![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: You'll have to choose.... | |||
| Joker |
|
1 | 2.38% |
| Bruce Wayne/Batman |
|
4 | 9.52% |
| Harvey Dent/Two-Face |
|
4 | 9.52% |
| James Gordon |
|
1 | 2.38% |
| Lucius Fox |
|
0 | 0% |
| Alfred Pennyworth |
|
3 | 7.14% |
| Jonathan Crane/Scarecrow |
|
29 | 69.05% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,685
|
Options are
James Gordon Joker Harvey Dent/Two-Face Alfred Pennyworth Bruce Wayne/Batman Jonathan Crane/Scarecrow Lucius Fox I'm leaving Salvator Maroni off the list because of how minimal his character was, I feel like it is wrong to compare him to the much larger characters I've listed. I included Scarecrow since he was prominently featured in Batman Begins, despite being a bit part in The Dark Knight. Consider a few of these appeared in both films, you're welcome to discuss both. My vote is Alfred Pennyworth. I still don't like Caine's Alfred |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Butcher of New Liberty
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under there
Posts: 5,579
|
Well if you leave out Maroni, who had a bigger part than the Scarecrow in The Dark Knight, which is what the question pertains, too...
Umm, I'll go with Caine by default, as Eckhart, Ledger, and Oldman are pure gold, and I love Bale's Batman.
__________________
It was you, Charlie. You was my brother. You should have looked out for me a little bit.You should have taken care of me just a little bit. You don't understand. I could have been somebody. Instead of a bum, which is what I am. Let's face it. It was you, Charlie. It was you, Charlie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,685
|
I explained why I included Scarecrow and not Maroni, because Scarecrow, unlike Maroni was in both The Dark Knight and Batman Begins. Since some of the characters on the poll, like Batman, Gordon and Alfred, were also in both those characters are building upon their performances in the previous film. I decided to include Scarecrow because ultimately you know a lot about him already before the movie starts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 384
|
Batman was a bore. So bad after Begins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Butcher of New Liberty
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under there
Posts: 5,579
|
Quote:
__________________
It was you, Charlie. You was my brother. You should have looked out for me a little bit.You should have taken care of me just a little bit. You don't understand. I could have been somebody. Instead of a bum, which is what I am. Let's face it. It was you, Charlie. It was you, Charlie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,942
|
None of the above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,627
|
My pick is Scarecrow since, well, he had nothing to do with Scarecrow. The comic Scarecrow is one of my top favorite villains - I like the idea of this incredibly skinny, old professor set out for revenge, dressed as a rag covered Scarecrow in an old hat. Its a very horrorish character. I know many Nolan characters have also very little to do with the comic and thats never been an issue with me, but in the case of Scarecrow I just didnt like what hes been replaced with. While Joker wasnt reflecting the comic Joer completely either and had plenty of original, newly developed bones, all the new stuff and the ending mixture was very interesting and entertaining. In case of Scarecrow, I just didnt find a young criminal psychologist who occasionally uses just a mask to be interesting at all. As a separate character he works, but as a Scarecrow he fails miserably imo. And Im not talking about accurate portrayal (the hell with copycating comics, it counts whats good not whats copied), Im talking about being an interesting character. And as I mentioned, outside of personality, age and who he is, the visual aspect lacked as well. I would love something like this (screens from the movie Scarecrows)
![]()
__________________
Last edited by GothamAlleys; 04-16-2011 at 12:02 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,890
|
Batman, but not Bruce Wayne.
I really, really dislike Batman in TDK. The way he talks, acts, sounds, fights... just everything about him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 384
|
Even Bruce in this was very bland. All he did was moan and go through monotony for the entire film.
In Begins he was so much more interesting and alive. Yeah, I get the story is more serious, but that don't mean you should just have the same expression for the whole film. Don't get me started on Batman and that suit. In Begins, it was close to perfect. He looked imposing and sometimes like a monster. In Tdk, it was a guy in black modern armor...with a gallery of ridges. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rubbing your rhubarb.
Posts: 15,263
|
Scarecrow is one of the weakest ever. He was just a comedic relief. A girl can beat him. And the acting IMO was weak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
All Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,472
|
I liked the scarecrow and the actor, how different the characters are physically in nolans movie, deep inside their the same, crane is still that psychopathic maniac that loves fear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,685
|
Quote:
I really always wanted comic movies to utilize C-Listers, and even some B-Listers as single use, throwaway villains. The Dark Knight used Scarecrow fairly effectively in that regard. I will throw some people a bone though, the costume for most of Scarecrow's collective screentime was poor. I thought it was an excellent example of Nolan letting 'realism' get the best of him. What is unrealistic about his costume? I could make it in three hours with a gift certificate to T.J.Max. It's just a 'scarecrow' costume, heavy on browns and grays with a hat. Nothing special about it. I think that would've improved his effectiveness. Last edited by Optimus_Prime_; 04-16-2011 at 10:27 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Flawless!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 7,745
|
While I love Michael Caine and his unique vision for Alfred...
