Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? - Page 4

batman44 · 10-11-2008, 10:10 AM

Well, if they go with LexCorp Lex and get away from the goofiness, I think it would be enough to distance itself from the Donnerverse Luthor. Although, I don't mind Luthor being played by a black guy.

I Am The Knight · 10-11-2008, 10:11 AM

I don't think Luthor should be black...There's no real reason for him to be black.

batman44 · 10-11-2008, 10:18 AM

I don't think he should be black either, but if it happened I wouldn't be too upset. Then again, I can't think of any black guy off the top of my head that's right for Luthor.

FaT_tONle · 10-11-2008, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by batman44

I don't think he should be black either, but if it happened I wouldn't be too upset. Then again, I can't think of any black off the top of my head that's right for Luthor.

My first choice...

I just think... if you are going to reboot... why not embrace some changes? We aren't talking about Will Smith as Superman here... I just think people are tired of the same old Lex. No matter how corporate/post-crisis you make him... they won't see the differences.

Superark · 10-11-2008, 10:29 AM

There really is no reason to have a black Lex Luthor. It would make zero sense.

I Am The Knight · 10-11-2008, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaT_tONle

My first choice...

I just think... if you are going to reboot... why not embrace some changes? We aren't talking about Will Smith as Superman here... I just think people are tired of the same old Lex. No matter how corporate/post-crisis you make him... they won't see the differences.

No thanks...All the changes the franchise needs can be lifted from the comics. You don't need to make Luthor black or Lois an albino for that.

FaT_tONle · 10-11-2008, 10:31 AM

And bringing Routh back would make sense?

Superark · 10-11-2008, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaT_tONle

And bringing Routh back would make sense?

You cannot even make the comparison

FaT_tONle · 10-11-2008, 10:40 AM

When SLJ was announced as Nick Fury people were up in arms... even though there were comics based off of that version... it wasn't the mainstream. But it was still done despite the doubts of comic book readers. It's a change that works for cinema. I think it's a good idea because you completely wash your hands of Donner's Lex.

I Am The Knight · 10-11-2008, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaT_tONle

When SLJ was announced as Nick Fury people were up in arms... even though there were comics based off of that version... it wasn't the mainstream. But it was still done despite the doubts of comic book readers. It's a change that works for cinema. I think it's a good idea because you completely wash your hands of Donner's Lex.

The thing is that I find it just completely unnecessary. And I would have preferred Fury to be The Hoff BTW

or not black...I don't think people cared either way because to them, Nick Fury is a non character.

To distance Donner Luthor from the new Luthor, you only need to change his characterization a little bit. Show him to be a bit more ruthless. Introduce LexCorp if you will.

Superark · 10-11-2008, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaT_tONle

When SLJ was announced as Nick Fury people were up in arms... even though there were comics based off of that version... it wasn't the mainstream. But it was still done despite the doubts of comic book readers. It's a change that works for cinema. I think it's a good idea because you completely wash your hands of Donner's Lex.

I did not like that they did that with Nick Fury b/c again there was no reason to.

Now when Michael Clark Duncan was cast as Kingpin that made sense b/c he was the only actor who could physically inhabit the role in terms of size and physique.

Changing Lex's color is not the only way to "wash your hands" of the Donner version of Lex.

FaT_tONle · 10-11-2008, 11:01 AM

Again... all that stuff works if you are starting from scratch... but if they bring back Routh they will have an extra difficult time making the distinction. Now we can argue whether it's better to keep Routh or not, but I think the purpose of THIS thread... is if Routh is back... would you view it as a prequel or reboot? All I am doing is suggesting something that clearly makes this a reboot.

Superark · 10-11-2008, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaT_tONle

Again... all that stuff works if you are starting from scratch... but if they bring back Routh they will have an extra difficult time making the distinction. Now we can argue whether it's better to keep Routh or not, but I think the purpose of THIS thread... is if Routh is back... would you view it as a prequel or reboot? All I am doing is suggesting something that clearly makes this a reboot.

You're right, back onto the topic of the thread.

I think with Routh it will still be a reboot.

I Am The Knight · 10-11-2008, 11:12 AM

It could be like Batman Forever...If they had kept Keaton. But not like Batman Forever. You know what I mean...

bgshw44 · 10-11-2008, 05:15 PM

whoever plays lex and the urrounding characters, they need to be BIG names

Man of Tomorrow · 10-11-2008, 05:17 PM

Edward Norton dammit.

Nirvana · 10-11-2008, 05:23 PM

I'll interpret it by the direction the Studio says they're taking.

I Am The Knight · 10-11-2008, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Man of Tomorrow

Edward Norton dammit.

For Luthor?

Man of Tomorrow · 10-11-2008, 06:09 PM

Yes. Obviously.

He's done with Marvel and Hulk.

WB needs to snatch him over to our side.

Spider-Fan83 · 10-11-2008, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgshw44

whoever plays lex and the urrounding characters, they need to be BIG names

idk, I kinda don't like when they go with a big name for the villain, when the hero is usually an unknown

it always seems like they trying to attach a big name just the sell the movie better

Superman-Prime · 10-11-2008, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Man of Tomorrow

Yes. Obviously.

He's done with Marvel and Hulk.

WB needs to snatch him over to our side.

