Differences between GC Twilight Princess and Wii Twilight Princess?

[kainedamo]

So what will be the differences between the GC Twilight Princess and the Wii Twilight Princess?

First of all, obviously, the Wii has the new controller. That will make a big difference in gameplay and controls, especially since we've learned they've integrated the sword fighting with the motion of the controller. Fishing, bow and arrow, among others will be done by moving the controller about. Kick ass, can't wait. What concerns me though, now they've integrated the sword fighting with controller motion. When you play gun games at the arcade, it's fun and all, but you get tired real quick. Won't you get tired having to flick the controller about to sword swipe all the time??

What about graphics? Much of a graphical difference?

Anything else in game we will see on the Wii but not on the Gamecube?

I've heard TP is going to be a MASSIVE game.

[hippie_hunter]

The Wii version will also have better graphics, a widescreen display, and Navi

[Spidey-Bat]

One of the other million TP threads may have something.

[TheGrayGhost]

Actually, I heard that the Wii version of Twilight Princess will not feature updated graphics, only widescreen display. Miyamoto said that instead of spending time updating the graphics, they were going to add additional content like dungeons, characters, items, etc. Miyamoto also said that the Wii version is the superior version.

[TheGrayGhost]

And yeah, it's going to be massive. Rumors circulating the net indicate that it will take 45 REAL minutes to cross Hyrule on Epona.

[kainedamo]

That rumor sounds suspicious. What would that even be based on?

[Spidey-Bat]

Originally Posted by TheGrayGhost

And yeah, it's going to be massive. Rumors circulating the net indicate that it will take 45 REAL minutes to cross Hyrule on Epona.

I hope not

[XwolverineX]

Why? That's kickass.

[Axid]

No, it's too big and will be like Oblivion...except not disappointing

[Spidey-Bat]

Originally Posted by XwolverineX

Why? That's kickass.

I dont want to spend 45 min going from Death Mountain to Lake Hylia.

[Future Prez]

Originally Posted by Spidey-Bat

I dont want to spend 45 min going from Death Mountain to Lake Hylia.

If this does prove to be true, I'm guessing its from the the most remote point in the game to another remote point, just so Nintendo could market it with 45 minutes-worth of land to cross. Traveling from meaningful places like Death Mountain to Lake Hylia will probably take far less time.

[Spidey-Bat]

And there's always the warp songs. But I always liked taking the scenic routes in Ocarina of Time.

[jaydawg]

Same here. I want to enjoy Hyrule's beauty.... but not 45 mins worth. Either way, this is a lock for greatest launch title of all time.

[CantThinkOfAName]

Will you be able to play the Wii version using the GC controller or the Wii regular controller?


Im having a tought time deciding which to get. Wii will probably be better, but i can get the GC version right away, while it might take a while before getting a Wii

[hippie_hunter]

Originally Posted by CantThinkOfAName

Will you be able to play the Wii version using the GC controller or the Wii regular controller?


Im having a tought time deciding which to get. Wii will probably be better, but i can get the GC version right away, while it might take a while before getting a Wii

The Wii version will not be using the Gamecube controller at all.

[kainedamo]

Originally Posted by Axid

No, it's too big and will be like Oblivion...except not disappointing

I don't think it's too big. Zelda games are supposed to be big and have plenty to do.

I imagine, like someone said above, it will be 30 mins from one remote point to another.

I imagine that this Zelda game will have ALOT more places to visit.