![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Choose most likely scenario to bring sides together | |||
| Singer convinces he can bring film under budget but somehow also more action |
|
4 | 36.36% |
| WB has him agree to run decisions by them> writers, casting decisions, amount of action scenes |
|
2 | 18.18% |
| WB agrees to make sequel, but Singer as producer. |
|
5 | 45.45% |
| Other |
|
1 | 9.09% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Panned User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,254
|
I guess everyone has decided a sequel with Singer at the helm won't happen. If it were to happen, what do you think would be the key agreements on both sides to make it work?
P.S. > I know every thread has been done by now with slow /no \S/ news.
__________________
JcDc-- My original join date was: 05-07-2003 --Time flies, and so should Superman! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
In the fire
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In the fire.
Posts: 10,202
|
Of the three, i'd have to say #3.
IMO, I doubt they would want to bring back a director of a film that made about half the fans (and public) not care if a sequel were made or not. He'll most likely be the producer in a reboot as well, if it happens anytime soon that is. Gawd we need some news, even bad news would be a welcome change.
__________________
''Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.'' ~ John Wayne |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Web-Swinger
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 39,735
|
So true there greenktoo. No news sucks alot. Atless if we have one little thing like an official writer, or officially know if singer is 100% off or 100% still on board. It would be more to talk about then the same things we all end up doing daily
As for the options i agree if they do decide to get a film going in next 2-5 yrs singer could likely end up getting a producer credit and likely in name only with no control of the film's direction.
__________________
Warner Bros Restructure's Dc comics into DC entertainment. Hopefully more characters and long in developmental hell projects can make it into the big and small screens soon. Marvel and the House of Mouse? www.ItsJustMovies.com |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,780
|
there is no sequel. period.
__________________
STATEMENT OF THE YEAR "The general public still considers superheroes to be silly & nerdy-40 years after Batman went off the air. And people think by dropping a pair of trunks will suddenly stop this? Please." by Kuwasa REMARKS ON THE NEW SUPERMAN IMAGE - Condomman, tramp stamp, |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Panned User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,254
|
Seriously did you even read the opening post for this thread?
__________________
JcDc-- My original join date was: 05-07-2003 --Time flies, and so should Superman! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,166
|
Warner Bros. won't trust Singer to direct again, but they will want his input as a producer simply because they can't just let his input go.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
|
Hope it isn't singer. Didn't he want to bring back Zod? Hasn't the guy got his own ideas! Instead of ripping off supes 2. I mean you have all these bad guys to choose from and thats the best you can do!
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|