The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 - Page 38

Senator Pleasury · 08-09-2013, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by regwec

I love that moment. Say what you will.

It's excellent. That hanging guy probably never knew what hit him.

I also love how Gordon and other policemen could barely see this black bat figure walking away.

justpassinby · 08-09-2013, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Comics N' Toons

Returns wasn't better. It was too quirky. This movie felt like a Batman comic book of the period. Returns was a weird amalgam of all of Burton's previous movies, with Batman in it. Good movie, but not as "classic" if you will as this one!

Yea, I kinda admire it for what it is though

Quirkiness can come in all sorts and varieties, and this particular one happens to be irresistable.

Not sure if I can call 89 a "classic" - sure, objectively it probably is, but there was annoying stuff in it that kinda ruined the overall impression for me.
Batman being unnecessarily creepy / douchey in a few scenes, Kim Basinger is too much of a "damsel" overall. The movie feels a bit "indecisive" at times in regards to its plot and tone, but obviously tons of great stuff in it nonetheless.

Mister Meddle · 08-09-2013, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justpassinby

Batman being unnecessarily creepy / douchey in a few scenes, Kim Basinger is too much of a "damsel" overall.

There is nothing wrong with Batman being creepy. Are we forgetting his name is BAT-man? Is hiding in the shadows, taking advantage of his appearance to scare thugs and being more mysterious to the masses now a bad thing?

I don't have anything against Batman/Bruce Wayne being a bit douchey. Unless he is expected to be like Superman with a bat suit and no superpowers.

Comics N' Toons · 08-09-2013, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mister Meddle

There is nothing wrong with Batman being creepy. Are we forgetting his name is BAT-man? Is hiding in the shadows, taking advantage of his appearance to scare thugs and being more mysterious to the masses now a bad thing?

I don't have anything against Batman/Bruce Wayne being a bit douchey. Unless he is expected to be like Superman with a bat suit and no superpowers.

It depends on what interpretation of Batsey you like best. I know some people who only appreciate the Adam West version (they are generally over 50 year old though).

Mrs. Sawyer · 08-10-2013, 10:06 PM

I'll go as far as to say Returns sucks.

justpassinby · 08-11-2013, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parker Wayne

I'll go as far as to say Returns sucks.

Way too far!

Doc Ock · 08-11-2013, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parker Wayne

I'll go as far as to say Returns sucks.

No!

Comics N' Toons · 08-11-2013, 01:09 AM

it doesn't suck, it's just not Batman 89!

Mrs. Sawyer · 08-11-2013, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doc Ock

No!

Yep. I think Returns sucks. I think Burton got too much control and it hurt the movie. You guys can like Returns, but I really don't enjoy and I think in terms of enjoyment.

It's still a better made movie than Schumachers, though the campiness of Schumacher's movies make it at least an enjoyable comedic watch.

justpassinby · 08-11-2013, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parker Wayne

Yep. I think Returns sucks. I think Burton got too much control and it hurt the movie. You guys can like Returns, but I really don't enjoy and I think in terms of enjoyment.

It's still a better made movie than Schumachers, though the campiness of Schumacher's movies make it at least an enjoyable comedic watch.

Both Returns and Robin feel like the more self-confident, decisive follow-ups of their somewhat mumbling predecessors to me.
Forever tried to balance camp with "serious" drama, and, well - Robin only had a few scenes of that, the rest just unapologetically crazy ****.

Returns has quite a different vibe from Batman, but still it's completely committed to what it is, a dark, surreal and naughty Burton tale about lost souls in a city or whatever; 89, eh, kinda does this and then that, throws me off every time. Still cool though

(And yes, this is all subjective obviously)

regwec · 08-11-2013, 05:57 AM

There should be a way of automatically ignoring members until they have been around for six months.

justpassinby · 08-11-2013, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by regwec

There should be a way of automatically ignoring members until they have been around for six months.

To what end? They'll still be saying the same infallible **** then as they are now - see above post for evidence

regwec · 08-11-2013, 11:45 AM

I have this guy on ignore, but I can only assume that four posts in a row = spam.

Kane52630 · 08-11-2013, 12:05 PM

Man, just when I thought it couldn't get any lower on the hype.

**C. Lee** · 08-11-2013, 12:19 PM

The "rape" talk will stop now.

Ponyboy · 08-11-2013, 11:44 PM

^Halle-frickin-lujah.

