The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > Superman > Man of Steel

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2014, 01:20 PM   #876
Human Torch
I Yam What I Yam
 
Human Torch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,769
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milu View Post
Well after giving the movie a second viewing, here are my thoughts on what could've been changed:
  • The tone; more specifically, it could've stood to be softened. I'm not asking for a rehash of the Donner/Reeve classic, but a modern Superman movie can be done without an end product more humorless than the Dark Knight trilogy.
  • The dialogue and one liners. "It all goes downhill..." "Dicksplash." Terrio is a very welcome addition to the team behind Dawn of Justice.
  • The codex. This plot device provides unnecessary bloat to Superman's origins.
  • The editing. At times it feels amateurish.
  • The cinematography. Less shaky cams, and less zoom-ins please.
  • The music. Zimmer is an incredible composer, but his work on this movie isn't one of his best, let alone worthy of Superman. The Superman theme itself starts off promising, but doesn't really go anywhere. I was hoping Zimmer would abandon the minimalist approach he took to the Dark Knight trilogy, but it still lingers. Plus it feels like 75% of the score is either in C-major or C-minor.

In the end, Man of Steel is ambitious, but ultimately just serviceable. Just because a movie tries to soar high, or stimulate meaningful conversation (which I don't understand but some people think this movie succeeds at that), doesn't make it superior to its contemporaries, especially when aspects of the production design leave things to be desired.

I didn't have as much problem with the music,but agreed on all points.

__________________
We always need to hear Both Sides of the story.
Human Torch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2014, 05:24 PM   #877
Nemeres
Easy, miss. I've got you.
 
Nemeres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Quito, Ecuador
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milu View Post
Well after giving the movie a second viewing, here are my thoughts on what could've been changed:
  • The tone; more specifically, it could've stood to be softened. I'm not asking for a rehash of the Donner/Reeve classic, but a modern Superman movie can be done without an end product more humorless than the Dark Knight trilogy.
  • The dialogue and one liners. "It all goes downhill..." "Dicksplash." Terrio is a very welcome addition to the team behind Dawn of Justice.
  • The codex. This plot device provides unnecessary bloat to Superman's origins.
  • The editing. At times it feels amateurish.
  • The cinematography. Less shaky cams, and less zoom-ins please.
  • The music. Zimmer is an incredible composer, but his work on this movie isn't one of his best, let alone worthy of Superman. The Superman theme itself starts off promising, but doesn't really go anywhere. I was hoping Zimmer would abandon the minimalist approach he took to the Dark Knight trilogy, but it still lingers. Plus it feels like 75% of the score is either in C-major or C-minor.

In the end, Man of Steel is ambitious, but ultimately just serviceable. Just because a movie tries to soar high, or stimulate meaningful conversation (which I don't understand but some people think this movie succeeds at that), doesn't make it superior to its contemporaries, especially when aspects of the production design leave things to be desired.
Spot on about the tone. And the codex thing, such a cluttering, dead weight piece of plot nonsense.

Although to be honest, "dicksplash" did make me chuckle.

__________________
Tuuuuu-turu-tu-tuuuuuuuuuuu

TUUUU-TUUUU-TUUUUUUUUUUU...
Nemeres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2014, 09:36 PM   #878
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,010
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by br0adband View Post
Kara Zor-El was the pilot of that scout ship - all this is explained in the prequel comic. If you haven't read it, that's understandable that you wouldn't get where the suit came from.

Also, when Clark inserts the House of El command key into that ship and 'fires it up," Jor-El's sentience then inhabits the craft and controls all the systems.

To honestly think for even one second that the ship wouldn't then be capable of providing a suit for Kal is just crazy. It wouldn't be a "war suit" like the other suits, it wouldn't necessarily be designed as battle armor either - Jor-El has already made it abundantly clear as we all know that Kal is nearly invulnerable here on Earth under our younger yellow sun.

Having him wear suits similar to the ones Zod and his cohorts wear (because they were traveling in space at times when they're on other alien worlds inspecting the old colonial outposts) would be somewhat ridiculous. It would also be unreasonable to think that they never ever found themselves under another yellow sun someplace out there beyond our heavens, and had the same reaction by gaining some strength and other abilities.

House of El command key inserted into a scout ship sent out by House of El members and even piloted by a member of the House of El = Kal gets his suit as expected.

It's not that tough to understand (but you gotta read the prequel comic to get it, that much is certain).

Dude, I struggle to understand why people even need the suit explained, ( given that the ship came from a planet so advanced that it could open doorways into hyperspace, people could copy their personalities into small metal objects) but also that the main character can fly and shoot laser beams from his eyes.

If you can suspend disbelief on stuff like that, the ship being able to manufacture a suit for Kal doesn't seem too far fetched. It's like....the interstellar travel, flying and laser beams are okay, but a specially designed suit inside a space ship, now that''s too much ?

I don't disrespect people's opinions, and if that bugged some people, that's fine - but I still don't understand why.

cheers.

(BTW Man of Steel, I admit not perfect, but then no film is. MOS was still 100% awesome, a great new direction for Superman in the 21st Century).


Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 06:05 PM   #879
Steamteck
Side-Kick
 
Steamteck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by hurley711 View Post
I didn't like that we are supposed to believe that Zod was prevented from killing the family because Superman had him in some sort of headlock. Ummm...all Zod had to was move his eyes he didn't need to turn his head!
Seemed to me Zod was doing it slowly to force Superman to kill him now that he felt he was defeated or close to it.

__________________
It isn't that there are too many idiots in the world, its the lightning is improperly distributed
Mark Twain
Steamteck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 09:21 PM   #880
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,010
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steamteck View Post
Seemed to me Zod was doing it slowly to force Superman to kill him now that he felt he was defeated or close to it.

Good call. I'm quite convinced Zod went into that fight with a death-wish,
which he expressly states.

As for turning his head and other arguments about what Superman could have done instead....none of them have been convincing solutions to the dilemma Supes faced. In the end he did what he had to do.
Some people hate the writers for putting him in that position, but I think it makes him a better character, that he was able to make a hard choice.

People chuckle in flicks like the Expendables when some character shoots a bad guy dead, and then cracks a one-liner, but when Superman kills someone it's just wrong ? Obviously it was a big deal for Supes to do that. Yeah, maybe the movie should have followed that up a bit more, but regardless that scene still works IMO.

Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2014, 11:36 PM   #881
iambranded
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 226
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

im watching it now.......i liked the movie...it was pretty decent as it was when i watched it in theaters ...but geeezzz i think Superman crashing into buildings and more buildings... im thinking he kills a bunch of people in there also....

iambranded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2014, 12:52 AM   #882
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,010
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by iambranded View Post
im watching it now.......i liked the movie...it was pretty decent as it was when i watched it in theaters ...but geeezzz i think Superman crashing into buildings and more buildings... im thinking he kills a bunch of people in there also....
Respect your opinion, but gotta disagree with you there dude.

In Superman's defence he gets thrown through a bunch of buildings by Zod. It's not like he either decided to plow through them, or was just being careless (unlike the grain silos or the gas station, now that was a bit reckless, although not legally reckless -don't worry about it , long story) If you watch the start of the fight, they're over the buildings, it's Zod who takes it down into the city.

If you really want to complain about killing innocents in that film, think about what happened during the Smallville fight, when the army copters and jets opened fire with cannons and missiles on the main street. Where do you think all the ricocheting rounds went, or those that just missed ? Into the buildings where the people were hiding.

If anyone killed a lot of people in Metropolis it was the evil Kryptonians with their gravity beam which flattened whole city blocks, and the armed forces who opened up with missiles at a target that was directly above the city (and when the missiles get deflected down into the city, do they stop shooting ? No. They decide they have to get closer ! )

It just seems weird to be all "oh no Superman probably killed some people when he got thrown through those buildings" but not "Holy **** ! Zod and his goons just wiped out a ton of people" especially when we see Faora spectacularly murder a platoon of soldiers right in front of us. I kind of like that Superman was less than perfect, but also the fights were pretty intense.

Just IMO of course, and glad you thought the film was decent.

Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2014, 03:02 AM   #883
WBwins
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

The fact so many people came out of the movie with the misconception that "Superman killed a lot of people" is a fault of themovie,it was filmed in such a way that gave this wrong impression.
Same thing with Jonathan kent being a dick

WBwins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2014, 08:02 PM   #884
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,010
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by WBwins View Post
The fact so many people came out of the movie with the misconception that "Superman killed a lot of people" is a fault of themovie,it was filmed in such a way that gave this wrong impression.
Same thing with Jonathan kent being a dick
Really ?

That's an interesting suggestion, I think you have a point ther. I don't agree with you entirely, but it's still an interesting thought. I didn't come out thinking that Superman had killed anyone except Zod. Sure it was a radical departure from previous Superman films, which were mildly goofy ( I mean, in Superman II where Zod threatens people, we all remember Christopher Reeve trying to keep a straight face while shouting "THE PEOPLE !"

My theory is that the media and various pundits have misrepresented the film. If you watch the Honest Trailers "how to fix Man of Steel 2" you get Nick Mundy (not my favourite reviewer anyway) losing his mind and yelling about stuff that actually didn't happen in the film. I think it's a bit rich for Grant MOrrison to complain about Superman having to kill Zod, when he's written some of the most ultra-violent comics out there.

The other big perception some people seem to have come away with is that Superman didn't save anyone (maybe because he didn't get a cat out of a tree, or rescue an airplane -which is kind of a Superman staple).

No he didn't save anyone.....well except the busload of kids, Lois Lane on 3 occasions, his mom, the oil rig workers, the helicopter gunner, the family in the train station and the entire human population of the Earth....

Again this is about perception. You might be onto something, maybe because of the way it was filmed, and the darker tone, people didn't notice.
But I think has far more to do with the impression that people formed (rightly or wrongly) rather than the substance of the film - and IMO the critical response contributed to that impression (which is why one of the chief Editors at Rotten Tomatoes was stunned by the division among critics).

Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 01:37 PM   #885
Steamteck
Side-Kick
 
Steamteck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 511
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by WBwins View Post
The fact so many people came out of the movie with the misconception that "Superman killed a lot of people" is a fault of themovie,it was filmed in such a way that gave this wrong impression.
Same thing with Jonathan kent being a dick
Apparently you may have something there but not for me. To the degree that I can't imagine folks are talking about the same movie I saw. It seemed pretty clear to me what was happening.

__________________
It isn't that there are too many idiots in the world, its the lightning is improperly distributed
Mark Twain
Steamteck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 02:29 PM   #886
hopefuldreamer
Bangarang!
 
hopefuldreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South West, UK
Posts: 11,262
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Sorry if this has already been discussed a lot... I haven't been on the forums much lately.

I've been giving it a lot of thought recently, and it's been bugging me, so I thought i'd discuss it here

I think that one of the biggest problems I have with the film is how they handled one character...

Jonathon Kent

In the majority of interpretations I have come to know and love, Jonathon Kent is the man that Clark gets the TRUE strength of Superman from. And I don't mean his bravery.

He sees how much his father believes in what some might call the 'little things' - politeness, hard work, kindness to strangers, giving your neighbors a helping hand, always aspiring to be honest etc - and he aspires to be that kind of man.

In Smallville, Jonathon Kent is a well liked and respected man BECAUSE of all those qualities. He is approachable and reasonable and most importantly of all... he sees the best in people.

And he teaches Clark to see the best in people.

I don't feel at all like that's what we got in this film.

I mean, i'm not saying they showed Jonathon Kent to be a bad person. He was quiet, seemed to keep himself to himself, very private. He was never aggressive or anything... in fact, he just seemed pensive all the time.

But in MOS, they showed a child who was raised in fear. A child who was repeatedly reminded he had a huge burden of a destiny and it was much more important that anything else... including other children's lives!

A child who was so conditioned by this fear, so brainwashed by it... and so desperate for his Dad's approval (which it seemed like he rarely got because the focus was on the future and not the present)... that he felt the only option was to let him DIE right in front of him to show him was being a 'good son'...

Which is IMO, messed up enough in itself.

But then you have the guy whose grown up thinking that his Dad's death is all his fault, and all the fault of an unaccepting world that's just too full of suspicion and greed to accept him. That the only thing he can try and do with his adolescent-adult years is to spend them in solitude, with no friends or connections, moving from place to place trying to find out where he is from... just so that all that guilt and confusion might have a reason behind it.

And that to me, is closer to Batman than Superman.

The Clark Kent I know... the one that was raised by the loving and hopeful Jonathon and Martha Kent, would have saved his Dad. Despite what his Dad wanted.

Because it is physically not within him to let someone die for his secret when it is in his power to stop it. IT IS PHYSICALLY NOT IN HIM!

I don't care how many conversations they have had about Jonathon's theory of a hypothetical future in which the world will suddenly be ready... The fact is, in this film there is absolutely NO CHANGE in the world or in people, from the moment where he let's his dad die 'because we're not ready' - to the moment he reveals himself to the world. It would have been the exact same reaction. People have not changed in the slightest or become somehow more ready.

So not only is his theory kind of thin at best, and a very poor basis for a child to allow his father to die... it is actually PROVEN incorrect later in the film.

I mean, seriously, did Clark not have a moment where he thought 'Oh man... I think Dad was wrong... I think people are handling this okay... maybe he didn't need to die'.

I won't go into how I feel about the actual set up of the rescue (as personally I think the whole thing was illogical because there was PLENTY of time for Clark to nip in and grab that dog with no risk of exposure).

But I will say, that the downright sad portrayal of Jonathan Kent in this film is the very first thing I would change.

I mean, I'd change that before i'd change the neck snap. And I felt pretty strongly about the neck snap.

But in my eyes, in a world in which Jonathon Kent was a character full of light instead of doom and gloom, Clark might not have seemed so depressed. And the movie itself, not so depressing.