It just doesn't resemble the comic interpreatation very well, but I wouldn't call it weak AT ALL. Scarecrow works just fine in Nolan's world... but I don't really want to see anymore done with him. *sigh* What Tim Burton could have done with him...!
__________________
Michelle Pfeiffer: Living Legend... you can look, but don't touch! VIDEO-CLick to Watch!:
I'll miss you dad! xx |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Banned User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,685
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Flawless!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
... the audience laughed so hard during the ''I hope your not a member of the fire-bridage!'' moment. So I think he worked well as comic relief too. Plus he got some great scenes/lines in The Dark Knight as well. Although I felt he was definitely more ''Michael Caine'' than Alfred in the sequel. It's different... but it works for the Nolan series. It may not be the Alfred from the comics (which is the only reason I voted for him) but it still a fun interpretation of a more relaxed and outspoken Alfred. It's fun to get different versions.
__________________
Michelle Pfeiffer: Living Legend... you can look, but don't touch! VIDEO-CLick to Watch!:
I'll miss you dad! xx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 638
|
Batman, Bales Batman really regressed from Begins and it's not like he was amazing in Begins.
Compared to the amount of hype Bale had when he got casted , he really hasn't lived up to it and the whole Batman voice is down right awful |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The place in between...
Posts: 10,153
|
They were all weak apart from Dent and Joker.
Alfred was nothing but a exposition dumper or device to move the plot forward. Same with Lucius. Bruce Wayne was a douche who tried to steal the girl of the guy he wants to save Gotham. His Batman sounded like he had throat cancer and the fight scenes were abysmal. Crane was a laughable villain. He had one good scene in Begins where he sprayed Batman with the feat toxin and set him on fire. I thought Gordon was ok... until the ridiculously overwraught, exposition dump in the last monologue. Which for some strange reason people think was brilliant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 638
|
Yeah i wasn't as keen on the Gordon monlogue at the end, not saying it was bad but i think it also seemed a bit cheesy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
TEOL
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,223
|
-Scarecrow was 1000x worse in TDK, than in BB.
-I didn't like Batman in TDK that much, and thought he was better in BB. -I really liked Dent and Two-Face. -Wasn't a fan of The Joker. Heath did a good job of playing a nasty villain, but it didn't completely feel like a good Joker to me. Some parts were great, others were just, mehhhhh. So I guess I'll say The Joker, because of how much time he was on screen, and how disappointed I was by the performance. But I also thought Scarecrow was HORRIBLE in TDK. He was good in BB, sure, he wasn't perfect, but a stupid drug dealer who gets caught in seconds is pretty much a useless character. So both were pretty bad, IMO.
__________________
-"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88mph, you're gonna see some serious s***" |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
TEOL
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,223
|
Quote:
__________________
-"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88mph, you're gonna see some serious s***" Last edited by Travesty; 04-17-2011 at 04:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The place in between...
Posts: 10,153
|
Quote:
The scenes accompanying it were good, with Batman being chased by the cops. But ugh, the dialogue just completely ruins it for me. I think the worst part of the movie in terms of spoon feeding was Lucius' line to Batman when he reveals his big sonar super computer. "This... is wrong!" Well no **** Sherlock! Thanks for talking to me like i'm a 5 year old! Last edited by The Morningstar; 04-17-2011 at 05:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
TEOL
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,223
|
Quote:
![]() But speaking of "talking to me like a 5 year old", the themes of "fear" were pretty much spoonfed in BB, as well. So both movies have their faults, IMO.
__________________
-"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88mph, you're gonna see some serious s***" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,942
|
Hahaha this has just turned into a clone of the 'Criticisms' thread, with the same three or four people repeating the same stuff they said in there.
Cute. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The place in between...
Posts: 10,153
|
The title of the thread is what was the weakest portrayal. We are criticizing the characters. If you see no faults what so ever, you're blind.
Unless you want to counter my point about Lucius' spoon feeding? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
TEOL
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,223
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But I guess I could go into every other thread here, and see you praise the movie more than we do dislike it. But yes, it is cute how upset you get about peoples dislike for a movie you love so much.
__________________
-"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88mph, you're gonna see some serious s***" Last edited by Travesty; 04-17-2011 at 05:08 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|