ThePhantasm · 08-12-2013, 12:23 AM

Thanks C. Lee

justpassinby · 08-12-2013, 05:31 AM

Now careful now. If you're allowed to make references to it, then so am I

Senator Pleasury · 08-12-2013, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justpassinby

Now careful now. If you're allowed to make references to it, then so am I

Oh yes. Bewaaaare, bewaaaare, for the whole SHH seems to be dying to make references to that.

justpassinby · 08-12-2013, 10:39 AM

And when it comes to that, I'll be able to make them references all the more - so let them come! For now though, one person is quite enough, thanks

**C. Lee** · 08-12-2013, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justpassinby

Now careful now. If you're allowed to make references to it, then so am I

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senator Pleasury

Oh yes. Bewaaaare, bewaaaare, for the whole SHH seems to be dying to make references to that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by justpassinby

And when it comes to that, I'll be able to make them references all the more - so let them come! For now though, one person is quite enough, thanks

He just got infracted for it....so please....you guys make another reference just to see what happens.

Cain · 08-14-2013, 02:29 AM

I always thought it was supposed to be "I am the night" like the line used by Conroy in TAS. Did the guy who create that photo get it wrong?

TruerToTheCore · 08-14-2013, 04:20 AM

It's most definitely "night". Knight doesn't make much sense.

Couldn't find either line here.

http://screenwritersutopia.com/scriptdb/media/731.html

Comics N' Toons · 08-14-2013, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cain

I always thought it was supposed to be "I am the night" like the line used by Conroy in TAS. Did the guy who create that photo get it wrong?

i've never heard that!

Senator Pleasury · 08-14-2013, 09:24 AM

Yeah, it was "night." I got it was the original line because that's what Batman said in the comic adaptation.

08-10-2013, 10:06 PM	#930
Mrs. Sawyer Banned User Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Jersey City, NJ Posts: 24,547	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 I'll go as far as to say Returns sucks.

08-11-2013, 01:09 AM	#933
Comics N' Toons Viva La Revolucion! Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 3,015	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 it doesn't suck, it's just not Batman 89! __________________ Jerry and Joe were gentlemen. Bob Kane was a thief and a glory-hound who was more concerned about profit and prestige. I cannot bring myself to believe the same things about Stan Lee in regards to his two main contributors, Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko. I'm inclined to believe Stan's version of events as he has usually been very willing to credit his co-conspirators, but the truth is because different versions of credit exists, we will never truly know.

08-11-2013, 05:57 AM	#936
regwec Make Mine Marble Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Perfidious Albion Posts: 28,492	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 There should be a way of automatically ignoring members until they have been around for six months. __________________ "Myth and high culture have much in common. Each is concerned to idealise the human condition, to lift it free from contingencies". - *Sir Roger Scruton* Love Freedom? PENCE 2018

08-11-2013, 11:45 AM	#938
regwec Make Mine Marble Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Perfidious Albion Posts: 28,492	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 I have this guy on ignore, but I can only assume that four posts in a row = spam. __________________ "Myth and high culture have much in common. Each is concerned to idealise the human condition, to lift it free from contingencies". - *Sir Roger Scruton* Love Freedom? PENCE 2018

08-11-2013, 12:05 PM	#939
Kane52630 Astral Plane User Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: New York Subway Posts: 91,807	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 Man, just when I thought it couldn't get any lower on the hype. __________________ Follow My Batman Blog HOW COULD THIS BE WRONG \| THE GLITCH MOB Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:

08-11-2013, 12:19 PM	#940
C. Lee I'm not old...I'm ancient SHH! Administrator Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 54,930	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 The "rape" talk will stop now. __________________ Go here for answers about AVATARS, signatures, etc The Official Board Rules Avatar by hunter rider

08-11-2013, 11:44 PM	#941
Ponyboy Serenity now! Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Wellington, NZ Posts: 3,059	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 ^Halle-frickin-lujah. __________________

08-12-2013, 05:31 AM	#943
justpassinby Side-Kick Join Date: Jun 2013 Posts: 80	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 Now careful now. If you're allowed to make references to it, then so am I

08-12-2013, 10:39 AM	#945
justpassinby Side-Kick Join Date: Jun 2013 Posts: 80	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 And when it comes to that, I'll be able to make them references all the more - so let them come! For now though, one person is quite enough, thanks

08-14-2013, 02:29 AM	#947
Cain I Heart Amazons Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Live from New York (Earth-33) Posts: 6,005	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 I always thought it was supposed to be "I am the night" like the line used by Conroy in TAS. Did the guy who create that photo get it wrong? __________________ I enjoy comic book adaptations but I'm a comic book fan first and foremost. Not a comic book movie fan.

08-14-2013, 04:20 AM	#948
TruerToTheCore Banned User Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Earth-1 Posts: 2,936	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 It's most definitely "night". Knight doesn't make much sense. Couldn't find either line here. http://screenwritersutopia.com/scriptdb/media/731.html

08-14-2013, 09:24 AM	#950
Senator Pleasury Banned User Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 2,844	Re: The Official Batman (1989) Thread - Part 3 Yeah, it was "night." I got it was the original line because that's what Batman said in the comic adaptation.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode