![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Will you kneel before Zod in SR2? | |||
| I want to see Zod as the villain in SR2 |
|
16 | 11.85% |
| I do NOT want Zod in SR2, but will still go see it if he is |
|
80 | 59.26% |
| I do NOT want Zod in SR2, and will NOT see it if he is |
|
39 | 28.89% |
| Voters: 135. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 198
|
post your thougts here
__________________
Chris Reeve + Dean Cain = Brandon Routh |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Illadel
Posts: 4,030
|
Terrible idea... anything to do with Zod.. even mentioning his name.
Well I would not go that far, but the people that felt Superman Returns payed too much homage to the first film and didn't exactly love it for that reason will stay far away if Zod Returns.... Might as well give it that name Zod Returns...and the box office will be worse then this one.
__________________
100 chimps working in unison to create the next great American Novel... It was the best of times it..... it was the blurst of times??? You have to love Mr. Burns. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 10,801
|
Someone should make a petition for Zod not being in the sequel.
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,989
|
I think this could be like Raime with Sandman and Venom... except this time Singer with Zod and Brainiac. I personally want Luthor (minor role) with Brainiac (bigger, but not the biggest role) making a clone of Zod that Superman beats early on, confusing him, then a Superman clone totally throwing off Superman and ruining his reputation. The clone will turn out to be Bizarro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,989
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Not a Goddamn Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 10,801
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The King is Back!
SHH! Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Titanium Groceries
Posts: 49,859
|
I think Zod would be cool to have for the sequel. Imagine with todays special effects a massive battle between two Kryptonians. And have Superman kill him in the end just like he did in the comics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Green Guy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,165
|
No Zod in this film or any other future Superman films!!!
__________________
"Great spirits have always experienced violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein "All that was great in the past, was ridiculed, condemned, combatted, suppressed." -Nikola Tesla “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” – Margaret Mead |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Crimson and Clover
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Detroit Rock City
Posts: 20,206
|
zod would be rad to have, but i'd prefer him in a third film. i'd like to see someone new in the second film. but, ultimately, if they go with zod, im sure it'll be amazing...the fight scenes will be ridiculous.
and just because zod will be involved doesnt mean they'll be hacking supes 2. i can see the concern over that due to the numerous references of the original donner film in SR...but im sure if they go with zod it'll be a totally original story. much like how the dark knight will be using the joker, like burton has, but it'll be a new and original joker story.
__________________
Dear Prudence, won't you come out and play?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MESO-F******-POTAMIA!
Posts: 20,647
|
No to Zod. Even if it was the modern Comic version of Zod. I want to see someone else before they bring him him.
__________________
Long live THWIP*[/color] [color=red]2000-2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 881
|
eh, I wouldn't mind Zod so long as there were another villain involved in the plot, too. Maybe have Zod be the main villain in part 2 (with Lex Luthor), with Brainiac in the background manipulating things, then have him reveal himself in part 3. that's how i'd like things to play out, anyway...
someone already mentioned this, but I thought I'd say it again -- Singer using Zod in the sequel does NOT mean that it'll automatically be a rehash of SUPERMAN II. What I mean is, the presence of Zod doesn't necesarily mean the movie has to be a rehash of SUPERMAN II (in the same way that RETURNS was a rehash of Donner's SUPERMAN). If anything, the way I envision it, if Zod IS a/the villain in the sequel, it'll be an entirely NEW Zod, with NO referneces AT ALL to SUPERMAN II -- a Zod who's never been to Earth before. RETURNS really only puts Donner's SUPERMAN in a vague history -- NOT SUPERMAN II!! For all we know, Zod hasn't been to Earth yet! Last edited by Dan33977; 09-06-2006 at 02:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
The King is Back!
SHH! Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Titanium Groceries
Posts: 49,859
|
Quote:
1. Lex Luthor knows that location of the Fortress of Solitude and he knows his way around in Superman Returns. Even Kitty says that he acts like he's been there before. In Superman II, Lex found the Fortress of Solitude. 2. Jason White, the son of Superman and Lois Lane. Clark and Lois had sex in the Fortress of Solitude in Superman II. In Superman Returns we have little Jason. 3. Lois doesn't know that Clark is Superman (yet she apparently had sex with him). At the end of Superman II, Lois forgets that Clark is Superman. In Superman Returns, she still doesn't know that Clark is Superman. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Illadel
Posts: 4,030
|
Quote:
well stated
__________________
100 chimps working in unison to create the next great American Novel... It was the best of times it..... it was the blurst of times??? You have to love Mr. Burns. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,900
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 3,328
|
I wouldn't mind three villains. So i say Brainiac, Luthor and maybe Zod.
__________________
Favorite ongoing titles: The Immortal Iron Fist Superman New Avengers Mighty Avengers JLA! "Strong, Powerful, Invincible. Superman is a hero we can all look up to. To find him, all you need is to look up in the sky." \S/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
AMERICA FTW
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bronx
Posts: 12,766
|
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ZOD
DAMMIT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOOO no
__________________
Superman Returns is better than the Dark Knight |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
milfhunter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At Tarantino's grave...Where he belongs
Posts: 5,090
|
You can have 1 billion villains and make it work as long as they 1) can all act , 2) worh within the story and 3) kick supes ass in a 200 million CGI fight scene orgy
__________________
Rambo is better then viagra. Heck it should be mandatory viewing for us males before we bang our women |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
AMERICA FTW
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bronx
Posts: 12,766
|
I want to see that, but it's definitely more important that it works for the story, indeed. King Kong had a lot of meaningless bashfests that while visually amazing for the first few minutes, just put me to sleep zzzzzzz afterwards so maybe you know where I'm coming from with this idea.
BUT ANYONE BUT ZOD!!! NO MORE VAGUE HISTORY!!! I'LL EVEN TAKE SUPES VS HARRY POTTER INSTEAD OF ZOD YES... USE SOMEONE WHO DOES MAGIC.
__________________
Superman Returns is better than the Dark Knight |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 23,318
|
Terrence Stamp is still around, therefore put him in. He should have been in Returns really. Sure he's older, but either work that into the storyline, or use X2 CGI.
__________________
Read Cobalt Blue's comic strip adventures online - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cobalt...68148599902345 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 881
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Sum Dum Goy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Currently living in sanity.
Posts: 19,136
|
if Zod is the next villain...i will hate Singer foreverz. i like how he used the originals as a vague history but he needs to move the story forward, not backward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,900
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,782
|
NO ZOD!! I`d say make Richard become Metallo or give us Brainiac or Darkseid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
I'm not old, I'm ancient
SHH! Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 42,147
|
I would prefer for Zod not to be brought back...but have a bad feeling he will.
__________________
Go here for answers about AVATARS, signatures, etc The Official Board Rules Avatar by hunter rider |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pescadero State Mental Institution
Posts: 1,627
|
Man, I'm the only insane guy on here, I guess. I honestly wouldn't mind seeing Zod brought back into the equation. I also wouldn't mind seeing any one of Supes' other rogues gallery members. As long as I like the film and it's quality in my eyes, then I don't give a damn if they use Prankster and Toyman (although they wouldn't be tops of my list).
__________________
"I can't have anyone with me...who isn't with me." Ross Webster - President & CEO of Webscoe Industries |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|