__________________
I think back to my father. As a farmer, he had a natural understanding for the Earth. I remember him telling me this world is capable of providing for all its creatures. Even now, with so many more people, there exists enough food for everyone.

"The problem," Pa used to say, "is people. As far back as we go, we've always had problems with sharing. Seems everyone's too busy holding on to what they've got to care how their neighbors are doing."


*\S/T*

Last edited by hopefuldreamer; 09-09-2014 at 04:22 PM.
hopefuldreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 03:09 PM   #887
SlamAdams
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,598
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Except for his final moment, I liked how they portrayed Jonathan Kent. He wasn't simply a mouthpiece for classic, blue collar, middle America morality, but he was scared for his son. I thought they portrayed his struggle nicely between raising Clark to be the best he can be and the fear and protectiveness that I think would come naturally to a father who's child is so impossibly gifted. It was one of the few things I actually liked about the movie.

__________________
Slam Adams at House of Geekery
SlamAdams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 08:16 AM   #888
WBwins
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Agree Hopeful dreamer on Jonathan kent though I liked the movie regardless.The Top 5 things I think needed to be changed in the movie were

1.NOT Making Superman the cause of the Invasion
2.Jonathan kent
3.Editing
4.Showing the world needing Superman
5.Showing the worlds reaction during Zods invasion(Not after like in BVS)

WBwins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2014, 09:10 PM   #889
Batmannerism
Side-Kick
 
Batmannerism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,010
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by WBwins View Post
Agree Hopeful dreamer on Jonathan kent though I liked the movie regardless.The Top 5 things I think needed to be changed in the movie were

1.NOT Making Superman the cause of the Invasion
2.Jonathan kent
3.Editing
4.Showing the world needing Superman
5.Showing the worlds reaction during Zods invasion(Not after like in BVS)

Dude, I respect your opinion but disagree with you.

1. Superman wasn't the cause of the invasion. He was the reason Zod arrived on Earth, but the reason for the invasion was that after Zod arrived he to wipe out humanity and rebuild krypton via genocide. The reason for that was because Zod was a crazy son of a *****.

2. Disagree with you, sort of. I think the Tornado scene could have been handled better. I think Costner was amazing in the "You're the answer son" scene. What they should have done was used Dylan Spraybury in the Tornado scene, rather than Henry Cavill - that would have made it seem a bit more logical that Clark wouldn't save his dad.
Personally, I think Pa Kent's death should have been a little different - and one of the best things about his death in Superman the movie, is that it shows that there are limits on Superman's powers (e.g. he can't beat death itself.....well he can't raise the dead).

3. The only editing that bugged me was the shaky cam in the Krypton council scene, otherwise I thought it was top notch.

4. Given that Superman saved a lot of people in the film, including the entire human race.....at which point a character actually says "He did it. He saved us." Well, I think they pretty much established that when the world needed him, he came through.

5. yeah, that I agree with you on that. A one or two minute scene after Zod's death would have made a big difference. I think the drone scene should have come between the final flashback (at Pa Kent's grave) and "Welcome to the Planet" . Definitely shouldn't have left this for the sequel, although I'm sure it will appear as a plot point in B v S.

But honestly, it didn't diminish the film for me. Cheers.

Batmannerism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2014, 09:17 PM   #890
the last son
Side-Kick
 
the last son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,587
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

Someone made a great point. The Jonathan Kent death scene would've been a lot more effective getting the kid actor to play Clark during that scene. Cavill I guess was playing a teen, but he looks 25, so it makes it harder to accept him just watching his dad die. Getting that young teen would have really pulled your heart strings and make you understand listening to your dad.

__________________
STAY OUT OF MY TERRITORY
the last son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2014, 04:13 PM   #891
Hypestyle
Side-Kick
 
Hypestyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 5,825
Default Re: What are your complaints? What would you do differently? *SPOILERS* - Part 1

.... I'd give the film an A-.

Regarding characters- Jimmy is missed (Lois is taking her own photos! meta commentary on journalism jobs today!) -- I think that the blogger guy could have been made into Jimmy.

Lana and Pete are rendered irrelevant to Clark's backstory. Definitely there's no "Superboy" era to speak of. Of course, there's 10 years of Smallville, so I guess the filmmakers figured it would be pointless to go there and give him a super-career as a teen.

There was no public crisis that Superman helped out with before the Zod invasion. The invasion-- and the destruction of much of downtown Metropolis-- was basically his introduction to the general public. A victory, yes, but extremely Pyrrhic.

It's unclear what happened to one of the kryptonian scout ships.

Hypestyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"
Contact Us - Mobile - SuperHeroHype - ComingSoon.net - Shock Till You Drop - Lost Password - Clear Cookies - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - AdChoices


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.