The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > Superman > Man of Steel

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2009, 12:00 AM   #51
nintendo nerd
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mexico city
Posts: 2,411
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by KalMart View Post
Lots of movies do that. The Star Wars prequels weren't exactly universally loved by all Star Wars fans. But then, it didn't suffer the kind of pride-bruising embarrassment of not continuing on while others did....which kinda' has a way of exacerbating things.
Maybe because they know, there won't be anymore Star Wars films. Or because they have to follow certain continuity. But Superman on the other hand is a different beast. There has been dozens of interpretations and everyone of us wants something different.

nintendo nerd is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 12:00 AM   #52
I SEE SPIDEY
HYPE AWARD WINNER!
 
I SEE SPIDEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In Superman's arms
Posts: 29,176
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse View Post
But this happens EVERY SINGLE THREAD! When Wiseman said how much SR sucked, I suddenly became Casandra of Troy. First, comes the statement, "SR sucks", then comes "SR was great, critics liked it, it made more money that Batman Begins" then "Batman Begins had a smaller budget, SR was 270million" then "It wasn't 270, 70 of it was spent on previous versions, and the marketing sucked" and it keeps going and going and going like a coked up Energizer bunny.
Holly f**k I love this post.

__________________
Come think with us:http://thinkmcflythink.squarespace.com/

The Lego Movie: 8.5/10-RoboCop 6.5/10-Captain America: The Winter Soldier 9.5/10

I SUPPORT GIVING BATFLECK A CHANCE.
I SEE SPIDEY is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 12:03 AM   #53
Superark
The Purveyor of Good
 
Superark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 6,391
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse View Post
But this happens EVERY SINGLE THREAD! When Wiseman said how much SR sucked, I suddenly became Casandra of Troy. First, comes the statement, "SR sucks", then comes "SR was great, critics liked it, it made more money that Batman Begins" then "Batman Begins had a smaller budget, SR was 270million" then "It wasn't 270, 70 of it was spent on previous versions, and the marketing sucked" and it keeps going and going and going like a coked up Energizer bunny.
you are the man!

This is actually an interesting thread/topic that can be discussed yet the hater/supporters of SR always let battles get in the way

__________________
"Truth, Justice, & the American Way"
Superark is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 12:06 AM   #54
KalMart
239-Bean Irish Chili
 
KalMart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,845
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nintendo nerd View Post
Maybe because they know, there won't be anymore Star Wars films. Or because they have to follow certain continuity. But Superman on the other hand is a different beast. There has been dozens of interpretations and everyone of us wants something different.
I think it's a combination of fan-pride being hurt, the harsh realization of familiarity not automatically meaning popularity, and envy....over one's favorite character, who's supposedly the 'hero of heros', not being the cat's meow in a peak time for comic-movies. All groups of fans have differences within their own communities.....but when they're all left in the dust, they need someone to blame. Sometimes the nearest one is the most convenient. Other times you try and pick a demon. For a group of German socialists in the 1930's, it was the Jews. Today, it could be Western civilization as a whole.....or maybe just a movie studio.

__________________
KalMart's Vids on YouTube
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
Plus, is the infatuation that teenage girls have with pseudo-vampires any less sad than your infatuation with men in spandex and Heath Ledger? Its probably more justifiable for them. :)

Last edited by KalMart; 05-25-2009 at 12:15 AM.
KalMart is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:09 AM   #55
dark_b
Side-Kick
 
dark_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 43,377
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

whait a minute. TS will bomb?

i need to whait 2 weeks(Sony)


Last edited by dark_b; 05-25-2009 at 03:22 AM.
dark_b is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:44 AM   #56
matrix_ghost
milfhunter
 
matrix_ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At Tarantino's grave...Where he belongs
Posts: 5,343
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ita-KalEl View Post
Are you still sure that there's not a place for Superman?

Watchmen
Production Budget: $150 million
Domestic: $107,483,804 58.8%
+ Foreign: $75,225,483 41.2%
= Worldwide: $182,709,287

Terminator Salvation
Production Budget: $200 million
Domestic: $56,382,000

Superman Returns after its first week-end did $66,795,937
I wonder if it's really impossible to imagine a better performance for the supposed "Man of Steel".

