![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Lethal Weapon vs.Die Hard, which do you prefer ? | |||
| Lethal Weapon Franchise |
|
15 | 37.50% |
| Die Hard Franchise |
|
25 | 62.50% |
| Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Montgomery/Atlanta
Posts: 977
|
Which action franchise do you prefer ? Are you team " Yippy Ki-yay Mutha***" , or team " I'm gettin to old for thi sh** " ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Earned the Power of Love
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,599
|
Like Lethal Weapon more. Especially the first Lethal Weapon. Mel Gibson is just phenomenal, one of his best performances. I think the Lethal Weapon sequels also are more consistently good, they know what worked in the first one and didn't stray too far from that formula.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Not a golem
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Accusing Parlor
Posts: 2,130
|
Neither is a great series. Both have one great first film, then a bunch of sequels that don't come close to that first installment. I'd say Die Hard: With a Vengeance is better than any of the Lethal Weapon sequels, and the original Die Hard better than the original Lethal Weapon, so I'm going Die Hard.
__________________
Do not accept checks from: Chief Wiggum - Reverend Lovejoy - Homer J. Simpson - Homer S. Simpson - H.J. Simpson - Homor Simpson - Homer J. FongBATMAN FOREVER
SCENE BY SCENE |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
You'll never Beetus
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,332
|
Die Hard
__________________
Holding out hope..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Half Monk, Half Hitman
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: B.P.R.D.
Posts: 20,559
|
The Die Hard franchise is the better one.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
You'll never Beetus
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Driving coast to coast
Posts: 15,332
|
Quote:
__________________
Holding out hope..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Built from Lego
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Zealand/Canada
Posts: 2,738
|
I hold the first of both franchises in equal standing, however as an over all set of movies Die Hard gets my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Loose Seal
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,137
|
Quote:
__________________
VERONICA MARS LIVES. VIDEO-CLick to Watch!:
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/...-movie-project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
SW Prequels Defender
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 17,257
|
Great question. DH1 and 3 are some of the best films ever made, imo, but DH2, 4 and now, probably 5, are below average.
The LW franchise has only one mediocre movie, which is LW2, but even that one is better than the worst DH movie. I can't decide. Not yet. I wish there was a 3rd option.
__________________
*Avvy by Kane52630* |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Scrawny gaunt & anorexic?
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 1,326
|
This was a really tough choice. The way I decided was to look at the all the films as a whole. And I decided that Mel Gibson`s character had a better arc and a kind of resolution.
At the end of LW4, he was no longer suicidal, had found a new love and became a Father. That`s why I think the Lethal Weapon series is better. YMMV
__________________
Si hoc legere potes nimium eruditionis habes For crying out loud, after nine months of intermittent, random and unrelated PC crashes. Changing the RAM got rid of the last of the crashes! It was a good excuse to go to 32Gb... Got 64Gb now! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
?
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,277
|
I was always more of a 'Riggs and Murtaugh' kinda guy.
Lethal Weapon for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
SW Prequels Defender
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 17,257
|
I think I'm gonna go for LW, too.
__________________
*Avvy by Kane52630* |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Scrawny gaunt & anorexic?
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 1,326
|
Perhaps someone should write a screenplay where Riggs and McClane team up!
__________________
Si hoc legere potes nimium eruditionis habes For crying out loud, after nine months of intermittent, random and unrelated PC crashes. Changing the RAM got rid of the last of the crashes! It was a good excuse to go to 32Gb... Got 64Gb now! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 566
|
Man, I can't decide! I love both the LW, and DH franchises. I'm really not sure if I can just pick one or the other? I'm not sure yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Stay Frosty
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,789
|
This is about as close to a draw for me as it can get. I love both series (especially the first movies of both) and which one I prefer probably depends my mood at the time. If I had to choose, I would probably go with Lethal Weapon. I really am a big Mel Gibson fan (minus the drunken rants).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Stay Frosty
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,789
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tijuana/San Diego
Posts: 4,579
|
i love both franchises, but i think the Lethal Weapon series as a whole was much better because it actually had better sequels and characters remained grounded to a certain extent.
the first Die Hard film is perfection, but as the series progress McClane went from being a normal guy in a dire situation to a superhero. Liver Free or Die Hard was rather mediocre, and so far i have not heard good things about the new film. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
The Outsider
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The Lost Highway
Posts: 2,638
|
Universal Soldier
__________________
"The world is indeed comic, but the joke is on mankind." - H.P Lovecraft Check out my Tumblr! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Bell-Ringer
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,171
|
Lethal weapon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Death Contagious Deity
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 932
|
I'd take DH1 over any of the LW's, but LW was far more consistent.
__________________
Lightning struck down twice... Stones thrown rooftop high... Defend night-flight sites... Trap clamped, snared for pyres... Witchtripper...
Witchtripper... |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tijuana/San Diego
Posts: 4,579
|
i think what really helped the Lethal Weapon films stay consistent through out all 4 films was that it was fortunate enough to have the same director in all 4 films
unlike with Die Hard, whose best films (1 & 3) were directed by John McTiernan. the remaining films suffered in quality because of the people directing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
callin' it like I see it
Join Date: May 2007
Location: I come from the land Down Under
Posts: 16,059
|
Tough choice because they're not really the same type of action movies, but I've always like the chemistry between Gibson and Glover, they bounce off each off fantastically so I'd probably say LW. Plus LW had Renee Russo.
__________________
Fanboys make excuses, real fans acknowledge screw-ups. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,984
|
Lethal Weapon
I prefer Die Hard 1 and 3 over the Lethal Weapons, but as a series LW wins. Also, Die Hard 2 is not nearly as bad as people make it out to be. Last edited by Jake Cassidy; 02-14-2013 at 05:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 661
|
Love 'em both, as far as the Michael Kamen scored films are concerned!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Side-Kick
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,984
|
The storyline for Die Hard With A Vengeance was originally intended to be Lethal Weapon 4. Which explains the buddy/cop element of it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|