Should they film the next 3 films back to back???

Advanced Dark · 11-29-2006, 10:45 PM

Let's assume they manage to resign Tobey & the crew for another film. Wouldn't it make sense to film 2 or 3 films back to back while Tobey can still be convincing in the role? He is getting old. I'd hate to see them start a whole new storyline in part 4 and then watch Tobey walk in part 5. There's little risk since the movies all make money so just film 2 or 3 back to back which will give you plenty of time afterwords to starting looking for fresh blood.

GoldGoblin · 11-29-2006, 10:49 PM

They should definitely film part 4 & 5 back to back,it would be a good investment for the studio,for Tobey,for everyone basically.

spyderman2k4 · 11-29-2006, 10:56 PM

I would actually love that idea. Obviously there's no way Toby could do three more that are spaced apart like the first three have been... back to back (to back) would be the only way. I'd love to see three more films, as would a lot of fans, and I'd love to see them with all the same actors (at least one!) It seems like it would really be a long shot, but it would also be pretty much ideal.

Spider-ManHero12 · 11-29-2006, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spyderman2k4

I would actually love that idea. Obviously there's no way Toby could do three more that are spaced apart like the first three have been... back to back (to back) would be the only way. I'd love to see three more films, as would a lot of fans, and I'd love to see them with all the same actors (at least one!) It seems like it would really be a long shot, but it would also be pretty much ideal.

its very possible tobey can star in three more, he wouldnt be that old.

Advanced Dark · 11-29-2006, 11:02 PM

^ Not spaced out every 3 years he couldn't. He's already starting to look a bit old. I think he could make it work if they spent 2 years or whatever it takes to film another 2-3 films and then release one in the Summer and one during XMAS or the following Summer. This would give the studio plenty of time to start looking for fresh blood and if it took 4 years to get another film off after that it'd would be worth it. I love Raimi but at some point were gonna want to see a different directors vision of Spidey.

Jasmine · 11-29-2006, 11:06 PM

I'd be for it, and yes it would be more convenient for the actors/studio if they were to agree to it.

SamuraiSon6 · 11-29-2006, 11:47 PM

assuming there is a worthwhile plot and everyone signs back on then it would make perfect sense to do them back to back while they all fit the part still

NewYorkSpider · 11-30-2006, 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamuraiSon6

assuming there is a worthwhile plot and everyone signs back on then it would make perfect sense to do them back to back while they all fit the part still

I agree.

11-29-2006, 10:45 PM	#1
Advanced Dark Banned User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Rock Bottom Posts: 17,593	Should they film the next 3 films back to back??? Let's assume they manage to resign Tobey & the crew for another film. Wouldn't it make sense to film 2 or 3 films back to back while Tobey can still be convincing in the role? He is getting old. I'd hate to see them start a whole new storyline in part 4 and then watch Tobey walk in part 5. There's little risk since the movies all make money so just film 2 or 3 back to back which will give you plenty of time afterwords to starting looking for fresh blood.

11-29-2006, 10:49 PM	#2
GoldGoblin Side-Kick Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: California(The Golden State) Posts: 14,275	Re: Should they film the next 3 films back to back??? They should definitely film part 4 & 5 back to back,it would be a good investment for the studio,for Tobey,for everyone basically. __________________ What if Norman Osborn is dead,the Chameleon pretends to be Norman and Harry is the Green Goblin.

11-29-2006, 10:56 PM	#3
spyderman2k4 Side-Kick Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 397	Re: Should they film the next 3 films back to back??? I would actually love that idea. Obviously there's no way Toby could do three more that are spaced apart like the first three have been... back to back (to back) would be the only way. I'd love to see three more films, as would a lot of fans, and I'd love to see them with all the same actors (at least one!) It seems like it would really be a long shot, but it would also be pretty much ideal. __________________ I'm Chuck Norris' Side-Kick http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php If you have been part of SHH for less than 6 months, it will benefit you to click on this link.

11-29-2006, 11:02 PM	#5
Advanced Dark Banned User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Rock Bottom Posts: 17,593	Re: Should they film the next 3 films back to back??? ^ Not spaced out every 3 years he couldn't. He's already starting to look a bit old. I think he could make it work if they spent 2 years or whatever it takes to film another 2-3 films and then release one in the Summer and one during XMAS or the following Summer. This would give the studio plenty of time to start looking for fresh blood and if it took 4 years to get another film off after that it'd would be worth it. I love Raimi but at some point were gonna want to see a different directors vision of Spidey.

11-29-2006, 11:06 PM	#6
Jasmine Side-Kick Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: St. Louis, Missouri Posts: 11,553	Re: Should they film the next 3 films back to back??? I'd be for it, and yes it would be more convenient for the actors/studio if they were to agree to it. __________________ SM4: Lizard Last edited by Jasmine; 11-29-2006 at 11:10 PM.

11-29-2006, 11:47 PM	#7
SamuraiSon6 Side-Kick Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Smallville Posts: 1,534	Re: Should they film the next 3 films back to back??? assuming there is a worthwhile plot and everyone signs back on then it would make perfect sense to do them back to back while they all fit the part still

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode