energy and thoughts should be on…? A lot of your posts really just seem like you venting your emotions and not necessarily linked directly to the facts of whatever topic you're writing about.

You really seem to hate the social landscape in the States, more violence or aggression ain't solving that.

DeadPresident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 02:03 PM   #735
DarthSkywalker
May the Force Be With You
 
DarthSkywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 83,774
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by B View Post
I don't know if that's the case, but I do know I wouldn't expect to last long going into a Starbucks (or anywhere similar) bypassing the counter, taking a seat & proceed to use the WIFI facilities in full view of the staff without being told that I'd need to order something to stay.

All the CEO aplogised for was that it led to an arrest, not that they were asked to leave or that the police were called. We all know the only reason that it was released was because it has been spun up by the media as being racially motivated from the staff.
The CEO specifically said they were looking at their policies. That the police were called on two guys waiting and causing no issues raises the question, would she have done this if they were white? And I think we all know that answer.

__________________
"I've been running scams on the street since I was ten. I was kicked out of the flight academy for having a mind of my own. I'm going be a pilot. Best in the galaxy."
DarthSkywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 02:05 PM   #736
DarthSkywalker
May the Force Be With You
 
DarthSkywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 83,774
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadPresident View Post
I did read the article, and it didn't show the actual security footage. All it had was the excerpts about the woman's comments, which doesn't make it look like the husband is the racist in this equation, it makes it look like she is.

Not to mention 'these people' (while likely implying race, I admit) could very well have been meant as 'burglars' or 'robbers', not necessarily 'black people'. Still seems like pretty weak evidence to go off to call the man a categorical racist. If they wanted people to be able to make their own minds up instead of leading with the highly slanted agenda they'd have released the footage.

Either way, these are two separate things. Whether either of them is a racist or not is an academic discussion at this point since it's difficult to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, the main point should be that the old geezer should be charged with something since firing a weapon with such little justification has to be criminal negligence/recklessness at the very least, if not attempted murder and a few other things thrown in.
I think seeing someone ring the door bell, seeing their race, taking that as they are criminal and then to get a gun and shoot at them makes them obviously racist. Separating the wife and husband here makes not one bit of sense. They worked in tandem with no evidence of anything. They just started accusing and shooting.

__________________
"I've been running scams on the street since I was ten. I was kicked out of the flight academy for having a mind of my own. I'm going be a pilot. Best in the galaxy."
DarthSkywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 02:18 PM   #737
DeadPresident
Side-Kick
 
DeadPresident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,023
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthSkywalker View Post
I think seeing someone ring the door bell, seeing their race, taking that as they are criminal and then to get a gun and shoot at them makes them obviously racist. Separating the wife and husband here makes not one bit of sense. They worked in tandem with no evidence of anything. They just started accusing and shooting.
Maybe, maybe not - "worked in tandem" makes it sound like they're the Pinky and the Brain of shooting at black teenagers. Not one bit of sense? I'm not sure about that. From the description of the scenario it's the wife's reaction that caused her husband to get the gun. it seemed to happen quickly, it's not like they were having an in-depth back and forth ascertaining whether the person was black.

"Honey, who's at the door?"

"A young man looking for directions to the school".

"That's nice dear, tell him to take his first left and then the second right after three miles".

"He's black".

"Oh, that's not nice dear - Don't give him the directions. He's black, and clearly wants to rob us. I'll fetch the rifle".

*Cue hysterical rambling by the woman*

Is that how it went down? Or is it possible the woman's hysterical reaction assuming it was a robbery played a part in the husband's calculation to fetch the rifle? Both of them were idiots in the situation, but it seems presumptuous (there's a lot of that in this thread…) that both were on exactly the same page about every detail in a situation that happened this fast. But this is besides the point and not what I initially commented on, my initial comment was simply pointing out that classifying someone as racist without much evidence seems a little odd.

This thread mainly seems to be an unhealthy venting space where racist incidents are posted and then people lament the existence of cracker-ass crackers in an dysfunctional group therapy setting


Last edited by DeadPresident; 04-15-2018 at 02:22 PM.
DeadPresident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 02:42 PM   #738
RockSP
MYTH SMITH ∞!!!
 
RockSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12,320
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by B View Post
We all know the only reason that it was released was because it has been spun up by the media as being racially motivated from the staff.
Spun up, heh. So what's the difference between those guys and the white lady who was there and said herself she asked to use the bathroom (prior to the two men entering) and wasn't given any hassle about it...wasn't asked to buy anything before being given access to the facilities? Oh, that's right, she's full of it and is lying...because reasons.

__________________
"We're living in a world where we're having our rights taken away by giant corporations, and [fanboys] were cheering for another corporation to eventually take our rights away...because we'll get superhero movies!" --writer Brandon Easton on the Disney/Fox merger

https://www.facebook.com/MythworldeMedia/
RockSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 04:26 PM   #739
Elektra1
Ski bum
 
Elektra1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,504
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

I don't know if the husband is racist, the wife probably is. Which makes it more plausible that the two share the same viewpoints.

However. If I called to my husband that someone was trying to rob us or that someone was trying to get into our house, he would likely grab any sort of weapon that we have (no guns. We don't own any. Baseball bat maybe. Or ski pole. Whatever). He would take me at my word. But would he shoot/swing at someone without checking it out for himself? No. But in Canada, we tend to ask first. Otherwise, I would have been shot numerous times for knocking at the wrong door at 8pm trying to deliver pizzas (in the US).

Elektra1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 04:35 PM   #740
DarthSkywalker
May the Force Be With You
 
DarthSkywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 83,774
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadPresident View Post
Maybe, maybe not - "worked in tandem" makes it sound like they're the Pinky and the Brain of shooting at black teenagers. Not one bit of sense? I'm not sure about that. From the description of the scenario it's the wife's reaction that caused her husband to get the gun. it seemed to happen quickly, it's not like they were having an in-depth back and forth ascertaining whether the person was black.

"Honey, who's at the door?"

"A young man looking for directions to the school".

"That's nice dear, tell him to take his first left and then the second right after three miles".

"He's black".

"Oh, that's not nice dear - Don't give him the directions. He's black, and clearly wants to rob us. I'll fetch the rifle".

*Cue hysterical rambling by the woman*

Is that how it went down? Or is it possible the woman's hysterical reaction assuming it was a robbery played a part in the husband's calculation to fetch the rifle? Both of them were idiots in the situation, but it seems presumptuous (there's a lot of that in this thread…) that both were on exactly the same page about every detail in a situation that happened this fast. But this is besides the point and not what I initially commented on, my initial comment was simply pointing out that classifying someone as racist without much evidence seems a little odd.

This thread mainly seems to be an unhealthy venting space where racist incidents are posted and then people lament the existence of cracker-ass crackers in an dysfunctional group therapy setting
What about getting his rifle forced him too shoot at the kid? Do you honestly think the kid being black had nothing to do with the husband shooting first and asking questions later? And if not, I ask you how many incident of young white people going to a strangers door has ended with them being shot at?

And what I find important to this very case is that the man was most likely lying about his reasoning. Surveillance footage is what got them to arrest the man.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/14/us/mi...ons/index.html

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...for-directions

And I ask, if the wife is racist, what is the chance her husband isn't? How often is that a thing? She was just running out there talking about "those people" and her husband was like, "That just isn't right honey"?

__________________
"I've been running scams on the street since I was ten. I was kicked out of the flight academy for having a mind of my own. I'm going be a pilot. Best in the galaxy."

Last edited by DarthSkywalker; 04-15-2018 at 04:40 PM.
DarthSkywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 05:04 PM   #741
TheCommissioner
Banned User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,434
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadPresident View Post
See this is the issue. You seem to like lashing out at whites in general, irrespective of whether they actually are the "racist inbred a-holes" you think they are or if there are just enough hints that make you jump to that conclusion.

So from the perspective of putting your energy or thoughts into something constructive, is wishing ill on incurable racists really what your energy and thoughts should be on…? A lot of your posts really just seem like you venting your emotions and not necessarily linked directly to the facts of whatever topic you're writing about.

You really seem to hate the social landscape in the States, more violence or aggression ain't solving that.
whites? no

the system that enables black and brown bodies to be murdered in the streets with no consequence, and a large bunch of the citizenry that is clearly ok with it...very much so

I hate the landscape that lets people rationalize their hate, that Michael Brown and Tamir Rice had it coming, that Trayvon Martin deserved to die

that's what I hate

TheCommissioner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 05:23 PM   #742
DeadPresident
Side-Kick
 
DeadPresident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,023
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthSkywalker View Post
What about getting his rifle forced him too shoot at the kid? Do you honestly think the kid being black had nothing to do with the husband shooting first and asking questions later? And if not, I ask you how many incident of young white people going to a strangers door has ended with them being shot at?

And what I find important to this very case is that the man was most likely lying about his reasoning. Surveillance footage is what got them to arrest the man.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/14/us/mi...ons/index.html

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...for-directions
I personally think it's likely it had something to do with it - but I don't like making categorical statements without sufficient evidence. So my assessment would be what chamber said before, it likely had a racial component. I don't find that to be synonymous with "this individual is a racist in general".

Quote:
And I ask, if the wife is racist, what is the chance her husband isn't? How often is that a thing? She was just running out there talking about "those people" and her husband was like, "That just isn't right honey"?
I've seen a case on the hype in the relationship thread of a user describing his wife's frequent prejudicial statements/slurs about certain Munro ties and how e tries to talk to her about it and she blows it off - so it's happened at least once. Spouses don't always have exactly the same morals or values.

DeadPresident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2018, 08:13 PM   #743
RockSP
MYTH SMITH ∞!!!
 
RockSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12,320
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotNickFury View Post
See, I can't tell if you're being genuine here or just playing devil's advocate.
He's trolling, as usual.

__________________
"We're living in a world where we're having our rights taken away by giant corporations, and [fanboys] were cheering for another corporation to eventually take our rights away...because we'll get superhero movies!" --writer Brandon Easton on the Disney/Fox merger

https://www.facebook.com/MythworldeMedia/
RockSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 02:23 AM   #744
Aximili86
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,991
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Shouldn't the issue here be the staff member who called the cops in the first place, rather than the officer's behavior?

The police chief (a black dude) has a point there. They weren't just randomly passing through and decided to arrest a couple of idle black guys hanging out. They received a call-in from staff members about people occupying sales space without purchasing anything.

The arrests are totally overkill, but the staff escalated it to that, not the cops. I guess if they'd tried other more polite/reasonable methods first (politely asked them to buy something if they wanted to sit in the store, and the guys had refused, and aggressively), the calling of cops would be warranted. Sounds like that's not what happened though, looks like the cops was the initial go-to move.

Which is dumb. But that's not on the officers, once they get a complaint and there is some genuine tresspassing, they've gotta take the guys out of there.

Aximili86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 02:30 AM   #745
chamber-music
Infinity Ammo
 
chamber-music's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 34,114
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by B View Post
I don't know if that's the case, but I do know I wouldn't expect to last long going into a Starbucks (or anywhere similar) bypassing the counter, taking a seat & proceed to use the WIFI facilities in full view of the staff without being told that I'd need to order something to stay.

All the CEO aplogised for was that it led to an arrest, not that they were asked to leave or that the police were called. We all know the only reason that it was released was because it has been spun up by the media as being racially motivated from the staff.
In the UK I doubt many Starbucks franchises would allow you to just hang around without ordering anything but it seems to be pretty common in Starbucks in the U.S.

Even a few of the eye witnesses to this event said they had been hanging out in the Starbucks without ordering anything.

I don't know if there was a racial motivation as to why this Starbucks employee took particular issue with the two black guys but it is strange they were singled out when numerous other people have said they hang out in that Starbucks branch all the time without ordering and the staff never ask them to order or leave.

__________________
All aboard the Pork Chop Express!
chamber-music is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 06:13 AM   #746
KRYPTON INC.
Side-Kick
 
KRYPTON INC.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 55,760
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aximili86 View Post
Shouldn't the issue here be the staff member who called the cops in the first place, rather than the officer's behavior?

The police chief (a black dude) has a point there. They weren't just randomly passing through and decided to arrest a couple of idle black guys hanging out. They received a call-in from staff members about people occupying sales space without purchasing anything.

The arrests are totally overkill, but the staff escalated it to that, not the cops. I guess if they'd tried other more polite/reasonable methods first (politely asked them to buy something if they wanted to sit in the store, and the guys had refused, and aggressively), the calling of cops would be warranted. Sounds like that's not what happened though, looks like the cops was the initial go-to move.

Which is dumb. But that's not on the officers, once they get a complaint and there is some genuine tresspassing, they've gotta take the guys out of there.
Remember folks... Police Officers are apparently devoid of the capacity of common sense and have zero discretionary authority at their fingertips.

So you can call them for anything, any kind of alleged crime and upon arrival they have to arrest and charge someone.

...

...

...


What kind of bereft of reality world view is this?

Seriously? The police had no real reason to take these guys in. They were called. Okay? And? Upon arrival two people are peaceable siting down. Oh the horror. They explain they are waiting for a friend. Again... Not violent or illegal. Also, said friend actually shows up as they are being arrested, so that corroborated their story.


But... We all shouldn't be surprised there are people so detached from reality that they defend this sort of thing no matter what. Henry Louis Gates was literally arrested in front of his own home.

Not one white person in the U.S. would have silently put up with that but ya'know... Gates and other Americans are supposed to just grant a mulligan to authorities every time.

__________________
My father. 1946-2014

He truly proved that every person has the potential to be a force for good in this life. So anyone that reads this, do me a favor... Call your parents.

http://www.tobecontinuedafanboypodcast.com/ To Be Continued A Fanboy Podcast: SOLO A STAR WARS STORY Spoiler Review Discussion.
KRYPTON INC. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 06:37 AM   #747
chamber-music
Infinity Ammo
 
chamber-music's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 34,114
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Bad time to be Black in Coffee shops recently.

A black actor got a attacked by a racist El Salvadorian woman in a coffee shop Madrid.

Quote:
“A racist attack nearly left me without an eye,” actor Marius Makon posted on Twitter. “Racism will never defeat us, love, love and love.”

Makon, who was born in Cameroon and is also known as Elton Prince, was referring to a Saturday assault in Madrid that left him bruised and bloodied.

According to the report, the attack occurred in an establishment in Móstoles, a city in the Madrid region, at around 7am. The actor, known by his stage name Elton Prince, approached the counter with his friends to order coffee when a woman, accompanied by a man, said to him: “I don’t want black people in this place or in front of me.”

According to Makon’s Facebook post about the incident, he replied: “No Miss, I will only be here for a moment and then I’m leaving. I don’t have any interest in staying near you for long.” The 33-year-old woman, who is from El Salvador, then allegedly replied: “I don’t care, you black piece of s***, get out of here.” He said: “Calm down Miss, I insist, we are in a public place and I don’t understand your anger.”

“Black piece of s***, I’m white. I can kill you and nothing will happen,” she said, before grabbing a beer bottle and smashing it against the actor’s head. She hit him a second time, causing a cut to his head among other injuries, which required medical attention.

The actor was helped by people in the bar and the owners of the establishment called the police. When the authorities arrived they identified the culprits and advised Makon to file a report, which he did at a police station. The woman was detained shortly after and then released once her statement was taken by the police.

In its complaint to Madrid regional authorities and the hate crime special department, the Spanish Immigration and Refugee Support Network said that as well as physically injuring the actor and hurling racist abuse, the woman “was looking to provoke the victim and cause a reaction.”

The organization has called for an “immediate” sentence and is pushing the Móstoles Town Hall and the Madrid regional government of Cristina Cifuentes to “show their condemnation for what happened.” “We will not stop until these types of backward, intolerable and feudal-era assaults are stopped,” the organization published on Facebook.

“Now I am in my house and I look through these images [of his injuries] I do not feel any hate towards the woman,” Makon posted on Facebook. “I want to say that I am not angry with her and I don’t know why. I am sad that she feels such hate, that she lives with hate. It saddens me that she does not enjoy life, that she doesn’t leave a small space in her heart to love.

“What’s funny is that before hitting me with the bottle she said to me, ‘I’m white and we are in Spain. I can kill you and nothing will happen to me.’ The truth is nothing has happened to her,” he added. “After being identified she has gone home, while I have gone to mine with seven stitches. Now the problem is in the hands of the law. The law will decide on the sentence.”

The incident comes a week after the Council of Europe released a report urging Spain to create an independent anti-racism body. Spain and the micro-state of San Marino are the only members of the 47-strong Council that still lack an organization specifically designed to tackle racism.
Can't post the link due to the language and graphic imagery.

__________________
All aboard the Pork Chop Express!
chamber-music is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 07:32 AM   #748
Hypestyle
Side-Kick
 
Hypestyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 7,142
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

In an affluent suburb north of Detroit, a local teen got lost while walking to school, and approached a random house to ask for directions. He almost lost his life:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/14/u...irections.html



Brennan Walker, 14, of Rochester Hills, Mich., woke up around 7:30 a.m. on Thursday — too late. He had slept through his alarm and was going to miss the school bus.

So he decided to walk to Rochester High School, where he is a freshman. That takes about an hour and a half, but he thought he would at least make it in time for his third-period class in world studies, his favorite subject.

Brennan did not have his smartphone that morning, and so, lacking assistance from GPS, he tried to follow the route his bus usually takes. He ended up in a quiet subdivision where the roads looped into each other, and when he noticed he had gone in a circle, he stopped to ask for help.

He tried one home, and then another. A woman answered the door, he said, and began yelling almost immediately, as if he were trying to break into her house.

“She didn’t really give me a chance to speak a lot, and I was trying to tell her that I go to Rochester High and I was looking for directions,” Brennan said on Friday. “A few moments later the guy came downstairs, and he grabbed the shotgun.”
Continue reading the main story

Brennan ran. The man followed briefly, walking out of his house and stepping off his porch, according to home security camera footage reviewed by the authorities. He fired a single shot with a 12-gauge shotgun, but Brennan was not hit. The teenager kept running. A few minutes later he encountered deputies — the woman at the home had called the authorities — and told his story.


The authorities said Jeffery Zeigler, 53, fired his shotgun once at a teenager who asked for directions on Thursday. Credit Oakland County Sheriff's Office

“It’s disgusting, it’s disturbing and it’s unacceptable on every level,” Sheriff Michael Bouchard of Oakland County said. On Friday, the man, Jeffery Zeigler, 53, was charged with assault with intent to murder and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, the authorities said.


Join a deep and provocative exploration of race with a diverse group of New York Times journalists.


The security footage suggested that Mr. Zeigler was “not terribly weapons-competent,” Sheriff Bouchard added. “He was slower to discharge the weapon and as a result, allowed this young man, thankfully, to get farther away.”

The episode involving Brennan, who is black, called to mind instances in which black people have been killed by armed civilians or the police in recent years, like Stephon Clark, 22, who was fatally shot last month by Sacramento police officers, setting off widespread protests. Brennan’s story is similar to that of Renisha McBride, 19, who approached a stranger’s home in a Detroit suburb and was shot and killed in 2013.

Brennan’s mother, Lisa Wright, said she considered Rochester Hills, a Detroit suburb, a safe community but was only half-surprised that her son was threatened. “As a black person, I know it’s a possibility,” she said.

Mrs. Wright was mindful of what has happened to other black teenagers, like Trayvon Martin, the unarmed 17-year-old in Florida who was killed while wearing a hooded sweatshirt by a neighborhood watch volunteer. She said she had already had the talk with her son about all of the extra things he might have to do to keep himself safe: Don’t wear hoodies. Be open and approachable. Take your hands out of your pockets. She added that in the security footage she had seen, her son appeared to be doing everything right on Thursday morning.

“I just remember a huge shotgun being pointed and aimed at my son,” she said. “My son was running away.”

Mr. Zeigler, a retired firefighter, told a District Court judge on Friday that he was in bed on Thursday morning when his wife began “screaming and crying,” The Associated Press reported. “There’s a lot more to the story than what’s being told,” he added, “and I believe that will come out in court.”

Hypestyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 08:56 AM   #749
B
[insert witty comment]
 
B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7,756
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthSkywalker View Post
The CEO specifically said they were looking at their policies. That the police were called on two guys waiting and causing no issues raises the question, would she have done this if they were white? And I think we all know that answer.
Causing no issues other than the 2 of them refusing to make a purchase & then subsequently refusing to leave at the request of the staff because of this.

As for looking at their polices, it's such an ambiguous term it really means very little. No policy they have regarding notifying the authorities if you are asked to leave (for whatever reason) & refuse, will change.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockSP View Post
Spun up, heh. So what's the difference between those guys and the white lady who was there and said herself she asked to use the bathroom (prior to the two men entering) and wasn't given any hassle about it...wasn't asked to buy anything before being given access to the facilities? Oh, that's right, she's full of it and is lying...because reasons.
I've read half a dozen articles & flicked through the woman's Twitter feed & unless I'm missing it, she doesn't mention that she asked staff & was allowed to use the restroom facilities without hassle. Got a link for that part?

What she does say is that 'other white people do the same thing', meaning go to Starbucks, don't buy anything & take a seat at a table in full view of the staff for an indefinite period of time to use the free wifi or in this case wait on a friend. Now that I find difficult to believe, according to Docker it is common, I know it isn't common where I live & the dozen or so Starbucks near me. People lingering around for extended periods of time after they've had their coffee or snack, yes I can believe & have seen that, but Starbucks doesn't have an open door policy for people to roll in off the street & use their facilities or take up tables & chairs indefinitely if you aren't paying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chamber-music View Post
In the UK I doubt many Starbucks franchises would allow you to just hang around without ordering anything but it seems to be pretty common in Starbucks in the U.S.
It's definitely not the case in the UK which is one of the reasons why I find it so hard to believe. Particularly when it's with somewhere like Starbucks as you often find, much like with McDonalds, Burger King & other global franchises, that their policy regarding these sorts of things is universal. If you're allowed to chill in Starbucks in the US without ever needing to order anything, how do they stop the homeless from just wondering in taking refuge?

I recall being in a couple of Starbucks in New York & while there wasn't anything regarding using seats/tables without order, there were some quite passive aggressive signs regarding the use of toilets being strictly for paying customers.

B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2018, 10:46 AM   #750
Docker2.0
Watchin' you!
 
Docker2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Neva Neva land
Posts: 24,188
Default Re: Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by B View Post
Causing no issues other than the 2 of them refusing to make a purchase & then subsequently refusing to leave at the request of the staff because of this.

As for looking at their polices, it's such an ambiguous term it really means very little. No policy they have regarding notifying the authorities if you are asked to leave (for whatever reason) & refuse, will change.



I've read half a dozen articles & flicked through the woman's Twitter feed & unless I'm missing it, she doesn't mention that she asked staff & was allowed to use the restroom facilities without hassle. Got a link for that part?

What she does say is that 'other white people do the same thing', meaning go to Starbucks, don't buy anything & take a seat at a table in full view of the staff for an indefinite period of time to use the free wifi or in this case wait on a friend. Now that I find difficult to believe, according to Docker it is common, I know it isn't common where I live & the dozen or so Starbucks near me. People lingering around for extended periods of time after they've had their coffee or snack, yes I can believe & have seen that, but Starbucks doesn't have an open door policy for people to roll in off the street & use their facilities or take up tables & chairs indefinitely if you aren't paying.



It's definitely not the case in the UK which is one of the reasons why I find it so hard to believe. Particularly when it's with somewhere like Starbucks as you often find, much like with McDonalds, Burger King & other global franchises, that their policy regarding these sorts of things is universal. If you're allowed to chill in Starbucks in the US without ever needing to order anything, how do they stop the homeless from just wondering in taking refuge?

I recall being in a couple of Starbucks in New York & while there wasn't anything regarding using seats/tables without order, there were some quite passive aggressive signs regarding the use of toilets being strictly for paying customers.
Oh! You live in the UK? Then I understand why you find it so hard to believe about people not ordering things at Starbucks and sit there for hours. Here it is VERY common. People use the wifi all the time without ordering. I think it's part of the appeal of Starbucks.

__________________
A united Marvel is unstoppable! F4 and X-men back at Marvel at Disney!??!?!............nothing is stopping that ship!
Docker2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of Mandatory Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2018 All Rights Reserved.