Should SM3 be the last

[hulkamania85]

No way. Spider-Man needs to become the next James Bond at best, or get run into the ground like Rocky at worst.

[Red]

Bump!

[War Lord]

I think X-3 should be the last with Xavier and Magneto.

[Hugebear]

Originally Posted by Mike

I just hope Chameleon's lame ass doesnt step foot in any of the movies. He's so lame.

The Chameleon would be cool to see in one of the movies. Infact I'd like for him to be the main villain, by himself with no other villain, to see if Raimi can make a great Spider-man movie. I mean its easy to make a action movie, when you have villains with powers.

[The Villain]

Originally Posted by Hugebear

The Chameleon would be cool to see in one of the movies. Infact I'd like for him to be the main villain, by himself with no other villain, to see if Raimi can make a great Spider-man movie. I mean its easy to make a action movie, when you have villains with powers.

I'd like to see Chameleon aswell but maybe it would be good to have him as a behind the scenes type baddie perhaps hiring a few goons to do some jobs etc.

I would prefer to see Mysterio first though and I know Chameleon was Spideys first main baddie he faced but Mysterio has a lot of indications for being used in a future sequel.

It would make sense to introduce Quentin Beck to SP3 since MJ has got more into acting. He could just be Beck but have him act in a sinister way towards MJ during the film.

I hope and pray that Spidey will have atleast six films so we can see Mysterio, Scorpion, Lizard and Electro.

[Red]

bumpy

[DroolingforGwen]

Can anyone give me a successful sequel that contained new directors or a recast in actors??? I can't think of one of the top of my head... as far as six Spiderman movies... i think that will be a complete mess... it just gets redundant after a while... i mean characters like mysterio and chameleon are characters that will appeal to the fanbase... but will they appeal to the general public... I think not... obviously it all depends on Spiderman 3... (which we all no is gonna reek in almost 400 million domestically... but to make three more movies??? That might work if it was done ten years after sm3 (ala Batman Begins)... i want to see them rap it up with four movies tops with the core cast (Tobey, Kirsten, Simmons)... (and just a side note... if Kirsten isn't coming back, why don't they just make them break up at the end??? No one has really mentioned it a whole lot... but they could do something like they did in Batman Begins With Rachel and Bruce... I think that's a better solution than a recast...)

[maninthechair]

If they can come up with good stories to tell, I say keep the movies coming. They just have to pick the right directors who will take the material seriously. These hollywood idiots don't think the material can hold up so they try to camp it up. As we'll all agee, that's a big ****ing mistake. I think Raimi is done after this but if they replace him with someone good, I'd be up for seeing more of these movies

[The Riddler]

no way this movie does bad at the box office, so expect the franchise to continue.

[Spider-Bite]

Originally Posted by DroolingforGwen

Can anyone give me a successful sequel that contained new directors or a recast in actors??? I can't think of one of the top of my head... as far as six Spiderman movies... i think that will be a complete mess... it just gets redundant after a while... i mean characters like mysterio and chameleon are characters that will appeal to the fanbase... but will they appeal to the general public... I think not... obviously it all depends on Spiderman 3... (which we all no is gonna reek in almost 400 million domestically... but to make three more movies??? That might work if it was done ten years after sm3 (ala Batman Begins)... i want to see them rap it up with four movies tops with the core cast (Tobey, Kirsten, Simmons)... (and just a side note... if Kirsten isn't coming back, why don't they just make them break up at the end??? No one has really mentioned it a whole lot... but they could do something like they did in Batman Begins With Rachel and Bruce... I think that's a better solution than a recast...)

A batman begins style revamp of spider-man will not work as good as Batman Begins worked simply because the first movie was so close to the original story. How can you tell his origin without making the same exact movie over again? think about it. What can you show?

dorky kid getting bit by spider at science exhib

discovers his powers

becomes a wrestler, gets ripped off, lets the burgular pass,

burgular kills his uncle

becomes a hero

How could they show all that without making the same movie over again? It worked for Batman Begins but that's completely different.

I agree on the Dunst situation. I think Gwen should die in part 4 or 5. by then Dunst would be willing to come back probably.

[DroolingforGwen]

The biggest problem I have with six movies is the fact that new directors will be taking over and probably new actors as well... and that's when things go sour pretty quickly... i'm not stupid enough to think people can not be replaced but...a continuation that just won't live up to the past movies... what i was trying to get at at the Batman reference was simply taking a break between trilogies... take a four or five year break atleast and get things right rather than cramming in a crappy ass movie... find the right people and the right cast but I am still convinced that six movies is just beating it to death, and while the movies might make money... they will lose quality for sure...