The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > The Avengers > The Avengers Sequels

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2015, 09:31 AM   #1
Demileto
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 409
Default James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Source: http://www.spoilertv.com/2015/05/mar...owns-film.html

Thoughts?

Demileto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 06:42 PM   #2
MakeMinesMarvel
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"


MakeMinesMarvel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 09:59 PM   #3
Avenger
Earth's Mightiest Fanboy
 
Avenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 832
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

That's too bad. I was kinda hoping he'd be the main villain of the first post-Infinity War Avengers movie.

__________________
"They always talk about transcending the genre and I don't believe in transcending the genre. I believe in the genre." -Joss Whedon
Avenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2015, 10:16 AM   #4
The Villain
Side-Kick
 
The Villain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 932
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Kang would be cool and perhaps Korvac?

The Villain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 09:04 PM   #5
KangConquers
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
 
KangConquers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,107
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Probably not for long after F4.

KangConquers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2016, 05:37 PM   #6
Dasher10
I'm like Deadpool IRL
 
Dasher10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,031
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Even without Kang, Marvel still have Korvac, High Evolutionary, Count Nefaria, Namor, MODOK and Proctor.

__________________
Fire Scott Buck
Dasher10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 05:38 AM   #7
eon001
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 824
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Not sure if that's true. Kang's first appearance was in The Avengers #8 according to wiki.
That being said, if that's true it would be so frustrating considering Fox will probably never get round to using him. And if they do, they won't know what to do with him and totally ***k him up.

eon001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2016, 03:44 AM   #8
TheVileOne
Side-Kick
 
TheVileOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 51,100
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

It's not always about first appearances. Kingpin first appeared in the pages of The Amazing Spider-Man. He didn't really become a Daredevil villain until much later. Punisher also appeared in Spider-Man originally, but his rights were at Lionsgate/Artistan at first.

I think it's really just about how Marvel sold certain character licenses off. They probably sold certain groups together.

It might take a while, but hopefully Marvel gets all the characters back after a while.

__________________
"This is true. This is real. This . . . Is . . . Straight Edge."

- CM Punk
TheVileOne is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2016, 10:26 PM   #9
Dasher10
I'm like Deadpool IRL
 
Dasher10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,031
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Quote:
Originally Posted by eon001 View Post
Not sure if that's true. Kang's first appearance was in The Avengers #8 according to wiki.
That being said, if that's true it would be so frustrating considering Fox will probably never get round to using him. And if they do, they won't know what to do with him and totally ***k him up.
Kang is at Fox because Marvel didn't even consider an Avengers film series and sold the Avengers off one by one. Iron Man was at New Line, Spider-Man and Luke Cage were at Sony, Hulk was at Universal and Thor was at Paramount. Kang was bundled with the Fantastic Four because there was no way to do an Avengers film.

And yeah, Fox don't care about the Fantastic Four at all and it shows. Plus I care more about Fantastic Four villains in other Marvel properties like Doom vs Black Panther, Annihilus vs the Guardians and Kang vs Avengers than I do about another Fantastic Four film. When Fox can't even legally cross the FF over with the X-Men, I'm not sure if Fox would even want to do a sequel or another reboot since the FF universe would feel very small and isolated compared to the Avengers and X-Men shared universes. Plus, FF just uses up a release date that could go to something that carries a lot less risk.

__________________
Fire Scott Buck
Dasher10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2016, 05:58 PM   #10
TheVileOne
Side-Kick
 
TheVileOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 51,100
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Yeah. Just like how they sold Kingpin to Fox with Daredevil even though the character originated in the pages of Spider-Man.

__________________
"This is true. This is real. This . . . Is . . . Straight Edge."

- CM Punk
TheVileOne is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 08:56 PM   #11
Silvermoth
Avenger
 
Silvermoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,754
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Not anymore they don't

I would definitely love to see kang after they do galactus. Great way to set up the young avengers

__________________
Mutant and proud.
Silvermoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2017, 10:26 PM   #12
Hypestyle
Side-Kick
 
Hypestyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 7,070
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Kang can be in the next avengers movie no doubt. But how to justify his fixation on "mainstream MCU Earth" when he's from the 40th century, supposedly? Hmm.

Hypestyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 11:09 AM   #13
CLARKY
Side-Kick
 
CLARKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: france
Posts: 2,798
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Maybe it'll be a good way to reintroduce the main characters with new actors. I mean Kang goes back in time and fight the younger version. Right ?
It could work.

CLARKY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 11:10 AM   #14
Iceman
Infinity War!
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Londinium, North of Gaul, circa XLIII AD
Posts: 106,996
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Everyone is coming back!

__________________
Xbox GT: BAHAMUT ZERO X 145,527 G
X-MEN - AVENGERS - JUSTICE LEAGUE
Iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 11:14 AM   #15
Dark Raven
The Gal from Themyscira
 
Dark Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tall and tanned and young and lovely
Posts: 43,328
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Fox doesn't own Kang now!

__________________
Quote:
Anne Hathaway: "You did not just ask me that!! What a forward young man you are!!! My goodness!!"
Dark Raven is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 11:18 AM   #16
Iceman
Infinity War!
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Londinium, North of Gaul, circa XLIII AD
Posts: 106,996
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Fox owns bugger all now!

__________________
Xbox GT: BAHAMUT ZERO X 145,527 G
X-MEN - AVENGERS - JUSTICE LEAGUE
Iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2018 All Rights Reserved.