"Watchmen will do great!"
"Terminator Salvation and its sequels will do billions. Superman is useless".
At this point if the Hobbit failed, at WB they would be in trouble.

It's clear that they have canned the Superman franchise without a single good reason, and I wonder if now (after that a TS sequel is not sure anymore) there is a place for it.
Shush ITA-KAL EL
Everybody knows that WB's decision to release the next POtter movie this years instead of nov. '08 was because of the (feared) performance of Watchmen and Terminator. I'm sure other people saw that as well. There are very few movies that are sure fire blockbusters before they're even released. Recent examples of this are 300 , Transformers and Star Trek. Although movies may look good when thy're being promoted by releasing clips , trailetc etc , in the end you really don't need how a movie might perform untill the movie actually is released . Watchmen and Terminator fall in that last category. I think it was the summer of 2006 when WB really felt the absence of movies like Potter with so many of their high profile movies not making the $$$ ( Superman Returns and Poseidon). So naturally they learned their lesson.

Summer '08 started bad for WB with Speed Racer bombing financially however they got their money with TDK's success. Because the Potter movies have always been a goldmine for WB ( so much so that they can cancel the negative BO results from other movies) , i feel that WB's doesn't need to worry about Supermans return just to compensate losses .

2009-2010-2011. 3 years with a Potter movie being released each year.
There was talk that WB was trying to release superhero movies fone franchise 3 years apart so that would've meant that we'd see the next Batman movie in 2011. But given that Nolan is doing Inception ( which judging from reports seems to be a bigger picture then the small-scale Prestige ) for a summer 2010 release , my guess is that next Batman movie will come out in 2012.

Although we haven't heard nothing from WB regarding an active development for a Superman sequel , WB could technically release the next Superman movie in 2013.
However personally i'd rather seem them release the next superman movie in 2012 IF at least Batman 3 is also released in 2012 simply going by the logic that Batman 3 will most likely perform very well.
2011 could've also been a good year but WB is releasing the last Potter movie in July , Green Lantern in June and Happy Feet 2 in November. The first superman movie also came out in december if i'm not mistaken but IMO WB should be smart enough not to screw up their own movies by releasing them so lose to each other. Happy Feet performend very well during the nov.-dec period.

It's really a question of how WB wants the Superman sequel to be but i it's anything like Superman Returns , the audience wo'n't flock to the movies. You need to have that fun/entertainment factor that made moives like the POTC trilogy , Transformers & spider-man such a such a FINANCIAL success/

__________________

Rambo is better then viagra. Heck it should be mandatory viewing for us males before we bang our women
matrix_ghost is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:46 AM   #57
KalMart
239-Bean Irish Chili
 
KalMart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,845
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by dark_b View Post
whait a minute. TS will bomb?
Not if a whole lot of moviegoers suddenly start liking it a lot, spreading good word of mouth as to how good it was, and get more people to go see it. Of course, the movie will have to do its part first.

__________________
KalMart's Vids on YouTube
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
Plus, is the infatuation that teenage girls have with pseudo-vampires any less sad than your infatuation with men in spandex and Heath Ledger? Its probably more justifiable for them. :)
KalMart is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:59 AM   #58
dark_b
Side-Kick
 
dark_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 43,377
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by matrix_ghost View Post

It's really a question of how WB wants the Superman sequel to be but i it's anything like Superman Returns , the audience wo'n't flock to the movies. You need to have that fun/entertainment factor that made moives like the POTC trilogy , Transformers & spider-man such a such a FINANCIAL success/
i hope it will be an entertaining and fun movie.

dark_b is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 11:08 AM   #59
Ita-KalEl
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,744
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse View Post
:facepalm

Do you people really think this changes in anyway WB's viewpoint on Superman Returns? Really?
Superman Returns? We are discussing about the Superman franchise.

