"Who should you vote for in 2008" Quiz!

[Superman4ever]

This is pretty cool. I got Obama; agreed with 8 of the 10 topics. I agreed with Paul, surprisingly, only 5 out of 10 from the questionnaire.

http://votechooser.com/index.html

Also this is a nice chart of the candidates and their view on the main policies.

http://knowbeforeyouvote.com/

[StorminNorman]

I got 6/10 for McCain
Oddly enough 5/10 for both Hillary and Paul.
Obama 4/10.

[rdh007]

7/10 for both Obama and Hillary
I disagreed with both of them on immigration and NCLB, but him on tax cuts and her on Iraq. Hmmmmmmmmmm...

4/10 for Paul
3/10 for McCain

[Matt]

I split all of them. Kinda appropriate, eh?

[rdh007]

Admit it, Matt. You had 5/10 for all of them and 6/10 for Obama, but you don't want to say it. C'mon. Out of the closet, you Obamaniac.

[Superman4ever]

Matt?

[SuBe]

I got 6/10 for McCain, no suprise.

[Marx]

No surprises for me guys.

Hillary Clinton 7/10
Barack Obama 7/10

Ron Paul 4/10

John McCain 3/10

[Prison Mike]

I got :

Obama 9/10

Hilary 7/10

McCain 3/10

Ron Paul 3/10

[Malice]

7/10 Ron Paul

[SonnyBlack]

I was surprised John and Barack were not equal but the rest makes sense.

Ron Paul 7 - 3
Barack Obama 5 - 5
Hillary and John 4 - 6

[The Senator]

Obama- 7/10
Clinton- 5/10
McCain- 2/10

[Superman4ever]

Originally Posted by jmanspice

Obama- 7/10
Clinton- 5/10
McCain- 2/10

Whoa, that's kinda surprising. I would have thought Clinton, didn't you campaign for her?

[Humpty Dumpty]

I received an eight out of ten for Obama, but parts of the quiz are too vague to distinguish between my positions on issues addressed by certain questions and Obama’s. For instance, I matched him on the environment question, but I disagree profoundly with his approach to the environment because of his emphasis on nuclear power. I also matched him on healthcare, but again, I take issue with his refusal to support a single-payer system. It’s not even clear what the word “favorable” means in the economy question. Obviously, anyone would want more “favorable” trade policies since “favorable” just means “good.” I don’t want more NAFTA-style stuff; that’s for sure.

Also, what happened to Nader and Gravel? They’re both still in the race, whereas Paul has been absent from it for quite some time now. I know that I certainly agree with the two of them more than I do any of the candidates provided on this questionnaire.

[The Senator]

Originally Posted by Superman4ever

Whoa, that's kinda surprising. I would have thought Clinton, didn't you campaign for her?

Yes, but the two things we disagreed on were 'minor' (it wasn't the best test, as far as I'm concerned-- there should have been more questions). We disagreed on when troops should be withdrawn (I said immediately, she said 1-2 years), what should be done about NCLB (I said abolish it, she said reform it), what should be done about trade policy (I said new policies, she said new policies and new high tech jobs), whether the Iraq war should have been authorized (I said no, she said yes), and there was one other thing.

[Superman4ever]

Originally Posted by jmanspice

Yes, but the two things we disagreed on were 'minor' (it wasn't the best test, as far as I'm concerned-- there should have been more questions). We disagreed on when troops should be withdrawn (I said immediately, she said 1-2 years), what should be done about NCLB (I said abolish it, she said reform it), what should be done about trade policy (I said new policies, she said new policies and new high tech jobs), whether the Iraq war should have been authorized (I said no, she said yes), and there was one other thing.

Well, I'm 100% in agreement with Jman. DUDE, we should run for president.

HA! America's Solution: A Muslim and a Homosexual. Talk about change!

[hippie_hunter]

Originally Posted by Superman4ever

Well, I'm 100% in agreement with Jman. DUDE, we should run for president.

HA! America's Solution: A Muslim and a Homosexual. Talk about change!

That's soooo un-American . The best change comes from the same ol' WASPs that we elect time and time again.

[Superman4ever]

Originally Posted by hippie_hunter

That's soooo un-American . The best change comes from the same ol' WASPs that we elect time and time again.

Fine!

Say goodbye to the 34th amendment, section C: All woman of, respectable age, breeding, and of well endowment, from henceforth, shall, in accords with the Hooters bill of 2010, enjoy liberation from heinously repressive, undergarments (Also referred to as brassiere, knickers, tit huggers, so on and so forth). Those liberations, shall include, but are not to be limited to: going commando, toting pasties or not (depending on the diameter of the areole), see through clothing, fishnet clothing, and/or no clothing (bottomless is not necessary but recommended*).

Subsection DD: Proper maintenance of anterior, posterior and medial pubic regions is mandatory, and shall include, but are not limited to: American (minimum standard), French (acceptable) or Brazilian waxing (Preferred).

[rdh007]

That Revolution had better be televised!

[The Senator]

We'll see what happens... I'm already running with BL... "Mixers for Change" and all that good stuff.

[SuperFerret]

1. Barack Obama [details]
8 2
2. Hillary Clinton [details]
7 3
3. John McCain [details]
3 7
4. Ron Paul [details]
2 8


Although, I have to say that on many questions the answers I would give weren't there, and I had to choose the most acceptable.

[souvlaki]

No shock here.

Obama 8/10
Clinton 6/4
Paul 3/7
McCain 2/8