![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Shaper Savant
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 2,560
|
Okay. I understand a lot of people hate Civil War. But would anyone want to see Stark become director of SHIELD without all the muss and fuss of Civil War? Maybe if Fury dies and Hill decides he's more qualified.
Point being, instead of recasting both RDJ and Samuel L Jackson someday, they just make Stark director of SHIELD, develop a drinking problem, etc. Great fodder for continued Iron Man films after Phase 3.
__________________
I just stole a poncho from a wooden Indian... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Enemy
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parts, Unknown
Posts: 1,142
|
A lot of people hated Civil War?
__________________
Every damn word I say is a sneak attack!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 789
|
We'll have to see how he develops in IM3, but... I don't think the Downey Stark has the maturity - or the interest - for something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 568
|
This. Movie Stark isn't even ready to lead The Avengers, let alone SHIELD!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|