Ita-KalEl is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 11:23 AM   #60
Ita-KalEl
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,744
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lighthouse View Post
But this happens EVERY SINGLE THREAD! When Wiseman said how much SR sucked, I suddenly became Casandra of Troy. First, comes the statement, "SR sucks", then comes "SR was great, critics liked it, it made more money that Batman Begins" then "Batman Begins had a smaller budget, SR was 270million" then "It wasn't 270, 70 of it was spent on previous versions, and the marketing sucked" and it keeps going and going and going like a coked up Energizer bunny.
I repeat: we are talking about the future of the Superman Franchise (sequel or reboot), not about Superman Returns.
I know that you don't like this thread, but do we have only to talk about the "casting" of the supposed reboot forever?
Till yesterday filmnerdjamie wrote that Summer 2011 is occupied by the T:S sequel. I wonder only if it has changed and if there is a chance that someone at WB can think that maybe Superman can be reintroduced in less than 3 years.

Ita-KalEl is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 11:37 AM   #61
matrix_ghost
milfhunter
 
matrix_ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At Tarantino's grave...Where he belongs
Posts: 5,343
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ita-KalEl View Post
I repeat: we are talking about the future of the Superman Franchise (sequel or reboot), not about Superman Returns.
I know that you don't like this thread, but do we have only to talk about the "casting" of the supposed reboot forever?
Till yesterday filmnerdjamie wrote that Summer 2011 is occupied by the T:S sequel. I wonder only if it has changed and if there is a chance that someone at WB can think that maybe Superman can be reintroduced in less than 3 years.

Quote:
2011 could've also been a good year but WB is releasing the last Potter movie in July , Green Lantern in June and Happy Feet 2 in November.

__________________

Rambo is better then viagra. Heck it should be mandatory viewing for us males before we bang our women
matrix_ghost is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 12:02 PM   #62
FilmNerdJamie
The Mod You Deserve
SHH! Global Moderator
 
FilmNerdJamie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Between the Moon, New York City & your sister
Posts: 8,162
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

I've been of the opinion for the past 2 weeks that Salvation would under-perform and this would be it for the franchise. Increasingly advanced "Meh!" word-of-mouth mixed with the insane popularity and success of Star Trek.

That said, I still thought it would at the very least win the weekend box-office (i.e. around $75 million!)

__________________
FilmNerdJamie is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 01:07 PM   #63
dark_b
Side-Kick
 
dark_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 43,377
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

i guess good word of mouth and realese date really matters

dark_b is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:24 PM   #64
Superark
The Purveyor of Good
 
Superark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 6,391
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FilmNerdJamie View Post
I've been of the opinion for the past 2 weeks that Salvation would under-perform and this would be it for the franchise. Increasingly advanced "Meh!" word-of-mouth mixed with the insane popularity and success of Star Trek.

That said, I still thought it would at the very least win the weekend box-office (i.e. around $75 million!)
So do you think this might give Superman more of an opening for 2011 now?

__________________
"Truth, Justice, & the American Way"
Superark is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:53 PM   #65
RachelDawes
Gotham Attorney
 
RachelDawes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In a courtroom or tied up in a warehouse
Posts: 8,423
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nintendo nerd View Post
Its hard not to mention SR, because the fan base is so divided. It's not like if everyone loved/hated the film. This is the first time I've seen a movie doing that.
There seems to be a similar pattern in the TS thread. There are a lot of 7, 8, and even the occasional 9/10s, but also quite a few people saying "This movie stunk! I'm glad it's the end of the series."

__________________
RIP Heath Ledger, the Best Joker Ever.
RachelDawes is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 03:59 PM   #66
RachelDawes
Gotham Attorney
 
RachelDawes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In a courtroom or tied up in a warehouse
Posts: 8,423
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ita-KalEl View Post
I repeat: we are talking about the future of the Superman Franchise (sequel or reboot), not about Superman Returns.
I know that you don't like this thread, but do we have only to talk about the "casting" of the supposed reboot forever?
Till yesterday filmnerdjamie wrote that Summer 2011 is occupied by the T:S sequel. I wonder only if it has changed and if there is a chance that someone at WB can think that maybe Superman can be reintroduced in less than 3 years.
Maybe. Didn't Jamie say that WB met with Singer as late as November 08 to discuss a sequel to SR? The disappointment of TS could get them thinking about it again.

__________________
RIP Heath Ledger, the Best Joker Ever.
RachelDawes is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 04:16 PM   #67
KalMart
239-Bean Irish Chili
 
KalMart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,845
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RachelDawes View Post
Maybe. Didn't Jamie say that WB met with Singer as late as November 08 to discuss a sequel to SR? The disappointment of TS could get them thinking about it again.
But then, the disappointment of SR could make them think twice. It's kinda' tough to ask someone to compensate for something disappointing with something a little less disappointing.

__________________
KalMart's Vids on YouTube
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
Plus, is the infatuation that teenage girls have with pseudo-vampires any less sad than your infatuation with men in spandex and Heath Ledger? Its probably more justifiable for them. :)
KalMart is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 04:20 PM   #68
KalMart
239-Bean Irish Chili
 
KalMart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,845
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ita-KalEl View Post
I repeat: we are talking about the future of the Superman Franchise (sequel or reboot), not about Superman Returns.
I know that you don't like this thread, but do we have only to talk about the "casting" of the supposed reboot forever?
Till yesterday filmnerdjamie wrote that Summer 2011 is occupied by the T:S sequel. I wonder only if it has changed and if there is a chance that someone at WB can think that maybe Superman can be reintroduced in less than 3 years.
Or they might use 2011 for a Terminator reboot...since they already have the slot.

__________________
KalMart's Vids on YouTube
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
Plus, is the infatuation that teenage girls have with pseudo-vampires any less sad than your infatuation with men in spandex and Heath Ledger? Its probably more justifiable for them. :)
KalMart is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 04:22 PM   #69
I SEE SPIDEY
HYPE AWARD WINNER!
 
I SEE SPIDEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In Superman's arms
Posts: 29,176
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

TS has nothing to do with the Superman franchise.

The fanboys are really reaching this time.

__________________
Come think with us:http://thinkmcflythink.squarespace.com/

The Lego Movie: 8.5/10-RoboCop 6.5/10-Captain America: The Winter Soldier 9.5/10

I SUPPORT GIVING BATFLECK A CHANCE.
I SEE SPIDEY is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 04:53 PM   #70
nintendo nerd
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mexico city
Posts: 2,411
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RachelDawes View Post
There seems to be a similar pattern in the TS thread. There are a lot of 7, 8, and even the occasional 9/10s, but also quite a few people saying "This movie stunk! I'm glad it's the end of the series."
I think is the hype and the excitement of a new Terminator movie and seeing it on the big screen that so many people are praising it right now. But IMO in a couple of months fans will realise it was as bad as T3 ( haven't seen the movie,though). Something similar happened with Spider - man 3 and FF2, when they were just realeased people were loving those films, at the spidey forums some were even saying it was the best of the trilogy and giving it 9 and 10.

But SR was released 3 years ago!!!! And we are still talking about it the same way, there's no ending. IMO the only way this will be over is if they announce a reboot with Brandon Routh on the leading role. That way people that hated the movie probably will get the film they wanted and the ones who loved it, at least get to see Routh again. At least Iknow I would be happy.


Last edited by nintendo nerd; 05-25-2009 at 05:00 PM.
nintendo nerd is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 05:20 PM   #71
KalMart
239-Bean Irish Chili
 
KalMart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,845
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nintendo nerd View Post
I think is the hype and the excitement of a new Terminator movie and seeing it on the big screen that so many people are praising it right now. But IMO in a couple of months fans will realise it was as bad as T3 ( haven't seen the movie,though). Something similar happened with Spider - man 3 and FF2, when they were just realeased people were loving those films, at the spidey forums some were even saying it was the best of the trilogy and giving it 9 and 10.

But SR was released 3 years ago!!!! And we are still talking about it the same way, there's no ending. IMO the only way this will be over is if they announce a reboot with Brandon Routh on the leading role. That way people that hated the movie probably will get the film they wanted and the ones who loved it, at least get to see Routh again. At least Iknow I would be happy.
I don't think there should be any intent to 'appease' some of this and some of that. If it's a reboot...then it's a completely new start leaving everything in the past...in the past. The new movie should be taken as it is and judged/accepted only on what it does and establishes going forward. If it's not Routh, then it just isn't...it's a different story anyway. the less ties it has to prior versions, even in casting, the better for it to start fresh.

