![]() |
|
|
#951 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 35
|
Well there's always Garth of Izar. Mentally unhinged Starfleet captain after getting his ability of genetic manipulation.
|
|
|
|
|
#952 |
|
Person of Interest
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 7,060
|
I hope it isn't Khan. Just because I don't think the new series should run parallel with the old one - I'd rather see new stories than new takes on old stories.
__________________
THE HOBBIT: An Unexpected Journey: My Review The Legendary Origin of Ben THE *T*USI IS DEAAAAAAD |
|
|
|
|
#953 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,627
|
Quote:
Take the modern version of Doctor Who. It not only modernised the concept but it also added three new Doctors, new companions and new, and now iconic, villains such as the Weeping Angels. That's how you do it.
__________________
Mutant and proud
|
|
|
|
|
|
#954 |
|
Ah-maz-ing
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In My Supersonic Rocketship
Posts: 8,440
|
I am I the only one who noticed how little we see of anyone in their classic colored uniforms in the trailer?
__________________
"Tampa isn't a place you go. It's a place you end up"-Dave |
|
|
|
|
#955 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 420
|
Okay, I've got a theory that this movie's going to reverse many of the previous themes and tropes from the olde series:
Whether the bad-guy's Gary Mitchell, Khan Noonien Singh, or Bob from Accounting, it seems likely his beef is more with Star Fleet than Kirk or the Enterprise-thus the black shirt of Star Fleet and the ominous threat seeemingly targetted at a mourning Federation. Now, we all know one of the main themes of Wrath of Khan was Khan's Ahab-like obsession with Kirk. Perhaps this time, Kirk is the one dangerously obsessed with hunting his enemy down. The hands on the glass scene seems like a straight up homage to the end of Wrath of Khan, but I can't be the only one who thinks it looks like Spock is the one in safety trying to comfort a dying friend. Maybe their going to tease the death of Kirk?
__________________
“There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal." -C.S. Lewis |
|
|
|
|
#956 |
|
Ah-maz-ing
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In My Supersonic Rocketship
Posts: 8,440
|
It's probably Cumberbatch's character that's going to die and then resurrect and kick some butt for whatever happened.
__________________
"Tampa isn't a place you go. It's a place you end up"-Dave |
|
|
|
|
#957 | |
|
Zoom!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 9,183
|
Quote:
It all contributes to a lack of color as far as the marketing is concerned though. Last edited by redhawk23; 12-07-2012 at 08:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#958 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 35
|
Meh. Five has some ok character moments, and I do enjoy the "What does God need with a starship." scene at the end. Nemesis is irredeemable.
|
|
|
|
|
#959 | |
|
The Smegginator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ScouseLand, Liverpool, England
Posts: 2,392
|
Quote:
Also, with the whole 'touching the glass' bit from the japanese trailer, it looks more like Spock is safe and is comforting someone else. Just the way the 'non spock' hand is placed and spocks hand approaches. It could very well be Kirk. Killing kirk off in the sequel? I'm all for a Kirk death if done right (looking at you Generations ) but to do it in only the second one? They would have to bring him back in the third. How? Well, all guess work with no real context. Yay for speculation ![]() --- Also, on a side note, just a little something I threw together for my facebook cover pic. Not bad for a 5 miute jobby (if I do say so myself)
__________________
METAL.GEAR
ASSASSIN'S Last edited by Smegger56; 12-08-2012 at 10:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#960 |
|
I am the night
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Under your Refrigerator
Posts: 27,086
|
I think the villain 'dies' in the beginning because of exposure to whatever gives him super powers and he rises to get revenge on the Federation. The scene with the glass might be from the death scene and the funeral we see in the trailer is for him.
__________________
Sweet Christmas |
|
|
|
|
#961 | |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 773
|
Quote:
![]() an wether it is that or something else, i think the glass scene will be a variation on the known scene.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#962 | |
|
Snyderite
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A theater near you
Posts: 8,140
|
Quote:
__________________
"What if a child dreamed of becoming something other than what society had intended? What if a child aspired to something greater?" - Jor-El |
|
|
|
|
|
#963 | |
|
The Smegginator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ScouseLand, Liverpool, England
Posts: 2,392
|
Quote:
__________________
METAL.GEAR
ASSASSIN'S |
|
|
|
|
|
#964 |
|
Snyderite
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A theater near you
Posts: 8,140
|
Haha, nothing at all.
