The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > General Movies > Marvel Films

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2011, 05:09 AM   #1
MucasMan
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 197
Default Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

Should Hollywood go with unknowns for superheros with big physiques, or go with a star?
I guess, Chris Hemsworth in Thor proves that you can, even though Anthony Hopkins as Father Odin said he had a tough go with him, saying he "couldn't act".
But, on the other hand, I think the powers that be (Fox, Marvel, etc) are afraid of going with a professional wrestler - afraid it would be labled a B-Move (trying to think of that wrestler in "Plan 9 from Outer Space)

Also, I'm not a fan of CGI for the bigger superheros (athough it would have been tough for the Hulk with a live actor)

So my point is - Yes, don't go with "The Rock", unless you want your marvel hero movie to be smarmy, but do look all over the world for someone who can fill the shoes (almost literally) of your bigger heros and villains.
Example - Michael Chiklis has great acting ability, but, come-on, he was a little too small for the FF's Thing!

MucasMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 05:13 AM   #2
Avenger
Earth's Mightiest Fanboy
 
Avenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 669
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

They should keep doing what they've been doing, which is cast actual actors to play their characters.

The GA would laugh Marvel right off the proverbial stage if they tried to put wrestlers up on the screen instead of actors.

Avenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 05:42 AM   #3
psylockolussus
His flesh is weak now
 
psylockolussus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Future
Posts: 9,285
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

It depends.

Chris Hemsworth was also on Star Trek. I don't think he was a wrestler turned actor.

__________________
- A Chemist. A Capitalist. A Viper -
Wolverine: The Rise of Viper

"You have courage but that won't help much now"

FoX Cinematic Universe - The X-Men Central
psylockolussus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 05:54 AM   #4
Ponyboy
I'm the real Peterman.
 
Ponyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Wellington, NZ
Posts: 2,859
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

Thor needed a big fella in the title role.

Michael Keaton got away with Batman. There are certain roles like that can justify casting someone like Keaton over, let's say, casting someone primarily for their physicality.

__________________
www.WelcomeToBoneville.com
Ponyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 02:04 PM   #5
kedrell
You'll never Beetus
 
kedrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,480
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

Quote:
Originally Posted by MucasMan View Post
Should Hollywood go with unknowns for superheros with big physiques, or go with a star?
I guess, Chris Hemsworth in Thor proves that you can, even though Anthony Hopkins as Father Odin said he had a tough go with him, saying he "couldn't act".
But, on the other hand, I think the powers that be (Fox, Marvel, etc) are afraid of going with a professional wrestler - afraid it would be labled a B-Move (trying to think of that wrestler in "Plan 9 from Outer Space)

Also, I'm not a fan of CGI for the bigger superheros (athough it would have been tough for the Hulk with a live actor)

So my point is - Yes, don't go with "The Rock", unless you want your marvel hero movie to be smarmy, but do look all over the world for someone who can fill the shoes (almost literally) of your bigger heros and villains.
Example - Michael Chiklis has great acting ability, but, come-on, he was a little too small for the FF's Thing!
I thought this rumor was de-bunked? Hemsworth clearly CAN act.

__________________
Holding out hope.....
kedrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 03:00 PM   #6
Bubonic
Banned User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,065
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

No one should be hired solely on the basis of their frame or likeness to the character. You need actors to pull off these unbelievable characters and make them believable.

I remember when people wanted Triple H as Thor because he's huge and Norse looking. Imagine how bad Thor would have been if they'd gotten their wish.

I see some people getting behind the Old Spice guy as Luke Cage because of his self-promotion and his paltry resemblance.

People try to argue that the Rock would be the perfect Namor and again I facepalm because he'd make an already hard to swallow character even more ridiculous than he has to be.

I'm just glad no one listens to them and casting agents have some foresight, especially at Marvel Studios.

From what I've character casting should not be part of the democratic process.

Bubonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 04:08 PM   #7
bubbadoom
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,138
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

Quote:
Originally Posted by MucasMan View Post
Example - Michael Chiklis has great acting ability, but, come-on, he was a little too small for the FF's Thing!
Was he too small? Remember, the real Thing - the Kirby Thing - was shorter than Reed so I think he was comic accurate in the movies.

bubbadoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2011, 06:51 PM   #8
S. Grundy
Side-Kick
 
S. Grundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,468
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbadoom View Post
Was he too small? Remember, the real Thing - the Kirby Thing - was shorter than Reed so I think he was comic accurate in the movies.
Yeah, Chiklis was 100% based on Kirby's early Thing, before the pronounced brow and wider physique.

In my opinion they should go with who ever is good for the role, plain and simple. Actors can dye/cut/grow their hair, gain/lose weight/muscle etc... for a role.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubonic View Post
People try to argue that the Rock would be the perfect Namor and again I facepalm because he'd make an already hard to swallow character even more ridiculous than he has to be.
If there's one comic character the Rock would be great as, it would be Black Adam for DC.

S. Grundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2011, 12:51 AM   #9
bubbadoom
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,138
Default Re: Should Hollywood Go With Unknowns for Superheros with Big Physiques, Or Stars

I still want to see the Rock as Wyatt Wingfoot...

bubbadoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.