__________________
KalMart's Vids on YouTube
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
Plus, is the infatuation that teenage girls have with pseudo-vampires any less sad than your infatuation with men in spandex and Heath Ledger? Its probably more justifiable for them. :)
KalMart is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 06:12 PM   #72
Mostpowerful
*SUPERMAN*
 
Mostpowerful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The sky
Posts: 3,128
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nintendo nerd View Post
But SR was released 3 years ago!!!! And we are still talking about it the same way, there's no ending. IMO the only way this will be over is if they announce a reboot with Brandon Routh on the leading role. That way people that hated the movie probably will get the film they wanted and the ones who loved it, at least get to see Routh again. At least Iknow I would be happy.
Me too.


Quote:
Originally Posted by KalMart View Post
I don't think there should be any intent to 'appease' some of this and some of that. If it's a reboot...then it's a completely new start leaving everything in the past...in the past. The new movie should be taken as it is and judged/accepted only on what it does and establishes going forward. If it's not Routh, then it just isn't...it's a different story anyway. the less ties it has to prior versions, even in casting, the better for it to start fresh.
Well, nintendo, myself and many others think differently than you, and no matter what you say, we are not going to change our minds. We like what we like, just like you, Kalmart. You really seem to want to change people's minds..

__________________
Brandon Routh IS SUPERMAN.

avatar by lere - @stargazer0118 - Superman wears trunks
Mostpowerful is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 06:29 PM   #73
NeoRanger
Side-Kick
 
NeoRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 640
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
But SR was released 3 years ago!!!! And we are still talking about it the same way, there's no ending. IMO the only way this will be over is if they announce a reboot with Brandon Routh on the leading role. That way people that hated the movie probably will get the film they wanted and the ones who loved it, at least get to see Routh again. At least Iknow I would be happy.
The only way this will be over is if we FINALLY get a new Superman movie. I highly doubt any serious Superman fan will still be arguing over SR after another film has been released-- unless, of course, it ends up sucking worse. But unless that's the case, Routh or no Routh, SR will get stuck in the past like all things, you know, over and done are supposed to be; then we'll finally be done with this.

The main reason why Routh's still in the running is because they like him, not because you do.


Last edited by NeoRanger; 05-25-2009 at 06:35 PM.
NeoRanger is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 06:29 PM   #74
NeoRanger
Side-Kick
 
NeoRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 640
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Quote:
You really seem to want to change people's minds..
By GOD, you're right! I can see the subliminal message all over that post of his. KalMAAAAAAAART!

NeoRanger is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 06:36 PM   #75
Excel
O-bama-ama-ama-ay-ay
 
Excel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Places
Posts: 19,559
Default Re: Dear WB, your supposed 2009 blockbusters continue to fail...

Terminators failure clearly doesnt come as a shock to W.B. The argument would be "Well, they pushed Batman from 2011 to 2012 so T5 could go there, now thats not happening", however Warners DID just move Green Lantern to summer 2011. With Harry Potter winding down, here is W.B. 's tentative schedule, atleast that I can forsee. Again, like 2010, they can and will pull a film out of their ass ala "Inception" and make it as a tent pole, but heres the way it looks.

2010: Inception
2011: GreenLantern
2012: Batman
2013: Green Lantern
2014: Green Lantern

GL could go in either 2013 or 2014; IF Superman is going to be on the big screen any time soon, all signs point to one of those years. Knowing W.B., 2013 looks like the earliest.

However, next thing you know, we'll be hearing about a "Matrix Rebooted" film instead.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KalMart View Post
If Obama's presidency turns out to be a bust.....should the US re-elect George Bush? Is there a place for George Bush in our future?

__________________
If You Wanna Make The World A Better Place, Take A Look At Yourself, And Then Make A Change

R.I.P. Heath
Excel is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.