![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,337
|
I wouldn't be surprised if Priest opens below 10m. It's effect on Thor will be negligible. Bridesmaids could be a dark horse, but either way Thor should have a comfortable drop barely over 50%.
And then Pirates will cripple it. I'm stunned it's getting moderately good reviews.
__________________
- Dear Chris, please edit TDKR to include longer shots than you normally have. |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Lurker #1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The MIA
Posts: 6,294
|
I'm worried about Bridesmaids. That looks like the surprise hit of the summer and my girlfriend really wants to see it.
__________________
*CAPTAIN AMERICA* ******THE WINTER SOLDIER****** _____________________2014______________________ :xbox: XBLIVE-MARCPINK :xbox: YOU CAN'T BE HALF A GANGSTER. |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,216
|
Bridesmaids looks like it's going to benefit from the "it's my turn to pick" factor and good reviews. That still likely means that it will do mid-20s business, but it might take a million or two from Thor.
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 420
|
another $5mil on tuesday
__________________
http://www.jarwatchesfilms.com
every film i've seen for the first time since january 1st, 2011 http://www.twitter.com/jarwatchesfilms |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 550
|
200 mil should be possible... but it has to perform this week... say what you want about pirates... but Jack Sparrow is much loved... sure we saw the same character three times... but who can say no to some witty exchanges, monkeys and mermaids... its gonna make **** ton of money...
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
You'll never Beetus
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,348
|
Quote:
__________________
Holding out hope..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
You'll never Beetus
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,348
|
Quote:
__________________
Holding out hope..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,216
|
I personally see Thor making 160-180 domestic, and 230-250 foreign. It's going to be tight on a sequel...studios only net about 55% of the gross, plus you have to figure that after Paramount's cut, and the Marketing costs, that Thor will barely be making a profit.
I'm still a little shakey about Paramount's role, and what financial responsibility it assumes as distributor, but we're looking at a 150 million dollar film, with at least 50 million dollars in marketing budget. After the theater dips it's beak in my predicted 410 million dollar worldwide gross, it'll be down to 225 million. Paramount takes 10% for distribution, taking us down to 203.5 million... If marvel spent 50 million marketing this movie they'd be down to making 3.5 million dollar profit on this movie. If they spent more than that, then they'll still be in the Red on the 400+ million gross. That'll of course be fixed when the movie hits dvd and blu ray, but still, there's plenty to worry about with Thor, and plenty of possibility of it not getting a sequel.
__________________
Marvel Slate: 2013: Iron Man 3, The Wolverine, Thor: The Dark World 2014: Captain America: The Winter Soldier, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, X-Men: Days of Future Past, Guardians of the Galaxy, Big Hero 6 2015: Fantastic 4 Reborn, Avengers 2, Ant-Man Your move, DC... Last edited by KangConquers; 05-12-2011 at 09:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 550
|
how is the word of mouth?
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 550
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
You'll never Beetus
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,348
|
Seems fine based on the dailies but the 2nd weekend is what really tells the tale of WOM.
__________________
Holding out hope..... |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
You'll never Beetus
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,348
|
Sequel already is pretty much guaranteed.
__________________
Holding out hope..... |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
You'll never Beetus
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,348
|
Quote:
__________________
Holding out hope..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,379
|
Yeah. Let's just say if the math in that post were correct there'd be maybe a tenth of the sequels there are.
Studios get more than 55% of the opening weekend. For a big movie like this merchandising and product placement offset much of the cost. etc, etc A sequel is in the bag at this point. |
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,765
|
A sequel is in the bag after it is announced .
They are not even going to consider a sequel until after The Avengers. |
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Newbie First Class
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
Thor has no real competition until Pirates arrive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Start Your Agents...
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 22,214
|
Yeah, when you think about it, Marvel's flagship franchises are with Sony and Fox, so they are left with the Avengers to make movies with at Marvel Studio. And Thor is still one of their most recognizable properties, so there is no reason why they won't make a sequel out of it.
__________________
"There are two things that I can’t stand when I go to see a movie based on a comic book: being ignored and being pandered to. Fans are well aware when movies are doing either one." - Joss Whedon
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The place in between...
Posts: 10,153
|
Does anyone think the leak of Thor dented it's OW? I think it may have cost it 5 mill or thereabouts. From what i've heard it was a pretty decent copy.
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Armored Avenger!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a cave with a box of scraps
Posts: 6,357
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,379
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Armored Avenger!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a cave with a box of scraps
Posts: 6,357
|
Re: Thor's box office competition - Part 1
Quote:
Marvel has to make these properties work because until they get back the rights to Spider-man, X-men, Fantastic Four, if Thor didn't work, what are they going to do next Ant-man? This is why Disney owning them is so important, they can experiment without everything riding on the line. As successful as Iron Man was, TIH might have put them out of business as an independent studio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,379
|
Yes, they are going to do Ant-Man next. And if Captain America bombs (which I don't think it will, but as an example) there will not be a Captain America sequel. Much like there will not be an Incredible Hulk sequel.
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Armored Avenger!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a cave with a box of scraps
Posts: 6,357
|
Quote:
They have to make money off being a studio and the only properties they have are these characters. This is totally different than DC where the closest equivalent to Marvel Studios is Legendary Pictures. TIH was also a different scenario though, because Marvel had to find a distributor and were forced to work with Universal as an agreement for getting the rights to the character back. Because they have the financial backing of Disney now they have alot less risk than they do with another studio. Yes the films still have to be profitable, but that's part of the reason why Ed Norton and Terrance Howard are no logner involved with Marvel. Let me put it this way, if these franchises fail, then Marvel Studios will be shut down as a division. They HAVE to make these films, or develop other material based on other things than superheroes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
REDACTED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,379
|
And they have dozens of properties that they can adapt to film. If one bombs, they will not dwell, they will move on to the next property.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|