Not yeeeet...... remember "Avengers"?

lukedoggwalker · 10-11-2008, 07:35 PM

why do so many people want Brandon back yet hate it to be a prequel?? they can still give him a new look and everything.

FaT_tONle · 10-11-2008, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman-Prime

Not yeeeet...... remember "Avengers"?

I doubt Norton will return due to the fact that his film underperformed... but I don't see Norton as Lex in any way shape or form regardless of his role in a previous Marvel film.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lukedoggwalker

why do so many people want Brandon back yet hate it to be a prequel?? they can still give him a new look and everything.

You need to give this notion a rest... it is a worser idea than rebooting with Routh...

Superark · 10-11-2008, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaT_tONle

I doubt Norton will return do to the fact that his film underperformed... but I don't see Norton as Lex in any way shape or form regardless of his role in a previous Marvel film.

You need to give this notion a rest... it is a worser idea than rebooting with Routh...

That's not a word!

Seriously though, Norton will have nothing to do with this film!

lukedoggwalker · 10-11-2008, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaT_tONle

You need to give this notion a rest... it is a worser idea than rebooting with Routh...

the question im asking is WHY? so many people keep saying it's a "worser" idea but nobody has given me a good reason as to why it is.

View Poll Results: I will interpret a modern Superman origins film with Brandon Routh as:
A Reboot	28	68.29%
A Prequel to SR	13	31.71%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

10-11-2008, 10:10 AM	#76
batman44 Go Speed GO Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: right here Posts: 5,506	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? Well, if they go with LexCorp Lex and get away from the goofiness, I think it would be enough to distance itself from the Donnerverse Luthor. Although, I don't mind Luthor being played by a black guy. __________________ << Romans 1:16 >> For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. Last edited by batman44; 10-11-2008 at 10:16 AM.

10-11-2008, 10:11 AM	#77
I Am The Knight In the Welsh Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Bale-Cave Posts: 11,718	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? I don't think Luthor should be black...There's no real reason for him to be black. __________________ Before SHH, your miserable, insignificant little life was laughable. Now that you've found SHH*, have you noticed you've become more popular? Suddenly* EVERYONE wants to hang out with you. SHH. You owe us your livelihood.**

10-11-2008, 10:18 AM	#78
batman44 Go Speed GO Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: right here Posts: 5,506	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? I don't think he should be black either, but if it happened I wouldn't be too upset. Then again, I can't think of any black guy off the top of my head that's right for Luthor. __________________ << Romans 1:16 >> For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. Last edited by batman44; 10-11-2008 at 10:28 AM.

10-11-2008, 10:29 AM	#80
Superark The Purveyor of Good Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Atlanta, Georgia Posts: 6,128	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? There really is no reason to have a black Lex Luthor. It would make zero sense. __________________ "Truth, Justice, & the American Way" - Thats how I like my Superman!! *Twitter: Follow @Superark*

10-11-2008, 10:31 AM	#82
FaT_tONle Banned User Join Date: May 2006 Location: En Mi Casa Posts: 14,549	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? And bringing Routh back would make sense?

10-11-2008, 10:40 AM	#84
FaT_tONle Banned User Join Date: May 2006 Location: En Mi Casa Posts: 14,549	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? When SLJ was announced as Nick Fury people were up in arms... even though there were comics based off of that version... it wasn't the mainstream. But it was still done despite the doubts of comic book readers. It's a change that works for cinema. I think it's a good idea because you completely wash your hands of Donner's Lex.

10-11-2008, 11:01 AM	#87
FaT_tONle Banned User Join Date: May 2006 Location: En Mi Casa Posts: 14,549	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? Again... all that stuff works if you are starting from scratch... but if they bring back Routh they will have an extra difficult time making the distinction. Now we can argue whether it's better to keep Routh or not, but I think the purpose of THIS thread... is if Routh is back... would you view it as a prequel or reboot? All I am doing is suggesting something that clearly makes this a reboot.

10-11-2008, 11:12 AM	#89
I Am The Knight In the Welsh Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Bale-Cave Posts: 11,718	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? It could be like Batman Forever...If they had kept Keaton. But not like Batman Forever. You know what I mean... __________________ Before SHH, your miserable, insignificant little life was laughable. Now that you've found SHH*, have you noticed you've become more popular? Suddenly* EVERYONE wants to hang out with you. SHH. You owe us your livelihood.**

10-11-2008, 05:15 PM	#90
bgshw44 Side-Kick Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,243	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? whoever plays lex and the urrounding characters, they need to be BIG names __________________ Lets go WB make another superman movie!!

10-11-2008, 05:17 PM	#91
Man of Tomorrow Banned User Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 5,877	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? Edward Norton dammit.

10-11-2008, 05:23 PM	#92
Nirvana Slowly Losing My Mind Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: FL Posts: 9,333	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? I'll interpret it by the direction the Studio says they're taking. __________________ What would you do if I sang out of tune, Would you stand up and walk out on me? Lend me your ears and I'll sing you a song, And I'll try not to sing out of key.

10-11-2008, 06:09 PM	#94
Man of Tomorrow Banned User Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 5,877	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? Yes. Obviously. He's done with Marvel and Hulk. WB needs to snatch him over to our side.

10-11-2008, 07:35 PM	#97
lukedoggwalker Side-Kick Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 68	Re: Will you interpret the next \S/ film as a reboot or prequel? why do so many people want Brandon back yet hate it to be a prequel?? they can still give him a new look and everything.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode