Superman 2-who do you want to direct?

[Excel]

IF Bryan Singer cannot direct Superman2, who do you want?

I'd chose J.J. Abrams.

1.hes a fantastic writer who knows superman inside and out. his script has fantastic drama and some very very impressive action scenes
2. the sequel will hopeflly have physical villains, and even though his ty zor character and his origins were made up, they were great. hed be an instand classic villain, no doubt about. menacing and cool, and it was abrams sole creation.
3. MI3 looks great. the action, style, fx, acting, and tone all look fantastic and im sure he could bring this to superman.
4. budget control. MI3 as having runaway bidget problems until J.J. Abrams entered the picture.
5. very respected name. "from the creator of LOST, ALIAS, AND MI3"

...hes my choice. whose yours?

[Cinemaman]

If MI3 bombs, he will not direct it.

But I likes your thread

[dr collossus]

Personally, I think at this point in cinema history it's too big a responsibility for one director. I would like to see two people co-directing it to balance each other out. Obviously this can stifle creativity so they need to be two people who can work well together.

[ToddIsDead]

I'd like to see how Speilberg would handle Superman. But I think Abrams would probaly do a really good job. As long as there's no suit in a can.

[Cinemaman]

I hope Singer will come back.

But if he doesn't, I hope Ratner will NOT come back.

I think J.J. Abrams isn't bad choice for Superman.

[Immortalfire]

There's already been a Superman 2

[Cinemaman]

Originally Posted by ToddIsDead

I'd like to see how Speilberg would handle Superman. But I think Abrams would probaly do a really good job. As long as there's no suit in a can.

Believe me, Spielberg don't want films like this.

WB asked him for Superman or Harry Potter, and he didn't want it.

And he is a great director, but Superman would be like WOTW with superhero.

[Immortalfire]

Originally Posted by Cinemaman

but Superman would be like WOTW with superhero.

[Il_Siciliano]

I'd be over the moon with Michael Mann, but slightly more realistically Zemeckis would catch the bright side of Superman.

[Cinemaman]

Originally Posted by Immortalfire

There's already been a Superman 2

Excel meant another director (if Singer doesn't come back) for SR sequel.

[Cinemaman]

Originally Posted by Il_Siciliano

I'd be over the moon with Michael Mann, but slightly more realistically Zemeckis would catch the bright side of Superman.

Spielberg, Zemeckis, Lucas... they all don't want to direct movie about superheroes.

[Cinemaman]

Originally Posted by Excel

IF Bryan Singer cannot direct Superman2, who do you want?

I'd chose J.J. Abrams.

1.hes a fantastic writer who knows superman inside and out. his script has fantastic drama and some very very impressive action scenes
2. the sequel will hopeflly have physical villains, and even though his ty zor character and his origins were made up, they were great. hed be an instand classic villain, no doubt about. menacing and cool, and it was abrams sole creation.
3. MI3 looks great. the action, style, fx, acting, and tone all look fantastic and im sure he could bring this to superman.
4. budget control. MI3 as having runaway bidget problems until J.J. Abrams entered the picture.
5. very respected name. "from the creator of LOST, ALIAS, AND MI3"

...hes my choice. whose yours?

Sorry, but I have some questions.

1. Did you read his script?
2. I thought we will have Metallo or Brainiac in sequel, right?
3. Did you see MI3? It can be disappointment also.

P.S. I think WB will ask another new popular director, like it was with Singer.

[Excel]

i did read his script, i havbent seen mi3. but i have no doubt, it will be a good film and looks great all around.

where was it sad metallo n brainiac were to be in the sequel? his tyzor villains is BADASS. MAULS zod or doc ock or joker in terms of menacing and coolness. lot like DARTH MAUL.

[grey_jeanie]

I reckon Ratner will want to be in there. But assuming it finds big success with SR I think more of the 'big wigs' (what a sad phrase) will stick their foot in the door. Big names such as Spielberg.

[Cinemaman]

Originally Posted by Excel

i did read his script, i havbent seen mi3. but i have no doubt, it will be a good film and looks great all around.

where was it sad metallo n brainiac were to be in the sequel? his tyzor villains is BADASS. MAULS zod or doc ock or joker in terms of menacing and coolness. lot like DARTH MAUL.

Give me please photo and some information about Ty-Zor.

I heard something about him.

[Cinemaman]

If Singer doesn't come back, Ratner will ask WB to be director.

But I think they will confirm that they find a new director before Ratner will ask them.

[Pickle-El]

Zemeckis. That guy is class.

[dark_b]

Originally Posted by grey_jeanie

I reckon Ratner will want to be in there. But assuming it finds big success with SR I think more of the 'big wigs' (what a sad phrase) will stick their foot in the door. Big names such as Spielberg.

if the movie is a succes than singer will direct the sequel.
isnt it obvious?
we get a new director only if singer doesnt wana do it.

[Cinemaman]

Originally Posted by dark_b

if the movie is a succes than singer will direct the sequel.
isnt it obvious?
we get a new director only if singer doesnt wana do it.

Agreed.

[dr collossus]

For the love of god I hope its not Ang Lee

[Cinemaman]

Does somebody know somethink about Ty-Zor?

[Pickle-El]

Originally Posted by Cinemaman

Does somebody know somethink about Ty-Zor?

Dude, you post A LOT.

Sorry , I just had to say that.

[Matt]

Brett Ratner. He seems to be combining everything Singer did right and fixing everything Singer did wrong on X-men...no reason he couldn't do that here.

Alternativley...James Cameron, who is a fantastic sci-fi director. David Fincher...just because he's David Fincher. Or Peter Jackson who knows how to make epics.

[dr collossus]

Originally Posted by Matt

Brett Ratner. He seems to be combining everything Singer did right and fixing everything Singer did wrong on X-men...no reason he couldn't do that here.

[Cinemaman]

1. Director should make a really good movie for public.

2. He should make it for fans too.

3. He should make it to get more money