![]() So I just re-watched "Where No Man has Gone Before." I guess it's pretty easy to make the argument for or against Cumberbatch being Gary Mitchell. Ditto for Alice Eve being Dehner. On one hand, the powers Gary displays could be similar to what we're seeing here with this new villain. And the whole revenge angle could be due to Kirk (or someone else) leaving him for dead on a barren planet, like Gary. The whole "Into Darkness" thing also plays into where they were when Gary got his powers. However, other things lead me to believe it's not him... the English accent being the key thing. It's difficult to see how anything that might have transpired after Nero entered the timeline could have led to Gary's nationality presumably changing. Additionally, we don't see Benedict's eyes lighting up or anything like that. Of course, this is all contingent on the idea that JJ Abrams is trying to stick really close to the original series.
__________________
"What if a child dreamed of becoming something other than what society had intended? What if a child aspired to something greater?" - Jor-El |
|
|
|
|
#965 |
|
Person of Interest
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 7,060
|
What if the character replaces Gary Mitchell without being Gary Mitchell? What if the character is a different crew member with a different name, who in this timeline is the one affected by the galactic barrier rather than Mitchell?
__________________
THE HOBBIT: An Unexpected Journey: My Review The Legendary Origin of Ben THE *T*USI IS DEAAAAAAD |
|
|
|
|
#966 |
|
Snyderite
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A theater near you
Posts: 8,140
|
Yeah, that certainly seems like a possibility. It's not like that many people outside of diehard Trekkies even know who Mitchell is.
__________________
"What if a child dreamed of becoming something other than what society had intended? What if a child aspired to something greater?" - Jor-El |
|
|
|
|
#967 |
|
Not a Racist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 16,863
|
The writers have stated that the current comic book taking place in this universe is canon. So either this is Gary Mitchell returning from the dead, or a completely unrelated event. I really don't think Khan will be anywhere near this.
|
|
|
|
|
#968 |
|
Snyderite
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A theater near you
Posts: 8,140
|
Oh, I forgot about the comic. How does Gary's story fit in there?
__________________
"What if a child dreamed of becoming something other than what society had intended? What if a child aspired to something greater?" - Jor-El |
|
|
|
|
#969 |
|
Not a Racist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 16,863
|
It's mostly a direct adaption of the original series episode. I believe it was the first arc of the comic series.
|
|
|
|
|
#970 |
|
All Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,452
|
If Gary Mitchell's the villain then i wouldn't mind that arc becoming non-canon
__________________
STAR WARS Returns 2015
|
|
|
|
|
#971 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23,119
|
Does it bother anyone that we're getting yet another "revenge-driven" villain?
I mean, I get that it's a pretty popular story, but that's pretty much all that drove Nero. Hopefully Cumberbatch's villain will have a bit more to him than just wanting vengeance. Some kind of political layer to it, at least.
__________________
Writer and Lyricist of GOTHAM'S KNIGHT: THE BATMAN MUSICAL And if I'm right The future's looking bright A symbol in the skies at night |
|
|
|
|
#972 |
|
All Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,452
|
Now that you mention it, maybe the new villain (if he's mitchell) has become mad because of his powers or something like that like he originally did in the original series
__________________
STAR WARS Returns 2015
|
|
|
|
|
#973 | |
|
Smooth Operator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 14,292
|
Quote:
__________________
12 hours? You call that a filibuster? Strom Thurmond is laughing at you from hell. ~posted by Thundercrack85 on 04.05.2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
#974 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 5,725
|
Based on Devin Faraci's tweets of seeing the full trailer at BNAT (that debuts with the Hobbit this coming Friday), he's thinking it's Sybock now...even without the ears.
__________________
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT." "The Fire Rises" |
|
|
|
|
#975 |
|
callin' it like I see it
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
Posts: 16,084
|
I like the fact who the villain is is still up in the air. I like the mystery.
__________________
Fanboys make excuses, real fans acknowledge screw-ups. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|