![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,051
|
My son loves watching the shuttle/plane scene. And it occured to me. That scene were Supes rescues the plane would have been an awesome way to introduce Superman if this was an origin movie. And yes, I know in the retconned Superman origin in the comics. Supes saves Lois from a crashing shuttle. But, watch the scene again and try to think of it as if this was the first time everyone from the pilot of the fighter plane, Lois, all the way to the baseball stadium crowd sees Supes. It would have been awesome.
And on a nitpick to the movie. For a non-origin movie. Its terrible that we don't see Superman until 35 minutes into the movie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
Does that mean you'd like to see the Return to Krypton scene or not? I would in the deleted scenes at least. Plus others that were missing.
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
Quote:
Personally, I don't care about it one way or the other. What really matters is its context in the story. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
Thanks for answering. But I'm wondering why quote the 35 minutes thing. Was it a mistake on your part?
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,127
|
Quote:
To me if the story is good enough it doesn't really matter when you first see the character in costume. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
I agree (about the last part). Will there be an apocalypse?
![]() Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 2,183
|
Quote:
Somebody should tell Singer that is what chemistry between Superman and Lois looks like. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
What does it show? I may be near my limits.
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Terminator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Liverpool, U.K
Posts: 21,382
|
Quote:
They all thought they were going to die, and then Superman returns out of nowhere to save them, a brilliant scene in the movie IMO. Plus you do realise it takes 40 mins for Spiderman to show up in Spidey 1 and that Batman takes over an hour to show up in BB dont you?
__________________
2013:
1)Django Unchained-9(2)Star Trek Into Darkness-9(3)Iron Man 3-9(4)Evil Dead-8(5)Oblivion-8(6)The Last Stand-7.5(7)Oz: The Great And Powerful-7.5(8)Jack The Giant Slayer-7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
I've been expecting you
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stroud
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
![]() You do realise those two are both origin stories, as per his original post?
__________________
Out of mind, back in five minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
But isn't "Superman Returns" an introduction film. So in a sense it has to explain the characters and world it is in. So it's an origin film of sorts. I'll admit I'm glad it wasn't fully one as there's the 1978 film already. Which took around an hour for him to show up.
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
Terminator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Liverpool, U.K
Posts: 21,382
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2013:
1)Django Unchained-9(2)Star Trek Into Darkness-9(3)Iron Man 3-9(4)Evil Dead-8(5)Oblivion-8(6)The Last Stand-7.5(7)Oz: The Great And Powerful-7.5(8)Jack The Giant Slayer-7.5 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I've been expecting you
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stroud
Posts: 603
|
I'm sorry, I don't get it. Either its an origin story or its not. There are so many arguments based on this 'vague history' idea, either the story reintroduces the character (which is decidedly NOT what Singer claims) or it doesn't.
__________________
Out of mind, back in five minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
It did reintroduce the character and world.
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Terminator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Liverpool, U.K
Posts: 21,382
|
Its not an origin story, but it is origin story like because (As Angeloz said) the characters and world had to be re-introduced to both new and old fans.
__________________
2013:
1)Django Unchained-9(2)Star Trek Into Darkness-9(3)Iron Man 3-9(4)Evil Dead-8(5)Oblivion-8(6)The Last Stand-7.5(7)Oz: The Great And Powerful-7.5(8)Jack The Giant Slayer-7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Cav-El *****es
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In Superman's arms
Posts: 21,674
|
I don't see how it can be seen as an orgin story in anyway. The director himself calls it a vague sequel.
__________________
Come think with us:http://thinkmcflythink.squarespace.com/ Movies get an "A" for being good, not for effort |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
As stated it had to introduce the characters (actors) and world to people. Both the fans and non-fans.
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
I've been expecting you
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stroud
Posts: 603
|
That doesn't make it an origin story. Any film which isn't a sequel has to introduce the world and the characters to the audience.
__________________
Out of mind, back in five minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
Actually I consider it an introduction film or re-introduction film. I'm glad it isn't an origin film because there's already one (or more if you count television) around. But they do similar things.
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
I've been expecting you
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stroud
Posts: 603
|
Yeah that's basically just inconsistency and incoherence. It was a poor choice if you ask me. They should have either done a proper origin story, or had a short origin recap section at the beginning. Haha, SII managed it in under four minutes!
__________________
Out of mind, back in five minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,960
|
Which I think confused me as I don't think I'd seen the first film and I was a kid. Although I'm glad it was there 'cos I'd never seen Superman before.
Angeloz |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Terminator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Liverpool, U.K
Posts: 21,382
|
The director also said it is a re-introduction to the characters and world (and for many a first introduction to those things), so it follows the same formula of an origin movie IMO.
__________________
2013:
1)Django Unchained-9(2)Star Trek Into Darkness-9(3)Iron Man 3-9(4)Evil Dead-8(5)Oblivion-8(6)The Last Stand-7.5(7)Oz: The Great And Powerful-7.5(8)Jack The Giant Slayer-7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
I've been expecting you
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stroud
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
Basically Singer tried to be too clever. He tried to make an origin movie that wasn't an origin movie. As I said above, any original movie has to introduce its world and characters to the audience, without being an 'origin' story. What he should have done, was: a) Restarted the franchise and actually done a new origin movie b) Made a movie with an already well established Superman, and not tried to make a movie with all the issues a hero faces in an origin story in the context of a non-origin story c) Found some middle ground, and done an origin sequence in the beginning before moving on to something more original And there's your problem. The movie was not supposed to be an origin story, yet that's the formula it followed.
__________________
Out of mind, back in five minutes. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|