![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pa
Posts: 713
|
I sure hope he gets a chance to have his day, the correct way in a future Hulk movie. Any thoughts? I guess there's always Thor!
__________________
Its his RAGE not his size!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Just beside the Leprechaun, not Warwick Davis :)
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
) as we pretty much had Cruser in the shape of Nick Nolte/Bruce's dad in the 1st one...But hey, it's hollywood, and we are looking for at least 4 to 5 years, depending on TIH performance, to see a possible follow up.... It's in the air anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sharp Dressed Man
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Viacom offices
Posts: 7,720
|
If he ever does make his silver screen debut, it's definately a ways off. As I sincerely doubt there are any upcoming plans to include him at this time considering we essentially have seen a character with those same powers in Ang Lee's HULK. Personally, I would imagine it's a bit more likely to see Creel appear in a Thor film somewhere down the road than it is seeing him appear in a future Hulk sequel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Fantastic
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,320
|
I sure hope he does, that lame excuse for one of the coolest villians in Marvel they called Nick Nolte sure shamed the character.
At least bring him in a Thor movie if he won't be in a Hulk movie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: krypton
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
That lame excuse for a villain in the Ang Lee movie was a disgrace. I think, only the first Punisher movie ranks lower with DC/Movies. Im not even a punisher fan or a John Travolta fan but at least even that movie was done better than HULK. The real question is: Will there be another HULK movie after this one? HULK is the kind of character who can generate many stories. Because of his strength, and the fact that it's basically all he has, he makes a good fight for anyone. The task, (for over 90% of DCU/MU) is survival. I actually like the idea of a CGI HULK. However, it was the story and characters/actors, what make the movie a fluke. Banner looked more like a linebacker than a scrawny scientist. I like Ed Norton much better. Im excited that ABOMINATION will be in the movie. I hope they do both him and HULK correctly. I really hate this new found idea that ABOMINATION should be much bigger than HULK. They should be about the same size. ABOMINATION should look truely EVIL. As for THOR, He's my favoirte MU character. However, Im realistic enough to know that they might have to do the same thing they did with Silver Surfer. He's a cool character. However, he cant hold the numbers on screen alone. Neither can THOR or Namor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Your - Mr. Nice Guy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,546
|
I always liked the Absorbing Man so I was extremely pissed with what they did with the David Banner character in the first movie. But if Batman can redo the Joker, then maybe one day we can get the real Creel.
__________________
"Well, one thing I’ve been saying is that on the TV show they should make the Hulk a bit more intelligent." Stan Lee 1978 Interview |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|