Singer's open to directing another X-men film!

[X-Maniac]

Originally Posted by LastSunrise1981

Actually, we can change it. Those who didn't like it are voicing this displeasure and letting Fox, Marvel, Ratner, Penn, and Kinberg know exactly how we feel about it.

No you're not. You're just twittering on about it ad nauseum on an internet forum where there are bound to be people with more balanced views, or diametrically opposed views. Take your complaints to the source, rather than getting stuck in a groove on here. How many times do you want to say the same thing over and over? It's like pissing in the wind.

Originally Posted by LastSunrise1981

If enough noise is made then Marvel can get the rights away from Fox and take it to Sony, WB, or LGF.

Oh sure. Which is why Stan Lee has a part in X3, why he has written a comic to go inside the DVD release and why Claremont was actually on set during the filming of a movie containing elements of the Phoenix Saga he himself wrote. They must all be so unhappy with the movie.

Originally Posted by LastSunrise1981

Look at how much noise was made from Batman fans(myself included) and because of our dedication, because of a director, a writer, and a great actor who understood our complaints and frustration; a new Batman film was made and it satisfied the legions of fans who wanted to see The Dark Knight who was and is true to his character.

Batman was due a reboot anyway. But a lot of people didn't like the change in style - I know at least two people who hated the movie because it's not what they expect of Batman (they wanted something lighter and more colourful). I actually took one of those people to see the movie again, after explaining why it was made the way it was, and he developed a greater liking for it. The movie was probably a little too dark, serious and fun-lacking for many people.

[Cosmic Mind]

well, is true.....but still, we can hope see more of it......about Batman is amazing......

[gambitfire]

Originally Posted by X-Maniac

No you're not. You're just twittering on about it ad nauseum on an internet forum where there are bound to be people with more balanced views, or diametrically opposed views. Take your complaints to the source, rather than getting stuck in a groove on here. How many times do you want to say the same thing over and over? It's like pissing in the wind.

That's what the forums are here for.
If it bugs you soo much stay out of the threads that are bound to end up in this kind of topic. It's not that hard if you analyze the title properly .

Oh and calm down.

Originally Posted by X-Maniac

Oh sure. Which is why Stan Lee has a part in X3, why he has written a comic to go inside the DVD release and why Claremont was actually on set during the filming of a movie containing elements of the Phoenix Saga he himself wrote. They must all be so unhappy with the movie.

You do know that ppl that saw the advanced screening of X3 said it had Cyclops being Demolecularized. But they didn't show it in the theatrical releaser,...... i wonder why?

SHH boards and a few other forums have been acknowledged before, i wouldn't be surprised if they do so again.

Originally Posted by X-Maniac

Batman was due a reboot anyway. But a lot of people didn't like the change in style - I know at least two people who hated the movie because it's not what they expect of Batman (they wanted something lighter and more colourful). I actually took one of those people to see the movie again, after explaining why it was made the way it was, and he developed a greater liking for it. The movie was probably a little too dark, serious and fun-lacking for many people.

2 ppl WOW that must mean Batman was done improperly. If they wanted something lighter and colorful then they don't know the real Batman. Fun?! Batman isn't about FUN!!! lol .

[HughJackFan420]

well if singer does return this is what i would like to see...

returning characters

everyone from x1 to x3 except deathstrike and toad

since the official game was a prequel to x3 they should recap on that a little which will lead to all mutants facing a new invasion of sentinels and bastion trying to take control of them to rule the world and rid mutants and humans together.

Jean, Scott and Prof X come back

and a cliffhanger for the Age of the Apocalypse

[Fenix]

Heh, we need to turn back time, push back Superman (not any hard feelings toward it of course), and Singer needs to make X3 again
PS: I think if Singer would've done X3, I would've hoped that he would have made it, well, more complete and not just kill all these random characters off and all. Just my thoughts (even though X3 was supposed to be the last stand...eh I'm confusing myself )

[ntcrawler]

Originally Posted by Fenix

Just my thoughts (even though X3 was supposed to be the last stand...eh I'm confusing myself )

Well it's certainly the Last movie like it that we're going to Stand, haha

[CapBeerCino]

Do you suppose Singer would agree to do the commentaries for x-3 instead of Ratner? Just wondering

[danoyse]

Originally Posted by X-Maniac

Oh sure. Which is why Stan Lee has a part in X3, why he has written a comic to go inside the DVD release and why Claremont was actually on set during the filming of a movie containing elements of the Phoenix Saga he himself wrote. They must all be so unhappy with the movie.

Not to mention Claremont wrote the X3 novelization and also has a cameo in the opening scene.

[flavio_lebeau]

Meh Stan Lee had a cameo in Daredevil

[CapBeerCino]

Originally Posted by danoyse

Not to mention Claremont wrote the X3 novelization and also has a cameo in the opening scene.

THe guy who had to change his novel to fit the movie? Yeah I'm sure he's real happy. And you know- while shooting his cameo he couldn't tell how the movie will turn out.

It took Clooney few year to admit he hates B&R, so unless I hear any of those guys saying their opinions about x-3 I'm not buying it.

[danoyse]

Originally Posted by CapBeerCino

THe guy who had to change his novel to fit the movie? Yeah I'm sure he's real happy. And you know- while shooting his cameo he couldn't tell how the movie will turn out.

He hated it so much that he did the cameo and wrote the book. Fuming the whole time while he cashed the checks.

Arguing over how *happy* he was is absurd, we have no way of knowing of what he thought of the whole thing. But he certainly took part.

[CapBeerCino]

Originally Posted by danoyse

Arguing over how *happy* he was is absurd, we have no way of knowing of what he thought of the whole thing. But he certainly took part.

Well that's I was saying so I guess we agree.

[The Batman]

Alex Ross painted the opening sequence for spider-man 2, and he flat out admitted he hated that movie.

[Spider-Fan83]

Originally Posted by CapBeerCino

Do you suppose Singer would agree to do the commentaries for x-3 instead of Ratner? Just wondering

I could see him maybe doing commentaries with Ratner, but, really what would he be commenting on, if he did it on his own?

[ntcrawler]

Originally Posted by danoyse

Not to mention Claremont wrote the X3 novelization and also has a cameo in the opening scene.

So what? Claremont didn't come up with the story or the script, he had the task of writing a novel which follows the stuff that Penn and Kingerg came up with. This proves nothing. :P

[X-Maniac]

Originally Posted by ntcrawler

So what? Claremont didn't come up with the story or the script, he had the task of writing a novel which follows the stuff that Penn and Kingerg came up with. This proves nothing. :P

Chris would surely have had a mega-tantrum if they did something he regarded as truly awful...

Regardless, the novel is very good - it changes only a few details and fleshes out the story in places. Magneto's army travel by plane to SF, Jean helps Magneto move the bridge, she stays with Magneto partly to pose a threat to him, Angel asks if he can come to SF....