![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,798
|
I read arctiles from here:
http://supermancinema.co.uk/ and it led to my question as said in the topic's title. We all know that the Salkinds are the ones who fired Donner and they were the ones who saw Superman to be as campy as the '60s Batman show. So they cared for it, but for the wrong way. But we blame Lester. When in fact; Lester, as said by Donner in interviews back in that day, was probably the best guy on the crew. Let me explain: he offered good ideas for Donner on the movie's storyline (example: he was the one who thought the movie (STM) should end with the turning of the world). And he was the guy who thought more focus should be on to finish STM and wait for SII. He came up with these ideas that probably made the movie better than what was planned. But we blame Lester. Should we really blame Lester? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 4,259
|
Uh, I'd have preferred it if Superman 1 had ended the way it was originally planned. Not to open up the discussion again, but I hate the time-travel ending.
That said, I don't really blame Lester for anything - it is the Salkinds I feel are mostly responsible for the decline of the series. God, imagine each sequel had been progressively better than the first rather than progressively worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pescadero State Mental Institution
Posts: 1,627
|
Quote:
__________________
"I can't have anyone with me...who isn't with me." Ross Webster - President & CEO of Webscoe Industries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,562
|
we'll find out how much differnet the storys are in a few months
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Bonesaw is ready!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 455
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|